Holy crap.

Apparently she looks very different in that picture because she was wearing make-up and dressing up clothes

“The interviews amply show that neither Kate or Gerry can express normal emotions concerning their children — or any emotions at all”

It shows nothing of the sort, it used to be called a stiff upper lip, perhaps they prefer to do their weeping and wailing in private, rather than go on TV and do it.

You just want them to behave according to your rules - where is the guidebook that denotes how parents of abducted children should behave to your satisfaction ?

Idiot

No, I’d say that the idea of me being obsessed has come from YOUR imagination, and speaks volumes about YOUR mind.

I’ve never even discussed the “swinger” aspect because I know nothing about those inuendoes. I’d be glad to discuss it, if you’d like to point out some sources of information.

As for the pedophilia angle, speculation about that cannot be avoided, especially in view of the accusations once levelled at Murat, who is apparently associated with the McCanns, directly or indirectly.

Indeed, it is Team McCann itself that has presented the theory that a pedophilia network is responsbile for abducting Madeleine, who is now in Morocco, etc etc.

Why, in your opinion, are the McCanns OBSESSED WITH PEDOPHILIA?

The interviews amply show that neither Kate or Gerry can express normal emotions concerning their children — or any emotions at all. Even when Kate knew what she’d be asked and could plan her answers well in advance, she STILL thought that saying “6 months is a long time for me to be without Madeleine” would elicit sympathy! In describing her own emotional state, she STILL thought it was appropriate to say that she is now “not as happy as before”.

There is NOTHING about Madeleine in the “About Madeleine” section of their webpage. They have NEVER talked in any detail about Madeleine, and they only showed TWO recent pictures of her, even though supposedly they were desperate to have the public be able to recognize her. They cannot explain why in the photos they did provide, Madeleine is wearing cosmetics (liptstick, eye shadow, blush, eye liner, eye lash enhancing, etc), making the photos even less useful for identification.

Didn’t they have a whole bunch of normal recent photos, some close-ups, that would be useful for identification? Don’t they have any videoes of Madeleine doing something simple and normal, like kicking a ball around for example?

The McCanns’ extreme narcissism and their obvious regard for children as nothing but objects for their own pleasure does not bode well when it comes to the question of whether or not they themselves are connected with a pedophilia network.

You suspect posters are underage. I see. That explains your perspective on pedophilia very well.

Does it ? - I see you haven’t offered an explaination though.

As for perspective, you should try and get some, unfortunately they don’t sell it at Netto, so you’re S.O.L. there

You see I do happen to have some perspective, which is why I’m not posting some completely unsubstantiated tripe on the Internet.

You seem quite obsessed with Kate McCann being a swinger and even maybe having something to do with being a peadophile - all of which has come from your imagination - which clearly speaks volumes about the state of your mind.

You suspect posters are underage. I see. That explains your perspective on pedophilia very well.

Haha - a meaningful post ? - this from a numpty that suspects peadophillia, swinging and recreational drugs are involved based on no evidence whatsoever.

I feel sorry for your braincell, it must be dying of boredom.

I only asked who gave you persmission as I suspected you must still be at an age where you have to put your hand up to ask permission to go to the toilet.

“WHAT MADE YOU “DECIDE”…”
I explained that. You apparently have a reading comprehension problem. Good luck with solving that, before you move on to writing skills.

“AND MORE IMPORTANLY, WHO GAVE YOU ANY PERMISSION TO “DECIDE” ANYTHING ?…”

I guess in your life you need permission for all your decsions? That explains your inability to write a meaningful post. However, you might make a good Team McCann member, if you are not already one. Good luck.

I have only recently decided that the paedophilia angle of speculation is quite warranted.

HAVE YOU INFORMED SCOTLAND YARD THAT YOU ARE AVAILABLE ? I FIND IT REFRESHING THAT YOU ARE ABLE TO GET INSIGHT INTO A CHILD BEING SMACKED AROUND BASED ON NO KNOWLEDGE WHATSOEVER, SO NOT ONLY MUST YOU BE A GREAT DETECTIVE, BUT MUST ALSO BE IN POSSESION OF SUPERNATURAL POWERS.

