
Madeleine McCann: Robert Murat Innocent, Private Detectives & Kate McCann’s Hot Lips
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann.
DAILY MIRROR front page: “WE’LL FIND HER OURSELVES. Maddy parents bring in SAS private detectives”.
Kate and Gerry McCann have hired Control Risk Group, billed as a “crack security firm”, to find their daughter.
Page 5: “THE PROFESSIONALS” – There’s TV show in this. The Portuguese police could be the Keystone Cops, at least that’s what the tabloid press portrays them as.
“Millionaire ex-double glazing boss” is the mystery benefactor paying McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell’s wages. The former window cleaner owns Sale Sharks ruby union club. Look out for their new sponsor.
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE. ‘McCanns ARE LYING’ - Portuguese police says friends are in cover-up.”
Robert Murat is to be told he will not face charges. Kate and Gerry McCann will be the only named suspects.
“SMILING” – The WORLD’S GREATEST NEWSPAPERS leads with a picture of Kate McCann grinning.
Pages 4 and 5: “Kidnap? We just don’t; believe it.” It is reported in Portugal that an unnamed Irishman has come forward to say he was in the same place as the McCanns’ friend Jane Tanner. She told police she had seen a man carrying child dashing from the Ocean Club resort in the direction of Robert Murat’s home. The new witness says he saw no-one.
“’GUILT’ OF PARENTS - More than 60 per cent think the couple know what has happened to Madeleine.”
“WHEN KATE WAS HOT LIPS HEALEY” – 15 YEARS AGO Kate was nicknamed hot lips for her resemblance to Loretta Swit in TV comedy M*A*S*H. The Express has seen her Dundee University year book and the comments - “Kate was great fun”; “renowned for alcoholic binges and some ‘dance till you drop’ nocturnal activities”; “she was certainly more interested in going to the pub than she was in her studies” etc.
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE: PARENTS ARE LYING. Cops say McCanns & friends tried to frame suspect Murat.”
Pages 4 and 5: “McCANNS ‘ARE LYING’.”
A phone poll: “DO YOU BELIEVE THE McCANNS ARE LYING?” Let’s see if we can top that 60 per cent in the Star’s sister paper the Daily Express. Vote now and vote often.
THE SUN pages 12 and 13: “TWIN’S LIFT FOR MUM AND DAD.”
Kate and Gerry McCann are with son Sean. They have been to Mass. Kate sobs when Ave Maria is sung. Daughter Amelie is in nursery school. She is plying with the Cuddle Cat. She bursts into laughter, “her giggles rang around the building”.
DAILY MAIL front page: “Madeleine:
• Ex-SAS team joins hunt
• New sighting in Morocco
• Kate breaks down in church
• Police accused over forensics”
Page 8: “McCanns hire an ex-SAS team to hunt for Maddie.”
“Second witness supports sighting in Morocco” – Remember when Marl Pollard said she saw Madeleine in Morocco? Now we lean that a man also saw Madeleine in Morocco.
THE INDEPENDENT PAGE 17: “Murat no longer suspect.”
DAILY TELEGRAPH page 10: “McCanns hired detective firm with ex-SAS men”. Under Portuguese law, the McCanns are not permitted to carry out their own investigation in Portugal. But they can investigate in other countries.
THE TIMES front page: “McCann investigators” – McCanns hire private security firm.
Pages 12 and 13: “How they managed to turn campaign around.” The McCanns are “winning the propaganda war”. They have gone on the “offensive”.
A family source says: “It is for the police to prove they are guilty.”
GUARDIAN: No Madeleine news today.
Posted: 24th, September 2007 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,048) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





September 24th, 2007 at 10:34 pm
740 - Stig
I wouldn’t slag off any parent for leaving their kid at a kid’s club. That’s what they’re there for. That’s why I can’t comprehend the McCann’s behaviour. If they are of the mentality to leave their kids there during the day when it’s safer, then why not use a service in the evening when you know you’d get a lot of stick for doing so? It makes no sense.
As for the other parents, why would they want to keep a low profile? If I had left my kids at a kid’s club and saw the McCanns, I’d be first to call up the Mirror or the Sun and get some money for selling my (100% truthful) story to corroborate the McCann’s story.
