
Madeleine McCann: The Tapas 7 Speak, Blonde Children In Morocco And Hashish
MADDY WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
THE SUN front page: “McCANN FRIENDS HIT BACK – FURY OF TAPAS 7. Pals: there is NO pact”
Say the McCanns dining party: “The police told us not to discuss our statement. We’ve always tried to honour this. We wish to state there is categorically no so-called pact of silence – or indeed anything secretive between us. Just the desire to assist the search. It is frustrating that the facts we have done as we were asked is till being looked upon as suspicious”
“COPS IN WINDOW PROBE” – Paolo Rebelo is looking at the window of the McCanns’ holiday apartment. “is this how evil Maddie snatcher struck?”
Four pictures:
1. “Rebelo pushes window
2. Net curtains rustle in breeze as the window swings open
3. Detective leans in
4. Team confer about possible escape route”
“Fund paid mortgage” – Some of the £1million Madeleine McCann “fighting fun”
DAILY MIRROR front page: “NOW THEY BELIVE US – Police finally accept Madeleine was snatched”
Portuguese police are looking at possibilities
Says a friend of the McCanns: “At last, after all these months, Kate and Gerry’s story is being believed. They are very encouraged by the re-enactment of Madeleine’s abduction and the police now accept their version of events”
A policeman climbs through a window. He passes out a “large bundle”
“MADDY ‘SPOTTED 10 TIMES IN MOROCCO’” – Says private detective Francisco Marco: “Several unconnected people have told us of the same girl with the same woman. She has shorter hair than Madeleine. But everything else matches”. Like her name?
“MORTGAGE FUND FURY” – Says Clarence Mitchell: “The fund exists to help them when living costs became difficult”
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE – McCANNS USE FUNDS TO PAY MORTGAGE” – Two mortgage payments on their “£600,000” home
The Express leads with picture of Gerry McCann playing golf. Inset is a picture of Gerry McCann on a bicycle
“We’ve found a kidnapped blonde girl, but it’s not her” – A blonde girl in Morocco. She can speak English. She must have been kidnapped. Right?
Says Francisco Marco: “Blonde children are a valuable commodity in North Africa. They can be sold for huge sums and give prestige to families who buy them”
DAILY MAIL front page: “MADDIE FUND PAYS McCANNS’ MORTGAGE” – Mortgage repayments on their “£500,000” home. (How long before the Express and Mail start a heated debate on the value of the McCanns home and how that value has been affected by the story?)
Page 4: “Is she in the mountains? Investigators scour Morocco in the search for Madeleine”
Says the Mail: “In an extraordinary coincidence the detectives are reported to have already found an English-speaking blonde girl of about Madeleine’s age living with a local family”
How many more blonde children are in Morocco? And can we find them all?
DAILY STAR front page: “Maddie ‘alive in drug den’”
Page 7: “MADDIE’S IN MOROCCAN MOUNTAINS – Ten sightings with rich Arab”
Says Francisco Marco PI of the woman with the blonde child found in the Rif mountains: “My feeling is this woman is some sort of carer who is working on behalf of other people”
Says an “insider”: “It’s a very secretive country and the Rif mountains enjoy official protection because of the importance of the hashish production”
“McCanns in the clear – Portuguese police now believe Madeline was kidnapped”
THE TIMES page 13: “Police return to holiday apartment in attempt to solve Madeleine mystery”
Paulo Rebelo is inside the apartment. He walks to the beach. He passes Sergey Malinka’s home. He is on a road leading to the N125 main road
In Morocco, a 60-year-old woman is seen with a blonde child
“Funds for search used to pay mortgage on McCanns’ house” – The McCanns’ home is worth “460,000”
THE TELEGRAPH front page: “Police re-enact Madeleine night”
Page 17: Paulo Rebelo is at the Ocean Club. Says a source “close to the couple”: “Blonde children are a very valuable commodity in places like north Africa”
Paulo Rebelo is looking
THE GUARDIAN and THE INDEPENDENT: No Madeleine news
Posted: 30th, October 2007 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,424) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





October 30th, 2007 at 3:19 pm
There’s something deeply intriguing about the McCanns strategy.
