Terrorism In The UK: Doctors Of Death And A Glasgow Elbow
THE loss of life and limb would have been terrible. Luckily, the gang of terrorists unleashing a wave of death and pain on the UK were undone by parking regulations and setting themselves on fire before blowing everyone up.
And now – shock of shocks – we learn that the leaders of this mentally negligible band of wannabe mass murderers are two doctors.
The Sun hails them as the “DOCTORS OF DEATH”. “CAR BOMBER IS BRITISH DOCTORS,” says the Express’s front page. “TERROR COPS SEIZE DOCTOR AND WIFE!” trills the Mirror. “BOMBS: TWO DOCTORS HELD,” says the Mail.
The scandal would be more acute if they were not medical people. Some of our most prolific and notorious killers have had access to the official drugs cabinet. As Dr Harold Shipman, Nurse Beverly Allitt and Dr. Hawley Harvey Crippen show, the step-father of modern medicine is not Hippocrates but Dr. Josef Mengele.
How the arrested medics must be cursing their lack of foresight – if only they’d have just become village GPs they could have killed at will for years. But they had to grandstand. And that was their undoing. “How can a doctor want to take our lives?” asks the Express. Know your medical history, we answer.
They Are Few
So Iranian neurologist Dr Mohammed Asha, 26, is helping the police with their enquiries, having been arrested as he and his “burka-clad” wife were motoring up the M6 in Cheshire with their two year old son (profession unspecified).
The Sun says police believe the men who tried to set fire to Glasgow airport were also responsible for leaving those car bombs in London.
These are the Mirror’s al-Qaeda bombers. That shadowy organisation was behind it all. The group portrayed as a well-run machine with a regimented command structure. The group we now see as dangerous, murderous but desperate and in the face so many of us, weak and hapless.
Just how useless they are can be learned about in the Mirror where “hero” Steven Clarkson says he “floored [the] smouldering Jeep bomber with [an] elbow to the head”. Yes, an elbow. We are loathe to resort to racial stereotyping, but surely the approved method for a Glaswegian to bring down a barbecuing Asian man screaming “Allah, Allah” is with a “kiss” to the bridge of the nose.
This is the “BUNGLED TERROR OF AMATEURS,” says the Mirror’s terrorism expert.
Why? Why Not?
If you want to know the right way to do it ask Hassan Butt. Billed in the Mail has a “former member of radical Islamicist group”, Butt is carving out a niche for himself as a nodding head and expert in the thinking of Muslim men who don’t get enough sex.
He says the real driver behind the violence is “Islamic theology”. It has nothing to do with British foreign policy. So why does Tony Parsons of the Mirror write that there were terrorists before Iraq “but it is Iraq that has torn apart the fabric of our multi-cultural society, it is Iraq that hangs like a toxic cloud over this nation, it is Iraq that poisons everything”?
Yes, a toxic cloud. Any minute Parson is going to ally the war in Iraq with global warming. Of course, he is wrong. This deadly Islamicism is exported from the Middle East and Pakistan. It does not poison everything. Indeed, most of us don’t give Iraq a second thought as we get on with our lives.
And that includes immigrants and naturalised Britons of all creeds and colours too busy earning money and chasing a better life to worry about Iraq…
Pic spotter: Pommygranate
Posted: 2nd, July 2007 | In: Tabloids, War On Terror Comments (61) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- coolandcalm on Britain’s Got Talent Hollie Steel Guns For X Factor’s John And Edward
- Bat E Bird on Britain’s Got Talent Hollie Steel Guns For X Factor’s John And Edward
- joe lena on New Mexico’s Elizabeth Lambert Tries Out For Leeds United
- coolandcalm on Flexetarians Are Meat-Eating Vegetarians
- Peter Loxley on True Blood Porn, Oral Sex And Vampire Orgies, In Pictures
September 1st, 2007 at 4:41 pm
Hey Paul are you the one that use to be on the other Anorak site?
August 30th, 2007 at 5:28 pm
Muslims can’t assimilate to Western Society and don’t belong here.
well said joanne if you can not read and speak engalish before you get here your not much use to the country. your a burden as it cost money to provide translation. taking bennifit before you payed into the system.
