Comments on: Brand McCann: Buying Into Madeleine McCann

By: Andrew

Andrew — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:04:40 +0000

Take a look at the new counter-petition ive made in response to the McCann’s campaign

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/GuiltyOrNot/signatures.html

Sign it if you feel strongly enough

Here’s my new brand called “JUSTICE”

Allegedly

By: Andrew

Andrew — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:07:22 +0000

http://www.findmadeleine.com/
allegedly

By: cowmilla

cowmilla — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:03:38 +0000

Somewhere that actually cares?

By: cowmilla

cowmilla — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:02:54 +0000

I think I’m on the wrong site here, anyone point me to somewhere I can report this to whilst these members laugh at others misfortunes?

By: cowmilla

cowmilla — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:17:49 +0000

What parent would allow that image of their young daughter on the net? At any time?

By: cowmilla

cowmilla — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:01:40 +0000

What about this image? This has only come on the site in the last day or so.

http://www.imdb.com/gallery/hh/2022453/HH/2022453/iid_1375617.jpg.html?hint=group
The others were there about 2 days ago but not this one. Am I alone in thinking this image should not be on this site for 1 reason or another? Thoughts please or am I just going mad?

By: pip-pip-hooray

pip-pip-hooray — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:39:47 +0000

Never mind the DNA and sniffer dogs and floating the whole caboodle on the stock exchange. How about getting some behavioiural psychologists in. I’m not sure there is a ‘proper’ way to behave when you’ve lost your child, but some things really stick out to me.
1) I thought Kate looked guilty as hell when she met the Pope, really furtive. Check out the video again.
2) If my eldest kid had been abducted inexplicably, there is NO WAY I would let the other two out of my sight in the immediate aftermath. Damn, I’d need them surgically removed from my arms. Yet the twins were popped into daycare. Then off they went, globe trotting. Like they knew there was no threat…
3) Why are we disbelievers getting rapped on the knuckles for even ‘thinking’ the unthinkable. One homicide survery states in non-stranger situations victims under 20 years of age, 54% were most likely to be killed by a family member. So not that unthinkable to look at the immediate family then.
4) Just because someone keeps trying to ram their ‘truth’ down our throats doesn’t mean their version of reality is right - it could be an extreme symptom of a psychological disturbance (ie personality disorder). Have they been examined by a psychologist?
Anybody else thinking along the same lines?

By: Donna

Donna — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:00:48 +0000

I’ve had the best day ever!’ will be both copyrighted & trademarked

I think you should be ashamed of that comment. Mock the parents all you like, but to mock the last words of a 3 year old girl who probably has been murdered. You couldn’t stoop any lower!

By: Andrew

Andrew — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:48:16 +0000

They only people visibly profiting from Madeleine’s image
(Because that’s all that remains of her) ….are surprise… the McCanns.
I’m registering the Trademark :
“If anyone can, the McCann’s can”
Incase any of you lot try to profit from it. I know what you’re all like in here

and I’m starting my NEW petition called

“The right for EVERYONE to drug kids , abandon them, go get drunk AND profit”

Any takers? Please sign

(+Give generously. Cash, cheque, paypal, diamonds, false alibi, wine, Book deal, photo opportunity, anything. Oh, except your opinion when it doesn’t suit us)

Allegedly

By: katrina

katrina — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:08:48 +0000

you guys are idiots!
of course they have to trademark the fund name…after all, its a large sum of money involved, and if it isn’t all used to find ,adeleine, they will want to use it to help other people find their children…they’ve already made this clear…
obviously most of you are probably unemployed losers sitting at home speculating and have no idea of how the business world works, and yes, their child is missing, but there is a large amount ofpeople behind the scenes looking after the money, and trying to protect their child ’s image from being stuck on the front of A` T-SHIRT and sold by idiots wanting to capitalise off the whole ordeal….

By: ron

ron — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:00:15 +0000

Am I alone in wondering if Mr Branson coming out in support, is anything to do with The Sun (Rupert Murdoch & Sky) begining to express doubts?

By: Johnd

Johnd — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:48:56 +0000

Excellent site Ron and a good summary of what we have all been surmising on this site.

Customer.relations@fly.virgin.com

e mail and let Branson know what you think of his decision to support this couple who at least should be charged with neglect. I notice that two previous major sponsors have decided not to sponsor this new fund. No corporation would back this fund I am sure.

By: Jolie

Jolie — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 03:14:46 +0000

Thanks, Ron, for providing the link and reminding me of that information and for posting a comment to the blog’s author. She will very likely respond back to you, as she reviews comments. Not sure where the website originates from. I’ve wanted to comment there, too, but haven’t made time yet to sign up to be able to.

