<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Banksy Gets Painted Over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/177102/twitterings/banksy-gets-painted-over.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/177102/twitterings/banksy-gets-painted-over.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/177102/twitterings/banksy-gets-painted-over.html/comment-page-1#comment-92572</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/177102.html#comment-92572</guid>
		<description>No books required, intellect is as intellect does. Nobody mentioned beauty. Only you.
My post still stands! Perception is a personal thing, based on experience and shall we say Corruption. Some call it "education"

In all fairness even Banksey himself calls his work shit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No books required, intellect is as intellect does. Nobody mentioned beauty. Only you.<br />
My post still stands! Perception is a personal thing, based on experience and shall we say Corruption. Some call it &#8220;education&#8221;</p>
<p>In all fairness even Banksey himself calls his work shit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/177102/twitterings/banksy-gets-painted-over.html/comment-page-1#comment-92568</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/177102.html#comment-92568</guid>
		<description>could the 'onorouble gentlman please refer to my previous reply after swallowing his apparently seldom used thesaurus.

cuz... it ain't in the eye of the beholder at all... art isn't beauty, beauty isn't art! the two are often mutually exclusive in fact. by necessity. :D

haywain haywaen heywain

see? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>could the &#8216;onorouble gentlman please refer to my previous reply after swallowing his apparently seldom used thesaurus.</p>
<p>cuz&#8230; it ain&#8217;t in the eye of the beholder at all&#8230; art isn&#8217;t beauty, beauty isn&#8217;t art! the two are often mutually exclusive in fact. by necessity. <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>haywain haywaen heywain</p>
<p>see? <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/177102/twitterings/banksy-gets-painted-over.html/comment-page-1#comment-91937</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/177102.html#comment-91937</guid>
		<description>How can anyone quantify abstraction or the beholders perception of matters comprising this googleplex of variables within the subject/s?

He says tomato, she says tomáto, tomáto, ,tomao, tomáto....

Hmmmm food</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can anyone quantify abstraction or the beholders perception of matters comprising this googleplex of variables within the subject/s?</p>
<p>He says tomato, she says tomáto, tomáto, ,tomao, tomáto&#8230;.</p>
<p>Hmmmm food</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/177102/twitterings/banksy-gets-painted-over.html/comment-page-1#comment-91803</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/177102.html#comment-91803</guid>
		<description>and you side stepped a reply by contriving a non response. fabulous. i thought at least you would raise the level by saying 'a child of five could do it' :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and you side stepped a reply by contriving a non response. fabulous. i thought at least you would raise the level by saying &#8216;a child of five could do it&#8217; <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/177102/twitterings/banksy-gets-painted-over.html/comment-page-1#comment-91522</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/177102.html#comment-91522</guid>
		<description>You haven't tasted my Wife's cooking obviously. (you walked right in to that one)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You haven&#8217;t tasted my Wife&#8217;s cooking obviously. (you walked right in to that one)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/177102/twitterings/banksy-gets-painted-over.html/comment-page-1#comment-91097</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/177102.html#comment-91097</guid>
		<description>and of course, it *would* be. being myself a practicing (arf) 'traditional' artist, it always amuses me to read slightly vehement critiques of modern art by people who have no understanding of what 'art' is. i bet you just LOVE an unmade bed, don't ya? ;)

if i declare it art then it goddam well IS art. if you throw the dinner against the wall- is it the dinner hitting the wall that makes it art? is it the actual substance and the patterns it makes that make it art? or is it the act of throwing that is the art bit?

or maybe you just like a nice Haywain. erk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and of course, it *would* be. being myself a practicing (arf) &#8216;traditional&#8217; artist, it always amuses me to read slightly vehement critiques of modern art by people who have no understanding of what &#8216;art&#8217; is. i bet you just LOVE an unmade bed, don&#8217;t ya? <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>if i declare it art then it goddam well IS art. if you throw the dinner against the wall- is it the dinner hitting the wall that makes it art? is it the actual substance and the patterns it makes that make it art? or is it the act of throwing that is the art bit?</p>
<p>or maybe you just like a nice Haywain. erk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/177102/twitterings/banksy-gets-painted-over.html/comment-page-1#comment-90787</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/177102.html#comment-90787</guid>
		<description>You could throw your dinner against the wall and some stupid moron would say it's art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could throw your dinner against the wall and some stupid moron would say it&#8217;s art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
