
Madeleine McCann: Kate McCann Sobs, Gerry McCann Points And 14 Questions
MADDY WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MIRROR front page: “KATE’S TORMENT – ‘I think she is being held by someone in their house..as Madeleine’s mummy I feel in my heart she’s out there’”
“Distraught” Kate McCann is on Spanish TV. She is being interviewed. Says she: “I don’t know how anyone could harm anyone as beautiful as Madeleine”
Pages 4 and 5: “TEARS OF KATE – After six months of holding her heartbreak in check..Madeleine’s mum breaks down on TV”
Three pictures of Kate McCann:
“SO EMPTY: Kate tries to explain her loss on TV”
“TOO MUCH: She can’t hold back the tears”
“SOBBING: Kate and Gerry on TV”
“14 questions Portuguese police are flying to Britain to out to the McCanns and friends” – So reports Portuguese newspaper 24 Horas. Why would the police publish the questions and allow the McCanns and their friends to prepare answers? Why only – or as many as - 14 questions? Unless these are questions made up by the media, questions the police are “expected” to ask…
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE – POLICE WANT ANSWERS TO 14 QUESTIONS. What detectives demand to know”
Pages 4 and 5: “Kate breaks down during TV grilling.” Kate and Gerry McCann are on the telly. Says Kate: “I feel sad and I feel lonely and our life is not as happy without Madeleine…we want people to try to reunite us with your beautiful girl”
And: “We know the truth. We know we are totally innocent. That is why we are calm. We know each other”
Says a “British detective”: “The detectives could be giving the suspects enough rope to hang themselves. It is a common tactic in police investigations to let those under suspicion speak on television in case they trip themselves up”
THE SUN front page: “KATE WEEPS FOR MADDIE – I feel in my heart she is out there”
“Distraught” Kate on the telly. Kate and Gerry are publicising a telephone hotline. No, not 999, their own number
Pages 4 and 5: “MADDIE NEEDS US – So lonely without our lovely girl, sobs Kate”
Three pictures of “Precious..the happy Maddie her mum longs to see”
Three pictures of the McCanns:
“Anguish…Gerry faces TV quiz”
“Ordeal…Kate fights back tears”
“Brave…but the McCanns struggle with their emotions as they relive the night Maddie vanished”
The hotline. Says Kate McCann: “We want to appeal to the people of Spain, Portugal and North Africa to help us and to tell them we have a new central phone number for them to call”
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE MUM FINALLY CRACKS – Suspect Kate sobs on TV as she is quizzed”
Pages 8 and 9: “MADDIE’S MUM TV BREAKDOWN – Torment as Kate’s sobs halt interview four times”. Spanish TV journalist Roberto Arce sees Kate “prostrate with pain”
The McCanns hotline number is 00 34 902 300 213
DAILY MAIL pages 8 and 9: “I’M SAD AND LONELY…LIFE IS NOT HAPPY”
Says Mrs McCann: “Somebody knows something. It is not about us. It is about Madeleine.” Is it? We are watching the parents
Gerry McCanns is a “consultant cardiologist”. He says: “We have not been charged with anything”
“Will they find her in Spain?” – Gerry McCann tells El Mundo newspaper (Spain): “The possibility that Madeleine is alive and in Spain is real…If someone had a car, it is clear they could cross into Spain. There is no border guard and no one closed the border the night Madeleine disappeared.” And we look again at the police
THE TIMES page 3: “Sobbing Kate McCann insists that Madeleine is alive and being held”
“Days of hope and despair” – The Times looks at some key dates: June 21 (Madeleine in Malta); August 3 (Madeleine in Belgium); August 23 (Madeleine in Morocco)
DAILY TELEGRAPH front page: “’I’M SO SAD AND LONELY’ – KATE McCANN WEEPS FOR MADELEINE ON SPANISH TV”
Page 5: “’Sad, lonely’ Kate weeps for Madeleine in TV interview” – Kate McCann wept “uncontrollably”. Says he:” I feel anxious she is not with us”
THE GUARDIAN page 12: “McCanns set up phone line to seek Madeleine”
THE INDEPENDENT: No Madeleine news today
Posted: 25th, October 2007 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,754) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





October 25th, 2007 at 2:51 pm
It’s raining here!
