
Madeleine McCann: Jane Tanner’s eFit, A Spanish Angel And Wearing Pink Pyjamas
MADDY WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE – 70% DON’T BELIEVE McCANNS”
The McCanns are on the TV in Spain. The show is followed by a phone vote. The people vote, at least some of them do; how many, we are not told. One, two, three..? Gerry is a “cardiologist”
Pages 4 and 5: “Police: Parents are hampering probe.” Angel Galan, head of the Spanish National Police’s kidnap, extortion and murder squad says: “There is no real information to indicate that Madeleine could be in Spain although Mr and Mrs McCann might think so. I think the question is why couldn’t she be in France or in the UK? Why does it have to be Spain, Portugal or Morocco?”
“Drawing that could catch her abductor” – an artist’s impression of a man carrying a child in the vicinity of the McCanns holiday complex on May 3. The man is of average height, of average build, with dark hair and with his facial features not filled in. Do you know him?
The artist was commissioned by the McCanns in light of a person their friend Jane Tanner said she saw on the night Madeleine disappeared
THE SUN front page: “PICTURE SENSATION. He took Maddie – MAN SEEN BY McCANNS’ PAL ON FATEFUL NIGHT”
A drawing of a man. The caption: “Hunted…a drawing of man with child in his arms as seen by Jane Tanner”
Page 13: “MADDIE IN ARMS OF SNATCHER. Pyjamas ‘prove it is her’” – The man is 5ft 6. He is 5ft 10 in the Express. He is “slim”. The girl is wearing pink and white pyjamas. The man is in a maroon shirt, camel coloured trousers and black or brown shoes
Says Clarence Mitchell: “We hope this will go a long was to proving the independent eyewitness account that she was taken by someone and the police’s focus on Kate and Gerry as potential suspects is wrong”. See drawing of a man seen by McCanns’ friend
And: “We believe it does show Madeleine in his arms. The description of the pyjamas is accurate enough to believe that is the case.” The McCanns’ friend sees the girl wearing pyjamas like those worn by Madeleine, whom she knows
“GERRY BACK AT WORK” – Gerry McCann is a “cardiologist” – lest we ever forget
DAILY MIRROR front page: “This is the man who took our Madeleine. PARENTS RELEASE SKETCH”
Page 11: “’He was slim with untidy black hair, plastered back. He was hurrying with a child in pink pyjajmaas’” (No songs please)
“’KIDNAPPER’ SEEN BY KATE’S PAL”
Paul Routledge: “All I want to do is put my arms around her and say: ‘there, there’ while she sobs out her grief on my shoulder”
DAILY MAIL front page: “Friends’ fears for ‘increasingly fragile’ Kate”
Pages 8 and 9: “Is Kate at breaking point?” – If she cracks up will the papers like her better? “Friends fear for Maddie’s mother after TV ordeal”
“SPANISH EYES” – The McCanns have launched a private “proxy investigation” in Spain. Under Portuguese law it is illegal to use private detectives while an investigation is ongoing
The mystery man who may have taken her” – Mrs Tanner sees the man. She is later “racked with guilt”
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE PARENTS ‘HIDING TRUTH’ – 70 per cent of TV viewers thinks McCanns are lying”
Pages 4 and 5: “BODY LANGUAGE SPECIALIST GIVES HIS VERDICT ON KATE – ‘MUM WOULD BE VERY GOOD POKER PLAYER’.” Robert Phipps watches the interview with Kate McCann on Spanish TV. She is frowning, and expert Phipps says this is indicative of “pain” and stress. Who knew? We do not know if he then voted in the subsequent poll
THE TIMES front page: “Madeleine ‘abductor’” – The white man is of “medium build”
Page 9: “’This is the man who took Madeleine away’” – The Times says the new picture bears “no resemblance to Robert Murat”. The picture has been handed to the McCanns’ detectives who are operating across Europe and North Africa
DAILY TELEGRAPH front page: “Madeleine ‘abductor’” – This is the man Jane Tanner says she saw at 9:15pm on May 3
THE INDEPENDENT and THE GUARDIAN: No Madeleine news today
Posted: 26th, October 2007 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,749) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





October 27th, 2007 at 12:38 am
http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/177197.html
October 27th, 2007 at 12:38 am
J C
it was Princess Diana
October 27th, 2007 at 12:35 am
well this is the icing on the cake
gordon brown
one of the reptile people
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4bSCaoDlDs
October 27th, 2007 at 12:35 am
Here are the Tapas Nine members:
Gerry McCann
Kate McCann
Matthew Oldfield
Rachael Oldfield
Jane Tanner
Russell O’Brien
Fiona Payne
David Payne
Diane Webster
So WHO is the tenth? And are we sure there was a tenth? Or an eleventh for that matter?
Since when is it certain that there was a tenth?
anyone?