Are they shooting at whatever moves on the press or do you think that they actually know what evidence the police has against them? Just consider the following:
Evidence : DNA samples confirm sedation - Immediately grandmother comes out and says that the abductor must have sedated MAdeleine before taking her.
Evidence : DNA samples confirm presence of Madeleine’s body in the car - Immediately Gerry McCann comes out with an explanation that they transported rotten mean and nappies from Madeleine and sweaty sandals could be the origin of these fluids.
Evidence : The witness statements given by the Tapas 9 alone about the night of 3 May (not including other neighbours and guests at the ocean club) confirms that it would be impossible for someone to have entered the room and abducted Madeleine without being confronted at one of the checking visits by the parents or their friends - Immediately Gerry McCanns comes out with a story that now he thinks that the abductor was in the room when we went to check for Madeleine (knowing that this would make it more plausible to have an adbuctor entering the room despite the alleged checking).
My guess is that they are somehow having access to details of the accusation file against them. Judging by how some of the portuguese trade union representatives have reacted to their statements (particularly the last one about thinking that the abductor was in the room), it is clear that these statements are obviously produced with the intention of supporting a possible defence in court, or even discouraging the prosecutor from forming an accusation.
It could also be that they are just reacting at these things as they come out in the press (but they don’t really know if this part of the file of evidence against them or not).
October 30th, 2007 at 3:19 pm
I’ve no time now,just wanted to say, that the cemetery, doesn’t have funerals there for long years ago,sorry my English
bye
October 30th, 2007 at 3:18 pm
Candy 458- I think he works in non invasive cardiology but I read that when he returns it will be behind the scenes doing more administrative work.
October 30th, 2007 at 3:16 pm
Does anyone believe for one minute that Maddie will be found in Morocco? Spain, no. How about Malta or Belgium - been there , done that.
This story has become an absurd pantomine with little dignity in evidence - its time it was put to bed and left there until a genuine development takes place.
The name of Milly Dowler has been mentioned - her parents behaved with quiet strength and decorum for the six months she was missing. No fund was set up. No PR team hired. Just grief that no-one doubted. When her bones were found they thought not of themselves but of their remaining child. Milly’s murderer was never caught.
October 30th, 2007 at 3:16 pm
Hi All, haven’t read all posts yet … just to ask; is there any way I can withdraw my money from the Fund?
And how is it possible GM came back to work?
I would think, if you are a suspect in a possible murder case, health&Safety department will not allow you working on people’s hearts? :-O
Do they let peadophile suspects work at schools? :-O
What the f. is going on?
October 30th, 2007 at 3:15 pm
453 matty
The piece about this Irish teenager? It’s a newspaper article. Can’t quite remember where I read it though.
October 30th, 2007 at 3:15 pm
318 Stevo
I still check on this site from time to time but the comments here upset me too much to spend longer than a few minutes here but I am sure the truth will eventually come out. Anyway Stevo you mention something about JW and Murat. I found this quote from an old article in the Daiy Mail
“They have been described as lovers, but Murat denies this. “She’s my partner, and we are very, very, very close - but she’s not my girlfriend because she can’t be. She’s a Jehovah’s Witness and she’s still married. I’m not a Witness, but I attend study classes.”
The link is http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=459316&in_page_id=1770
So I guess this impliesthat Murat is looking to convert?
I looked into the whole JW connections a while back and found out that there was a lot of problems with sexual abuse of children amongst JW leaders go to http://www.silentlambs.org/
I am not saying there is any connection here with Murat but it is interesting. Also if his girlfriend is a JW then I wonder if her portuguese husband is as well. I also thought it was very odd especially in a very macho mediterranean society that Murat is dating a woman who still lives with her husband. How the hell does this guy feel about Murat?
October 30th, 2007 at 3:14 pm
Birds of a feather flock together.
October 30th, 2007 at 3:14 pm
Amused to note that Gezzer Mc has been playing golf at home in Rotheley…..thats par for the course…..unlike his previous activities of visiting rubbish dumps!
October 30th, 2007 at 3:13 pm
Pact of Silence?????
And Russell, when the questions start to surround him, loses his sympathy: “I have nothing further to tell you. I am not going to dishonor the compromise I assumed with Kate and Gerry. They want to control all information that is disclosed”.
