
Madeleine McCann: Kate McCann Sobs, Gerry McCann Points And 14 Questions
MADDY WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MIRROR front page: “KATE’S TORMENT – ‘I think she is being held by someone in their house..as Madeleine’s mummy I feel in my heart she’s out there’”
“Distraught” Kate McCann is on Spanish TV. She is being interviewed. Says she: “I don’t know how anyone could harm anyone as beautiful as Madeleine”
Pages 4 and 5: “TEARS OF KATE – After six months of holding her heartbreak in check..Madeleine’s mum breaks down on TV”
Three pictures of Kate McCann:
“SO EMPTY: Kate tries to explain her loss on TV”
“TOO MUCH: She can’t hold back the tears”
“SOBBING: Kate and Gerry on TV”
“14 questions Portuguese police are flying to Britain to out to the McCanns and friends” – So reports Portuguese newspaper 24 Horas. Why would the police publish the questions and allow the McCanns and their friends to prepare answers? Why only – or as many as - 14 questions? Unless these are questions made up by the media, questions the police are “expected” to ask…
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE – POLICE WANT ANSWERS TO 14 QUESTIONS. What detectives demand to know”
Pages 4 and 5: “Kate breaks down during TV grilling.” Kate and Gerry McCann are on the telly. Says Kate: “I feel sad and I feel lonely and our life is not as happy without Madeleine…we want people to try to reunite us with your beautiful girl”
And: “We know the truth. We know we are totally innocent. That is why we are calm. We know each other”
Says a “British detective”: “The detectives could be giving the suspects enough rope to hang themselves. It is a common tactic in police investigations to let those under suspicion speak on television in case they trip themselves up”
THE SUN front page: “KATE WEEPS FOR MADDIE – I feel in my heart she is out there”
“Distraught” Kate on the telly. Kate and Gerry are publicising a telephone hotline. No, not 999, their own number
Pages 4 and 5: “MADDIE NEEDS US – So lonely without our lovely girl, sobs Kate”
Three pictures of “Precious..the happy Maddie her mum longs to see”
Three pictures of the McCanns:
“Anguish…Gerry faces TV quiz”
“Ordeal…Kate fights back tears”
“Brave…but the McCanns struggle with their emotions as they relive the night Maddie vanished”
The hotline. Says Kate McCann: “We want to appeal to the people of Spain, Portugal and North Africa to help us and to tell them we have a new central phone number for them to call”
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE MUM FINALLY CRACKS – Suspect Kate sobs on TV as she is quizzed”
Pages 8 and 9: “MADDIE’S MUM TV BREAKDOWN – Torment as Kate’s sobs halt interview four times”. Spanish TV journalist Roberto Arce sees Kate “prostrate with pain”
The McCanns hotline number is 00 34 902 300 213
DAILY MAIL pages 8 and 9: “I’M SAD AND LONELY…LIFE IS NOT HAPPY”
Says Mrs McCann: “Somebody knows something. It is not about us. It is about Madeleine.” Is it? We are watching the parents
Gerry McCanns is a “consultant cardiologist”. He says: “We have not been charged with anything”
“Will they find her in Spain?” – Gerry McCann tells El Mundo newspaper (Spain): “The possibility that Madeleine is alive and in Spain is real…If someone had a car, it is clear they could cross into Spain. There is no border guard and no one closed the border the night Madeleine disappeared.” And we look again at the police
THE TIMES page 3: “Sobbing Kate McCann insists that Madeleine is alive and being held”
“Days of hope and despair” – The Times looks at some key dates: June 21 (Madeleine in Malta); August 3 (Madeleine in Belgium); August 23 (Madeleine in Morocco)
DAILY TELEGRAPH front page: “’I’M SO SAD AND LONELY’ – KATE McCANN WEEPS FOR MADELEINE ON SPANISH TV”
Page 5: “’Sad, lonely’ Kate weeps for Madeleine in TV interview” – Kate McCann wept “uncontrollably”. Says he:” I feel anxious she is not with us”
THE GUARDIAN page 12: “McCanns set up phone line to seek Madeleine”
THE INDEPENDENT: No Madeleine news today
Posted: 25th, October 2007 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,754) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





October 25th, 2007 at 6:09 pm
I think G. doesn’t want K to answer too many questions, because K’s state of mind is fragile. She might think she still see’s Maddie, everyday. It looks to me that Kate is mostly just unglued and will end up soon in the Loony Ward soon.
