Muslims can’t assimilate to Western Society and don’t belong here.

What he said is quite correct.One or two Muslims here or there isn’t a problem,but mass immigration of them is.We can see that from the way they behave en masse,in European countries.It wasn’t a few Muslims that were rioting after the Danish cartoons,calling for non Muslims to be beheaded.

Yes, it’s called Islam.

And about Dr. Mohame Asha if we think for amoment we can see that he can’t do it for many reasons :

1) His great jop that need him to be totally free.
2) How can he do this and he has his family with him???
3) If he did it then why did he reserved the ticket to his country on 12 july and he didn’t reserve it on the day of bomb?

Example A: A white acquaintance of mine was recently mugged by a black man in the street . For a couple days following this incident he found himself getting nervous and angry each time he saw a black man approaching him in the street. Was he justified in feeling this way? He rationalized the incident back to himself later and then realized that in fact his fear was irrational and that he was wrong to consider all black men as potential muggers.

Example B: An Asian acquaintence of mine watched a news report on the TV about the rape and murder of a young girl. He was shocked to the core. He expressed real disgust and deep anger. For a moment he wanted to say that all white men, of a certain class and background, are potential child rapists. Was he justified in thinking such thoughts? Later on, after cooler reflection, he realized that his reaction was simply irrational.

Example C: An Italian acquaintance recently read a book about the extermination of Native Americans. He was very angry about it and seemed to think that both Christianity and every white Americans is guilty for these crimes. Was he right to express such an opinion? Later on, however, he realized that such a sentiment is irrational.

The purpose of these examples is to illustrate one point: namely, that when you express anger against whole communities you usually have in mind particular events on the basis of which you make general statements. The is always a problem about making general statements about whole communities. If it is right to condemn whole communities then in each of the examples, it is right to entertain irrational thoughts about others.

Unfortunately this is the dilemma faced by people, the so-calelled non-believers right from the time of Muhammed.

This is the moral imperative. There is no such thing called “The rules of engagement” with Islamic thought. Islamic Jihad is very clear Quran verses “8/39 and 2/193″ for the abolition of all non-Islamic religions the world over. So we have no chance. Imagine you go in to the forest and attacked by a Tiger — can you argue with it? Just like the Tiger runs on its instinct, a true Muslim is insensenced by his Jihadic instinct.

Honestly, I do not have an answer to the question. Because I racked by brain to find an answer to the question of Islamic Psyche — the rules of engagement. It is bizzare, Christ didnt mind going to crufixion but Muhammed crucified everyone who opposed him. So I believe you can really — if necessary make Archbishops criticise the Bible — thanks to Jesus’s own actions such a thing won’t be necessary. But you cant make a Muslim critisize Quran — he either faces death or punished to death by the Ummah (the other muslim world in the name of Fathwah).

I believe in prevention is better than cure. All democratic nations should outright ban Quran from their civilized world. Those who read quran should do it like those who watch pornography over the Internet. That will only make them rethink about why they are doing what they are doing!

I am deeply sorry for writing like this. But I acknowledge a rage with in me a rage against all the loss of innocent life. A rage against this brutal acts of terrorism. Quran is making terrorists so my anger is going towards Quran. Not the people who are reading it and following it.

I believe in Humanity. Not the barbarity!

We all suffer some consequences from the terrorists, either death and injury of friends and colleagues, or just the embarrassment of the same faith and/or nationality, that being so much lesser then report them ,its not betrayal after all.

I would advise you to take it with a pinch of salt! What else they could do except condemning it?! If they dare ask them to condemn Quran, and Muhammed for preaching backdoors to Heaven. Then I will believe them. Merely condemning people who commit terrorism is not enough.

No one was COMPARING - the whole point was to illustrate that every community has idiots.

Please re-read the posts above.

Now please do not be surprised that so-called doctors or people like July 7 bomber Sadique Khan do not appear to be religious fanatics! They need not be even reading Quran! That is why they slip the net of the MI5. We normally suspect a person wearing a beard or doing 5 times prayer. They are nothing but bunch of people who may be undergoing their mid-life crisis.

The real danger is in the doctrine itself! Quran supports the so-called BACKDOORS in to heaven. As per Quran the September 11th and July 7 bombers are already in heaven. That is why the hate preachers called the July 7th bombers “THE MAGNIFICIANT”.

The entire doctine of Quran is filled with hate. Koran on grounds of religion promotes disharmony, feeling of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities and incite people to commit violence and disturb public tranquility…

Let us analyze and see what might have prompted the Doctors to do what they did! As per quron (the doctine of terror):

Place of War in Islam:

Islam would have been a harmless fossil so far as the non-Muslims are concerned, if waging of aggressive wars for the spread of the faith had not occupied the pride of place in the petrified image of the Prophet. We have to face the fact that violence and war-mongering have become essential and major ingredients of the Muslim psyche through the medium of the Prophet?s Sunnah.

There are grades of people who enter in to the paradise:

1) Teh MujAhid 2) The GhAzi 3) The ShahId

1) Teh MujAhid

The Quran (9.10) makes the point quite clear. The mujAhid (Muslim who engages in jihAd) is presented as far superior to the mere mu?min (person who affirms that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is the Prophet of Allah).

NOTE: THIS IS THE REASON Muslims can’t get CONTENTED BY MERELY BEING MUSLIM. They are the people who you see praying. Now see further…

2) The GhAzi

A still higher grade goes to the ghAzi, that is, one who slays an ?infidel? with his own hands. That is why this appellation was flaunted by all Muslim sultans who invaded or thrived in India at one time or the other.

NOTE: Do you remember the beheadings of innocent British civilians in Iraq?! The guy who beheaded Kenneth Bigley is — as per Quran — a Ghazi. Ghazis are outright barbaric warriors. You will never see them in Mosques. By fighting war, by doing beheadings they secure their place in paradise

3) The ShahId

It is, however, the shahId (martyr) who gets the highest grade in the Islamic roll of honour. The mujAhid who gets killed in a jihAd becomes a shahId and goes straight to jannat (paradise) without having to wait for the Day of Judgment like the rest of the mu?mins. Muhammad did not believe in rebirth, nor in traffic between heaven and earth. But he forgot his own teaching when he tried to glorify a martyr. A martyr, he proclaimed, ?will desire to return to this world and be killed ten times for the sake of the great honour that is bestowed upon him.?15

If one is really interested in getting at the core of the Quran, one should go to the original sources rather than read the modern apologists who sell only sweet tales in the name of Islam. The earlier imams and sufis were far more honest and straight-forward in stating what the Quran stands for. They had no use for twentieth-century humanist notions which the apologists have been trying to foist on Allah and his Prophet.

NOTE: Remember the suicide doctor in Glasgow who is shouthing Allah Allah and fighting the policeman?! He is — as per Quron — a Shahid. The highest of them all.

Quran has to be banned from all democratic societies. It is a book of Zihad. Unfortunately you can not draw a line with this kind of doctrine. How could you stop a faith that advocates grades and paradise to people who either behead or commit terrorist acts?!