The reason they are coming to the western world is they want to live by the laws of the “koran” is that the correct way to say it not that care. but they want to be free from the required rules of it. It’s called have the cake and eating it. they will never admit it but by coming to the west and settleing here now there two kinds of muslim. an eastern muslim and a western muslim. a western muslim lives in freedom and the woman has a say. The eastern muslim live in tirranie and the woman has no say. The only one that has his own way is the I’atola. The muslims coming west are just turning there backs on opresstion just as the prodistans did to catholicism. But they want to keep the koran but only with the bits they like. oh a new sec’t is born and it wont be long before young muslims have there own splinter group. and so and and so on. I’m thinking of starting one for people that are none believers. we are just what we are and nothing more. no one is any better than any one ells that looks to no sign or symbol for hope.
August 17th, 2007 at 7:10 am
If a Christian has done a crime it will go as individual crime. Each community bashes the other. As another quoted, self faith is the solution….
August 17th, 2007 at 12:42 am
Just to add to that,John,I can’t believe you ask people to question why those Muslims “felt driven to do this.” Driven to do this? There is absolutely no excuse for what those animals did,and to suggest such a thing almost implies they couldn’t help themselves.I find that disgusting.
Muslims can’t assimilate to Western Society and don’t belong here.
August 17th, 2007 at 12:36 am
John,with regards to your comments to Liam,how can someone who is opposed to Islam a racist? Islam is a religion,not a race.
What he said is quite correct.One or two Muslims here or there isn’t a problem,but mass immigration of them is.We can see that from the way they behave en masse,in European countries.It wasn’t a few Muslims that were rioting after the Danish cartoons,calling for non Muslims to be beheaded.
August 10th, 2007 at 11:25 pm
Should muslims be allowed to teach our kids?
July 28th, 2007 at 3:13 pm
i think all people need to be a bit more tollerant. I told some muslim people at work that i had seen the prophet mohammed leaving a gay bar holding hands with another man, as i drove past in my car, and they went berserk.
July 23rd, 2007 at 6:08 pm
Organized Religion of any kind is for the weak minded. Have faith in yourself and the natural order and stay away from those who believe in ghosts and spirits as they are merely the sheep and puppets of the ones with power.
July 10th, 2007 at 8:33 pm
“Have you ever stopped to ask why these people feel driven to do this?”
Yes, it’s called Islam.
July 5th, 2007 at 9:00 pm
knowit , You don’t know any thing about islam or about JIHAD. I can give you an advice: you must read about islam and about prophet MOHAMED and I swaer you will change your mind totally.As islam ordered us to respect all people , don’t kill any one who didn’t hurt us, even in the war we are ordered not to kill a child,a woman, a big man , a guy who didn’t have a weapon , not to hurt an animal or cut a tree……………..
And about Dr. Mohame Asha if we think for amoment we can see that he can’t do it for many reasons :
1) His great jop that need him to be totally free.
2) How can he do this and he has his family with him???
3) If he did it then why did he reserved the ticket to his country on 12 july and he didn’t reserve it on the day of bomb?
July 4th, 2007 at 3:44 am
Here are some illustrations for the really hard of hearing (and understanding):
Example A: A white acquaintance of mine was recently mugged by a black man in the street . For a couple days following this incident he found himself getting nervous and angry each time he saw a black man approaching him in the street. Was he justified in feeling this way? He rationalized the incident back to himself later and then realized that in fact his fear was irrational and that he was wrong to consider all black men as potential muggers.
Example B: An Asian acquaintence of mine watched a news report on the TV about the rape and murder of a young girl. He was shocked to the core. He expressed real disgust and deep anger. For a moment he wanted to say that all white men, of a certain class and background, are potential child rapists. Was he justified in thinking such thoughts? Later on, after cooler reflection, he realized that his reaction was simply irrational.
Example C: An Italian acquaintance recently read a book about the extermination of Native Americans. He was very angry about it and seemed to think that both Christianity and every white Americans is guilty for these crimes. Was he right to express such an opinion? Later on, however, he realized that such a sentiment is irrational.
The purpose of these examples is to illustrate one point: namely, that when you express anger against whole communities you usually have in mind particular events on the basis of which you make general statements. The is always a problem about making general statements about whole communities. If it is right to condemn whole communities then in each of the examples, it is right to entertain irrational thoughts about others.
July 3rd, 2007 at 3:52 pm
John you say: “would you want the bible to be criticised by the Archbishops?”
Unfortunately this is the dilemma faced by people, the so-calelled non-believers right from the time of Muhammed.