And Anorak has censored me two times!
All I wanted to say is , after looking the Spanish interview, Mr Mccann is a stone-cold and dangerous b@stard and not a caring father.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:51 pm
637 the third way
Could you please not use the catchphrase ‘The third way is the only way’. It makes me feel the same way as the MC keep repeating ‘it’s aaaaabslotely ludicrous to think we sedated the children.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:51 pm
600 Patch
I totally agree that the McCanns think in a totally different way to most people. They don’t appear to have half a clue about what sounds normal or is normal therefore, despite any efforts by Clarence etc to teach them a few tricks for the TV, they are totally unable to present themselves as caring honest people.
Looking on some other sites this morning, eg Times On-Line, I am totally sickened by the opinions expressed - that the McCanns are compassionate grieving people. I agree that they don’t look too good, but probably with the fear of prison they don’t actually feel like tennis lessons any more. I wonder how the jogging’s going.
If I was Clarence, I think I would begin some damage limitation on myself straightaway, namely by getting out before getting dragged further down. He’s probably regretting changing career by now. Oh, for the good old days with the BBC!!!
I’m beginning to feel bad about my own feelings towards them - they just give bad vibes. I think it began when they started SELLING wristbands so we could help them in their ?search.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:48 pm
Pat the twat/professional profiler, Ade and Stevo…….
You’re going to have to fight for the post because it’s a close call.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:48 pm
627 bapsy76
Clarkeson wanted to find some links to the actual waste dump in Praia da Luz and didn’t know the best way to find it.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:48 pm
430
Thea
I hadn’t heard that Gerry said that before. My faith was unsettled when Kate was taken into questioning. Gerry said on his blog that Kate was there a long time, but that she was not there longer than him on previous occasions. Next day Kate was declared a suspect. Either they don’t talk to each other, or gerry was trying to show the public something of a good image but not the real situation. Since then I have not trusted him.
It was nice talking with you to.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:47 pm
Next mission for Comical Clarrie (aka The Facilitator)……
“I’m a Celebrity….Get me out of here……!”
October 25th, 2007 at 2:47 pm
623 Third Way.
Comments made by GM upset your theory that people wouldn’t help him for money or otherwise. GM’s exact words were, “it was time to call in some favors.”
Even if only a fatal accident and sedation were involved, the children would have been taken away from the McCann’s. There is no question about this. Had they been truthful, it would probably be behind then by now. That is, unless the autopsy showed sexual abuse.
The desire to keep their family intact is what I think is driving them on. Somewhere along the way truth was sacrificed for family and as Catholics, they should know that truth comes before family.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:47 pm
598, Ian,
I don’t think abduction was mentioned in the latest interview.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:47 pm
637 Third Way
But it’s not a real “way” is it? At best it’s a kind of pseudo theory but is totally incomplete without any motives or explanation. Isn’t it in cloud cuckoo land like the psychic theories and sleepy Brian’s theories?
October 25th, 2007 at 2:45 pm
632 Hideki
If you search for schools in Merseyside you may find the head teacher person and may find a photo. There’s plenty of photos of the “other” Brian Kennedy because he’s a wealthy tycoon.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:44 pm
625 Stevo - The THird Way is the rational and obvious explanation to what happened to Madeleine McCann.
It’s called the Third Way because it does not believe in shortcomings in the police investigation, but it does not believe that the McCanns killed Madeleine either.
The Third Way is based on observed behaviours and confirmed facts (mostly from the few public appearances of the PJs and the many confirmed out-of-the-norm behaviours of the McCanns during interviews, before and after Madeleine’s disappearance).