September 24th, 2007 at 10:34 pm
I have never (knowingly) met a member or ex-member of the SAS. They are a secretive lot by definition. I do however know an ex Royal Marine who I know for a fact was seconded to the Special Boat Squadron for a short while. The SBS are like the SAS but better because they don’t get their feet wet… not my line but theirs - think about it. Anyway, I reckon that a real SAS person would shoot the whole of the wretched McCannClan on sight knowing about their child abuse activities. If they have hired anyone it will be some fat thugs who are probably part of the McCann’s favourite paedo/swingers/drugs/alcholics ring. True SAS do have principles, I believe.
September 24th, 2007 at 10:33 pm
Can you believe what people are posting on you tube?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F46kt-NR8OU&mode=related&search=
September 24th, 2007 at 10:33 pm
http://youtube.com/watch?v=iQ6drtavEvA&mode=related&search=
not seen this one before the one where gm leaves km
September 24th, 2007 at 10:33 pm
Bulldump
I don’t drink!
September 24th, 2007 at 10:32 pm
734 You are re-pasting something from the real stig.
As far as I can see, the quotation from the PJ has no bearing on the statement that “This is a lie cooked up by the Portugese leak”.
In the absence of any firm data, we have no way of knowing whether the McCanns did or did not refuse to answer any questions.
Any supposed data comes from leaks from one side or the other, and is therefore immediately suspect.
September 24th, 2007 at 10:32 pm
719
So because (apparently) Madeleine cried on one or maybe two evenings (and according to her upstairs )thats your basis for your crappy little joke? Funny enough my little one cries when she’s put to bed. Sometimes she’s just over- tired. Sometimes she just play up. But whatever………..
Anyway, your boring me………so bog off!
September 24th, 2007 at 10:31 pm
puzzled you are corect and that was reading too, the mccanns would have stood on the rooftops and rubbished any claims that they had not answered all questions if this was the case.
Garth Says:
September 24th, 2007 at 10:23 pm
Caroline - 702
Apologies to you. Nice one!
gareth you rubbished carolines post but then realized that she was pro mccann and then congratulated her on a good post
erm… we aint all just got back from the pub and are not all blind and gullable
September 24th, 2007 at 10:31 pm
731 - hotlips
So have you got a link to the missing video? I’ve laughed at the South Park one but that’s quite old now.
Here’s a funny McCann video…
http://youtube.com/watch?v=LsUrH1A5zD4
The presenter is preening herself much like Kate I guess.
September 24th, 2007 at 10:30 pm
736 blunger
You have to volunteer, e.g. by e-mail or ‘phone.
September 24th, 2007 at 10:30 pm
surley the blood off a fallen scab would smell differently to the smell of death detected after at least 2 hrs??
September 24th, 2007 at 10:29 pm
724 Stevo
“If there were so many other kids doing the same as Madeleine don’t you think the parents of those kids would be talking to newspapers?”
Well if you were one of those parents and you had read all the negative comments about what people here generally think about parents who “park” their children in the kids club while they do something else - would you own up or keep your head down?
You can’t slag of the McCanns for doing something and expect other people who have done likewise to stick their heads above the parapet.
It would be nice to see though.
September 24th, 2007 at 10:29 pm
Kate reveals Madeleine had been practising a dance at the club which she was looking forward to showing her mum the following day - “but I never got to see it”.
I wonder what the dance was?
Maybe it was the “keep us all in” limbo dance!
September 24th, 2007 at 10:29 pm
if only cuddle cat could speak
September 24th, 2007 at 10:28 pm
maybe ob and t are like huntley and his girlfriend
September 24th, 2007 at 10:28 pm
Daddy-Daddy
“if you visit the cuddlecat.co.uk website, click on the ‘Can you help?’ link and volunteer to assist then you’ll be invited to help monitor blogs, forums, etc. You’ll be encouraged to make “helpful” posts and to counter the more ludicrous™ facts as they emerge.”
I’m sorry, I cannot find any such invitation re blogs and forums. Could you be more precise on how to find it, please ?
September 24th, 2007 at 10:26 pm
Has anyone considered that the “ex-SAS” mob are really there to protect the fragrant couple and the whole of their coven from assassination or, preferably, extreme mutilation?
