
Madeleine McCann: The Nanny Suspect, Amaral Policing And Jail
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann.
SUNDAY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE MYSTERY. BRING IT ON.”
The Sunday Express is not the Express, which has form some weeks led with the front-page banner “MADELEINE”. The Sundays Express goes its own way.
“McCanns remain defiant as they face 40 questions from UK police this week”
“Kate and Gerry’s fury as new sighting in Morocco by businessman is ignored”
SUNDAY MIRROR front page: “MADDIE HUNT: THE TRUTH.”
The truth… At last…
“DISGRACE.”
A picture of Madeleine McCann (on the right). A picture of Portuguese copper Goncarlo Amaral (left).
“Police have ignored 250 sightings of her” – and have investigated how many?
“Cop leading police probe works four hours a day” – Amaral’s not overworked and fresh.
“He has three-hour boozy lunches with pals” – Amaral holds lengthy meetings to discuss and masticate over the case with team.
“Puffing on a cigarette and knocking back beers, the man leading the world’s biggest missing child inquiry enjoys yet another long, boozy lunch.”
Good to know that the Mirror is not wasting its time and watching him.
STAR ON SUNDAY: “THREATS TO McCANNS.”
“Friends say the couple are ‘extremely concerned’ by the nature of the threats and are considering hiring extra security.
Last night a spokeswoman for the McCanns, both 39, confirmed that they had been sent what she described as ‘negative letters and fear mail’.”
INDEPENDENT: “Maddie ‘kidnapped by maid’, says email.”
“The McCanns’ spokesman, Clarence Mitchell, said they were ‘encouraged’ by the development.”
SUNDAY TELEGRAPH: Kate McCann will risk jail to find Madeleine
Kate McCann has been told by her legal team that she faces jail sentence if she flouts Portuguese law to discuss details of the four-year-old’s disappearance in a high-profile television interview.
She tells a “close friend”: “I will do what I must. What does any of it matter if it helps find Madeleine?”
“It is what Kate thinks will help,” a close friend tells the paper. “What choice does she have? Unless Kate and Gerry ignore the law and speak out, their chances of finding Madeleine will dwindle further. Better to risk prison if it helps find her.
“Will the Portuguese police really prosecute a mother whose sole aim is to find her daughter or at least, God forbid, discover the whereabouts of her body? Kate, most of all, believes risking a jail sentence is nothing compared to finding Madeleine.”
Who needs an interview with Kate with friends like that?
THE OBSERVER: “This limbo that lasts a lifetime,” writes Carol Sarler.
“The McCanns are said to be devastated by dashed hopes; if so, they must get used to it, for there will be more sightings, more dashing and, to add to their misery, more harassment of more innocent families. I know this because, having investigated the disappearance of Ben Needham on Kos in 1991, the unfolding of the McCann case has felt like one long, wretched, groundhog summer.
“Ben, recapped in a nutshell: his grandparents, Eddie and Chris Needham, moved from Sheffield to Kos with their teenage son Stephen, daughter Kerry and her boyfriend and their son, Ben…
“…The singular difference between the Needhams and the McCanns is, crudely, class. Eddie has homemade tattoos on his knuckles, Chris was a grandmother at 38, Kerry and her boyfriend - a man known, as they say, to the police - lived in a council block. Perhaps this explains why, throughout their ordeal, nobody from the British consulate in Athens once got off their butt or went to Kos to help or support; surgeon Gerry McCann, by contrast, mobilised the world.”
“Arabic adverts aid Madeleine hunt”… “Despite the disappointment of last week’s misleading sighting of a blonde girl in the Moroccan town of Zaio, the McCanns believe that their daughter might be somewhere in the country.”
TIMES: No Madeleine news today.
Posted: 30th, September 2007 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,108) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





September 30th, 2007 at 7:48 pm
577 its back again snore snore snore
September 30th, 2007 at 7:48 pm
Someone post the news report…. not covered here!
September 30th, 2007 at 7:47 pm
573 Give it time. Someone on here will produce 15 reasons why the McCanns pushed her down the steps. I’m afraid that some people on here want a conviction at any price.
September 30th, 2007 at 7:45 pm
554 Mr Angry
This is not a gay website and I will comment all I like, It seems you like Mr Arse A little to much for my liking, his comments were ludicrous if he dose not agree with the web site what is he doing on there in the first place
September 30th, 2007 at 7:42 pm
End of part one.