G. needs to take his family to the country and hire people to look for Maddie. I fault G. for not taking care of K and the twins. It’s obvious K. needs a rest.
Their high-paying PR person needs to give them the correct scoop: Go into hiding you silly silly people before you end of hanging yourself and ruining your reputation forever.
October 25th, 2007 at 6:07 pm
Throughout the interview, Katie answered Q’s and spoke of Madeleine with her eyes moving downwards to the left. When she stated that “Maddy is still out there” her eyes went down to the right?
What are the psycological norms this represents? Anybody a BL expert?
October 25th, 2007 at 6:06 pm
942
mk, no there is something going on with the website. For the past three days I’ve been having that problem off and on. So it isn’t just you and Stevo.
October 25th, 2007 at 6:05 pm
942 mk
It was weird. When I split my original message into two, it worked. There was nothing controversial in there but it only did it to that posting.
October 25th, 2007 at 6:05 pm
891 Remigius Says:
I am not talking about modern nature worshippers.
——————————————–
LOL
The meeting in the night to May 1st at the Blocksberg isn’t a modern thing.
This was real witch meeting in the middleage or so. For centuries people was sure that in that night the witches were partying etc - pagan superstition maybe - but you can find this stories in the documents of the witch hunt processes and also in tales.
October 25th, 2007 at 5:59 pm
758 Stevo
I also failed to get messages to Pat B posted earlier today.
I tried a couple of times between posts 100 and 200ish, then gave up.
Thought it was my pc.
October 25th, 2007 at 5:59 pm
936 john
nice clip - a young rowan atkinson - how strange…
October 25th, 2007 at 5:57 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1n9u4LTjtI
Brandon - brilliant!! thanks
October 25th, 2007 at 5:57 pm
905 901 ian stevo
stiggy’s just MT8 - I don’t read below the stig says bit
October 25th, 2007 at 5:55 pm
791 Portia Says:
Edit….The police have also reported finding Maddie’s DNA in his home.
++++++++++++++++
The MEDIA have reported that some source allegedly close to the police has allegedly suggested the Madeleine’s DNA was found in Murat’s home..
When someone from the PJ stands up on TV and makes these sorts of claims, then we can believe it. Until then, assume its media rubbish.
October 25th, 2007 at 5:54 pm
JERRY says o one of first interviews NO COMMENT when asked if he knows murat,murat goes missing for 5 months then comes out telling everyone he is skint,who is he telling ,im sure pj have it all under control murat suspect,4000 pages agaisnt the mcliars,just waiting for one major slip up,or finding the body,or a TIP off,maybe justa old BINNED idea ,or someone DUMPING evidence on their desks,or maybe i am just talking RUBBISH ,again
October 25th, 2007 at 5:54 pm
The origin of “ridiculous” and “ludicrous” charges - as per Alas Smith and Jones.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZoSqPxsNtU
October 25th, 2007 at 5:50 pm
783 Third Way Says:
Boys and Girls, I’ve seen a few contributions trying to discredit the Third Way. Weak attempts I have to say. As we all know it is not possible to discredit the Third Way because the Third Way is the only way.
Madeleine died on the 3rd of May. Her body was removed from the room and hidden by someone who knew the McCanns and was party to whichever unconventional relationships they keep with their “friends”. Edit…..
+++++++++++++++++
And I propose that Madeleine has returned to her real life as a Pixie…. And no, I can’t prove that any more you can prove your theory…. That’s all the Third Way is, a theory without any real proof that makes it any better than a myriad other theories that float about in here and elsewhere..
October 25th, 2007 at 5:49 pm
277
Sammy J Says:
October 25th, 2007 at 10:59 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1n9u4LTjtI
hope the link above works, it’s just that this whole case reminds me o a story on Monkey Dust. watch it if you have time!
then diane
Thanks guys that made my day
October 25th, 2007 at 5:47 pm
If you read Gerry’s blog from beginning to end (October 22) you will see that he NEVER mentions Murat, only ONCE, after a month, he mentions “a portuguese suspect that police is interviewing..” (or so)
Yet, after Murat arrest on May 14, he keeps, and keeps, and keeps on insisting on abduction. His favourite world…
October 25th, 2007 at 5:46 pm
865 stevo uta
yep dam bursting - good analogy.
the “pact” has held out so far. When they get some REALLY hard questions someone will break. Not the fragrant starring-role pair but one of the taparrati…
October 25th, 2007 at 5:42 pm
927
Judgenot, Murat had worked as an interpreter for the PJ before. I think he offered to help in this case for the first couple of days, but I can’t confirm that.
