
Madeleine McCann: Robert Murat Innocent, Private Detectives & Kate McCann’s Hot Lips
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann.
DAILY MIRROR front page: “WE’LL FIND HER OURSELVES. Maddy parents bring in SAS private detectives”.
Kate and Gerry McCann have hired Control Risk Group, billed as a “crack security firm”, to find their daughter.
Page 5: “THE PROFESSIONALS” – There’s TV show in this. The Portuguese police could be the Keystone Cops, at least that’s what the tabloid press portrays them as.
“Millionaire ex-double glazing boss” is the mystery benefactor paying McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell’s wages. The former window cleaner owns Sale Sharks ruby union club. Look out for their new sponsor.
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE. ‘McCanns ARE LYING’ - Portuguese police says friends are in cover-up.”
Robert Murat is to be told he will not face charges. Kate and Gerry McCann will be the only named suspects.
“SMILING” – The WORLD’S GREATEST NEWSPAPERS leads with a picture of Kate McCann grinning.
Pages 4 and 5: “Kidnap? We just don’t; believe it.” It is reported in Portugal that an unnamed Irishman has come forward to say he was in the same place as the McCanns’ friend Jane Tanner. She told police she had seen a man carrying child dashing from the Ocean Club resort in the direction of Robert Murat’s home. The new witness says he saw no-one.
“’GUILT’ OF PARENTS - More than 60 per cent think the couple know what has happened to Madeleine.”
“WHEN KATE WAS HOT LIPS HEALEY” – 15 YEARS AGO Kate was nicknamed hot lips for her resemblance to Loretta Swit in TV comedy M*A*S*H. The Express has seen her Dundee University year book and the comments - “Kate was great fun”; “renowned for alcoholic binges and some ‘dance till you drop’ nocturnal activities”; “she was certainly more interested in going to the pub than she was in her studies” etc.
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE: PARENTS ARE LYING. Cops say McCanns & friends tried to frame suspect Murat.”
Pages 4 and 5: “McCANNS ‘ARE LYING’.”
A phone poll: “DO YOU BELIEVE THE McCANNS ARE LYING?” Let’s see if we can top that 60 per cent in the Star’s sister paper the Daily Express. Vote now and vote often.
THE SUN pages 12 and 13: “TWIN’S LIFT FOR MUM AND DAD.”
Kate and Gerry McCann are with son Sean. They have been to Mass. Kate sobs when Ave Maria is sung. Daughter Amelie is in nursery school. She is plying with the Cuddle Cat. She bursts into laughter, “her giggles rang around the building”.
DAILY MAIL front page: “Madeleine:
• Ex-SAS team joins hunt
• New sighting in Morocco
• Kate breaks down in church
• Police accused over forensics”
Page 8: “McCanns hire an ex-SAS team to hunt for Maddie.”
“Second witness supports sighting in Morocco” – Remember when Marl Pollard said she saw Madeleine in Morocco? Now we lean that a man also saw Madeleine in Morocco.
THE INDEPENDENT PAGE 17: “Murat no longer suspect.”
DAILY TELEGRAPH page 10: “McCanns hired detective firm with ex-SAS men”. Under Portuguese law, the McCanns are not permitted to carry out their own investigation in Portugal. But they can investigate in other countries.
THE TIMES front page: “McCann investigators” – McCanns hire private security firm.
Pages 12 and 13: “How they managed to turn campaign around.” The McCanns are “winning the propaganda war”. They have gone on the “offensive”.
A family source says: “It is for the police to prove they are guilty.”
GUARDIAN: No Madeleine news today.
Posted: 24th, September 2007 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,048) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





September 24th, 2007 at 12:34 pm
(146) And, if you remember, at one point, the McCanns said they believed her to be in Spain and, lo and behold, two days later there was a “sighting” in Murcia.
What I can’t understand is how they can criticise the PJ so much for supposedly not doing nothing when their team of private detectives has been working since May and hasn’t found anything either. And I imagine that private detectives can work with many less restrictions than the PJ and, in practice, can operate in any country they want.