Not that I would ever consider such a thing if on a shooting trip they happened to be in the way as I accidentally fell over on the steps getting onto the plane and scratching my knee…
September 24th, 2007 at 10:26 pm
Just re-posting 643 to help other people to add their views.
442 puzzled
“I ask all those who are so convinced the McCanns are innocent - why do they not answer the questions and help? If they have nothing to hide - why are they hiding?”
They have NOT refused to answer questions. This is a lie cooked up by the Portuguese leak. Here, verbatim, is what the judge who reviewed the evidence presented to him by the PJ said.
“Since the police have not collected any elements of proof after the parents became arguidos on September 7 that justifies any new actions, I have not requested any new interviews.”
September 24th, 2007 at 10:26 pm
697 Thank you Mary.
Now I have the “most likely” and “least likely” if you get me drift….
September 24th, 2007 at 10:25 pm
643 Stig. I am confused. The judge would have said this after the McCanns had been questioned by the PJ. Right? So as arguidos I know that they are not obliged to answer any questions. Bit like taking the 5th Amendment in the States, I believe.
So MY reading of what the judge said was that they would not be re-interviewing the McCanns in the foreseeable future because they would not have any new questions to ask them.
That surely is a very different interpretation to ‘they answered all the questions they were initially asked’. Also, if they had answered all the questions that the PJ asked I am sure that the McCann PR Team would be let us know loud and clear.
I would love other people’s reading of this.
September 24th, 2007 at 10:24 pm
711. Stevo - I found that link and posted it one here a while ago - I think I found it on Sky News - it is right at the end of an interview - the very last question.
Here is another interesting one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9spzFFbM_pc&mode=related&search=
September 24th, 2007 at 10:24 pm
Kate says: “As I put her to bed, she smiled at me and said, ‘Mummy I’ve had the best day ever. I’m having lots and lots of fun’.”
Yeah right….
Little did poor Madeleine know what was about to happen next as the parents joined the Negligent Nine for a night of vino.
September 24th, 2007 at 10:23 pm
Caroline - 702
Apologies to you. Nice one!
September 24th, 2007 at 10:23 pm
Am I correct in stating that the sniffer dogs on May 3/4 followed Madeleines scent to the supermarket?
If I am it would explain why Tanner would have seen an abductor go past her ie also past Wilkins and GM.
If as now appears Tanner states that the abductor went towards Murat’s house the scent would have gone east rather than south towards the supermarket, church and the beach.
September 24th, 2007 at 10:23 pm
717
“For example, can anyone explain the thought processes that lead Team McCann, on Day 23, to register the domain names cuddlecat.co.uk and cuddlecat.org.uk?”
megalomania and denial maybe?
September 24th, 2007 at 10:23 pm
I’ll probably be banned for life for this but what if K and G sedated m but the “other one” took advantage and ended up killing her, but went back and told mc canns she must have died from overdose and will help them.
every stone and all that
September 24th, 2007 at 10:22 pm
529 Seymour Laws
So do I take it that you are prepared to overlook ‘naf’ if there are sufficient vines?
September 24th, 2007 at 10:22 pm
715 - Real Stig
The article you give a link to is hardly something I’d call credible but allowing some latitude for a moment - how about this comment in it:
“Madeleine had spent the day at a kids’ club near the family’s holiday apartment in Praia da Luz in Portugal, swimming, face-painting and colouring-in with other children.”
Just where are the parents of these other kids at the club who had their faces painted etc?
This is exactly why the stories are a load of baloney. If there were so many other kids doing the same as Madeleine don’t you think the parents of those kids would be talking to newspapers? They wouldn’t be bound by any secrecy laws. And, I’m not talking about the Tapas 9 - I mean other families staying at the Mark Warner complex or even at other places nearby. How come we never hear from anyone else?
September 24th, 2007 at 10:20 pm
714 have the McConns been seen in the pub/tapas/offie lately or are they trying getting pissed at home for a change WITH the kids?
September 24th, 2007 at 10:19 pm
Just a thought but i wonder how much the Mcconns are paying for these sightings.
Anyone going on holidays soon?