WHAT MADE YOU “DECIDE” AND MORE IMPORTANLY, WHO GAVE YOU ANY PERMISSION TO “DECIDE” ANYTHING ?

INTUITIVELY - reading your ridiculous posts I’d say you’re parents were closely related

How many insults must a nation hurl at another before there is war?
How many lies can we tell?
What can we plunder and soil in the name of power.
They can now monitor and see how the subjects deal with their anger and aggravation, do they network and gripe or do they do Michael Moore kind of things. In order words are they moved to action apart from verbal opinions on forums.
If the controllers of this experiment find out it is that easy to lie to us, to insult us, and get away with it again and again, then we as a species are truly doomed.

Maybe this situation just needs to get so totally absurd that the charade that it is is revealed once and for all and something new can come into being.

I often wonder if we could ever get organised into a really intelligent factor. I read so much on the web that is absolutely brilliant and I think if we could tap into an information centre where we could immediately punish our governments for not adhering to our desires for justice and transparency.

I fear we are already too controlled to ever be a risk to the powers that be.
I think this whole McCann thing has been a fabrication to see just how much we can take,
and you know the sad thing it is endless.
We will keep getting outraged.
Then Hopeful.
Then outraged.
And all the time the insults grow bigger.
I NEEEEEEDDD TO SCCCREAAAAAM

OR WILL KATE NEXT YEAR BE EVEN LESS HAPPY THAN THIS:
“I’M NOT AS HAPPY NOW AS I WAS WHEN I WAS FREE AND MADELEINE WAS ABDUCTED” SAID KATE, INTERVIEWED IN HER JAIL CELL.

1341
m.e. Says:
1336 Hideki
“Intuitively, I thought this was a paedophile case from day one and have alluded to it loads of times in my posts way back. ”

Well then, I think you have good intuition. Although I immediately sensed that there was child abuse involved, I only suspected parental violence such as smacking the kid around, sedating her to keep her quiet, etc.

I have only recently decided that the paedophilia angle of speculation is quite warranted. Perhaps the “last straw” for me was watching the McCanns in their Spain interview. They had plenty of time to prepare for it, and yet it made them look like monsters. This is a mother who actually thought that saying stuff like “6 months is a long time for me to be without Madeleine” would sound natural and elicit sympathy. They are NOT worried about any horrible suffering Madeleine might be going through because
1) she is dead and they know it — and besides,
2) she already went through the horrible suffering at their hands
(both mere personal speculations or impressions, of course)

Look at the photos I linked previously, as well as this one
http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/madeleine.thumbnail.jpg
at the top of this thread.

The girl is being decked out for the photos. From the “abduction” viewpoint, the eye shadow and other make-up renders the photos virtually useless for identification. They only would be useful (so the McCanns apparently think) as PR — since she is so “cute” and “adorable”. I’m really surprised no one has pointed out how utterly disgusting these photos are — and that apparently the McCanns DID NOT TAKE ANY NORMAL PHOTOS OF MADELEINE. The only “normal” ones are very old photos — probably the other more recent ones would have “raised eyebrows” to say the least.

m.e. wrote: “Everything since has only confirmed this suspicion although it still might be wrong. Lots of people have referred more to ’swinging’ and recreational drugs and indeed they may be involved but there are unfortunately several indicators that seriously point to paedophilia. But no concrete proof yet and they may be coincidences. ”

The paedophilia activity and the recreational drugs and “swinging” areof course not mutually exclusive. Quite possibly the McCanns were involved in all of this.

Remember the “gooseberry” mother of one Tapas9 couple at first testified they each only checked on their own kids — not on all kids. At first I thought she was the one telling the truth, but what I think happened was the Tapas9 decided to lie and not tell the police all the kids were together. This woman was following that line when she said each checked on their own. (and/or she did not want her children involved with the scandal).