JC
October 27th, 2007 at 12:34 am
1365
Judith C Says:
ask mods / admin to pass it on for you
October 27th, 2007 at 12:33 am
1360 batman…
Yeah, you can’t make this crap up.
Criminal Profiler Pat Brown talked about socially impaired people that thought their requests were completely acceptable whereas normal people would see them as… well… ludicrous.
This is looking more and more like it is the case in this case.
Risible.
October 27th, 2007 at 12:32 am
For anyone who wants bad dreams tonight - Gerry has updated his Bog.
I suddenly feel the need to vomit.
Night all.
October 27th, 2007 at 12:31 am
1356. That’s hearsay Judge Dread and your true colors are showing. I cannot figure you out. Not that I need too.
October 27th, 2007 at 12:31 am
1296****
” Kate on the verge of psychosis “. The Mccanns appear already psychotic. They seem to wear the twin ‘badges of invulnerability and irreproachably”, beyond all danger and blame. Misfortune is always something that happens to others, never to themselves (or their children- until they disappear that is), nor have the Mccanns ever accepted any responsibility for their part in the events of 3 May. The only thing they have offered is excuses.
October 27th, 2007 at 12:31 am
1290 The Real Stig Says:
1282 Peter O
Have you seen the MW blurb regarding their listening service, which they ‘used’ to offer until this happened?
+++++++++++++++++++++++
I’ve seen bits of it – someone posted an archive link to that blurb prior to MW ‘removing it’!
The fact that someone/an organisation offers a ‘service’ doesn’t mean you, as a parent, should automatically assume it’s fit for purpose – I’m staggered that MW offer the service. I’m flabbergasted that any right thinking parent would assume it’s safe to leave young children unattended for any length of time. Sadly, I have to concede that what the McCann’s did in leaving their children unattended on successive nights appears not to be as rare an activity as I might like to believe! I/we would never do this and I don’t believe the most parents would either.
October 27th, 2007 at 12:31 am
BrandonFlowers -ooh I love David Icke stuff!
I was the one of the open minded people when he was ridiculed for calling himself the son of God - I realised the press may have taken it out of context - things never change !
The difference between David Icke\’s public humiliation and the McCanns is that David Icke took it on the chin and understood why people found him amusing then still came out on top - the McCanns have so much arrogance they cannot even consider why people may be suspicious of them - that is why they will never come out on top!
October 27th, 2007 at 12:30 am
He is possibly the mystery donor brandon
October 27th, 2007 at 12:30 am
I think she was killed by accident ,at first i believed in the Mccans, but they told so many lies.And 1 ex cop told the window story was a big lie, and also the hour they told they saw the abductor ,is impossible,because there was a lot of people in the streets.
October 27th, 2007 at 12:29 am
look how fucking cocky gerry is in this one
Q do you know robert murat?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfM90dsrqPM
October 27th, 2007 at 12:28 am
1362 - Bob - A link for what.
October 27th, 2007 at 12:27 am
Brandon that was a good link - I dont dine in my garden tho I have a BBQ and leave the kids with Jeremy Kyle so they dont have to breathe in the fumes which i think is responsible
October 27th, 2007 at 12:26 am
Judge Dread Says , the problem here with the first detective spoked to much.He told what he thought, and he also stressed with the media.
October 27th, 2007 at 12:25 am
Poor madeleine
I can think of a lot more words to say than her mummy did. Why did Kate say she has not seen her since she was four, She hadn’t turned four the last time she saw her?
October 27th, 2007 at 12:24 am
957: Thea
“So Judith C do you think they are keeping quiet because they cannot
talk or because they fear the money trail will end or their current careers will cease to exist? I get the distinct feeling that new careers are being set up for both Gerry and Kate and they will pretend to be outraged that they can no longer practise medicine but will be very happy because their new positions will give them greater wealth and privilege than they ever dreamed possible. Just my opinion at this time.”
======================================
Well, they’re not actually keeping quiet are they? just the reverse. They’re yapping non-stop, or their ‘friends’ or spokespeople are. The unending verbal diarrhoea is intended to confuse, hide and subvert - and save their skins. And they have been given a platform to do this that any other huckster in history would have died for. As for their current careers! What’s being an unknown upper working class doc compared to World Ambassador for Child Welfare (Kate’s idea - listen to the infamous Woman’s Hour radio interview in which she truly reveals herself - I have a link)…or Labour Parliamentary Candidate for Leicester East or Grimsby West, or some other safe seat - Mr.McScam’s objective. And, if my experience of this godforsaken country, Britain, (once the greatest in the world), is anything to go by, they will achieve these objectives because they will be rewarded, once cleared, for …for what? keeping their lips sealed in one area where they shouldn’t have been - how they managed to pull the strings that led to the top? Maybe!
