<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Illegal Bank Charges: £200million Paid Out So Far</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/175341/money/illegal-bank-charges-200million-paid-out-so-far.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/175341/money/illegal-bank-charges-200million-paid-out-so-far.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dar£n</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/175341/money/illegal-bank-charges-200million-paid-out-so-far.html/comment-page-1#comment-19474</link>
		<dc:creator>dar£n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/money/banks/175341.html#comment-19474</guid>
		<description>for more information on this topic, join Consumer Advice Group [CAG]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for more information on this topic, join Consumer Advice Group [CAG]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dar£n</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/175341/money/illegal-bank-charges-200million-paid-out-so-far.html/comment-page-1#comment-19473</link>
		<dc:creator>dar£n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/money/banks/175341.html#comment-19473</guid>
		<description>Hi can I just point out that the charges can NOT be stated as being 'illegal' so the title of this article is incorrect.

There has been no ruling to state they are illegal, they are simply at this stage deemed as being unfair or unlawful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi can I just point out that the charges can NOT be stated as being &#8216;illegal&#8217; so the title of this article is incorrect.</p>
<p>There has been no ruling to state they are illegal, they are simply at this stage deemed as being unfair or unlawful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/175341/money/illegal-bank-charges-200million-paid-out-so-far.html/comment-page-1#comment-19120</link>
		<dc:creator>John Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 08:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/money/banks/175341.html#comment-19120</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree, keep the claims coming!  The bank have been excessively greedy in fining customers with outrageously charges.  It is about time they were exposed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree, keep the claims coming!  The bank have been excessively greedy in fining customers with outrageously charges.  It is about time they were exposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/175341/money/illegal-bank-charges-200million-paid-out-so-far.html/comment-page-1#comment-18664</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/money/banks/175341.html#comment-18664</guid>
		<description>Yep keep those claims coming. A simple letter template from the Martyn Lewis web site was sent off to my bank and 6 weeks later a lovely cheque for £197. Uncontested. Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep keep those claims coming. A simple letter template from the Martyn Lewis web site was sent off to my bank and 6 weeks later a lovely cheque for £197. Uncontested. Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
