
Madeleine McCann: Jane Tanner’s eFit, A Spanish Angel And Wearing Pink Pyjamas
MADDY WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE – 70% DON’T BELIEVE McCANNS”
The McCanns are on the TV in Spain. The show is followed by a phone vote. The people vote, at least some of them do; how many, we are not told. One, two, three..? Gerry is a “cardiologist”
Pages 4 and 5: “Police: Parents are hampering probe.” Angel Galan, head of the Spanish National Police’s kidnap, extortion and murder squad says: “There is no real information to indicate that Madeleine could be in Spain although Mr and Mrs McCann might think so. I think the question is why couldn’t she be in France or in the UK? Why does it have to be Spain, Portugal or Morocco?”
“Drawing that could catch her abductor” – an artist’s impression of a man carrying a child in the vicinity of the McCanns holiday complex on May 3. The man is of average height, of average build, with dark hair and with his facial features not filled in. Do you know him?
The artist was commissioned by the McCanns in light of a person their friend Jane Tanner said she saw on the night Madeleine disappeared
THE SUN front page: “PICTURE SENSATION. He took Maddie – MAN SEEN BY McCANNS’ PAL ON FATEFUL NIGHT”
A drawing of a man. The caption: “Hunted…a drawing of man with child in his arms as seen by Jane Tanner”
Page 13: “MADDIE IN ARMS OF SNATCHER. Pyjamas ‘prove it is her’” – The man is 5ft 6. He is 5ft 10 in the Express. He is “slim”. The girl is wearing pink and white pyjamas. The man is in a maroon shirt, camel coloured trousers and black or brown shoes
Says Clarence Mitchell: “We hope this will go a long was to proving the independent eyewitness account that she was taken by someone and the police’s focus on Kate and Gerry as potential suspects is wrong”. See drawing of a man seen by McCanns’ friend
And: “We believe it does show Madeleine in his arms. The description of the pyjamas is accurate enough to believe that is the case.” The McCanns’ friend sees the girl wearing pyjamas like those worn by Madeleine, whom she knows
“GERRY BACK AT WORK” – Gerry McCann is a “cardiologist” – lest we ever forget
DAILY MIRROR front page: “This is the man who took our Madeleine. PARENTS RELEASE SKETCH”
Page 11: “’He was slim with untidy black hair, plastered back. He was hurrying with a child in pink pyjajmaas’” (No songs please)
“’KIDNAPPER’ SEEN BY KATE’S PAL”
Paul Routledge: “All I want to do is put my arms around her and say: ‘there, there’ while she sobs out her grief on my shoulder”
DAILY MAIL front page: “Friends’ fears for ‘increasingly fragile’ Kate”
Pages 8 and 9: “Is Kate at breaking point?” – If she cracks up will the papers like her better? “Friends fear for Maddie’s mother after TV ordeal”
“SPANISH EYES” – The McCanns have launched a private “proxy investigation” in Spain. Under Portuguese law it is illegal to use private detectives while an investigation is ongoing
The mystery man who may have taken her” – Mrs Tanner sees the man. She is later “racked with guilt”
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE PARENTS ‘HIDING TRUTH’ – 70 per cent of TV viewers thinks McCanns are lying”
Pages 4 and 5: “BODY LANGUAGE SPECIALIST GIVES HIS VERDICT ON KATE – ‘MUM WOULD BE VERY GOOD POKER PLAYER’.” Robert Phipps watches the interview with Kate McCann on Spanish TV. She is frowning, and expert Phipps says this is indicative of “pain” and stress. Who knew? We do not know if he then voted in the subsequent poll
THE TIMES front page: “Madeleine ‘abductor’” – The white man is of “medium build”
Page 9: “’This is the man who took Madeleine away’” – The Times says the new picture bears “no resemblance to Robert Murat”. The picture has been handed to the McCanns’ detectives who are operating across Europe and North Africa
DAILY TELEGRAPH front page: “Madeleine ‘abductor’” – This is the man Jane Tanner says she saw at 9:15pm on May 3
THE INDEPENDENT and THE GUARDIAN: No Madeleine news today
Posted: 26th, October 2007 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,749) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





October 26th, 2007 at 11:20 pm
LOL @ What!
I hope that was a joke!
Seriously though if they know where her body is and it is Spain they visit often…la la la!