A cold, distant and unbiased analysis of the data and consideration of probabilities shows that the McCanns unconventional relationships with others in their circle of friends has led to the disappearance of MAdeleine. They know what happened but they cannot say it because that would uncover the unconventional nature of the McCanns relationship with the others in the group. However, the McCanns know what happened, the PJ knows what happened and are only playing with time before someone cracks and everything is out in the open.
This is the Third Way my friends - the only way. Resist not your instincts - the explanation for this case is simple and available to everyone. You seek other explanations because you understand that what really happened is very very very sinister.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:44 pm
588 clarkeson
Is there anything of use in this Portuguese links page?
http://www.portalbusca.com/link.php?n=1204&c=
October 25th, 2007 at 2:44 pm
Hideki
For crying out loud they are two different people. They have appearred on TV. They are not the same. Time to leave it you are now starting to look stupid.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:43 pm
607 ELIMINAÇÃO DE RESÍDUOS Is waste disposal in portugese. What do you mean?
October 25th, 2007 at 2:40 pm
I don’t think anyone apart from the perpetrator is going to get involved in any kind of murder or killing unless they are somehow woven into the situation and are somehow compelled to join in with it.
This is why I can’t see what Murat’s involvement could be if he was a collaborator.
I’ve thought of drugs but even then, if he supplied drugs to the McCanns and/or their friends, why would he get tied in to a body disposal scenario? Anyone would take the drug rap because it would be more lenient than anything involving the death of a child.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:39 pm
CONTINUATION OF THE DOUBLE IDENTITY THEME
BRIAN KENNEDY VERSUS BRIAN KENNEDY
I copied this from the old thread, because IMO the subject has not been adequately addressed. Why is no one able to show us unequivocal and absolute proof that the “wealthy magnate” Brian Kennedy is NOT the ” Kates’ uncle, former headteacher” Brian Kennedy? Is it too difficult to prove this?
1531
jcb Says:
October 25th, 2007 at 12:00 am
1512 - Hideki
“Why is it so hard for you to believe that there are two Brian Kennedy’s?”
Because so far I have seen no proof. And you have not shown any proof either.
“I know for a fact that there are two…”
Fact!!?? Why are you unable to prove it, then?
“… and Maria is perfectly right when she says one is the retired Headmaster and the other is a double glazing millionnaire from Cheshire. ”
I’m rather tired of hearing a differentiation based on “present occumpation” and “past occupation”. Why don’t you provide the precise birth dates and birth places — if these individuals are not the same?
“Are you too lazy to Google it, and see for yourself?”
Hmmmmm… Are you too lazy to back up your own claims by providing documentation of birth dates and birth places? Why can’t you (or anyone else) at least provide links of sources that you think prove the individuals are not the same?
“Or are you just trying to create another doubt in peoples minds, and try to muck stir?”
Hmmmm…. There SHOULD be doubt in people’s minds, because no one has proved that the two Brian Kennedy’s are different people.
Moreover, as I posted before, immediately after the wealthy magnate Brian Kennedy entered the picture, the McCann family member Brian Kennedy (director of the “search” fund” DISAPPEARED from news articles. Previously, Kate’s uncle had been frequently quoted as “a family spokesman”. Now, there is NO MENTION of him. Why?
So… are YOU trying to remove doubt without providing any proof that they are different people? To use your words, are you “too lazy”? Or perhaps no such proof exists?
” I am sure we can find two idiots posting on this forum, we’re half way there, we only have to find another one!!!”
I don’t mind your personal remarks, but as far as I am concerned, YOU are the “idiot” for disparaging others, while claiming that the two Brian Kennedys are the same person, even though you are unable to prove such a simple claim.
Again, (to anyone), where is the proof?
October 25th, 2007 at 2:39 pm
Pat Brown
Co - NPD between a couple exists….
can it apply to a group ?
with a strange fetish or drug missuse connection?
October 25th, 2007 at 2:38 pm
There’s also absolutely no way that any simple relationship of friendship would lead to keeping quiet and possibly assisting in the disposal of a body.
