
Madeleine McCann: Missing Hours, Found Again And A PR Disaster
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann.
THE SUN front page: “MADDIE DAD AGONY. Fiend hid from Gerry. He was already in room he tells cops.”
A source close to the family says: “When Gerry went to check on Madeleine at 9.05pm he realised the bedroom door was open. Gerry is firmly of the view the abductor was already in the apartment.”
It’s another theory.
“When he went in he saw Madeleine was asleep but the bedroom door was slightly open. He thought, ‘That’s odd’ because he had left it firmly closed. But all the children were asleep. So he just went in and closed the door again and came out about 9.10pm.”
Good to hear Gerry McCann joining in the mood of speculation?
“Gerry is convinced the man must have been hiding, and once Gerry went through the patio doors the only way out was through the window. The front door was locked so the kidnapper took Madeleine and climbed out the window.”
DAILY MIRROR front page: “HOW SHE WAS TAKEN. The McCanns’ story.”
“Stolen to order after being spied on for days
Abductor hid in flat as Gerry looked in on kids
He got in through patio doors and out by window”
Gerry is a “heart specialist”.
Says a source: “When Gerry leaves, the man realises he has only a few minutes. He thinks the only way to get out without being seen is through the window.”
And: “Initially he thought Madeleine might have got up and gone to the toilet, or to get a drink or something.”
So what has changed? Why a new theory now, with a new spokesman on hand and the McCanns named as suspects?
DAILY STAR front page: “SEVEN HOURS TO KLILL MADDIE. Police probe her ‘lost’ final afternoon”
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE: THE MISSING SEVEN HOURS.”
Police sources reveal that “despite exhaustive inquiries they cannot confirm the whereabouts of part-time GP Kate, 39, and her daughter after 1.29pm on May 3”. A source said Kate’s movements were “unaccounted for until she sat down to have dinner with friends at a tapas restaurant within their holiday complex at around 8.40pm”.
The last photograph of Madeleine was said to have been taken by Kate at 2.29pm on May 3.
DAILY MAIL: “McCanns: What we really did in the missing six hours.”
“Madeleine had high tea at 5.30pm with staff at the Kids Club. She was picked up shortly before 6pm by Kate and Gerry.”
The friend insisted: “Kate was never alone with Madeleine that afternoon. There were always other witnesses present. These details were all given to detectives during police interviews, so they know what Kate and Gerry said happened that day.”
So no missing hours, then?
THE TIMES front page: “MADELEINE McCANN: Matthew Parris laments a PR disaster.
“The fatal flaw of David Cameron and Kate and Gerry McCann” - Our correspondent looks at the baleful influence of the marketing men.
“Look what they’ve done to Kate and Gerry McCann. Here were two people deserving of the most intense public sympathy. On a superficial level they got it – by the media bucketload. Yet did you not sense from an early stage an undertone of irritation at the couple? I’ve sensed it everywhere I go: not a sign of doubt about their innocence, which most of us take for granted, but a feeling, nevertheless, that they in some way invited trouble – though we banish the thought as brutal and wrong.
“Which it is. So why the ungenerosity? I believe it is because Kate and Gerry McCann have allowed an impression to arise that they and their advisers are marketing their own tragedy. Where we would have expected to see parents distracted and disorganised by grief, we have seen a professionally run campaign to find out what the media want, and give it to them.
“This has been done for a most defensible reason: to enlist the entire European public as amateur detectives in the search for Madeleine. But now her parents have ended up looking like film stars in a Hollywood weepy.”
“Put up or shut up, Madeleine McCann police told” - Friend of McCanns counters claims of ‘lost’ six hours before girl vanished
DAILY TELEGRPAH: “Madeleine McCann: Gerry certain he was in bedroom with kidnapper”
THE GUARDIAN: “From prime suspects to hounded victims - how parents turned the media tide”
Posted: 22nd, September 2007 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,536) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





September 23rd, 2007 at 1:18 pm
The McCanns are not and may never face any charges. This week they heard that they will not be called back for further questioning anytime soon.
So, Moderation, The Real Stig, Simon, Maria et al, answer me this. Why are they still mounting a defence instead of doing anything to Find Madeleine?
I have not heard of any “leaks” from the PJ that the McCanns could think require answering lately but still they are releasing information about what supposedly happened on May 3rd. Why?
Of course, you all know the answer. It’s because they’ve turned their attention onto us. People who post in forums or people who post comments on newspaper sites. Why do they feel the need to do this? If they ever do face charges it will be in Portugal (unless the UK’s pathetic government refuse extradition) and in front of Judges, not a jury of their peers. Why do they care so much that newspaper readers and internet bloggers and forum posters and YouTube viewers believe them to be innocent?
