The Creationist Museum: Would You Adam And Eve It
DINOSAURS and naked men and women in one museum… And they said it couldn’t be done. Hurrah:
PETERSBURG, Ky. - Like most natural history museums, this one has exhibits showing dinosaurs roaming the earth. Except here, the giant reptiles share the forest with Adam and Eve.
That, of course, is contradicted by science, but that’s the point of the $25 million Creation Museum rising fast in rural Kentucky.
Er…:
John Morris, president of the Institute for Creation Research in San Diego, an organization that promotes creationism, said the museum will affirm the doubts many people have about science, namely the notion that man evolved from lower forms of life.
“Americans just aren’t gullible enough to believe that they came from a fish,” he said.
Oh…
Posted: 29th, May 2007 | In: Twitterings Comments (5) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- Anorak on Madeleine McCann And The Wanted ‘James Bond’ Spy
- scotfree on Madeleine McCann And The Wanted ‘James Bond’ Spy
- June on Oxford Man Parks By Downing Street And Has Car Blown Up
- michelle on X Factor Live: Jedward Do Jive Bunny, Olly Murs Is The Man And Danyl Johnson Is Careless
- Joanna and the Wolf on Katie Price Should Marry Samantha Fox To Give Her Kids A Better Start In Life, Research Says
June 6th, 2007 at 11:00 pm
Peppered moth was a fraud anyway. Moths were stuck on trees as revealed in the Times 1997. Only proved inter-species evolution anyway.
May 31st, 2007 at 9:40 am
>the theory of evolution is that it’s a hypothesis, not a theory
?
it’s a theory, the clue’s in the name
>it contravenes several scientific laws
no it doesn’t, if it did, it would be thrown out
> Occam’s razor insists that it is the better theory
no it doesn’t. au contraire, the theory of a creator begs the question of what created the creator ad infinitum… so Occam’s razor would suggest spontaneous life at some point
>Those that disagree, please post some kind of cited example proving evolution
how about any study of any species ever done? the galapagos finches and their beak length variations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galapagos_finches
or the peppered moth that evolved to have browner wings after industrialisation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peppered_moth
or, hold on a minute, take a look at this fellow, the flounder http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flounder
it’s asymetrical, it has both eyes on one side of it’s head, you telling me someone *designed* that? lol
how about cave-dwelling toads that have eyes that have been covered over with skin? why not just *design* them without eyes?
you ask for things to be cited, but cite nothing yourself and show skant understanding of scientific terms
how about you cite one example of where the theory of evolution is contradicted or breaks a law of physics? (bearing in mind if you could do this…it would mean a Nobel prize)
May 30th, 2007 at 5:59 pm
The problem with the theory of evolution is that it’s a hypothesis, not a theory. It not only has no real scientific data supporting it, it contravenes several scientific laws like the laws of thermo dynamics, as well as the laws of common sense.
I believe in creationism because Occam’s razor insists that it is the better theory.
Those that disagree, please post some kind of cited example proving evolution.
May 30th, 2007 at 1:17 pm
Message from the UK.
This is really crazy madness! We have a writer called Richard Dawkins who has recently written a scientifically based book called ‘The God delusion’ giving a very careful explanation of the theory of evolution. He is a biologist and renowned scientist. There are many academics who have studied evolution for years producing volumes of research and data and have evidence and answers to how the earth and man evolved. These creationists are ignorant, clearly have no education and should be given absolutely no respect at all. No doubt this theme park will be a great success due to 50% of americans holding creationist beliefs. Anyone knowing the scientific truth should condemn these naive views at every opportunity.
May 30th, 2007 at 12:03 pm
And to quote a famous film:
It begs the question, on what day did God create creationists, and couldn’t he have rested on that day too?