
Madeleine McCann: A Titanic Struggle With The Germans And Slavery In Morocco
MADDY WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “IS MADELEINE A CHILD SLAVE IN MOROCCO?”
“Madeleine McCann may have been condemned to a life of slavery working as a ‘little maid’ for a rich Arab family…” Or not
Page 5: “’Madeleine will be used as a little maid’” – so suggests Inspector Hicham Alaoui of the Moroccan Police in El Hajeb near Fez
Little maids, notes the paper, are “collected by rich families as ‘curiosities’ as well as servants. A woman from a group called Ecpatuk says such children are “vulnerable to abuse”. The Express sys the girls are abused “physically, emotionally and sexually”. Can Madeleine McCann be among them? Maybe…
“Sacked detective called in to help with the probe” – Chief Inspector Goncalo Amaral is talking with new chief Paulo Rebelo
“Fury over magazine ‘sick’ ads” – German magazine titanic has lampooned the case, using Madeleine’s image in spoof supermarket adverts. Gerry and Kate McCann call it “sick” and “very hurtful”. The magazine says Madeleine McCann is “getting a bit much for many people”
DAILY MIRROR front page: “Clear us… you have no case”
Says a friend of Kate and Gerry McCann: “They are adamant they should now be cleared”, as are many suspects in ongoing investigations
Page 7: “McCann ‘clear us’ demand’” – Says Clarence Mitchell: “If the reports are true clearly it would indicate the police absolutely, and quite rightly, have no case against Kate and Gerry”
DAILY MAIL front page: “Oh. Come off it, Heather, how dare you compare your ordeal to Kate McCann’s?” Heather Mills is on the telly
Page 7: “Police pursuit of McCanns ‘is running out of steam’” – The public prosecutor in Portugal says Kate and Gerry McCann will not face further police interviews “unless detectives can produce stronger evidence against them”
Mark Williams-Thomas, a former detective with Surrey Police, says the McCann’s private detectives could be on the wrong trail in Morocco. Or not
THE SUN page 24: “GERMAN MAG’S SICK JOKES ABOUT MADDIE – McCanns’ horror as spoof ad pokes fun at lost girl”
Ad advert in satirical Titantic magazine promises the kitchen cleaner will “remove all traces at the home” even DNA traces. The adverts warn that just because Madeleine’s face is on the product it does not mean they can be taken for free. The Sun is disgusted. It reproduces the images and the words to allow its readers to share in its disgust
A march on the German embassy is not yet in the planning
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE SICK NEW TWIST – Horror at German abuse of missing tot”
The Germans have her. A German paedo!
Page 7: “TOTALLY SICK – A full reproduction of the spoof adverts. “McCann’s agony as rag mocks hunt for Maddie.” Thanks to the Star and Sun, the McCanns now know that an obscure German magazines has made jokes about their case
Says Clarence Mitchell: “It shows Madeleine herself no respect… The magazine did not seek permission to use Madeleine’s image to be used on this so-called joke. It they had it would almost certainly not have been given”
So much for doing anything to keep Madeleine in the news
THE INDEPENDENT page 5: “Mills: I am treated as badly as Kate McCann and Diana.” More on Lady Mucca
THE TELEGRAPH page 9: “Madeleine police ‘consult sacked head of inquiry’” – chief inspector Goncalo Amaral is on the case. Sort of
The paper says detectives are “no closer to solving the case”. And the campaign to find Madeleine goes on…
THE TIMES and THE GUARDIAN: No Madeleine news today
Posted: 1st, November 2007 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,518) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





November 2nd, 2007 at 2:38 am
Fencesitter, if it’s all about Madeleine for you, then Anorak isn’t the right place. It’s all about the media here. Also, we don’t know her, we can’t help her, it’s not our place to be brooding about her.
Hi Kris. You sound very reasonable for Krissie? Didn’t you used to be quite angry?
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:36 am
well, anyway, sit on your fence and think about it tomorrow.
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:34 am
Karen, sorry about Dumpbull. I was (sometimes) Krissie (but not always) but never Karalyn. It’s one of those crazy insults they seem to hurl at women for no particular reason except they are drunk and stupid and don’t know how else to respond. Crazy stupid chick just like those other crazy stupid chicks!
