
Madeleine McCann: Blonde Child Seen In Morocco
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann.
DAILY MAIL front page: “Could this be Maddie?”
Readers see a picture of a child being carried on a woman’s back - “The intriguing picture being probed by Interpol.”
Pages 10 and 11: “Could this really be Maddie?”
This is the picture of a girl “in the clutches of a group of Moroccans”. The picture was taken four weeks ago near Tangiers by Spaniard Clara Torres.
DAILY MIRROR front page: “MADDY IN MOROCCO?”
Readers see the same picture. The Full “astonishing story” is on pages 4 and 5.
Pages 4 and 5: “COULD IT BE?” Less the full story than another question.
“GERRY: I KNOW WE WILL BE CLEARED” – Gerry McCann says he and his wife “wanted to be eliminated from the enquiry as quickly as possible”. Some news.
THE SUN front page: “MOROCCO PHOTO SENSATION. IS THIS MADDIE?”
The picture is “sensational”. It has been described as “convincing”, but by whom is not said.
Pages 4 and 5: “GERRY & KATE: IT COULD BE HER – MADDIE PARENTS HOPE AT SIGHTING SENSATION.”
Clara Torres is talking on Spanish radio. She looks at the photo. Says she: “It sent shivers down my spine.”
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “NOW A ‘PHOTO’ OF MADELEINE IN MOROCCO.”
‘Photo’ is placed in quotes lest readers mistake the picture for a ‘SNAP’ or a ‘SHOT’.
Spanish Government official Jose Herrero Arcas says: “The National Police received a photograph by email taken by a young Spanish couple who believe it shows Madeleine McCann. The quality of the photograph is not very clear and it was taken from around 200 metres away. However, the National Police are taking the claim seriously enough to have sent it on to their colleagues at Interpol. I cannot give any more information than that.”
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE – AMAZING PHOTO IN MOROCCO.”
Pages 4 and 5: “MADDIE SEEN IN MOROCCO – Bombshell new photo is probed by Interpol.”
THE TIMES front page: “Police start investigation into ‘picture in Morocco of Madeleine McCann’.”
Page 5: “New photograph shows child like Madeleine on African woman’s back.”
A source close to the McCanns tells one and all: “The McCanns are not going to get their hopes up until the photograph has been sent for forensic examination.” And, dare it be said, a DNA test.
DAILY TELEGRAPH front page: “Is this Madeleine in Morocco?” The search for the missing child has taken a “dramatic turn”.
Page 9: “Gerry McCann is “confident” he and his wife will be cleared. A source tells us: “It is very unlikely that British police would question the McCanns on behalf of the Portuguese now.”
Robert Murat responds to claims by nanny Charlotte Pennington that on the night of Madeleine’s disappearance he was by the McCann family apartment: “I certainly was not there that night. At no point was I there.”
THE GUARDIAN & THE INDEPENDENT no Maddy news today.
Posted: 26th, September 2007 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,153) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





September 26th, 2007 at 12:56 pm
african’s be it in the south or northern africa, childrens hair is kept relatively short, because of heat and dust etc. they are normally protected from the sun too, hence the covering on the adults in the pic. this child being carried clearly has long hair and of light colouring, just a thought
September 26th, 2007 at 12:53 pm
328
interesting.
i liked
‘if they took care of their children as well as their PR they certainly wouldnt be where they are now.)’
September 26th, 2007 at 12:53 pm
Dont really like the terms pro or anti. They indicate a deliberate ‘emotional’ bias.
Maybe we should use for or against. Maybe thats worse.
And maybe I’ll get me coat….
September 26th, 2007 at 12:52 pm
mod … where is the priest then, has he reappeared, i must have missed that one, and if he has .. where had he been..just asking
September 26th, 2007 at 12:49 pm
testing, testing
September 26th, 2007 at 12:44 pm
i thought a berber was a carpet.
