
Madeleine McCann: A House Of Love, Find the Body & What Kate McCann Screamed
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann.
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE. ‘FIND BODY OR McCANNS WILL ESCAPE’ – Prosecutors ultimatum to Portuguese police.”
The case against Kate and Gerry McCanns is “hanging by a thread”.
A police sources says: “There is a determination within the force to bring this investigation to a satisfactory conclusion but there is a growing fear that without a body, that goal will be impossible.”
Pages 4 and 5: “Our reputation is tarnished forever” – Each day the McCanns prepare themselves for the “worst case scenario”. No, not that they will be wrongly convicted, rather they will learn of Madeleine’s death.
Clarence Mitchell says: “In the middle of this people forget this is still a family who are potentially facing bereavement but are still in that awful limbo position of not knowing what has happened to their daughter.” Thankfully Mr Mitchell is on hand to remind people of this every day.
“Doubts on the McCanns by a lie detector expert” – THE WORLD’S GREATEST NEWSPAPER asks John Ryan, of International Truth Verification Technologies Institute, to listen to Kate McCann’s voice. Says she: “However I think there is some sort of deception when I hear the lady speaking, either over the event or in avoiding showing her true feelings”.
DAILY MIRROR front page: “MADELEINE – find a body or there is no case.”
Page 5: “Gerry and Kate have often talked about the possibility of Madeleine being found dead. That would be the worst news but it would at least give them some..CLOSURE”. So says a “source close to the legal team”.
Antonio Cluny, President of the Public Prosecution Service, says: “Without the little girl’s body, everything is complicated… In the Maddy case, there is no confession and, according to what has been made public, the evidence gathered up until now keeps all leads open – from abduction to homicide or at least to a simple accident”.
DAILY MAIL front page: “EXCLUSIVE: Eyewitness reveals Maddie’s mother DID shout: ‘They’ve taken her’ after four-year-old vanished. WHAT KATE DID SCREAM.”
Nanny Charlotte Pennington is in Praia da Luz. She hears Kate McCann scream: “They’ve taken her, they’ve taken her!” The McCanns say Kate screamed “Madeleine’s gone”.
Sensation. Front-page news.
Page 4: “Nanny Pennington, who worked at the Ocean Club, is pictured. She’s wearing a brown beret and a pink coat. Her tights are black. Her legs are crossed.
“I was in the apartment less than five minutes after they found that Madeleine had gone. When we were coming out we saw Kate and she was screaming: ‘They’ve taken her, they’ve taken her’… It might not have been the first thing she said. But she definitely said it.”
So…
“She also repeated Madeleine’s name and said: ‘She’s gone, she’s gone.’”
Anyone hear anything else?
THE SUN page 24: “MADDIE LAW CHIEF: NO BODY, NO CASE.” Antonio Clunes says: “There have been cases in which it was possible to obtain a conviction without a victim – but there were confessions.”
But the McCanns are innocent, says a source. And they are not confessing. They are talking through their spokesperson.
DAILY STAR front page: “COPS CLOSE IN ON MADDIE. Final pieces of tragic jigsaw falling into place.”
Pages 4 and 5: “FIND THE BODY OR THEY WALK. Law bosses tell Portuguese cops to step up hunt.”
“TWINS’ HOUSE OF LOVE” – Clarence Mitchell says the McCanns have built a “house of love” for their family. Mr Mitchell says the McCanns are living “every parent’s worst nightmare times ten”. Mr Mitchell used to work for the tabloid press.
DAILY TELEGRAPH page 13: “Case against McCanns ‘rests on finding body’.”
Clarence Mitchell says: “They did not harm, let alone kill her.”
THE TIMES page 11: “No body, no conviction says McCann police.”
THE GUARDIAN & THE INDEPENDENT: No Madeleine news.
Posted: 25th, September 2007 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,296) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





September 25th, 2007 at 3:04 pm
389 Megz
Far be it from to stick my nose in (LOL), I would have a word with your Health Visitor if you have one, as the older the child, the more drugging they would need and this could have serious consequences as Calpol is a paracetamol based medication so liver/kidney failure is a real risk in these circumstances.
September 25th, 2007 at 3:04 pm
quite funny though!!
September 25th, 2007 at 3:03 pm
IM GOIN IF YER ANT GONNER TALK SENCE. YER ALL NO NUFFIN ENYWAY. AN NON OF YERS ARE PURFECK SO GET LOST IDDIOTS
September 25th, 2007 at 3:02 pm
Moderation please help me here
This “pikin” that @rse is referring too, is this like a “pikey” aka “chav”?
September 25th, 2007 at 3:02 pm
370 - Anonymous the 1st
love it - “innit!”
September 25th, 2007 at 3:02 pm
392
sorry that’s referring to 354
September 25th, 2007 at 3:01 pm
383 SSS what arse is trying to say is ‘I’m on day release from the psych unit” so we need to be understanding. Not!
September 25th, 2007 at 3:00 pm
382
Don’t you mean
I thought you were sodding off SSS or whatever you fool?