So we now know Sky were not called before the police. A friend called Sky Breakfast Time at 7am the following morning.
September 30th, 2007 at 7:42 pm
Every breath you take:
and did you know that baby polar bears learn very young to cover their noses with their paws because the black nose can be spotted by predators??
September 30th, 2007 at 7:42 pm
564, Ian the judge is not convinced. Think it through.
And regarding my academic background, it’s really irrelevant. That comment did however make me smile.
I have been posing on here and have suggested what I think may have happened and what I beleive hasn’t happened on a regular basis.
And regarding you comment that I only get my information from the press, the anti-McCanns have been ready to hang the McCanns recently based on 40 questions.
Who first told the world that the 40 questions exist??
I agree that it is naive to form opinions based on press reports. Team Anti-McCann does it often.
September 30th, 2007 at 7:37 pm
558 - hey, did you know camels only pee every three days?
Sorry, it’s that animal thing in me again. Drives me simply crazy!!
Speaking of which…..
“Lark, I hear a bark”.
September 30th, 2007 at 7:37 pm
But if Madeleine fell down the stairs and died, we have no motive for the ensuing COVER UP.
September 30th, 2007 at 7:37 pm
509. Ian Says:
September 30th, 2007 at 7:02 pm
499, Maria,
Calm down. There is nothing wrong with following a hypothesis. It is not ludicrous to suggest that a child who should not be left alone in apartment, but was, headed toward light and sound. If there were stairs there, it is not ludicrous to suggest she could have fallen down them.
If you simply will not accept anything which might not be flattering to these parents who clearly did not put their children before their own ‘fun’ then I suggest you go somewhere else. Like MSN.
************************************
Well said Ian.
I’ve wondered for some time if no one here, as a child, ever woke up to find their parents GONE?
I know of one time when I was 3 years old. We lived in an old farmhouse in a rural area. I woke up for some reason and discovered my parents weren’t home. I started crying and walked outside looking for them but got frightened from the shadows of the trees dancing in the star and moonlight. I began calling for them aloud and then went back inside and stood on a chair in the living room and yelled “Mommy, Daddy!” through a window facing the street.
I did this for quite some time before my parents heard me. They had been at our neighbors’ house which was several yards away (this was real country and we had over 50 acres the homes were very widely spaced).
My parents immediately came home and my mother was mad because I guess I spoiled her good time. Then when she saw the footsies of my pajamas caked with dirt and debris she got really angry realising I had walked about outside and could have been hit by a car or wondered further away from the house and gotten lost without them knowing anything.
It is completely and utterly fantastic how the McCanns have insisted she could not have opened the door and simply walked out. It is equally fantastic and ludricous for anyone with a brain in their head to not see what a weak claim that is - especially considering the source.
September 30th, 2007 at 7:37 pm
561 Missmatch. I dont get your point.
So you are rejecting any theory that she fells and the Mccanns decided that a dead baby is probably not a good advert for your role as a doctor?
So you think that a head injury cannot cause death, it has to be a broken neck?
So having your brains spilled out on a stone step couldnt kill you?
What exactly are you saying? DO you think the Mccanns are innocent of neglect innocent of illegal disposal of a body or innocent of anything at all?
September 30th, 2007 at 7:36 pm
Yes she could have easily been knocked unconscious by the fall or maybe she did break her neck and was killed instantly. Who knows how long she would have been there?
Anyway according to leaks…
Blood on stairs
Blood in apartment
Death Scent in car
DNA in car from dead body that had been drugged.
The leaks from the McC’s are becoming more ‘ludicrous’ as each one is released. “I haul rotting meat off to the dump” and “I saw 6 dead people the week before my holiday” and “We didn’t want to leave them with the strangers” the very strangers that had been watching them everyday…
While the leaks from the PJ are adding just one more piece of the puzzle and with each release the picture becomes more clear.
Of course it is all speculation.
My money is still on dogs though.
September 30th, 2007 at 7:36 pm
564 oooohhh get you whooos a clever boy then
September 30th, 2007 at 7:36 pm
Portia 565
Thanks for that, I’ve been wasting time looking for links and wondering if I’d imagined it. I wonder why its surfaced again now?
September 30th, 2007 at 7:35 pm
If the M’s did dispose of her body does anyone knw where it might be.
September 30th, 2007 at 7:34 pm
550 Atropia Yes there are not one but TWO new “leaked to the press” theories today (this was after a slow week, during which only ONE new theory — the transport of Maddie’s body on August 3 to Huelva Spain by G & K… NOte: Spanish policE OFFICIALLY deny PJ is actually investigating this lead at all).
