<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cho Seung-Hui Was No Suicide Bomber - Broadcast And Be Damned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/172694/twitterings/cho-seung-hui-was-no-suicide-bomber-broadcast-and-be-damned.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/172694/twitterings/cho-seung-hui-was-no-suicide-bomber-broadcast-and-be-damned.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anorak</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/172694/twitterings/cho-seung-hui-was-no-suicide-bomber-broadcast-and-be-damned.html/comment-page-1#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>Anorak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 09:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/172694.html#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>A conspiracy? That didn't take long...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A conspiracy? That didn&#8217;t take long&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BB</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/172694/twitterings/cho-seung-hui-was-no-suicide-bomber-broadcast-and-be-damned.html/comment-page-1#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>BB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 08:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/172694.html#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>It is really strange though.  I mean, the guy wasn't even a regular member of any known gun club.  I does not seem that he practised his control of guns  before the event on a regular basis as there is no mention by anybody to that effect.  Then, how on earth, this, shy, inward-looking nerd could have bought two highly sophisticated handguns, with no prior known gun skill or whatsoever, just a month before the killing and went about the business, with one gun in each hand, scoring the highest number of killing victims in the US history?

Are we talking about an 'expert marksman' here or some just deranged loner who went mad ?  I also read somewhere that the bullet that killed himself was lodged from behind, in an excution style.  I don't know but is that how gunmen usually kill themselves ?

The other thing is that, who on earth filmed him and took the pictures of Cho ?  And what about the gun receipts which were found in his bag?
I mean, how many of us would really keep the receipt of this kind, unless we hope it serves some purpose like drawing Cho to the killing.

There is a possibility that there are other people who are really behind the whole planning and excution of the killing.  Cho could have been a just convenient scapegoat who went along with the plan, possibly with a promise that he would die as a 'hero'.  This kind of logic can work on sick and unstable minds and somebody, knowing Cho's schizophrenic tendency and lonlieness,   could have used it.

Think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is really strange though.  I mean, the guy wasn&#8217;t even a regular member of any known gun club.  I does not seem that he practised his control of guns  before the event on a regular basis as there is no mention by anybody to that effect.  Then, how on earth, this, shy, inward-looking nerd could have bought two highly sophisticated handguns, with no prior known gun skill or whatsoever, just a month before the killing and went about the business, with one gun in each hand, scoring the highest number of killing victims in the US history?</p>
<p>Are we talking about an &#8216;expert marksman&#8217; here or some just deranged loner who went mad ?  I also read somewhere that the bullet that killed himself was lodged from behind, in an excution style.  I don&#8217;t know but is that how gunmen usually kill themselves ?</p>
<p>The other thing is that, who on earth filmed him and took the pictures of Cho ?  And what about the gun receipts which were found in his bag?<br />
I mean, how many of us would really keep the receipt of this kind, unless we hope it serves some purpose like drawing Cho to the killing.</p>
<p>There is a possibility that there are other people who are really behind the whole planning and excution of the killing.  Cho could have been a just convenient scapegoat who went along with the plan, possibly with a promise that he would die as a &#8216;hero&#8217;.  This kind of logic can work on sick and unstable minds and somebody, knowing Cho&#8217;s schizophrenic tendency and lonlieness,   could have used it.</p>
<p>Think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