If Madeleine was not abducted (as Third Way apologists believe), she died in the bedroom and her body was later removed.
Either the parents (or one of them) did this alone - unlikely. Or he/she/they relied on someone’s assistance. That assistance cannot have been available for money or friendship. That assistance can only have been available because the consequences of breaking the vow of silence would be damning for everyone involved.
The Third Way is the only Way. Don’t try to circumvent the most obvious way by looking for other explanations. The simple explanation - the third way is the only way.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:38 pm
622. That old vaudevillian trick Harry? The one with velvet boxes, scarves, smoke and mirrors to make Gerry look bigger? Oh I mean the one to make Kate appear voluptuous?
October 25th, 2007 at 2:37 pm
I hope Clarence is reading this shaking his head
whisky in one hand gun in the other
October 25th, 2007 at 2:37 pm
607 ELIMINAÇÃO DE RESÍDUOS Is waste disposal in portugese. What do you mean?
October 25th, 2007 at 2:35 pm
lol harry
October 25th, 2007 at 2:35 pm
623 The Third Way
What the hell is the 3rd way?
October 25th, 2007 at 2:34 pm
620 Pat Brown
I replied to you earlier but the posting numbers have gone awry.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:33 pm
There is absolutely no way that Murat or anyone else in the Tapas group would agree to keep silent about a crime - let alone hide a body - for money. Especially in a relatively short time period (even assuming that MAdeleine died sometime in the afternoon and not in the evening).
There’s only 1 explanation for any individual or group of individuals to agree to a vote of silence and probably assisting in disposal of the body.
That explanation is the Third Way - the only way. You know it makes sense.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:33 pm
The interview did not do the trick then?
October 25th, 2007 at 2:33 pm
581
Chloe Spain Says:
“I cannot believe that nobody has ever suggested they should, themselves, offer a reward. I cannot believe that nobody has ever suggested they should address Madeleine directly on the television. I do not understand why everything they say seems intended to alienate people. Surely they must realise that this is the case, irrespective of their guilt or innocence (which I doubt). Do they feel they’re above taking advice? Or do they deliberately want to make themselves unpopular?”
It all makes perfect sense if their aim is to keep their daughter in the headlines, as if they believe that would be helpful to find her. In this case only no news would be bad news.
It seems not locgial for me to accuse the McCanns doing the whole PR stuff for narcistic reasons, and at the same time to criticise them that their actions are not helpful to reach their alleged objectionable target.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:31 pm
602 Thea
I would say, if the McCanns are guilty, the explanation for the over-the-top media blitz and quickness of it taking off with help of big people in power might be because they had a “Thou protestest too much” disease, or the “Overexplaining” disease, contracted out of fear of exposure. Even though it is counterintuitive to think guilty people would want to draw attention to themselves and keep that attention going, people who are narcissists often don’t recognize that their certain behavioral choices and cover-ups do more damage than good (as far as not getting caught). I think it is the mixture of arrogance (I am smarter than the cops), entitlement, and distorted world view that makes narcissists and psychopaths do stupid stuff like welcome the police to search their car with a rape kit in the trunk or get breast implants with your suspiciously dead husband’s insurance money as soon as it hits your palm. People like this just don’t get what they do raises eyebrows. When they are confronted, they just come up with another explanation that is just as questionable as the first. I asked one serial killer suspect why he threw his brand new jeans away after they got wet from crossing a river because it was getting dark and he was scared of walking down a jogging path(the story he told to explain why he did not take the direct path home which would have intersected him with the murder victim at that very time of day). He actually told me, with a straight face, “I don’t like the way jeans dry when you get them wet.” Huh? Doesn’t he ever wash his clothes? ::shakes head::HE thought it sounded plausible or thought I would buy it; that is a psychopath for you.
October 25th, 2007 at 2:30 pm
616
I agree shame they didnt do that first in portugal when they didnt answer questions