And if you’re American, too, god help you!!
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:34 am
I’m sorry it is all about Madeleine,Iwant the next person to sully her name please have the bottle to put their name and address to their post
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:28 am
And, Fencesitter, at risk of sounding morbidly cynical, once a story gets to this point, it really is NOT about the child anymore. Who knows what happened to sweet Madeleine– I hope only that she isn’t suffering somewhere. This is absolutely a cultural phenomenon at this point, and it’s all about the media, and the way we use it, and the way we respond to it. Satire, parody, humor. There’s no reason to feel bad… it’s really NOT about Madeleine anymore. Madeleine has probably been dead for six months and what we are doing here is not hurting her.
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:26 am
Jolie, what I find interesting about that link (yes, the names are very common, I have no idea if they are our Anorak Pr0-McCanners) is that nearly all the names are female.
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:24 am
Fencesitter - I wouldn’t feel too ashamed, the satire is aimed at the media, and the McCanns’ use of the media, with a bit of amateur sleuthing thrown in. It’s not aimed at Madeleine. I think everyone feels sorry for the poor wee thing.
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:22 am
1432
Jolie Says:
November 2nd, 2007 at 1:57 am
1426 an observer
Perhaps you missed some of my recent posts that said I wouldn’t be visiting Hitchen’s blog after today and that after a good night’s sleep, I expected to be over my anger at him, mostly. I’m an emotional person. Once I get riled up, it’s hard for me to cool back down. That’s just the way it is. I hate dishonest, disrespectful behavior–it totally ticks me off. But it doesn’t do me (or anyone else) any good to continue beating the drum once I’ve gotten things off my chest.
—————–
sorry - missed it.
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:15 am
Jolie.
Thanks for the link. And about Hitchens - I think you were right to complain about him and I for one am glad you did. There is something very suspicious about him and I think it is important for people to share opinions about online personalities. Especially ones who apparently are wielding a lot of sway over quite a few people. It’s a shame that Paulo and Transfatty’s blogs don’t have as much traffic but maybe that is for the best.
Good night and don’t let that evil ugly old bald geezer bother you anymore!
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:14 am
1436
Jolie Says:
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:05 am
Trannyfattyacid has a new blog post up and she mentions viral marketing that the McCann team is involved in and put a link to a website for McCann supporters. On that home page, I clicked on ‘Teams’ and think we may have found some of the pro-McCannics from our forum on that list. Of course, these are common names, so it could be coincidental
———————————
well spotted jolie
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:11 am
1402
The Real Stig Says:
November 2nd, 2007 at 1:23 am
……….Good night all, I’m off.
Yes. Off your blank’n rocker.
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:08 am
Good night, everyone.
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:07 am
Karen
I appreciate satire, in fact I have had some fun myself here. I also want to hang my head in shame, this is the life of a three year old girl and even satire must have some boundaries
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:06 am
And here’s the link to Trannyfattyacid blog post
http://trannyfattyacid.blogspot.com/2007/11/talking-to-yourself.html
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:06 am
1417. 1428.1431 Peter O
Thank you for all your reasoned and sensible posts. You’ve had your work cut out for you this evening! Maybe a sopt of brandy or port would do you right?
It’s amazing isn’t tit? Broken records all of them. This is one of the drawbacks of vinyl.
LOL I have felt Maria is the yin to Stig’s yang.
Have nice night!
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:05 am
Trannyfattyacid has a new blog post up and she mentions viral marketing that the McCann team is involved in and put a link to a website for McCann supporters. On that home page, I clicked on ‘Teams’ and think we may have found some of the pro-McCannics from our forum on that list. Of course, these are common names, so it could be coincidental…
http://www.helpingtofindmadeleine.com/Teams.html
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:02 am
Fencesitter, I’m sure you’re very sweet - but if you want to take the case deadly seriously is a media satire site really the best place to post?
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:02 am
Right.. that’s my rant over! Must get some sleep. G’Night folks.
November 2nd, 2007 at 1:59 am
1420 Thea Says:
Thea – I **THINK** what Stig is ‘alluding to’ is that there were allegedly a series of break ins prior to the McCann’s arrival. I **THINK** also there may have been no signs of forced entry. Ergo, it would ‘appear’ that someone had a master key/keys.