I’ve asked these questions 3 times since I heard that they wouldn’t be called back for further questioning?
Why won’t the McCanns shut up now? When will they take a back seat to their daughter in the news? Why aren’t they doing something to Find Madeleine?
September 23rd, 2007 at 1:18 pm
1011
Why the problem with Oldfield?
If there are any suspicous actions amongst the tapas 9 I would have though O’Brien and Tanner were more likely. Tanner is the one who saw someone wrapped in a blanket but later remembered they were wearing pink pyjamas. She saw them but the person who was with Gerry did not. O’Brien was the one who was away from the table most of the time. His daughter was ill, is there any confirmation of this?
September 23rd, 2007 at 1:18 pm
nononethere 1043….. Ade has just proved your point for you in glorious technicolour!
September 23rd, 2007 at 1:18 pm
nononethere 1043….. Ade has just proved your point for you in glorious technicolour!
September 23rd, 2007 at 1:07 pm
sorry for double posting - my burglar alarm went off by mistake and all hell broke out.
September 23rd, 2007 at 1:06 pm
1034 stiggie you are gerrykins and therefore I’ve been personal on this forum. Wow I knew I would expose you. Was it your blood-stained iPod at the crematorium or do you have no comment as usual? When did you first find out about O’Brien and katiepops?
One for your iPod when PJ release it:
It ain’t what you do it’s the way that you do it
It ain’t what you do it’s the way that you do it
It ain’t what you do it’s the way that you do it
That’s what gets results
It ain’t what you say it’s the way that you say it
It ain’t what you say it’s the way that you say it
It ain’t what you say it’s the way that you say it
That’s what gets results
get a new PR team mate
September 23rd, 2007 at 1:04 pm
963,
I always enjoy reading your posts. They are always fair, articulate and intelligent thoughts. Too bad Anorak if filled with posters who prefer the lynch-mob mentality.
When I first started reading this forum, I thought it might be interesting, but the more I read the more I realised it was full of hate mongers, witch hunters and most with an IQ and literacy level of about 0. Whoever runs Anorak should be embarrassed of this forum and the aggressive, prejudice, and violent bile that comes out of it.
This forum is only addictive because it has a school playground mentality where people insult and bully those who do not agree with them. The forum is filled to the brim with vile insults alone. I don’t know anymore who is posting here, are they adults are they bored teenagers? Judge Judy for example claims to have 3 children yet she finds plenty of time to post some of the most hateful mail I have ever read. Will she teach her children that people are gulity until proven innocent. Will this be her legacy to her children one day? I hope not for their sake.
And what about Ade?? Sorry Ade you come to mind because I see your name all over this site and you are only one among many. I think one if your past posts read something like this, “we just need a bit more evidence to NAIL them”. Who the hell do you think you are? You definitely are not a leader Ade but a coward little follower who is hiding behind his posts with big talk, sarcastic remarks, prejudice commentary of a family you don’t even know. I just find this so bizarre! You really just come across as a hate monger, nothing more and nothing less.
And Firestar, another person who posts endlessly from morning, noon until past midnight endless dumb posts, do you have a life, a job, a family? How do you find the time to come here day in day out posting the same old garbage - are you not boring your self?
And Canda, I truly am embarrassed for you. I have lived in Canada and it is a country that I am very fond of because it is a very tolerent country with a politcally
neutral position regarding world conflicts. Canada is full of different, races, religions, cultures and although not 100% perfect manages to hold it together precisely because of its tolerance towards others. You embarass Canada for using it as a username because you too come across as a hate monger, nothing more, nothing less.
Again I could pick out a number of other posters here that going on about their HATE for the McCanns and even make ugly comments at the expense of Madeleine McCann because they think they are being clever or funny or whatever but an intelligent person reading this forum realises pretty quickly the sickness that ebbs through each and every hate-mongering post.
I can onlyimagine the number of posts that will follow mine, more dumb childish insults I am sure. But it doesn’t matter because it will just prove my point even more about how pathetic this forum is and how base the arguments really are.
So continue you on boring yourselves because as soon as this case ends, you’ll all be back spewing your venom about something else because maybe it helps you release something that is upsetting you in your own sad little lives.
September 23rd, 2007 at 1:04 pm
It could all be a hoax that has gone horribly wrong.
My initial reaction was that the McCanns knew where M was and what had happened to her. Judging by their UNSHAKABLE and CONSISTENTLY composed manner, my feeling was that she must be OK because they did not behave like grieving parents.