September 24th, 2007 at 12:32 pm
Re the Moroccan sightings- why would an abductor with a child want to be anywhere near the Ibis Marrakech -inside or ouside the lobby? - Too much chance of being spotted by foreign tourists, possible CCTV, police presence.
September 24th, 2007 at 12:31 pm
an interesting article outlining the way the secrecy laws wotk. Several other sidebars have interesting articles to read……
Again, I know I’ve posted it before but someone might want to take a look…
http://portugalresident.com/portugalresident/showstory.asp?ID=19212
I’m not going to state my non-pro-McCann status again!
September 24th, 2007 at 12:27 pm
125 - Oh well then, I didn’t realise you had an Express link.
September 24th, 2007 at 12:23 pm
I don’t think much credence can be given to the supposed sightings in Morrocco. Such reports surface whenever a missing child is heavily publicised. In the Sara Payne and Soham cases, well-meaning members of the public came forward with detailed accounts of sightings which proved to be totally unfounded. Whatever the witness heard, or thought she heard, could have an innocent explanation. Truthfully, one little blonde girl looks much like another. I fear the child must be dead for none of the abduction scenarios make sense. Child trafficking? We know children from the third world are smuggled into Europe to join relatives or for domestic slavery but I have never heard of it happening the other way round. A rich childless couple stealing a child to order? Such people would simply adopt an East European orphan. A paedophile ring? Such things exist but they are usually small groups of like-minded offenders who have befriended each other, not huge international conspiracies. Underage prostitution usually involves teenage runaways and where younger children are exploited I’m afraid to say that the perpetrators are usually parents, guardians or ‘friends of the family’.
September 24th, 2007 at 12:23 pm
Bulldump… sorry, I didn’t realise you were in Portugal at the time…
September 24th, 2007 at 12:23 pm
129
we know they left them alone for a pissup and madeleine vanished
So guilty of neglect
if that stories untrue and it changes daily
they are guilty for perverting the course
so whatever they did they’re guilty
their actions led to madeleines disapearance one way or another and should be made answerable
its up to us if we want to speculate
If they dont want us to, they shouldnt shove more additions and public appearances down our throats daily!!!!!!!!!!!!
September 24th, 2007 at 12:23 pm
just noticed - real stig backwards is - gits laer - hmmmm, perhaps the search should be in germany
September 24th, 2007 at 12:22 pm
moderation i do agree with you regarding south africans, but she did admit to it being a third world country
September 24th, 2007 at 12:19 pm
why hasn’t this elite squad found any evidence to suggest an abduction ever took place?
September 24th, 2007 at 12:18 pm
moderation i did see the whole thing and i saw what i saw. booing and jeering.
stig I would lay money on you knowing what the taste of the sweat of richard bransons scrotum is like
September 24th, 2007 at 12:16 pm
26 Ian - it is claimed that this ex-SAS private detective team were actually hired in May when Madeleine disappeared..just to clear that up…seen numerous posts with that mistake..i think people just read the headlines..
September 24th, 2007 at 12:16 pm
Bulldump 130. It was only half a dozen shouting at kate mcC the rest were clapping and shouting good luck if you saw the whole thing…..
But hey, everything on here is selctive according to viewpoint.
Well said Stig! There are a few real crazies surfacing now! Scary huh? and I’m also really cheesed off with the South Africans who slag of Britain at the drop of a hat. Give it a rest!
I’d sooner live here than there amid the barbed wire, security guards, car-jackers and kalashnikovs, that’s for sure.
September 24th, 2007 at 12:13 pm
good post just me
September 24th, 2007 at 12:12 pm
My belief is that all so called anti mccanners on this site would rather be proved wrong. But, pro mccanns have to live with the fact they are condoning a couple who had they not neglected their children in the first place would still have their daughter, and none of us would be discussing it in the first place. I would feel a tad better about th mccanns if they publicly admitted their neglect and showed guilt and remorse. all the time they are coming across as the victims I cannot change my opinion. the only victim in this is madeleine. and may I add, why are you wasting time on this forum if you are so utterly convinced the parents are innocent in all this, why are you not out looking for madeleine yourself if you think she is still alive?