Or did you mean
I fought you was sodding ooph (as in rhymes with pouff) SSS or wot EVER you fool
Could you be more precise please?
September 25th, 2007 at 3:00 pm
355 for admin
342 Ade genuine at 2:30
343 Ade Counterfeit at 2:31
344 moderation at 2:31
September 25th, 2007 at 3:00 pm
sss. arse is team mccann. they are bored too, so they are having abit of a laugh with themselves.
September 25th, 2007 at 3:00 pm
my step-sons mother gives her son calpol or the like to knock him out and gave us a nice big bottle so we could do the same to him (which we haven’t done btw) beginning to wonder if i should report it although i have no proof other than what she has said.
September 25th, 2007 at 3:00 pm
#374 Andy,
I would believe anything at this point.
If, in theory as always, there is truth to a death and a missing body, exactly how much will these people get away with, including all of the money collected, just amazes me.
September 25th, 2007 at 3:00 pm
@rse, I not sure I quite following your line of argument what what
September 25th, 2007 at 2:59 pm
381,
I actually agree with you Patricia.
September 25th, 2007 at 2:59 pm
Must have taken ages to write that ‘badly’! Another poster that is familiar though!
September 25th, 2007 at 2:59 pm
335 stevo
stevo, yes I see what you mean. I’m sorry if it seems I was making a big thing of your mentioning about the papers. I answered as soon as I read it and didn’t relise someone had already given you the link. I’ve seen it now that I went back to where I’d left off. I agree that a forum is meant to be interactive, I myself have tried to give links but it doesn’t work for me (obviously doing something wrong) I suggested the google bar ’cause I don’t live in the UK and that’s how I read the papers.
September 25th, 2007 at 2:58 pm
Well, that was certainly a conversation killer, and to think I only came on to say “hi” - or is it possible you are all still painstakingly working out what message Arse is trying to convey?
September 25th, 2007 at 2:57 pm
I think this debate on Anorak has become a stale merry go round of repetition.Same old theories and speculations..whether it is doubters, Pros, or on the fence, posts.
To that I say I will be much richer by the end of the day.
September 25th, 2007 at 2:57 pm
366,
its clear as day you are making it all up, really go back to your studies you are not fooling anyone with your misspelled posts.
September 25th, 2007 at 2:56 pm
378
Wow Arse, you have serious anger issues you need to deal with.
September 25th, 2007 at 2:54 pm
YOUR VALL SO BLOODY FURFECK ANT YER YE YE YE LIKE NONE ER USE EVER DUN NUFFINK WRONG YER MAKES ME SICK YER DUZ .D YER GOT NUFFIN BETTER TO DO THAN SLAGS PEOPLE OFF AS TRYING TO DO THE WRITE FIN GS AND YERS DONT NO HOW HARD IT IS BEING SO FOOLISH AS YE RMUST BE. IF YER CANNIE BE NICE WELL YER SHUDDN BE ANYFINK IF YER NO WOT I MEEN. AND YER CALLIN ME STUPID YE WRITE@@!!!!!!!!!!
September 25th, 2007 at 2:53 pm
364,
apparently Ade.
September 25th, 2007 at 2:53 pm
OK Toni, will do, probably be mid morning or lunchtime, as loads of work to catch up on.
Speak then
September 25th, 2007 at 2:52 pm
Moderation….I too went for dinner and Friday with partner and friends and could not put exact time to movements.However I can remember every second of time, and day up to point police and then hospital called me to tell me my late husband, at age 29 had been killed along with 4 others in a car crash.And that was 20 years ago.
YES. That I believe
September 25th, 2007 at 2:52 pm
Patricia Says:
September 25th, 2007 at 2:37 pm
Sorry, a lot of distractions but I do have a question.
If there are more dna results due soon then how is it known or reported accurately that the McCanns will not be charged with anything?
–
Your post nearly got lost in all the crap that followed it!
I suppose the simple answer is that anything that begins with “A source said…” can be safely ignored until such time as a name to go with the source is provided.
For instance, although I cannot remember the link, I read earlier this week that “according to a source” the Birmingham FSS was annoyed with PJ for misrepresenting the results of the earlier DNA samples and would not be sending any more results. Now how could that possibly be true? It didn’t stop the reporter (wish I could find the link) writing it as fact though.
September 25th, 2007 at 2:51 pm
McNotts… why have you changed your name yet again? something to hide?
September 25th, 2007 at 2:51 pm
SSS dont waste your time here today, I was away yesterday too, public holiday in SA, I popped in but the aliens are here today and they all talk another language and never answer any posts. I off home now but I will catch up with you tomorrow, pse pop in even if to have a gas with me.
September 25th, 2007 at 2:50 pm
317,
I don’t recall calling you an arse.
September 25th, 2007 at 2:50 pm
360 Stevo
Unless Team McCanno is moving to a “diversification strategy” versus the usual relatively intelligent “apologists” (e.g. simon). Perhaps now they want to show the Chavs support them too……
“innit”!
September 25th, 2007 at 2:50 pm
#362,
I will be much richer by the end of the day.