Ian Strachan’s Royal Sex ‘Con’ Explodes In His Face
“IAN Strachan lives in a £700-a-week flat in Chelsea Harbour.”
Ian Strachan owns a shirt (white), sunglasses (black) and has hair (highlighted). This is what we know, allegedly, in the Mail’s “mysterious playboy is ‘royal blackmail plot’.” Such are the facts in the picture. Although he might have borrowed the shirt and the, er, sunglasses. Let us assume nothing.
A “London friend” says, reportedly, that Strachan is bisexual and posts his details on a gay website. Readers learn that he once considered studying law. He tells a story that his father is “Icelandic and very rich”. The Mail says dad works in a fish processing factory.
Someone else says he once piloted a moon drone and led the infamous siege of Ibiza in 1987. So they say.
The native of Aberdeen once worked in chip shop, it is alleged. Some say he ran a clothes shop. Persons at the offices of his lawyer, Giovanni di Stafano, “understand his father to be a high court judge, with considerable private family wealth”. Or not.
The Sun hears “royal writer” Nicholas Davies tell Fox News in the US the name of the alleged royal and that Strachan is a “socialite”. So too is his co-accused, Sean McGuigan, who the Mail says has “grey hair” and lives in a “small flat” owned by Threshold support, which helps those with mental health problems”.
Is Mr McGuigan ill? We don’t know. Readers have no idea. It’s just inferred. Mr Strachan says he is innocent. So too does Mr McGuigan, who is not pictured.
The Express says Strachan was born Paul Einar Ian Adalsteinsson and was a “popular and ambitious pupil” at school. Good for him. But what bearing that on the matter in hand?
It’s all a blur of speculation, heresay and innuendo. We have no idea about Mr Strachan. The papers seem to be grasping at straws.
Says Mr Davies of the alleged video featuring an apparent bout of gay oral sex: “It is a con trick that exploded in their faces.”
No laughing. It is no laughing matter. And that’s might well be the only true thing we’ve heard…
Mr Strachan is guilty of nothing until a court of law says otherwise. It is irrespsonsible and wrong to comment on the case. As for the alleged victim, well, where are they in this story? Shhhhh…
Posted: 30th, October 2007 | In: Royal Family, Tabloids Comments (19) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- HOTWATER on Madeleine McCann: The Media Creates A New Maddie Monster And Twists The Facts
- yampster on Dundee Woman Accused Of Ripping Out Lover’s Testes With Her Bare Hands
- KathyM on Susan Boyle Weeps As The Press Set About Destroying Her
- Desperate Dan on I’m A Celebrity: Joe Bugner’s Career In Pictures
- Desperate Dan on The 14 Ten Most Offensive Google Search Results
April 3rd, 2009 at 8:52 am
17 Ian Strachan Says:
April 3rd, 2009 at 4:38 am
Buy the book motherfuckers…
Sounds like a good read with excellent use of the English language.
April 3rd, 2009 at 8:36 am
Ah! The Bob Geldof school of marketing. Irresistable. I’ll take two
April 3rd, 2009 at 4:38 am
Buy the book motherfuckers…
January 9th, 2009 at 12:55 pm
Danny - we are commenting on the media’s treatment of the story. We have no idea about the matter, only that the press find Mr Strachan interesting…
January 9th, 2009 at 12:40 pm
James. I have no idea. The papers quoted above target Strachan - the softer traget. He must be presumed innocent. As for the video, I’ve not seen it…
January 9th, 2009 at 11:37 am
Ive seen the video as have half of fleet street. How is it a con? How can you blackmail someone with something that doesnt exist and get jailed for it?
January 9th, 2009 at 11:32 am
is this site run by M15?
Moderator - No
January 9th, 2009 at 11:31 am
Look it up. Mugs
January 9th, 2009 at 11:31 am
Actually, his uncle is the supreme court Judge, Jonas Adalsteinsson. Mugs
January 9th, 2009 at 11:30 am
Ha… All you people make me laugh. The guy was set up and youve been fed a load of rubbish by I ops. You mugs!
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:20 pm
What a load of rubbish…. I knew Ian years ago, he’s one of the most generous and warmhearted guys youll meet, I sat every day at the trial and trust me, what came out in the newspapers is not what came out in court. Read between the lines, how can you blackmail someone if the the material does not exist…
November 24th, 2007 at 7:15 am
I couldn’t understand some parts of this article Explodes In his Face, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.
October 31st, 2007 at 3:41 pm
[...] I will quote this gem from Anorak: Says Mr Davies of the alleged video featuring an apparent bout of gay oral sex: “It is a con [...]
October 30th, 2007 at 6:27 pm
I’m just glad Louise isn’t here.
I’m not sure she’d be happy about this.
October 30th, 2007 at 6:23 pm
Sorry JEFFREY Archer.
October 30th, 2007 at 6:22 pm
Why is there a picture of Geoffrey Archer there?
October 30th, 2007 at 6:00 pm
These two sound like a real pair of winners.
Could we bring back beheading in the Tower for them?
Seems I’m turning into a closet royalist these days.
October 30th, 2007 at 2:12 pm
Ummmm…
October 30th, 2007 at 2:05 pm
Who is the Royal? Is it Freddy or someone married?