This is the moral imperative. There is no such thing called “The rules of engagement” with Islamic thought. Islamic Jihad is very clear Quran verses “8/39 and 2/193″ for the abolition of all non-Islamic religions the world over. So we have no chance. Imagine you go in to the forest and attacked by a Tiger — can you argue with it? Just like the Tiger runs on its instinct, a true Muslim is insensenced by his Jihadic instinct.
Honestly, I do not have an answer to the question. Because I racked by brain to find an answer to the question of Islamic Psyche — the rules of engagement. It is bizzare, Christ didnt mind going to crufixion but Muhammed crucified everyone who opposed him. So I believe you can really — if necessary make Archbishops criticise the Bible — thanks to Jesus’s own actions such a thing won’t be necessary. But you cant make a Muslim critisize Quran — he either faces death or punished to death by the Ummah (the other muslim world in the name of Fathwah).
I believe in prevention is better than cure. All democratic nations should outright ban Quran from their civilized world. Those who read quran should do it like those who watch pornography over the Internet. That will only make them rethink about why they are doing what they are doing!
I am deeply sorry for writing like this. But I acknowledge a rage with in me a rage against all the loss of innocent life. A rage against this brutal acts of terrorism. Quran is making terrorists so my anger is going towards Quran. Not the people who are reading it and following it.
I believe in Humanity. Not the barbarity!
July 3rd, 2007 at 2:08 pm
Damned if they do and damned if they don’t. What do you actually want these people to do? The terrorists have taken the book and distorted it’s meaning to their own ends - how can you ask people to condemn the text. If I was to take “eye for an eye” literaly and hurt all those who had offended me, would you want the bible to be criticised by the Archbishops?
July 3rd, 2007 at 1:56 pm
My thoughts run along those lines too.
If they reported them to the powers that be and disassociated with the terrorists , then I’ d believe their condemnation for real and not ’spin’
We all suffer some consequences from the terrorists, either death and injury of friends and colleagues, or just the embarrassment of the same faith and/or nationality, that being so much lesser then report them ,its not betrayal after all.
July 3rd, 2007 at 1:24 pm
Responding to the above article: “A leading Muslim organisation has condemned the barbarity of the failed car bomb attacks in London and Glasgow as it called on its faithful to provide “all the necessary support” to prevent terrorism”
I would advise you to take it with a pinch of salt! What else they could do except condemning it?! If they dare ask them to condemn Quran, and Muhammed for preaching backdoors to Heaven. Then I will believe them. Merely condemning people who commit terrorism is not enough.
July 3rd, 2007 at 1:18 pm
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/pressass/20070703/tuk-terrorists-our-enemies-say-muslims-6323e80.html
July 3rd, 2007 at 12:21 pm
Isabell writes: When you get Muslims writing in and comparing Muslim Fanatic Killers to hooligans, YOU KNOW YOU’VE GOT PROBLEMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No one was COMPARING - the whole point was to illustrate that every community has idiots.
Please re-read the posts above.
July 3rd, 2007 at 11:48 am
Please know this: ENTIRE QURAN IS A MANUAL ON JIHAD
Now please do not be surprised that so-called doctors or people like July 7 bomber Sadique Khan do not appear to be religious fanatics! They need not be even reading Quran! That is why they slip the net of the MI5. We normally suspect a person wearing a beard or doing 5 times prayer. They are nothing but bunch of people who may be undergoing their mid-life crisis.
The real danger is in the doctrine itself! Quran supports the so-called BACKDOORS in to heaven. As per Quran the September 11th and July 7 bombers are already in heaven. That is why the hate preachers called the July 7th bombers “THE MAGNIFICIANT”.
The entire doctine of Quran is filled with hate. Koran on grounds of religion promotes disharmony, feeling of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities and incite people to commit violence and disturb public tranquility…
Let us analyze and see what might have prompted the Doctors to do what they did! As per quron (the doctine of terror):
Place of War in Islam:
Islam would have been a harmless fossil so far as the non-Muslims are concerned, if waging of aggressive wars for the spread of the faith had not occupied the pride of place in the petrified image of the Prophet. We have to face the fact that violence and war-mongering have become essential and major ingredients of the Muslim psyche through the medium of the Prophet?s Sunnah.
There are grades of people who enter in to the paradise:
1) Teh MujAhid 2) The GhAzi 3) The ShahId
1) Teh MujAhid
The Quran (9.10) makes the point quite clear. The mujAhid (Muslim who engages in jihAd) is presented as far superior to the mere mu?min (person who affirms that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is the Prophet of Allah).