October 26th, 2007 at 11:20 pm
1239. Stig I totally agree. I thought Chemello and Paz were extremely disturbed sinister people who I thought would have been thrown in jail just on the evidence I had read about them. Not only had they tried to blackmail the McCanns but they had a male child with them who disappeared. Paz’s daughter had testified earlier about her mother and Chemello’s sadistic behaviour. Plus there were other charges against them as well. I cannot remember if I had read it in a French or Spanish newspaper but I could swear I read other reports of their release at the end of August or early September just before the McCanns were made arguidos. I will search for the info on Sunday or Monday when I have more time. Have a nice weekend.
October 26th, 2007 at 11:19 pm
1176 Iused to tell the same one all the time to the chicks….I promise I wont cum in your mouth,ah the life of a rock star even if I am dead and Pat Brown do you ever answer a question or just waffle a load of bollox.
October 26th, 2007 at 11:18 pm
Cast your vote
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/pollsanddebates/pollsanddebates.html?in_page_id=2006
October 26th, 2007 at 11:17 pm
Dave s He is funny. Like Steve T or whatever his name is. I don’t know what their opinions are but they are funny..
October 26th, 2007 at 11:16 pm
Butterfly
she has just been spotted in the Dominican Republic
October 26th, 2007 at 11:15 pm
1233 Judge Dread Says:
1212 - Peter O
Edit….
When you use words like ‘if’ and ‘may’ you are basing your theory on unsubstantiated opinion. Something criminal did happened in respect of Madeleine. She was left alone with the twins in an unlocked apartment unprotected.
+++++++++++++++++++++
I disagree with you.
I think it’s debatable whether there is in fact anything ‘criminal’ in what the McCann’s allegedly did re leaving the children in an unlocked apartment. Let me be clear though - Whether what they allegedly did was criminal or not, I completely disagree with it and they ought to be thoroughly ashamed of their actions. To make matters worse, I don’t think they, any of their supporters or apologists have ever really owned up and said it was wrong, unacceptable, stupid etc…
To further clarify.. I use the word ‘allegedly’ in the above paragraph because if Madeleine wasn’t abducted at about the time the parents would have us believe, then it is possible that whole ‘children left on their own’ is some kind of elaborate fabrication to draw attention away from some other time period when Madeleine came to some harm/went missing.
October 26th, 2007 at 11:14 pm
1237. I can knit very nice cock rings but talking dirty? Well actually I was a Lit major so I was forced to read Story of O, Henry Miller, Anais Nin etc….I used to write very clever mock ups of those authors to the joy of my then boyfriend’s heart and other organs. One of my first jobs out of college was writing the bios for the models in a small porn magazine. That was great fun.
I like walking on the beach, champagne, kittens, kissing and looking into the eyes of my special love. Blah blah blah…Go to page 28 and she’s on all fours worshipping 2 men at once.
Err hmmm…..Although I am flattered by the suggestion and would love to give it a try, just for old times sake, hubby will be coming home soon and wouldn’t be thrilled to see my writing soft porn on a news satire blog.
(Sssshhh maybe Tuesday he works late then.)
October 26th, 2007 at 11:14 pm
Hey I just read the quote above by Anorak where that guy Angel says ‘why does madeleine have to be in Spain? Why not Morrocco or Portugal?…etc…)
Is it just a good reason to visit Spain often for them without suspicion?
I would be watching their movements very closely cops when they visit Spain to follow up any sightings - watch where they go this time!
October 26th, 2007 at 11:12 pm
1240 - Peter O says “But what if Madeleine had been ‘moved’ prior to anyone being in the Tapas Bar that evening?”
That has been my theory all along, unless Gerry passed her to someone at 9.05pm.
October 26th, 2007 at 11:10 pm
My female friends ( yes I do have friends that live in the real world as well)
all found Gerry’s behaviour in the interview difficult to watch.
One of them who was in a violent relationship for a long time said his body
language reminded her of him.
He did not come across as protective in a loving way - more squeezing her hand
and showing a lot of concern about what she would say next.
If they are telling the truth there is no reason for Gerry to worry since nothing Kate
says could incriminate them - why would their lawyer stop them from answering questions that may lead to Maddie being found? That doesn’t make any sense unless they had committed a crime.
Conclusion: Starting to feel sorry for Kate now - not even Gerry trusts her.
She did everything asked of her - even cried for the camera apparently- did they edit it out?
Apparantley they stopped 4 times because she was crying uncontrollably - some good editing there since I did not notice the joins!
Everyone keeps saying how she cannot control her emotions - unless she has had Botox or is trying hard not to get any wrinkles - she hardly moves her facial muscles - so if they stopped 4 times - did they re-apply her make-up and do her hair at each stop?
Must have taken a few days to film.