October 30th, 2007 at 3:11 pm
Anyone else read about an Irish teenage girl who saw Gerry and Wilkins talking but didn’t see the man with the child Tanner allegedly saw? She is supposed to have been interviewed by PJ.
October 30th, 2007 at 3:11 pm
At the moment I’m torn - I think they can’t be guilty because where would they put the body and why would they keep in the media so relentlessly?
Then I think keeping in the media this relentlessly is a very odd thing to do - publicity is meant to help, but not at this level. And I’ve never seen an interview where I thought they were being sincere.
October 30th, 2007 at 3:10 pm
Portia,
Very intriguing info on NPD. I’d like to warn you and evereyone about “Dr.” Sam Vankin. He is a self-professed sufferer of NPD. His “dr” title comes from a correspondence school unaccredited) He has ben banned from Wikipedia because on the NPD pages he kept sighting his own work and was very manipulative with how the page was being written and edited and was using multiple names and atttacking other contributors. And finally, he heads a NPD survivor group on Yahoo Groups (or used to). I was a member for a couple of days when I realised how unsafe and bizarre it was that this man who claims to have been diagnosed with NPD is the owner/moderator of an NPD group for people who have been abused by people with NPD. i questioned the safety of this set up and was attacked by several of the women (most of the group is female) as being hostile towards “Dr. Sam” and I politely disagreed and brought up several facts about how those with NPD operate - including some information from Dr. Sam himself and next thing I knew I was banned from the group. No message from Dr. Sam privatetly or on the forum - just banned. Eventually I met other people online who had also had similar or even worse (he’s known to be very threatening towards anyone who critcises him or questions his motives - he especially hates women who challenge him) encounters with him
Although much of his writinig on NPD is rather good, study it more and you will find ceretain prejudices. The most glaring one is what he writes about the NPD’s partner, or narcissistic “supplier” as Sam calls the significant other in the narcissist’s life. He claims that the partners is of low to average intelligence and why it’s mainly women who will permit themselves to be the supplier and a whole bunch of other misogynistic tripe which is the forte of many narcissists because of their repressed homosexuality and sexual frigidity - they hatet females (and Dr. Sam Vankin is no different than any other regular NPD guy). He also cannot talk at length about men with NPD being sexually frigid, impotent and in an over whelming amount of cases - homosexual (but repressed and fetishised/fantasised). Like Vankin, these men will often surround themselves with females or people who need help (mental or physical) sos that they can at first glance appear sympathetic and helpful when in reality it’s a sham. They are using these people for their own narcissistic pleasure so that they can feel important and be near the very thing which terrifies them most which is love and humanity. They are misanthropists and are always blaming evereyone else for why they are having trouble.
His book is available online in its entirety so please - to anyone who is interested in this subject matter - please research Vankin first before giving him your money if you are considering purchasing his book. He’s a dangerous person imho. Hopefully he is still living in eastern Europe and no where me.
October 30th, 2007 at 3:06 pm
Found this site. If you think us Anorakers are hooked check out-
The Brit posted 10-18-2007 5.21am.
He’s got Portugese newspaper reports,who booked holiday, contradictions,Murat retina problem, you name it he’s got it
http://www.cybersleuths.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=2&t=001839
October 30th, 2007 at 3:06 pm
443, brondon flours.
I think a lot of those pro-McCann’s are 14 year olds, probably girls, posing as undercover PI’s.
October 30th, 2007 at 3:05 pm
I feel so sorry for the hard-up Dr’s……having to dip into the “Leaving No Stone Unturned” Fund to pay their hefty mortgage in (allegdly) July and August.
And why are we only now being told about this sorry tale of hard-up of Rothley Folk ?
Tut Tut…..Clarence….aren’t you the PR Supremo…whose job it is to keep us, the general public numbskulls, fully informed about all the terrible difficulties of these two characters?
Who has paid for the September, October and November mortgage costs ?
Have Mr R Virgin and that balding double-glazing guy, dipped into their pockets to help keep this show on the road and so the poor waifs the shame of having to continue raiding the “Search For Madeleine” Fund?
Clarence, you will have to pull your socks up lad…..bad PR and all that.
October 30th, 2007 at 3:04 pm
435 Dave s
Shouldn’t you be back in class now? The teachers will be very cross with you for masturbating in the toilets all lunchtime and making yourself late for the lesson.