September 26th, 2007 at 12:42 pm
Anorak not pro or anti - this is the a story of missing child blown up by the press.
September 26th, 2007 at 12:41 pm
Its a light haired Berber child, its normal, they look like that, end of story.
September 26th, 2007 at 12:39 pm
327 that is rubbish
she was warned she would be deleted if she didnt stop with the personal abuse to anti mc cann posters.
i was there.
September 26th, 2007 at 12:37 pm
309 jon
You stated that the police tried framed ther McCanns. Not only is that obviously not a fact, it is clear that you do not address this from an impartial perspective.
Lets take your pathetic comment one step further and give me an answer that makes sense because every time I give pro McCanners an opportunity I’m either ignored or their answer cherry picks selective pieces which only serve to promote their ‘trusting mindset’ theories and dont address what I said in the first place. Here goes jonny boy….
If your child had gone missing and you were innocent of involvement would the thought enter your head (as it did with Kate) to declare ‘frame’ BEFORE YOU WERE EVEN INTERVIEWED?
Now Kate and Gerry have been interviewed we would expect surely that they are now EVEN MORE CONVINCED (given the line of questioning) its a frame. And yet. And yet. And yet…. all talk of frame has gone hasnt it?
If Kate’s claim of frame were a genuine cry of innocence then they would be spouting it from the rooftops even more now, wouldnt they?
But of course, if it were the panic response of someone guilty of hiding something then we could expect that on reflection of what they’re dealing with and the studied advice they’ve received, they know that an accusation of frame is a complete non starter and would only lead to suspicion.
I’m sure they hope everyone has forgotten this episode. I haven’t and its yet another clear indication (though not proof alone) that they know something we dont.
But I’m sure you’ll disagree somehow…..
September 26th, 2007 at 12:36 pm
327 get it right! Krissie was pro-McCann……….
——————-
Mods and Admin
Krissie was just noisy
Strangely though the pro McCann camp had faded away, but seems to be making a come back.
But whatever is going on at least everyone is pro Madeleine.
But there is still a heavy loading towards on the fence and anti’s which isn’t really good for debate, gossip yes, but not debate. But it would be more effective if the ‘pro’ camp could use less emotion and more fact to back their points
September 26th, 2007 at 12:35 pm
80 Jon……………….
Please turn your caps off…we are not deaf and do please stop insulting everyone on forum.Your own view is on more or no less valid than anyone else.There is no need to shout at everybody who disagrees with you.I doubt PJ have time to read this or any other forum.
September 26th, 2007 at 12:33 pm
What do you guys make of this:
http://functionpix.com/index.php/article/Kate_ampGerry_McCann_to_face_fresh_questions/1608/
September 26th, 2007 at 12:33 pm
321. Moderation - we know this is not the anti-mccann forum - last night Krissie made posts, lost the argument then all her previous postings mysteriously got deleted!!!!!!
Proof that it is definately a pro-mccann mods and admin forum!!!!! p- since only a moderator would be able to do that so quickly!
September 26th, 2007 at 12:32 pm
320 spindoctors. The priest was never missing!!
September 26th, 2007 at 12:31 pm
322 - ty spindoctors. I will get on with the gardening in that case. TTFN.
September 26th, 2007 at 12:31 pm
(320) Spindoctors
“they will be here all day!”
Maybe only until 5 o’clock when their working day ends!
Anyway, I shall get on with my work and have another look later.
September 26th, 2007 at 12:31 pm
bulldump 316 quote of the week without doubt.
September 26th, 2007 at 12:30 pm
319. Puzzled - okay last post - the lie detector test is NOT something the Portugal police use and the PR MCcanns know this!!! It was an empty promise designed by PR McCann to fool people into trusting them!
Ask them to do a lie detector test in Britain and watch the excuses -
I am sure they can get a doctors note to back out of it……LOL
September 26th, 2007 at 12:30 pm
Once again anyone who doesn’t follow the party line is being verbally abused.