September 24th, 2007 at 12:10 pm
O’Hara you are a fool!!!!
September 24th, 2007 at 12:10 pm
125 edna simmons
The PJ got onto Murat because a female UK journalist said she was suspicious of him because of things he said to her and what she thought was very odd behaviour. The 9 were not the source of the original finger pointing.
September 24th, 2007 at 12:10 pm
131 No it doesn’t. For one statmement to be incorrect does not invalidate the whole argument.
September 24th, 2007 at 12:08 pm
Um …. that’s “hatred” of course.
September 24th, 2007 at 12:05 pm
1 milisoreja
You describe the SAS as famous for doing dirty jobs. As I see it the SAS are a truly admirable group of people who serve their country like few others. Their heroism, sacrifice and courage are legendary and admired world wide. To belittle them with a description that implies moral corruption and general unsavory behaviour is disgusting.
Once again, an anti-McCann campaigner, frothing at the mouth with indignation, questions the integrity, worth and character of people who lend their support or assistance to the McCanns. Everybody who helps them is evil spawn of the devil.
This utterly derogatory drivel shows very clearly how unbalanced your whole viewpoint is.
September 24th, 2007 at 12:05 pm
lol, moderation iit says :The community should be applauded for the support it has shown to the McCann family during this very difficult week.
is this the same community that was standing outside the police staion callin kate the daughter of a whore and booing?
September 24th, 2007 at 12:04 pm
I hope all you peope who “know” the McCanns are guilty will stand up and say “I was wrong” if and when the moment comes. You don’t “know” anything and neither do I. You can suspect, but you can’t “know”. Everytime you spew out your hatered of this couple you make yourselves look like idiots, and idiots that can’t spell either. Were you there? No, and neither was I. Nobody knows what happened. That’s the reality, get over it.
September 24th, 2007 at 12:04 pm
ok, why dont the mccanns just open up and spill the beans on everything they know. They say they cannot speak out due to portugese law, well fine, thats up to them, but, im sure more people would be on their side if they were just plain honest with us. not only that, im sure they can easily now afford to pay legal fees and get off lightly for speaking out if anything did come of it. i personally would rather take the rap for speaking out, and get on with looking for my daughter, than let the ’sources close to them’ keep the spin going.
September 24th, 2007 at 12:02 pm
Ooops… forgot to post the link. Duh!
http://portugalresident.com/portugalresident/showstory.asp?ID=18790
September 24th, 2007 at 12:01 pm
I know I’ve posted this before but as I had first hand knowledge of this its worth noting just as an example…..
September 24th, 2007 at 12:00 pm
It is no good coming into this forum and trying to deflect attention away from the Tapas 9 to the Mirror journo for pointing at Murat.
The Express link posted above tells us that the police were looking at Murat already because of the Tapas 9’s (now disputed) statements.
Try another forum where people don’t keep an eye on things.
September 24th, 2007 at 11:55 am
Gregory, I guess you’ve never been in trouble in Portugal. The PJ are not the Old Bill here that’s for sure.
Just google.
September 24th, 2007 at 11:49 am
The cash sloshing around is insane.. why the most expensive team if innocent? The maelstrom in which these people find themselves in cannot have been dreamt up by themselves, alone. It is the work of the imbeciles around them that do not look further than self-promotion. There is no end to the expansion of the clan, with backers that I thought would know better?? Do they have advisers?
Their can be no fact more clear than the ongoing suspicion of the PJ that these people are involved in a cover up.
I trust the PJ.
If I were the accused, I would sit tight, safe in the knowledge that I was innocent of any crime.
My opinion, is that the father may be the real aggressor.
Money makes the world go around.
September 24th, 2007 at 11:39 am
brandoflour i am not gonna compare the two parties cause people react in different ways to grief, but Rosemary Edwards father toouched a nerve
September 24th, 2007 at 11:37 am
also, if gordon brown interferes he is also undermining the home secretary, jacqui smith, as she said she was happy with the manner in which the investigation had taken placeby advisory the the british police