
Madeleine McCann: Blonde Child Seen In Morocco
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann.
DAILY MAIL front page: “Could this be Maddie?”
Readers see a picture of a child being carried on a woman’s back - “The intriguing picture being probed by Interpol.”
Pages 10 and 11: “Could this really be Maddie?”
This is the picture of a girl “in the clutches of a group of Moroccans”. The picture was taken four weeks ago near Tangiers by Spaniard Clara Torres.
DAILY MIRROR front page: “MADDY IN MOROCCO?”
Readers see the same picture. The Full “astonishing story” is on pages 4 and 5.
Pages 4 and 5: “COULD IT BE?” Less the full story than another question.
“GERRY: I KNOW WE WILL BE CLEARED” – Gerry McCann says he and his wife “wanted to be eliminated from the enquiry as quickly as possible”. Some news.
THE SUN front page: “MOROCCO PHOTO SENSATION. IS THIS MADDIE?”
The picture is “sensational”. It has been described as “convincing”, but by whom is not said.
Pages 4 and 5: “GERRY & KATE: IT COULD BE HER – MADDIE PARENTS HOPE AT SIGHTING SENSATION.”
Clara Torres is talking on Spanish radio. She looks at the photo. Says she: “It sent shivers down my spine.”
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “NOW A ‘PHOTO’ OF MADELEINE IN MOROCCO.”
‘Photo’ is placed in quotes lest readers mistake the picture for a ‘SNAP’ or a ‘SHOT’.
Spanish Government official Jose Herrero Arcas says: “The National Police received a photograph by email taken by a young Spanish couple who believe it shows Madeleine McCann. The quality of the photograph is not very clear and it was taken from around 200 metres away. However, the National Police are taking the claim seriously enough to have sent it on to their colleagues at Interpol. I cannot give any more information than that.”
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE – AMAZING PHOTO IN MOROCCO.”
Pages 4 and 5: “MADDIE SEEN IN MOROCCO – Bombshell new photo is probed by Interpol.”
THE TIMES front page: “Police start investigation into ‘picture in Morocco of Madeleine McCann’.”
Page 5: “New photograph shows child like Madeleine on African woman’s back.”
A source close to the McCanns tells one and all: “The McCanns are not going to get their hopes up until the photograph has been sent for forensic examination.” And, dare it be said, a DNA test.
DAILY TELEGRAPH front page: “Is this Madeleine in Morocco?” The search for the missing child has taken a “dramatic turn”.
Page 9: “Gerry McCann is “confident” he and his wife will be cleared. A source tells us: “It is very unlikely that British police would question the McCanns on behalf of the Portuguese now.”
Robert Murat responds to claims by nanny Charlotte Pennington that on the night of Madeleine’s disappearance he was by the McCann family apartment: “I certainly was not there that night. At no point was I there.”
THE GUARDIAN & THE INDEPENDENT no Maddy news today.
Posted: 26th, September 2007 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,153) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





September 26th, 2007 at 11:40 am
247
do all these nomads have passports?
or will they have swam there?
September 26th, 2007 at 11:40 am
Puzzled I did not begin the personal attacks I have responded only like with like which is evident if you wish to read back on any of my postings.
If there is a personal attack from me you will see that it is preceeded by one that I recieved from same.
The trouble with the many here that enjoy the mockery of this case is that when the attacks turn back on them they start whingeing like a crowd of babies a clear case of giving it but not being able to take it.
September 26th, 2007 at 11:39 am
239 “A(n) implausibility of gnus”
Apols
September 26th, 2007 at 11:39 am
234 bulldump
as i said before
the lady carrying the child as a shadow casting over her face and shoulder from the hat,
unlike the others with direct sunlight
the camera is unable to pick any detail out
September 26th, 2007 at 11:37 am
#219 I respectfully draw your attention to my earlier posting of no. 65.
and:
“The Portuguese police case was so weak at the time the couple were made official suspects that they had to be released on the lowest form of bail and were allowed to return home to Rothley, Leicestershire, two days later. ….detectives focused on private conversations with friends and family.”
ref: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2492626.ece
detectives focused on private conversations with friends and family.
A Portuguese police source is reported by Correio da Manhã to have said that there could now be a delay in the investigation as they prepare to make the formal request for the interview in Britain.
ref: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article2473974.ece
…..shall I go on with more references ?
September 26th, 2007 at 11:37 am
anagram of ‘gang of moroccans’:
mccanns gag on roof
another clue?
September 26th, 2007 at 11:37 am
A wardrobe of anoraks?
September 26th, 2007 at 11:36 am
233
Don’t forget….this lawyer defends paedophiles as well!
September 26th, 2007 at 11:36 am
236 - Milisoreja. I am SERIOUSLY impressed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
September 26th, 2007 at 11:36 am
239.
a lapwing of mc fans
September 26th, 2007 at 11:35 am
a rack of morrocan lamb ???
September 26th, 2007 at 11:35 am
http://bullmonkey.co.uk/fund/index.htm
for the opera users
September 26th, 2007 at 11:34 am
Some collective nouns for this blog….
A sleuth of bears
A wake of buzzards
A clash of bucks
A piteousness of doves
A implausibility of gnus
A mob of kangaroos
A deceit of lapwings
A shiver of shark
A bed of snakes
A murmuration of starlings
A pack of weasels
A zeal of zebras
But my favourite has to be; “rhumba of rattlesnakes”!
September 26th, 2007 at 11:34 am
i can just see all the nomads wandering across into pdl, kidnapping a kid and then wandering back.
or are they saying these wealthy nomads paid someone else to carry it out?
also, everyone is saying they were negligent eating in the tapas bar.
if this is the case, what is dining 5 miles away and leaving the kids a couple of days before? (was the door locked then?)