But Team McCann concocted the idea that each checked on all children by “making the rounds” — in their attempt to mitigate the child neglect aspect. Unfortunately their ridiculous story made no sense, filled with contradiction, and was not backed up by witnesses. Then it turns out that the children are ALL at the McCanns’ apartment — so they actually did not even need to lie about “making the rounds”. Why did they conceal the fact that the children were all together?

That is another “final straw”. At this point, you have to assume they would lie about anything, even about the children being alone and the door unlocked.

Let’s hope the McCanns are brought to justice, put in jail where they belong for child neglect and obstruction of justice, and made to pay back ALL the money that was donated — perhaps to a legitimate charity.

Does your intuition tetll you anything as to why the McCanns, a couple who claim their child was stalked and then napped to order by paedo (as you yourself believe the case to be), have frequently exploited their remaining 2 children in their massive Madeleine marketing campaign? Why has Mitchell, someone supposedly with a lot of power within UK media NOT requested news agencies not show the twins? And why haven’t any of their PR staff suggested to them that it’s not a good idea to have the twins with them in the many many photo ops they or their PR have set up?

The other interesting aspect of this news is that I find it incredubly strange that an American news organisation got access to the MW PdL resort and even interviewed guests on October 8th, 07 but the British programme which aired last week claimed they could not? MW is a British company isn’t it? Why would they have refused UK reporters but allowed of all news agencies an American outfit?

TUCHMAN (GARY TUCHMAN, CNN CORRESPONDENT) : The restaurant is located within the resort. Michael (ph) and Susan Cooper (ph) are now renting the unit right next door to where the McCanns stayed. The Coopers don’t know the McCanns but let us out on their balcony to see that the tapas bar is within eyesight of the apartment. But…

(on camera): If someone was crying inside this apartment, would you hear them at the restaurant?

MICHAEL COOPER, (GUEST STAYING AT RESORT): No.

This made me wonder about the McCanns’ constant reference to how eating at the tapas bar was like having dinner in their own garden? Yet they are not wealthy people who own a huge estate? So how could he have made this comment with total honesty? How can anyone believe their justifications for leaving the children without a sittter? Our own house is big and our backyard garden is quite large too and yet we can hear our child if he starts crying when we are outside on the patio or even at the far end of the garden and he’s asleep in his room.

Now why would they make up this fabrication if they had nothing to hide? It was also reported and proved by camera that the McCann patio door was NOT visable from the tapas restaurant. Again, why would they make up these “little” lies if there were not much bigger ones looming?

A lot of thanks, also!

Diario de Noticias - Quarta, 10 de Outubro de 2007 - PAULA MARTINHEIRA JOSÉ MANUEL OLIVEIRA

PJ returned to Maddie’s bedroom for 5 hours

Inspectors reconstitute the night of May 3

Two and a half months after the English tracking dogs detected cadaver odour in the apartment of the Ocean Club resort, in Praia da Luz, where Madeleine McCann disappeared from on May 3, the Policia Judiciaria (PJ) yesterday returned to the location, in order to make a new reconstitution of what happened on that night, at a time when the investigators have no doubts left about the British child’s death and the concealment of her corpse by her parents.

The operation appears after new clues were revealed by the exhaustive DNA analysis work that has been ongoing at the Forensic Science Service in Birmingham, in the United Kingdom, which point, as the British press in general reported yesterday, to the involvement of the McCann couple in their daughter’s death.

**********Yesterday’s diligence was the third of its kind, performed by PJ since Maddie disappeared (since the early morning of May 4, until the first week of June, the apartment was sealed, at the police’s service, and was searched again by the end of July). It was made under extreme discretion and lasted 5 hours, from 7 a.m. until noon, and as DNA could discover, it was led by chief inspector Tavares de Almeida, who was number two of the team that was coordinated by Gonçalo Amaral, who was demoted last week by the Judiciaria’s national directory. The PJ continues to insist on the idea that the key to the enigma lies in the apartment. The apartment was not occupied again since the tracker dogs marked the girl’s death.**********