I thought that once they had been to see the Pope and visited Fatima (yes remember those Halycon by-gone days following them around on their tour…) M would suddenly appear. They could then claim it was a miracle and pocket the fund-money. End of story. Mission accomplished. Scam over.
But things snow-balled. Big Brother wasn’t exciting enough this year so instead all eyes were on the McCanns. As each day went by they got deeper and deeper into the deception and now are snookered.
Claiming the reward money was always going to be risky because people would want even more questions answered.
If after about 30 days she had miraculously re-appeared then I think they would have been able to keep the fund money and we would now all be thinking ‘Madeleine who’?
September 23rd, 2007 at 1:04 pm
It could all be a hoax that has gone horribly wrong.
My initial reaction was that the McCanns knew where M was and what had happened to her. Judging by their UNSHAKABLE and CONSISTENTLY composed manner, my feeling was that she must be OK because they did not behave like grieving parents.
I thought that once they had been to see the Pope and visited Fatima (yes remember those Halycon by-gone days following them around on their tour…) M would suddenly appear. They could then claim it was a miracle and pocket the fund-money. End of story. Mission accomplished. Scam over.
But things snow-balled. Big Brother wasn’t exciting enough this year so instead all eyes were on the McCanns. As each day went by they got deeper and deeper into the deception and now are snookered.
Claiming the reward money was always going to be risky because people would want even more questions answered.
If after about 30 days she had miraculously re-appeared then I think they would have been able to keep the fund money and we would now all be thinking ‘Madeleine who’?
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:57 pm
so come on whats the revelance mike? i’m dying to know
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:54 pm
Love the takes on my name Mikes.
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:53 pm
Tap tap tapping on heavens door
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:52 pm
1031 Ade. You’ve confirmed it, you can’t read!
Check out my post about Praia properly and you’ll see that that wasn’t what I said at all…
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:52 pm
It also give you a chance to confess and make amends for forgiveness
and you have to do it before you are forgiven
its silence is golden
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:52 pm
[1014]
You mean masonically, Dont you?
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:52 pm
1024 ade
“Just being personal is plain boring…”
I agree, so why are you endlessly personal in your critique and comment of the McCanns?
You are a complete hypocrite about that.
You output of personal abuse directed at them is near unending and is mind numbingly boring in it’s utter fatuousness.
If ever there was a case of the pot calling the kettle black…
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:49 pm
stiggie and simon I did it my way…
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:48 pm
Priest was never awol. Unless of course he said mass, ran away, came back to say mass, ran away……
The Vatican hasn’t withdrawn anything…. The McCanns have not been charged or convicted of ANYTHING. The Church more than anyone works on ‘innocent until proven guilty’.
The records from the creche for that afternoon are with the PJ…. MW staff confirmed when asked by the press. (possibly Sky?)
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:48 pm
1016 brandon
moderation McCann says that (s)he lives in the Praia town and was in his church (last week?) so there’s no real confirmation. I reckon he’s still missing. It looks like Simon McCann has taken over moderation’s shift now anyway. I’m sure Simon can give an answer under moderation’s name…
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:46 pm
there were scottish elections that day and english and welsh. Labour got it ass well and truly kicked that day. What other importance does the date have?
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:45 pm
1014 What am I missing?
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:45 pm
I think Jose mourrinos departure is political too
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:45 pm
1023 Elections? Dont think this big boys club holds elections
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:43 pm
1015 - The last sighting according to the News of the World was 7pm by David Payne. He (WAS ON HOLIDAY WITH THE McCANNS), and claims to have visited the McCanns apartment and saw Madeleine being put to bed.
Strange how he has only just sated this fact in light of the ‘missing 6 hour theory’.
Talk about building a defence to suit.
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:43 pm
Well they arent allowed to come out and disclose the confession because of their oath etc………
But they can show it with signs of disproval
Have they been to mass yet?
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:43 pm
998 1012
C’mon stiggie and simon. Being personal just means you have lost. I don’t regard either of you as particularly informed, funny or entertaining but I don’t harp on about it. You are paid to be here. I’m here for a laugh and to help put the crooks away. I’m upfront about it.
How I spend my time is my business. If it wasn’t raining, I’d be in the garden. That’s that.
So c’mon show me by example how I can be more witty… Give us some examples of what’s on the fragrant iPod folders: We are the champions? Another one bites the dust. C’mon, loosen up…
Just being personal is plain boring…
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:42 pm
1014 in what way because of elections? or something else?
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:41 pm
do apologise, that shouold of been K & G
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:40 pm
I think the Mikes are getting warm.
September 23rd, 2007 at 12:40 pm
Sad to hear the news on the recently departed mime artist. Brings to mind though K & J, actions speak louder than words!