October 30th, 2007 at 3:04 pm
m.e.
My mind is not that open. When it comes to a 3/4 yr old I don’t want to think about it.
October 30th, 2007 at 3:03 pm
Folks - come one - some of you guys are sounding like the Third Way but with worst language (where is that lunatic by the way - hasn’t been here for a few days?).
The great anorak forum is here to test theories about Madeleine’s disappearance. The paedo- abuse theory within the family and circle of friends is possibly as valid as many other theories here in this forum. But let’s try to keep it above decency lines and skip some of the details.
I’d recommend that for use of foul language you go and join the tabloid forums.
October 30th, 2007 at 3:03 pm
442
Chloe Spain Says:
October 30th, 2007 at 3:01 pm
(434) Tinsel
It also occurs to me that O’Brien could perhaps be indebted to GM for something that occurred in the past.
——————————————————————–
Is O Brien a senior compared to Mc Cann?
October 30th, 2007 at 3:02 pm
funny how all pro mc cann’s ( apart from the WI type)
have the same way of talking
like an angry 14 year old , storming out the room, talking crap
October 30th, 2007 at 3:01 pm
(434) Tinsel
It also occurs to me that O’Brien could perhaps be indebted to GM for something that occurred in the past.
October 30th, 2007 at 3:00 pm
steveo. Obviously not. thanks and noted
October 30th, 2007 at 2:59 pm
430 Dave s
Though I wouldnt condone the use of phrases like ‘anal penetration’ because its speculation based on speculation, it cannot be denied that for those who dare to keep a very open mind, there are several indicators that this case revolves around paedophilia. It may be coincidence but there are therefore several ‘coincidences’ to accouint for, some tenuous, others worrying.
October 30th, 2007 at 2:59 pm
429 impressed
You wrote earlier:
“I do a lot of internet investigative work when carrying out work related investigations..never once come across godaddy com.”
Clearly you don’t do a very good job then.
October 30th, 2007 at 2:59 pm
Didn’t realise Angus McBride was Chris Langhams solicitor aswell as the Mcs.
October 30th, 2007 at 2:59 pm
For the thinkers out there:
“Pathological narcissism is at the root of many other mental health disorders.
It is a plague that has invaded families, corporations, politics, business, terror and crime organizations…
It is everywhere.
It is shocking how unaware are decision makers, mental health professionals and practitioners, community workers, and others who should know better. Ignorance is what allows the narcissist to commit serial abuse.”
http://www.mental-health-today.com/narcissistic/transcripts.htm
October 30th, 2007 at 2:59 pm
336
Ferdinand Says:
“Hmm, never seen it this way…
(Note: This was irony!)”
Yes, well , obviously my point that the McCanns would (if aware that the girl was dead) be guilty of fraud is… well, obvious.
I only meant to emphasize that this has nothing to do with their scam operation being a “charity” or being a “non-profit company”. The McCanns can be targeted with lawsuits if it can be shown that they have been aware that there was no abduction, and that the girl is dead.
Can it be proven that they KNEW Madeleine was dead?…. Probably. If so, they cannot hide behind the confidential finances of a private company.
October 30th, 2007 at 2:57 pm
433 stevO
How’s your kid? Go ask the care workers, eh?
And it’s you who typed that disgusting comment. You should be ashamed.
October 30th, 2007 at 2:56 pm
I don’t believe Madeleine was kidnapped to order by a ring–the risk was too great breaking into an apartment with parents checking every few minutes, and there was obviously not a lot of planning behind the purported plot. No escape vehichle, carrying the child away in plain site. Jane Tanner is trying to imply one monster acting on his own–but oops, now the story has changed to a ring based in North Africa. Ooops, the two plot lines do not match up. How will they make this plot line fly now?
Truthfully, as sweet and dear as Madeleine’s photos are, she is a very ordinary little girl. More likely to be attacked by a single person. Not a ring.
Based on the personality of the mother, I also hold her as the prime suspect.
There must be some type of illegal medical activity going on in the background to bind Gerry, O’Brian and Tanner into the scheme. I agree with the posts that say that Kate is bordering on a nervous breakdown. I agree with the Spanish psychiatrist that she always has been mentally ill (a hidden illness), and now it is more overt.