NOTE: THIS IS THE REASON Muslims can’t get CONTENTED BY MERELY BEING MUSLIM. They are the people who you see praying. Now see further…
2) The GhAzi
A still higher grade goes to the ghAzi, that is, one who slays an ?infidel? with his own hands. That is why this appellation was flaunted by all Muslim sultans who invaded or thrived in India at one time or the other.
NOTE: Do you remember the beheadings of innocent British civilians in Iraq?! The guy who beheaded Kenneth Bigley is — as per Quran — a Ghazi. Ghazis are outright barbaric warriors. You will never see them in Mosques. By fighting war, by doing beheadings they secure their place in paradise
3) The ShahId
It is, however, the shahId (martyr) who gets the highest grade in the Islamic roll of honour. The mujAhid who gets killed in a jihAd becomes a shahId and goes straight to jannat (paradise) without having to wait for the Day of Judgment like the rest of the mu?mins. Muhammad did not believe in rebirth, nor in traffic between heaven and earth. But he forgot his own teaching when he tried to glorify a martyr. A martyr, he proclaimed, ?will desire to return to this world and be killed ten times for the sake of the great honour that is bestowed upon him.?15
If one is really interested in getting at the core of the Quran, one should go to the original sources rather than read the modern apologists who sell only sweet tales in the name of Islam. The earlier imams and sufis were far more honest and straight-forward in stating what the Quran stands for. They had no use for twentieth-century humanist notions which the apologists have been trying to foist on Allah and his Prophet.
NOTE: Remember the suicide doctor in Glasgow who is shouthing Allah Allah and fighting the policeman?! He is — as per Quron — a Shahid. The highest of them all.
Quran has to be banned from all democratic societies. It is a book of Zihad. Unfortunately you can not draw a line with this kind of doctrine. How could you stop a faith that advocates grades and paradise to people who either behead or commit terrorist acts?!
July 3rd, 2007 at 8:10 am
Nuke ‘em
July 3rd, 2007 at 7:48 am
When you get Muslims writing in and comparing Muslim Fanatic Killers to hooligans, YOU KNOW YOU’VE GOT PROBLEMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
July 3rd, 2007 at 7:44 am
[...] and kill anyone and everyone in the vicinity. As we know, the two London bombs failed to go off. The cars were badly parked. And the Glasgow escapade foundered on the would-be mass murderers setting themselves on fire [...]
July 2nd, 2007 at 9:44 pm
another great post nadeem. hope i meet you again on Anorak. you should pop into the forums section of the site with your wisdom and good grace.
It has been a pleasure
Peace & Light
Winnie
July 2nd, 2007 at 9:35 pm
Dear Winnie,
Thanks for the corrections. A ‘Fairy Tale’ according to the dictionary is a” fanciful tale of legendary deeds and creatures, usually intended for children” whereas a Fairy story gives us “an interesting but highly implausible story; often told as an excuse”. It’s up to you what you want your children to read but my instinct would be to recommend the former and not the latter at this stage. By the way I wrote ‘Fairy Tale’ and not ‘Fairy Tail’ as you reported! A Fairy Tail does sound very interesting though - most probably has something to do with things that protrude from the rear.
Sorry I hope I was not getting ‘too serious’ but the subject does warrant some further explanations. Thank you for your kind words about ordinary Muslims. I wholly agree with your excellent observation! British Muslims - the vast majority of them - are indistinguishable from British ‘Non-Muslimss’ as far as aspirations and life goals are concerned. It’s not surprising as we live on a very small Island but also that we live, like or not, in the same world.
As for Harry Potter, well, I just can’t wait to read Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows! Have you watched the new film?
Best wishes, Nadeem
July 2nd, 2007 at 9:18 pm
Do fairies really have tails?
July 2nd, 2007 at 9:17 pm
sorry dear ,I was only joking. Most of the muslims I know are ordinary working people who want peace and shit loads of money just like anyone else.
July 2nd, 2007 at 9:07 pm
by the way Nadeem, I said “fairy story” not as you say “fairy tail”. i always thought fairies had wings but maybe i read the book wrong?
Or maybe you did.
July 2nd, 2007 at 9:02 pm
I am sorry Nadeem. I respect your opinion, it is so well put that i am ashamed of myself for sounding so silly. I will try not to treat this very serious matter so childishly next time. I will read the koran when i get time but this Harry potter book is taking me years to finish. Have you read it? Its amazing what magic can do for you.