October 25th, 2007 at 5:41 pm
923 I doubt it.
See this?
http://www.newsdeskspecial.co.uk/2007/10/murat-hid-madel.html
October 25th, 2007 at 5:41 pm
926
werent me who first posted it
but had to make you all watch lol
October 25th, 2007 at 5:41 pm
920
Peter O: “With the exception of Madeleine, who is allegedly missing, are all of the other children well and accounted for? Do any of them have names/nick names that could sound like Madeleine/Maddie? Wearing suitable clothes, could any of them be mistaken for Madeleine – accidentally or otherwise?”
I saw this yesterday, but don’t have the answers so I didn’t comment. Is your theory that someone was going after another friend’s child? If so, why? Wouldn’t they just give her back (leave her someplace to be found) if she wasn’t of any use to them?
October 25th, 2007 at 5:41 pm
was murat the interpreter for the PJ?
October 25th, 2007 at 5:40 pm
910 Brandon - excellent!
October 25th, 2007 at 5:39 pm
922 wanderer said
I don’t agree about corporate or businessmen not making bad decisions though.
Yes you’re probably right, that was a bit of a sweeping statement! apologies…..
October 25th, 2007 at 5:38 pm
maybe they wanted kids ( as they are all “siblings “) to spend time together ( in creches or drugged asleep while they all bonded)
October 25th, 2007 at 5:38 pm
902 - That’s what I think. Originally, Murat was fingered by the Tapas Nine. The PJ did not take him seriously as a suspect, but had to treat him as such after Gordon Brown leaned on them to allow the McCanns to release the “news” about the abuductor sighting (of Tanner’s.) I think failry eraly on, the PJ indicated to Murat’s lawyer that they didn’t think Murat was involved. Normally, a defense lawyer’s sole focus should be the direct clearing of his client. However, I theorize that Murat was so justifiably enraged when he realized the McCanns et al were setting him up, that he told his lawyer and the PJ he could tolerate a few more months of being under suspicion for that sake of helping nail the McCanns. This would make Murat a true red herring. I predict Murat eventually will removed from the suspect list and that the PJ will be unequivocal in declaring him innocent.
October 25th, 2007 at 5:37 pm
919
CoolandCalm, actually you bring up a good point about him possibly just being handed the job again. I keep forgetting Kennedy is paying and Kennedy offered his services, and I think Mitchell would have taken it because…well, if all ends well in regards to justice for Madeleine, in some way that will shine well on Kennedy.
I don’t agree about corporate or businessmen not making bad decisions though.
October 25th, 2007 at 5:36 pm
920
maybe they all bought the same sperm
and one didnt pay up
guess who lol
October 25th, 2007 at 5:34 pm
729 brandon flours Says:
I think this man needs more scrutiny
“Mr and Mrs Gorrod already knew two of the McCann group, Edit…..
++++++++++++++
I agree.. if only because, as I’ve posted elsewhere, that it is possibly misleading to assume this case revolves around a few small hours, or worse just minutes, on May 3rd if only because that’s what the usual arguidos would like us to believe. i.e. I (if I were the investigator, I’m not, etc, etc..) would like cast iron proof that Madeleine hadn’t gone ‘missing’ some days before the 3rd May.
Posted this yesterday… There are now FOUR four year olds known about in this case:
Madeleine
Tanner/O’Brien’s child
Murat’s daughter
Gorrod’s child
With the exception of Madeleine, who is allegedly missing, are all of the other children well and accounted for? Do any of them have names/nick names that could sound like Madeleine/Maddie? Wearing suitable clothes, could any of them be mistaken for Madeleine – accidentally or otherwise?
October 25th, 2007 at 5:31 pm
871 Stevo / 864 Wanderer
Didn’t notice the shirt but he was quite funny!! Told a few good jokes…. pretty good benchmark for me after a couple of glasses of wine!!
Re: the job, I think he probably more suited to corporate work but I guess he took the job because of his new boss and because he had got to know the McCanns in in Portugal. He’s a career man so I would think he knows what he’s doing. They don’t often make bad career choices.
October 25th, 2007 at 5:30 pm
the pjs are hard at work trying to find the body,with it they can work backwards ,the mcliars are convinced they wont find it,interesting end game,i still think she is giving us sub-concious clues RUBBISH