What happened to the ‘free speech’ that allows us all to post our views? This forum is becoming more like a military junta every day!
But I’m hanging in there and rising above it all and I hope the rest of the non-believers do as well.
Firstar asked a question I responded (very politely and factually) and he didn’t like it because I answered it instead of one of his cyber honchos!
Life on Anorak!
This isn’t the anti-mcCann forum don’t you know!!
September 26th, 2007 at 12:28 pm
Well that’s all folks!
Gosh the McCann PR team are paying a lot of money to try to win people over in here - you can tell which ones are the PR Team - they will be here all day!
What happened to the Priest?
Has he gone crazy knowing the things he does and being unable to tell anyone about it?
Maybe he’s living with Hedi McCann and an old man on a mountain with goats and doesn’t even know people are searching for him!
September 26th, 2007 at 12:27 pm
The McCanns have said they will take a lie detector test (source Clarence Mitchell with the proviso that the PJ requested it). This, presumably, is to reassure people that they are telling the truth and have nothing to hide.
Why not then just answer the PJs questions???????????????????? and let us all get on with the gardening!!!!!!!!!!
September 26th, 2007 at 12:26 pm
317
I have work to do, and I am not going to waste my lunch hour on this!
BBL
September 26th, 2007 at 12:22 pm
SSS we are only born with so many breaths, dont waste them on here, save them for when the grown ups come out to play
September 26th, 2007 at 12:22 pm
any new witnesses after 4 months should be told to go away and punched in the face really hard
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=483792&in_page_id=1770
September 26th, 2007 at 12:19 pm
300
My goodness, you really are juvenile.
I can’t be bothered with you anymore to be honest.
September 26th, 2007 at 12:19 pm
ben, as i have before, i have been using photshop for nealy 20 years, in h late nineties i work for alien skin and have 3 commercially availabe plug ins, the dress is white and striped which would offer enormous luminance.
September 26th, 2007 at 12:19 pm
jon - Madeleine is missing. - Yes she is!
There has been no body.
- The parents said ‘come on then find the body!’ which made people suspicious as it sounded like a gauntlet being thrown and made the police think the body was disposed of by dumping at sea or inceinerated.
The investigation wasted much valuable time in trying to frame the parents.
- Who framed the parents? Was it the British sniffer dogs or was it the British top DNA scientists? Or was it the Portugal police that framed them? How exactly do you frame someone for murder when a child could turn up at any day?
and before I have the usual emmotive wails of neglect=child abuse This was a form of child abuse but it was not murder and the evidence to support murder is unsustainable to such an extent that the judge refused to recall the MCs back to Protugal.
- No jon the judge realised that the McCanns said they would NOT ANSWER any more questions put to them by the police - they had already refused to answer over 40 questions between them - they were remaining silent - but I am sure the friends may not be quite so silent when they get called in!!!!
The baying mob is still crying for the police to spend time getting a murder conviction at best, a child neglect conviction at worst.
- What baying mob? the baying mob who gave money to a fund to find a missing child? The baying mob who waited for some remorse to be shown? The baying mob who would have forgiven them if they had confessed?
This couple are SUSPECTED of KILLING their child and are PROVEN to have NEGLECTED their children- yet still have custody of 2 children!
When Madeleine is still unfound and resources until she is are being wasted as the media is frenzied to satiate the mobs and the PJ have been influenced
- eh? I cannot answer that as it is babble!
September 26th, 2007 at 12:18 pm
307:
Jon – is there any evidence that the PJ actually told her that? “The PJ are reported as having said”….reported by whom? Is this Spanish woman a reliable witness? We don’t know that. Just look at the McCanns and their friends – look how many times they have changed their stories. And I believe that the police would simply say: “Thank you for the photograph, have a nice day”, because normally they keep all information to themselves.
September 26th, 2007 at 12:17 pm
Sorry Claire……for picking on you..
………I just had to do it! lol lol