<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Inconvenient Truth: Educator Al Gore Gets It Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/173481/twitterings/an-inconvenient-truth-educator-al-gore-gets-it-wrong.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/173481/twitterings/an-inconvenient-truth-educator-al-gore-gets-it-wrong.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas King</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/173481/twitterings/an-inconvenient-truth-educator-al-gore-gets-it-wrong.html/comment-page-1#comment-160374</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/173481.html#comment-160374</guid>
		<description>18 December 2007

Al and Kipper Gore
2100 West End Ave #620
Nashville, TN  37203

Subj:   Energy conservation

Dear Al Gore:

For many years I have been a somewhat unsuccessful environmentalist going back to the first OPEC oil embargo of the 70s.   

To get to the chaff, I have proposed what I call a National Energy lifeline to cover all hydrocarbon usages primarily from heating oil, gasoline, and electrical usage.  Letters to my two CA state senators produced no response.  I am hoping that this letter will provoke some thoughts to this subject and that your National and Global influence will have some impact.  

Below is the attachment to the letter that was sent to my State Senators Boxer and Feinstein.

Thank you for your consideration.



Nicholas King
Nking99@yahoo.com
310 216-7755

PS:    Incrementally increase the cost of hydrocarbon energy but provide a National Energy lifeline to help offset the financial burden of normal energy usage.  This will:
1.  Provide an awareness of energy use
2.  Increase the cost to high-energy users beyond the lifeline.
3.  Increase the incentive for alternate energy source development
4.  Notify the world that we are doing something for energy conservation.  This alone may probably bring down the cost of crude.  
5.  Preserve our present oil reserves for future use e.g.: oil will be required for aircraft use.  
6.  Accelerate the development of fission energy (atomic plants)
7.  Investigate the possibility of harnessing fusion (hydrogen) energy like the French are planning.
8.  Use of the 1040 tax form as a method of reimbursement to cover the added cost of the lifeline energy used.  Note that this method will weed out many of those who try to avoid taxes 
9.  Set up a research organization to explore the development and utilization of electrified highways for future travel.   E.g.:  the process of moving electrical induction.  

Consumers have been accustomed to high-energy usage and it will take a long time for them to relinquish this.  Again the best way for consumers to create a more sensible energy policy is to increase the cost of energy to them. Our society is dollar driven and in time adjustment to this increased cost will materialize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18 December 2007</p>
<p>Al and Kipper Gore<br />
2100 West End Ave #620<br />
Nashville, TN  37203</p>
<p>Subj:   Energy conservation</p>
<p>Dear Al Gore:</p>
<p>For many years I have been a somewhat unsuccessful environmentalist going back to the first OPEC oil embargo of the 70s.   </p>
<p>To get to the chaff, I have proposed what I call a National Energy lifeline to cover all hydrocarbon usages primarily from heating oil, gasoline, and electrical usage.  Letters to my two CA state senators produced no response.  I am hoping that this letter will provoke some thoughts to this subject and that your National and Global influence will have some impact.  </p>
<p>Below is the attachment to the letter that was sent to my State Senators Boxer and Feinstein.</p>
<p>Thank you for your consideration.</p>
<p>Nicholas King<br />
<a href="mailto:Nking99@yahoo.com">Nking99@yahoo.com</a><br />
310 216-7755</p>
<p>PS:    Incrementally increase the cost of hydrocarbon energy but provide a National Energy lifeline to help offset the financial burden of normal energy usage.  This will:<br />
1.  Provide an awareness of energy use<br />
2.  Increase the cost to high-energy users beyond the lifeline.<br />
3.  Increase the incentive for alternate energy source development<br />
4.  Notify the world that we are doing something for energy conservation.  This alone may probably bring down the cost of crude.<br />
5.  Preserve our present oil reserves for future use e.g.: oil will be required for aircraft use.<br />
6.  Accelerate the development of fission energy (atomic plants)<br />
7.  Investigate the possibility of harnessing fusion (hydrogen) energy like the French are planning.<br />
8.  Use of the 1040 tax form as a method of reimbursement to cover the added cost of the lifeline energy used.  Note that this method will weed out many of those who try to avoid taxes<br />
9.  Set up a research organization to explore the development and utilization of electrified highways for future travel.   E.g.:  the process of moving electrical induction.  </p>
<p>Consumers have been accustomed to high-energy usage and it will take a long time for them to relinquish this.  Again the best way for consumers to create a more sensible energy policy is to increase the cost of energy to them. Our society is dollar driven and in time adjustment to this increased cost will materialize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Frederickson</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/173481/twitterings/an-inconvenient-truth-educator-al-gore-gets-it-wrong.html/comment-page-1#comment-4037</link>
		<dc:creator>John Frederickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 00:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/173481.html#comment-4037</guid>
		<description>What does any of this have to do with Gore getting it wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does any of this have to do with Gore getting it wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
