Anorak | Civil War

Civil War

by | 7th, September 2006

DID he fall or was he putsched?

Plans to defenestrate Tony Blair appear to be far advanced and things are getting messy.

As the front page of the Times says: “Labour paralysed as the poison spreads.” The paper talks of “civil war” in the Labour party.

It’s Tony Blair versus Gordon Brown. And looking at the Times’s front-page picture of a beaming Gordon, this is a war only one side can win.

Unless, of course, Brown is a peculiarly gallant loser, a loser’s loser, a man who’s happy to lose so long as the better man wins?

Stranger thinks happen. Like the Guardian hearing leftwing Labour MP John McDonnell describe the in fighting as being like an episode from The Sopranos, albeit with Scots accents, bad food and no sex.

These are strange times. As the leader asks: “Who could honestly have predicted, back in 1994 or even as late as 2005, that the years of New Labour ascendancy would end in this way, with an irreconcilable eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation between the two men whose raw talent and unprecedented closeness built the most electorally successful government in the history of the British left?”

A fight? The papers gather round to take look. On the day one minister and six junior members of the Government resigned (the Independent sees one minister and seven parliamentary aides go), the Telegraph reports on Tony and Gordon’s meeting at number 10.

The tone

You have already read 1 premium article for free today
Access immediately the premium content with Multipass

Or come back tomorrow

Posted: 7th, September 2006 | In: Uncategorized Comment | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink