
HAVE you seen Jamie Oliver recently? The self-styled champion of healthy eating looks to have put on rather a few pounds himself. I wonder if his mother is feeding him burgers and chips through the railings outside his restaurant?
Anyway, while the face of supermarket giant Sainsbury’s took his fight to school kitchens, a new report by Oxford researchers suggests that if VAT was slapped on fatty foods, more than 3,000 fatal heart attacks and strokes could be prevented in the UK each year.
The study, in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, claims that a 17.5 per cent rise on fatty, sugary or salty foods would decrease the number of heart and stroke fatalities by 1.7 per cent, with the researchers saying that the time is now right to debate the introduction of a “fat tax”.
The boffins, from the Department of Public Health at Oxford University, used economic data to work out how demand would fall after the price of unhealthy foods increased, and which foods people might turn to instead. They then used the results to predict the health benefits the population would enjoy as a result.
However, Maura Gillespie of the British Heart Foundation remains unconvinced. Says she: “The debate on unhealthy diets is important as it is estimated that 30% of deaths from coronary heart disease are caused by unhealthy diets. Further evidence is needed on the effect of targeted food taxes before we can support a fat tax.”
With Jamie Oliver’s healthy school dinners crusade back-firing badly, surely the Government could at least slap a tax on the chubby-cheeky-chappy Mockney if he ever appears on our screens again?
Posted: 12th, July 2007 | In: Money Comments (5) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





July 12th, 2007 at 5:07 pm
Oh Miss Lovely, what have the bears done to deserve that? oh yuck! agree about everything else though
July 12th, 2007 at 4:21 pm
Why not cull the overweight and use the fat runoff from their blubber to feed the starving polar bears?
This would also improve the housing shortfall, help reduce global warming, benefit an endangered species and make the world smell nicer.
It’s win, win, and only a porky-lardass would say otherwise.
July 12th, 2007 at 1:43 pm
Why not have a ‘fat tax’ on those who are clinically obese (3 stone), the exceptions being those with a genuine thyoid problem etc or the elderly over 60..? That would trim people down
July 12th, 2007 at 1:26 pm
The phat Jamie foto is clearly 4 reel innit? Any clevva mofo can see dat.
July 12th, 2007 at 9:37 am
That photograph is fake. If it is supposed to be a joke then bad one. Is Anorak a tabloid now?