September 26th, 2007 at 11:33 am
SSS you go girl, let them have it - real dick heads some of these people they just dont understand the goings on in the real world
September 26th, 2007 at 11:33 am
Slán agat
September 26th, 2007 at 11:32 am
Can I turn the photo argumant on its head? (bearing in mind I don’t think it is Madeleine)…
Just supposing this woman, the tourist who took this photo, had looked at it and then done nothing about it of it.
Then maybe in 6 months time Madeleine was found and it was her in the photo… wouldn’t everyone be shouting… ‘why didn’t she say something at the time?’
Better to be safe than sorry, surely?
September 26th, 2007 at 11:31 am
i personally think whoever supplied the picture should be questioned as to their intentions.
whilst examining the image I noticed that at 200 meters the girl in orange is almost equidistant from the woman carrying the girl, yet the girl in orange is fairly well defined as oppossed to the grainy, almost sillhouette veiw of the woman carrying the child.
http://bullmonkey.co.uk/fund/
September 26th, 2007 at 11:30 am
204. jon - SHAME SHAME SHAME ON YOU. YOU HAVE ADDED TO MADELEINES MISERY IN A DELIBERATE CALCULATED AND MALICIOUS WAY
The only deliberately calculating malicious people are the McCanns and their friends.
Added to her misery? That person carrying the baby in the photo is a caring, responsible parent - more than I can say for the mCons who would have let the baby walk or got someone else to carry it!!!!
A dictators criminal lawyer and a PR man that reported closely on the Fred West case and on other family killers cases and friends that also abandon their children to go on the razzle - they surround themselves with the best people don’t they!
September 26th, 2007 at 11:30 am
slan leat millisoreja.
September 26th, 2007 at 11:29 am
adeus amigos, eu tenho que fazer algum dinheiro.
September 26th, 2007 at 11:28 am
220
this is why we are somewhat biased
__________________________________________________________________
Gerry and Kate McCann have always believed the Morocco sightings were vital,” a friend said. “Kate said her instinct from the start has been that Madeleine was smuggled into North Africa.”
WHY?
is her real father a morrocon gang leader?
September 26th, 2007 at 11:27 am
217 - Jon. Do you think comments like ‘judge dread and his motley crew a swill of crap’ are forwarding the hunt for Madeleine? Can you stop getting personal and instead let you arguments/points stand on their own merit. The slagging is very boring.
September 26th, 2007 at 11:26 am
Jon - the problem is as such - if and when Maddie is found - if she is alive then they will be “forgiven” - because Mddie now needs her loving parents love to get through the trauma of the abduction. If she is found dead, then all sympathies will be with the family and nothing will still be done. So where do we stand. Is child negligence now an “permitted crime”
September 26th, 2007 at 11:26 am
215
You Jon seem incapable of believing that the parents had anything to do with Madeleine’s disappearance.
YOU seem to think that the name MCCANN is synomynous with WHITE AS THE VIRGIN SNOW.
YOU think that the Mccann’s can do no wrong and EVERYBODY ELSE INCLUDING THE POLICE ARE WRONG……except YOU.
AND IF YOU THINK FOR ONE MOMENT, THAT A BRITISH FORUM CAN “PUSH” THE PORTUGUESE POLICE INTO A MURDER INVESTIGATION, YOU NEED SERIOUS TREATMENT OF THE PSYCHIATRIC KIND!
I don’t know what kind of dog on the street you think are, saying it is obvious they didn’t do it - really? Where is the proof of this?
OH YES, TO THE PERSON WHO SAID THAT THEY WOULD NEED TO BE SOCIOPATHS TO HAVE DONE ANYTHING TO MADELEINE:
They have proven that they are, in the least, amoral, as their stance is that they did nothing wrong leaving those BABIES alone for 6 nights in a row!
September 26th, 2007 at 11:26 am
Answer from a travel Forum (way back in 2005)
“Rabat is a city very used to westerners and Americans, so whether brown-haired and brown-eyed or blond-haired and blue-eyed you and your child are not going to stick out as much as you may think. There are even blond-haired blue-eyed Moroccans! Moroccans are familiar with westerners. Afterall, you can see Europe from Morocco, and every Moroccan family has at least one member who is living in or has lived in Europe .”
September 26th, 2007 at 11:25 am
217 - LOL there is no such collective name for crap. Goes to show how childish you really are.
September 26th, 2007 at 11:25 am
Look - it could be Madeleine - or maybe just someone elses 22 month old child!
http://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2007/09/07/princess-leonor/
See how ridiculous it seems to pick out every blonde haired child abroad?
Fair enough a photo of the child with the same eye mark - otherwise - pah!
September 26th, 2007 at 11:24 am
204 - Jon. I agree with you - the focus should be on finding Madeleine. (Actually I think you will probably not be able to find one single person on this sight who would not agree with that, by the way!).
So, what should the PJ do?
There are statistics to show that in most missing children cases it is someone very close to the child who is responsible for the disapppearance. (Don’t have the link to hand, someone posted in a couple of days ago). It is therefore both logical and fair that the PJ investigate the McCanns. If I were innocent and in their shoes I would be begging the PJ to ask me anything they want, search anything they want etc. if it helped move the case forward and shine the spot-light once again on the search for my little girl.
But the McCanns are not doing this. I ask simply ‘why not’?. Why do THEY not lead by example and assist the PJ in all ways possible.
My perception of what most posters here are doing is trying to work out what has happened to Madeleine. It is not a blind witch-hunt to hang the McCanns, although that might be your perception - in which case. Ok. We will have to agree to differ.
September 26th, 2007 at 11:24 am
If you enlarge the photo the person carrying “maddie” looks like steve fossett
couldnt resist