The McCann affair, I think, can only be sex related, Most things are. There’s a whole can of worms which would be released if certain people really speak about what they know. That’s why I wonder how long it will be before whoever is seen as the one likely to crack, or likely to want to tell the truth, or to save their own skins by incriminating someone else —actually gets killed. That is what happens when the truth is too close for comfort. People are just snuffed out. So expect a headline one day soon which reads: “…..found dead in mysterious circumstances: believed to have committed suicide”
By the way, on a lighter note: I think I saw that Mrs. McC is not wearing her wedding ring on the 3rd finger of her left hand any more and that it is now on the 3rd finger of her right hand. Check the Spanish video again! Meaning??
Thea, I just saw your other message about e-mailing me. I’d be very happy to hear from you that way but how do I give you my e-mail address without publishing it on this site? My book “Voices from Paradise: How the Dead Speak to Us” is on Amazon and most other internet booksites, but they don’t show my e-mail address. They do show the publisher’s details though, but then I’d have to rely on him contacting me and he’s very slow to do that usually. So, back to base: how can I let just you have my e-mail address?
October 27th, 2007 at 12:24 am
1289 jacquescousteau Says:
Edit…. what is the evidence for her last sighting? (given that your theory is true) what is the last absolutely substantiated sighting of her? - I seem to remember some speculation about doctored photo’s which place her about 2:30 pm……?
++++++++++++++++
I don’t think this would substantially alter the alleged last sightings – you still get into issues about whether the sightings are verifiable and from reliable sources. i.e. One of Tapas 9 members says they saw Madeleine at I think 7.00PM. Madeleine was allegedly served high tea between 5.30 and 6.00, was in the crèche in the afternoon, had that ‘last photo’ taken at 2.29PM and was in the crèche in the morning.
Now, all of the above ‘could’ be fabricated, but there is absolutely no evidence in the public domain that would allow any of us to question the veracity of any of the above sightings – well, I don’t believe there is, I’m sure others will comment if there are. Added to which, if they did try to fabricate the sightings for all/part of May 3rd it would make life a little more complex and increase the possibility of them being discovered.
I know Stevo did a pretty amazing job of modifying that ‘last photo’ to produce a copy without Madeleine in it, and one with Madeleine sitting to Gerry’s left rather than on the right. I’ve also argued that it would be very simple to fabricate the date and time of that picture. Please remember though, these are just theories of what might be possible, there is no evidence to suggest any of this has in fact happened.
All that said, you would hope that the PJ do/have considered such possibilities and verified all the sightings on May 3rd from multiple sources. i.e. If only person saw something you might question it, if dozens of independent people saw it you might believe it… Mind you, look at what messrs Blaine and Copperfield can do!
October 27th, 2007 at 12:22 am
Not seen this one before
mowing the lawn yeah right
try pissing off down pub 10 minutes away
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PT8QJL9nlaw
October 27th, 2007 at 12:22 am
Judge 1206
Do you have a link for that?
October 27th, 2007 at 12:22 am
ariel
I too like Jez and i think we should put the Mcs on that programme and see what happens
October 27th, 2007 at 12:22 am
1332 Trismegistus
And just when you thought it couldn’t get any sicker……..
What sort of people are these?
Brandon - the repeaters is spot on, and I think we all know who the reptilians are.
This whole circus is sick sick sick. All those who are aiding and abetting should hang their heads in shame.
October 27th, 2007 at 12:21 am
Bloody hell could do the DNA test live
October 27th, 2007 at 12:21 am
I too was duped by the how-can-they-have-left-them-alone debate & fuss.
And if these two people are liars, of which there is building evidence, nothing they say is reliable, including the times of dinner, checking on kiods, etc. As many have said, the twins could have been elsehwere that night and their 3-year old daughter already dead and disposed of.
So let’s forget everything the McCann and Tapas pple have told us. What’s left?
What information do we have about that night from non-mcCann, non-Tapas sources?
Can somebody list those facts for us?
thanks.
October 27th, 2007 at 12:20 am
Actually sod Antenna 3 should do a Kyle interview - the truth will out!
October 27th, 2007 at 12:20 am
1323 - thea
I can only hazzard a guess that the first detective has a problem with women, hence the fact that he is under investigation for allegedly beating the other woman up to get a confession out of her.
October 27th, 2007 at 12:20 am
1340 brandon flowers…
So very very true!!!
A very amusing game is to wait for the next bit of McPropaganda to be released, and then watch it spread through the world media by using news.google.co.uk.
If there is one thing that this case has taught me, it is that any shred of respect that I had for the media is misguided.
I no longer respect any of them. Even the “respectable” media consists of lazy, sheeplike characters that wouldn’t be able to do any real investigative journalism if their sorry little lives depended on it.
October 27th, 2007 at 12:19 am
I like Jeremy Kyle its not fair