<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cult Of Scientology: The BBC&#8217;s John Sweeney Loses It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/173338/twitterings/the-cult-of-scientology-the-bbcs-john-sweeney-loses-it.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/173338/twitterings/the-cult-of-scientology-the-bbcs-john-sweeney-loses-it.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/173338/twitterings/the-cult-of-scientology-the-bbcs-john-sweeney-loses-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-220260</link>
		<dc:creator>John Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/173338.html#comment-220260</guid>
		<description>Poor Mr Sweeney denied Freedom of Speech?

The guy went there to pull it to pieces and do a hatchet job. The script was written before anyone opened a mouth. BBC - how about some real Freedom of Speech and allowing the Church of Scientology to speak?

You never know, it might even have something to say.

Yours sincerely,

John Davis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Mr Sweeney denied Freedom of Speech?</p>
<p>The guy went there to pull it to pieces and do a hatchet job. The script was written before anyone opened a mouth. BBC - how about some real Freedom of Speech and allowing the Church of Scientology to speak?</p>
<p>You never know, it might even have something to say.</p>
<p>Yours sincerely,</p>
<p>John Davis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/173338/twitterings/the-cult-of-scientology-the-bbcs-john-sweeney-loses-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-193984</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/173338.html#comment-193984</guid>
		<description>Well done. Go get em'!

(released. dr:20:01:04.47)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done. Go get em&#8217;!</p>
<p>(released. dr:20:01:04.47)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/173338/twitterings/the-cult-of-scientology-the-bbcs-john-sweeney-loses-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-190055</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/173338.html#comment-190055</guid>
		<description>what a twat!    erm. in my opinion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a twat!    erm. in my opinion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnie Lerma</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/173338/twitterings/the-cult-of-scientology-the-bbcs-john-sweeney-loses-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-3270</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnie Lerma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 16:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/173338.html#comment-3270</guid>
		<description>Scientology is the Art of Deception, consider this written training routine, that the offensive scientologist was actively using to incite Mr Sweeney.

This document speaks for itself.

http://www.lermanet.com/scientology/john-sweeney.htm

And FWIW, Cult is a generous word for the actual Fraud crafted by hubbard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientology is the Art of Deception, consider this written training routine, that the offensive scientologist was actively using to incite Mr Sweeney.</p>
<p>This document speaks for itself.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lermanet.com/scientology/john-sweeney.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.lermanet.com/scientology/john-sweeney.htm</a></p>
<p>And FWIW, Cult is a generous word for the actual Fraud crafted by hubbard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil griffiths</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/173338/twitterings/the-cult-of-scientology-the-bbcs-john-sweeney-loses-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-2768</link>
		<dc:creator>phil griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 08:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/173338.html#comment-2768</guid>
		<description>John Sweeny needs to be praised for highlighting what is essentially an evil cult. It is sad to think that we live in a society where so-called thinking people are prepared to be influenced by the superficial opinions of little people like John Travolta and Tom Cruise. I am just surprised that Sweeny was perpared to put up with Scientology tripe for as long as he did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Sweeny needs to be praised for highlighting what is essentially an evil cult. It is sad to think that we live in a society where so-called thinking people are prepared to be influenced by the superficial opinions of little people like John Travolta and Tom Cruise. I am just surprised that Sweeny was perpared to put up with Scientology tripe for as long as he did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khalid aziz</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/173338/twitterings/the-cult-of-scientology-the-bbcs-john-sweeney-loses-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-2759</link>
		<dc:creator>khalid aziz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 22:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/173338.html#comment-2759</guid>
		<description>John
You are more respected than before. Any human pressured in such a way would have reacted one way or the other. You have caused no embarressment to BBC or yourself at all. Well done for taking such a daring job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John<br />
You are more respected than before. Any human pressured in such a way would have reacted one way or the other. You have caused no embarressment to BBC or yourself at all. Well done for taking such a daring job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brit1</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/173338/twitterings/the-cult-of-scientology-the-bbcs-john-sweeney-loses-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-2752</link>
		<dc:creator>Brit1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 21:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/173338.html#comment-2752</guid>
		<description>John Sweeneys reaction was justified in the context of the tricks that were being used.
Hurray for Sweeney!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Sweeneys reaction was justified in the context of the tricks that were being used.<br />
Hurray for Sweeney!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/173338/twitterings/the-cult-of-scientology-the-bbcs-john-sweeney-loses-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-2751</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 21:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/173338.html#comment-2751</guid>
		<description>If you listen to others and don't follow your opinions, how can be free to make your own judgement?

Think for yourself, find out for yourself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you listen to others and don&#8217;t follow your opinions, how can be free to make your own judgement?</p>
<p>Think for yourself, find out for yourself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anorak</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/173338/twitterings/the-cult-of-scientology-the-bbcs-john-sweeney-loses-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-2741</link>
		<dc:creator>Anorak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 20:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/173338.html#comment-2741</guid>
		<description>Saw the show. Felt for Sweeney. And found his reaction wrong but restrained. And how like Tom Cruise did that antagonistic suit look?! Was he a clone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw the show. Felt for Sweeney. And found his reaction wrong but restrained. And how like Tom Cruise did that antagonistic suit look?! Was he a clone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cult alert</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/173338/twitterings/the-cult-of-scientology-the-bbcs-john-sweeney-loses-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-2740</link>
		<dc:creator>Cult alert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 20:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/173338.html#comment-2740</guid>
		<description>Poor John Sweeney - I think he did well not to break that guy's nose! Scientology is a money-making cult - this programme proved that it is dangerous and populated by arrogant, smooth-talking brain-washers.

Well done John for having the guts to make the programme and to tell it like it really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor John Sweeney - I think he did well not to break that guy&#8217;s nose! Scientology is a money-making cult - this programme proved that it is dangerous and populated by arrogant, smooth-talking brain-washers.</p>
<p>Well done John for having the guts to make the programme and to tell it like it really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachael Marie Lord</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/173338/twitterings/the-cult-of-scientology-the-bbcs-john-sweeney-loses-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-2739</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachael Marie Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 20:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/173338.html#comment-2739</guid>
		<description>I have just finished watching the Panorama program. I believe that John Sweeney's outburst was outrageous however, one feels that if one is denied freedom of speech, such an outburst can only be expected. Moreover, if one apologises for such actions should one not try to understand why such an outburst occurred?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just finished watching the Panorama program. I believe that John Sweeney&#8217;s outburst was outrageous however, one feels that if one is denied freedom of speech, such an outburst can only be expected. Moreover, if one apologises for such actions should one not try to understand why such an outburst occurred?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leeza</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/173338/twitterings/the-cult-of-scientology-the-bbcs-john-sweeney-loses-it.html/comment-page-1#comment-2738</link>
		<dc:creator>Leeza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 20:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/173338.html#comment-2738</guid>
		<description>No way should john Sweeney feel that he should have to apologise for his rant!! I am so freaked out after watching this. Well done John!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way should john Sweeney feel that he should have to apologise for his rant!! I am so freaked out after watching this. Well done John!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