New theory #1 (leaked to Portugese Press): Maddie was taken by an angry former maid, who had been recently fired by Mark Warner, who took Madeleine in “revenge” for being fired. Leaked information says PJ very excited about this new lead and they received information with “identifying details” regarding this maid.
New theory #2 Maddie fell down the stairs and died, her death was covered up.
We could probably go much farther, make a list of 200 theories at least. I’d also add the theory about organ donation — she was stolen for her organs.
Funny enough, not a single one of these theories has any real evidence to back it up (at least, no evidence that WE actually know about). Go figure!
————————–
Mods and Admin
Krissie, whilst there are no firm facts, on this board they SPECULATE. It is allowed. Once the true story is out then its time to be precise, but until then they speculate, even without your permission
September 30th, 2007 at 7:34 pm
538 - “Who gives a f^*$ who you are. You’re an arrogant narcissistic hypocrit whose pedantic vitriolic voice is typically attached to a lonely person with delusions of grandeur who hasn’t been laid in a very long time.”
Ooops! - is this true??!! On second thought, maybe I won’t splurge on the book.
LOL
September 30th, 2007 at 7:33 pm
The falling down the stairs leak corresponds to a previous leak, back in late August, that some of the police evidence includes blood found on the outside apartment wall.
September 30th, 2007 at 7:32 pm
551 Simon - take your own advice.
Where do you get evidence he isnt convinced? If he thought they were off track he would have removed the Mccanns status of ’suspects’. He has not.
I didnt say he had chucked out the case - I was rebutting your views as they indicated you did not understand the inquisatorial justice system - I repeat that.
You obviously only read the press and have no academic background.
He must have supported their evidence so far, but wants more. We can all repeat what the press say, how about you put forward a hypothesis rather than reject hypotheses being investigated?
September 30th, 2007 at 7:32 pm
549 starsky.
well mr constructive himself why do you practice what you preach . and what on earth are you doing here ya knob.
September 30th, 2007 at 7:32 pm
559
Blimey case solved.
September 30th, 2007 at 7:30 pm
545 Ian - I did state that a head injury itself is not immediately fatal. I also stated that if there is an accompanying broken neck, then that can be fatal. You are right in that it is possible that she fell and died immediately. This would be due to a broken neck.
Toxicology screens are not routinely carried out on children with head injuries, nor are they routinely carried out during a postmortem, especially is there is an obvious cause of death such as massive head or neck trauma.
September 30th, 2007 at 7:30 pm
545 Ian
[Quote]
But in the end, the only really important point is that the Mccanns failed in their duty of care.
[End quote]
An incredible post!
A 4 year old is missing and your position is that the only really important point is the McCanns failed in their duty of care!!
Don’t you beleive the fact that a little girl is missing could be an important point too. The most important point even?
September 30th, 2007 at 7:29 pm
Maria, 437, I LOVE your list, it is very excellent!! I could add another 39 but I swear, I really don’t have time for this craziness. Still, I think you missed several VERY important theories, so I’ll add a couple:
40. The McCanns were “swingers” with other members of the Tapas 9, which proves their low moral character and also gives the friends a motive to help in the cover-up of the murder of their daughter. This proves their guilt.
41. Kate couldn’t handle Madeleine, who had CHARGE syndrome, and so killed her, chopped her into bits, and put her in the freezer to save the body. She hid this even from Gerry, and later transported Madeleine’s body to an unknown location in a suitcase in the boot of the car.
September 30th, 2007 at 7:28 pm
feeling neglected all the higfh profile people have been targedted but me,
what have they got to offer that i have not, its not true that us arabs demand a fortune for our services.
Sniffer camels available on request
September 30th, 2007 at 7:28 pm
Ian, I have never used another ID! never never never!!
Anonymous…. now now. calm down and remember Mister manners is watching you.
September 30th, 2007 at 7:27 pm
554
Me too!
September 30th, 2007 at 7:27 pm
fartstar have you come out the other side you . no wonder you talk so much crap you constantly talk through your arse. god your sad to expect some kind of priveliges just because you registered. you are obviously a narsasistic knob
September 30th, 2007 at 7:27 pm
549
Would you keep your comments to yourself. I quite like ARSE.
September 30th, 2007 at 7:26 pm
544 - spot on.
So I think the Mccanns ought to be charged with neglect at least.