By: Pam

Pam — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 03:06:20 +0000

Karen you are pathetic!!!

By: ron

ron — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 02:48:42 +0000

Community Verizon says;
Here’s the other thing. She only gets Gerry. I’m pretty convinced of that because there is no mention of the friends helping in the initial “search” and no mention of them being present when hotel staff and police arrive.

Ron says;

Source Telegraph.co.uk 12/09/2007
Kate McCann ran back to the restaurant at 10pm, saying Madeleine was missing.

10:14pm Police were called after “the friends made an initial search”.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/11/wmaddy311.xml

Thanks Jolie- is that an Australian site?, I have posted my response on it too, but I had to register first, have I just registered to something in Australia??
:0

By: Jolie

Jolie — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:44:28 +0000

Are Mr. and Mrs. McCann the most clueless parents-in-mourning ever? Guilty or not, they are definitely tasteless and repulsive to me.

Have you read the September 13 blog essay “What “What Really Happened to Madeleine McCann? I Think I’ve Figured it Out.” by ‘TootToot’ It carefully reviews what we know about the case, particularly that crucial first day when Madeleine was announced missing and speculates what might have gone wrong and why the parents may have made the decisions they did:

http://community.verizon.net/thread.jspa?threadID=1700002105&start=0

I hope everyone will take the time to read it.

BTW, I love the humor on this thread/blog. This case certainly has enough peculiarities in it and this patent pending business is bizarre and absurd.

By: Tiana

Tiana — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:11:47 +0000

polcop

Can you tell me if the kneeling down position with head down in front of you is a typical drug type scenario for a body. Like the young girl whose parents allowed her picture to be shown when she had died of a drug overdose.

By: Polcop

Polcop — Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:51:03 +0000

On 16- sep
Where is she says
“They keep talking of blood in the apartment. Well an overdoes of sleeping pills doesn’t make you bleed.”

Sorry but i am a former Police Officer i have to tell you you are wrong
an overdose is not a nice way to go its not all sweetness and light, blood and faces and urine are quite often involved as a person loses bodily functions
i went to such a sudden death after the girl involved dies and all she took was TEN paarcetamols.

By: Andrew

Andrew — Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:22:02 +0000

http://www.sundayherald.com/news/heraldnews/display.var.1691768.0.0.php

Some great “Andrew selected/edited” snippets in here for us below:

“There’s no let-up,” said Calum, whose Infohost firm hosts the family’s official website, run using some of the £1 million in donations being sent to the privately run Madeleine’s Fund: Leaving No Stone Unturned.
(©™® Patent Pending)

“There’s been a big increase in orders since they became suspects. Somebody came back 30 times, ordering 100 bands. Sometimes people just want one or two, so we throw a couple of extra bands in. It’s difficult to get rid of some of the medium-sized bands as they don’t fit many people. People would still want the Madeleine bands even if she was found. Her face is a (TRADE) mark.™ It’s everywhere.”

“I know from speaking to Gerry on the phone that he is 100% innocent. They are definitely not guilty. Gerry is very determined to find his daughter. You can tell it in his voice when he talks on the phone. He wouldn’t have done all this if they were guilty. If the fund ©™® is still going, we will continue the website even if they are charged and face trial. They wouldn’t want us to back off …”

WHAT?????? There’s more.

Madeleine’s uncle, John McCann, from Glasgow, said: “The main objective of the Madeleine fund is to leave no stone unturned (©™® Patent Pending) in the search for Madeleine.”

Except when it comes to Kate and Gerry’s stone, they want to crawl back under that one obviously.

This is the “killer” line for me everyone…

Calum is already working on new ventures after spotting a market in missing-person websites. Last week he contacted the family of missing schoolgirl Rosemary Edwards, from Hampshire, after her father made an emotional TV appeal. He said: “I don’t think we should be making money out of it, but I would love to do more stuff like this. We phoned up to see if they wanted a website for that missing girl, but they haven’t called back.”

I wonder why not? Maybe they are genuine people that don’t want anything to do with “Murder.Inc” (©™® Patent Pending) and the McCanns?

Allegedly

By: Karen - Holland

Karen - Holland — Sun, 16 Sep 2007 19:43:26 +0000

These McCann are hearless fools - celebrity wannabeeeee’s

I hope they rot!

NEGLECT NEGLECT NEGLECT - CHARGE THE BITCH!

——

Mods and Admin

A little hysterical and a a touch of hyperbole Karen?