A genuine Salaam to you from a non-believer.
Am i safe now?
Winnie
July 2nd, 2007 at 7:39 pm
It’s not very hard to make a simple distinction [between faith and fanaticism] and yet this appears most difficult for certain people. The other distinction and one that the same people ignore at their peril is between ‘knowledge’ and ‘action’ and the different opinions that exist within the Muslim world. No one is expecting great scholarship from the readers of this post but we are ALL expecting, at the very least, some elementary logic. Christianity cannot be blamed for the Slave Trade though I know some people who believe it is. People are entitled to believe whatever they like but if exaggerations are preferred over a more balanced view then no one else should be blamed for the problems such attitudes create.
Winnie says: “My kids can’t get to sleep without me reading a good fairy tail” and this she understands to be a good reference to the Qu’ran. The same argument is applicable to every Religious Scripture because it can all be dismissed as simple fairy-tales. However, this attitude neither increases our knowledge of the Scripture in question nor does it improve our understanding of what is at stake, especially as real human beings are dying. So, my point is, do not insult yourself by revealing your own ignorance. Try to read and understand before making absurd pronouncements about different faith communities. Nobody likes to be misrepresented least of all the fool who pretends to be learned.
July 2nd, 2007 at 5:55 pm
Thanks for filling me in Nadeem. Winston must have been smoking one of his wacky backy blunts that day . Where can i buy a copy of the Koran? My kids can’t get to sleep without me reading them a good fairy story.
Salaam
Winnie
July 2nd, 2007 at 5:13 pm
Wakeup Sir!
Like it or not, we are increasingly imperiled by, and simultaneously, oblivious to the global political ambitions of resurgent Islam.
These dangers appear genuinely contemporary after one learns the details of Muhammad’s dealings with the Jewish Banu Qurayzah tribe of Yathrub (Medina).
After sending a secret Muslim convert, Nu’aym bin Mas’ud, to sabotage a Qurayzah alliance with the pagan Quraysh, Muhammad debased the Jews as “brothers of monkeys.” This language also made its way into the Qur’an –in chapters 2 (verses 62-65), 5 (verses 59-60) and 7 (verse 166)–and is routinely invoked by current-day Muslim leaders.
The famed A. Guillaume’s 1955 translation of Ibn Ishaq’s Life of Muhammad (Sirat Rasul Allah), notes that Muhammad’s forces “laid siege to the Qurayzah strongholds for twenty-five days, until… ‘they were sorely pressed’ and, as Muhammad had warned, ‘God cast terror into their hearts’.” At this juncture, the leader of the Qurayzah offered his people three choices–to accept Muhammad and Islam, to kill their wives and children and fight Muhammad unencumbered, or to ambush Muhammad on the Sabbath.
The Qurayzah ignored their leader’s counsel and, instead, surrendered to the Muslims. Muhammad asked Sa’d bin Mu’adh to determine their fate–and he in turn ruled that “their warriors should be killed and their children and women be taken as captives.” Muhammad himself then went into the Medina market and dug trenches into which some the heads of at least 600 or 700 Qurayzah men (possibly, 800 or 900) would be struck. One boy who had not yet “begun to grow hair” later reputedly explained that this factor determined whether a boy was deemed a boy–and spared–or a man, and killed.
Every drop of non-Muslim blood Muhammad spilled, he deemed to have set “a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in Allah and the Final Day, and who engages much in the praise of Allah” (Qur’an, chapter 33, verse 21).
It’s all too clear, five years after 9/11 and July 7th, that most Americans and Britishers lack the motivation to read the Koran–which is neither long, nor impregnable.
If people read Qur’an, the public would soon discover that even the mildest of translations, which omit the most offensive verses and explicit terms, prove enlightening.
I rest my case… with a pleading: WAKE UP SIR!
July 2nd, 2007 at 4:44 pm
Knowit writes: “Nadeem, you may think I am putting people at risk by speaking in such language. I know from the bottom of my heart I am not a racist, neither I want to flame up”
However, if you really mean what you say you should not seek to equate fanaticism with faith. Also, you ARE putting more BRITISH lives at risk because if a fanatic or lunatic were to read your words, he would, most probably get the wrong idea. It is much better and safer, for all of us ordinary British folk, not to confuse fanaticism with faith as that can only brew disaster. Think carefully about what you are doing and yes, unfortunately, the hatred of others ALWAYS translates as a hatred of ONESELF.