Stig is so much better than me at finding all the relevant links, so I’ll let him pull them up, if indeed he wants to.
Anyway….
I believe this is er.. bollocks!
The break ins happened the previous season I believe, but I can’t verify that so I’m happy to be proven wrong.
And in case there is any doubt, I don’t believe a word of this!
November 2nd, 2007 at 1:57 am
1426 an observer
Perhaps you missed some of my recent posts that said I wouldn’t be visiting Hitchen’s blog after today and that after a good night’s sleep, I expected to be over my anger at him, mostly. I’m an emotional person. Once I get riled up, it’s hard for me to cool back down. That’s just the way it is. I hate dishonest, disrespectful behavior–it totally ticks me off. But it doesn’t do me (or anyone else) any good to continue beating the drum once I’ve gotten things off my chest.
November 2nd, 2007 at 1:57 am
I will go to bed now, my thoughts are with Madeleine, in case you have forgotten she is a small 3 year old little girl. When you feel compelled to belittle this case look to your , nieces , grandchildren, or god children, or even children and hang your heads in shame. This is for real. I hope the perpratators are brought to justice, and she will rest in peace.
November 2nd, 2007 at 1:52 am
1407 Maria Says:
I have never, ever defended the decision to leave the children out of earshot. Never.
There is every evidence, from their own mouths that they left their children alone and unsupervised.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Maria – You’re like a broken record too!
Who cares whether Social Services may or may not take children away? The fact remains that had the McCann’s not made such a crap parenting choice on successive nights, we wouldn’t be here discussing an alleged abduction.
You say ‘many parents do similar things’ – Even if that’s true, it’s still a crap parenting decision.
The fact that a site has a listening service does not absolve a parent or carer from the responsibility of making a sensible parenting choice. Leaving young children unattended is never a good parenting choice.
I see the checking time is now down to 20 minutes.. it was 30 minutes a while ago?
Of course there can be no automatic assumption that they are guilty of anything else just because they make crap parenting decisions on successive nights.
Whichever mealy mouthed way you attempt to dress this up, every time you repeat this nonsense it just hacks of parents, and others who care for/about children, that the McCanns’, their supporters and apologist can conceive of any circumstances in which it might be acceptable to leave young children alone.
And, you say “There is every evidence, from their own mouths that they left their children alone and unsupervised.” This is because if Madeleine wasn’t abducted they absolutely MUST keep up the illusion that Madeleine was alive and well and in the apartment after 9.00 PM on May 3rd. Once you start to challenge the abduction theory you must also start to question the claims of every one who could potentially be involved. Ergo, it is incorrect to assume that just because the McCann’s have admitted to leaving their children unattended, that they left ALL of their children unattended.
November 2nd, 2007 at 1:48 am
And Dumpbull I love the way you think saying fuck off is manic.
Do they not allow bad language in the retirement home?
November 2nd, 2007 at 1:46 am
Dumpbull - what was the point of you even being here?
I’m not manic, I just don’t appreciate some dickhead telling me that someone is gone when they weren’t.
November 2nd, 2007 at 1:46 am
1401
Jolie Says:
November 2nd, 2007 at 1:21 am
——————-
jolie,
if mike pisses you off so much stop going there. it is his blog and he is open about moderating it too.
i am not supporting him but your rant is going nowhere here. get over it and find somewhere else.
i posted a question to him; i don’t expect it to be posted and don’t expect an answer. that’s the way it is.
November 2nd, 2007 at 1:44 am
1420 Thea
LOL to you too
Go to bed… See you 2morrow
November 2nd, 2007 at 1:42 am
Goodnight Stig.
I think you defend Kate and Gerry because you like them.
But it is neglect.
November 2nd, 2007 at 1:42 am
Karen…You sound just as crazy as Krissie AKA karalyn…
Maybe you should borrow some of her Prozac!!! Ohhh you poor child..Must be a little manic..
I won’t be responding anymore Because I’m OUTTA HERE Ugly ass bitch!!
November 2nd, 2007 at 1:41 am
Dumpbull - Karalyn was posting under my name. She hadn’t gone.
November 2nd, 2007 at 1:41 am
1418. Pilimary,
LOL!