October 26th, 2007 at 11:09 pm
Mods and Admin
To all posters
Some posts are disappearing , this is beyond our control and NOT censorship.
We edit only (with permission) personal details or if requested to alter or delete posts.
The spam mechanism and the site is a little unreliable, the California fires being the cause.
Every now and then great chunks of posts disappear, this IS me, removing advertising for porn and drugs, and any banned posters. So, perhaps use the users name to identify the post , rather than the number
October 26th, 2007 at 11:09 pm
1247. Thanks for the tip - no wonder I am on pins and needles……(not literally, of course)…….don’t get too creative with that blog buddies.
October 26th, 2007 at 11:09 pm
1236 annie
It’s not the’ dont look at me expression’ she’s just abit crabby. like it
October 26th, 2007 at 11:08 pm
1237. Thea but what to do with the other 23 hours and 50 minutes……..
October 26th, 2007 at 11:08 pm
I think that to settle this lot once and for all, the McCanns should agree to seeing a good hypnotist - I dont think they would ever do it, but it would be interesting if they were taken back to May 3 under hypnosis
October 26th, 2007 at 11:08 pm
1241 lol muddy I hope your partner comes home early on Friday or you have something exciting lined up for Friday night? It is Venus’ day of luuuuv afterall. Cheers and have fun!
October 26th, 2007 at 11:07 pm
Not only do people refuse to accept responsibility, they pass the buck, but they refuse to look deep into their own darkness…….end of my two bits!
October 26th, 2007 at 11:07 pm
1237 thea………
i might just hang around a while if you’re going to talk dirty!!!
October 26th, 2007 at 11:07 pm
He will soon be found - the man? with no face and carrying a child? wearing pink pj’s. Well at least according to Spindoctor Mitchell.
October 26th, 2007 at 11:06 pm
Europeans drink Ovaltine? Dear Lord so much closer to Belgium and France and that’s the best chocolate drink you can get your hands on?
October 26th, 2007 at 11:06 pm
Batman, I have read both books and have both in my library. But if you don’t wish to discuss, that’s okay.
October 26th, 2007 at 11:05 pm
1238. Good idea!
October 26th, 2007 at 11:04 pm
1223 brianthesnail Says:
1212 are you on drugs or what mate? as far as i know it is a criminal offence to dispose of a body
++++++++++++++++++++
Well, if you count Ovaltine (Chocolate) as a drug then yes….. Guilty as charged…….
I think/hope, we type at crossed purposes!
Assume Madeleine wasn’t abducted at around the time suggested by her parents… OK… So why shouldn’t we also challenge that whatever happened to Madeleine happened between 9.00 Pm and 10.00 PM? Just because that’s the time that people want us to believe the crime(s) were committed, it doesn’t mean we should only consider that single hour. So, yes they were checking the children regularly, especially between 9.00 and 10.00 PM, so THEY all have alibis. But what if Madeleine had been ‘moved’ prior to anyone being in the Tapas Bar that evening?
Am I making sense yet?
October 26th, 2007 at 11:03 pm
1156 thea
I don’t see how they could get out of the outstanding arrest warrant. I too would wonder if a connection to other activities was suspected if letting them go with comprehensive surveilance installed, was to give them enough rope..
I do not have a strong theory that they were connected to Madeline but you have to wonder where they get the children their ‘business’ seems to be based on. I also mentioned them because there could be others like them who have not surfaced.
I can see how if Madeline had passed through your hands, the size of the reward might tempt you to try and get her back or pass on her current location.
October 26th, 2007 at 11:03 pm
That will become self-evident when you read it. It is not a novel, but a book by the guy who wrote ‘A Road Less Travelled’.
However, if you have no interest in human nature then don’t bother.
It is an excellent insight into how evil can flourish in our society because of people refusing to accept responsibility for their actions - amongst other things.
End of book review.
October 26th, 2007 at 11:03 pm
1232. Good healthy sex.
October 26th, 2007 at 11:03 pm
Anybody notice the likeness between Kate McCann and Heather Mills McCartney - they both got that “sideways” - dont look me in the eye expression - are they related?
October 26th, 2007 at 11:02 pm
Now, I’m gone - maybe!
October 26th, 2007 at 11:01 pm
1213 brianthesnail I am talking about the fact that there have been no baby pictures of Madeleine, the earliest being of her when she was 2 years old. would have thought it would have been good pr in the light of Gerry being accused of not being the father to see pics of him holding madeleine and looking paternal when she was a baby. Thought just came to me after seeing pics in yesterdays press of madeleine on her 2nd birthday