
Madeleine McCann: A Titanic Struggle With The Germans And Slavery In Morocco
MADDY WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “IS MADELEINE A CHILD SLAVE IN MOROCCO?”
“Madeleine McCann may have been condemned to a life of slavery working as a ‘little maid’ for a rich Arab family…” Or not
Page 5: “’Madeleine will be used as a little maid’” – so suggests Inspector Hicham Alaoui of the Moroccan Police in El Hajeb near Fez
Little maids, notes the paper, are “collected by rich families as ‘curiosities’ as well as servants. A woman from a group called Ecpatuk says such children are “vulnerable to abuse”. The Express sys the girls are abused “physically, emotionally and sexually”. Can Madeleine McCann be among them? Maybe…
“Sacked detective called in to help with the probe” – Chief Inspector Goncalo Amaral is talking with new chief Paulo Rebelo
“Fury over magazine ‘sick’ ads” – German magazine titanic has lampooned the case, using Madeleine’s image in spoof supermarket adverts. Gerry and Kate McCann call it “sick” and “very hurtful”. The magazine says Madeleine McCann is “getting a bit much for many people”
DAILY MIRROR front page: “Clear us… you have no case”
Says a friend of Kate and Gerry McCann: “They are adamant they should now be cleared”, as are many suspects in ongoing investigations
Page 7: “McCann ‘clear us’ demand’” – Says Clarence Mitchell: “If the reports are true clearly it would indicate the police absolutely, and quite rightly, have no case against Kate and Gerry”
DAILY MAIL front page: “Oh. Come off it, Heather, how dare you compare your ordeal to Kate McCann’s?” Heather Mills is on the telly
Page 7: “Police pursuit of McCanns ‘is running out of steam’” – The public prosecutor in Portugal says Kate and Gerry McCann will not face further police interviews “unless detectives can produce stronger evidence against them”
Mark Williams-Thomas, a former detective with Surrey Police, says the McCann’s private detectives could be on the wrong trail in Morocco. Or not
THE SUN page 24: “GERMAN MAG’S SICK JOKES ABOUT MADDIE – McCanns’ horror as spoof ad pokes fun at lost girl”
Ad advert in satirical Titantic magazine promises the kitchen cleaner will “remove all traces at the home” even DNA traces. The adverts warn that just because Madeleine’s face is on the product it does not mean they can be taken for free. The Sun is disgusted. It reproduces the images and the words to allow its readers to share in its disgust
A march on the German embassy is not yet in the planning
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE SICK NEW TWIST – Horror at German abuse of missing tot”
The Germans have her. A German paedo!
Page 7: “TOTALLY SICK – A full reproduction of the spoof adverts. “McCann’s agony as rag mocks hunt for Maddie.” Thanks to the Star and Sun, the McCanns now know that an obscure German magazines has made jokes about their case
Says Clarence Mitchell: “It shows Madeleine herself no respect… The magazine did not seek permission to use Madeleine’s image to be used on this so-called joke. It they had it would almost certainly not have been given”
So much for doing anything to keep Madeleine in the news
THE INDEPENDENT page 5: “Mills: I am treated as badly as Kate McCann and Diana.” More on Lady Mucca
THE TELEGRAPH page 9: “Madeleine police ‘consult sacked head of inquiry’” – chief inspector Goncalo Amaral is on the case. Sort of
The paper says detectives are “no closer to solving the case”. And the campaign to find Madeleine goes on…
THE TIMES and THE GUARDIAN: No Madeleine news today
Posted: 1st, November 2007 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,518) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





November 1st, 2007 at 6:24 pm
There is no comparison to a child running off in the shop or on the park, most active bright children wil do this, but to hide for half an hour is not normal and is usually a sign of attention, they expect the parents to at least go and look for them. It took them half an hour- go figure! Also if your child is known to be this way a close eye is usually given- it’s very macabre that now -her eye is the focus of the world. Why?
November 1st, 2007 at 6:23 pm
697 Remigius
But possible?
November 1st, 2007 at 6:23 pm
617
Judith C
I don’t know if it’s a mine. I only know, from a very true source
a) They know what hapened in Huelva
b) They know - the dangerous relations that the Mccans have
For know , this is the only thing i can remember.
IT’S TIME TO MAKE JUSTICE TO MADELEINE
Are we going to allow , this horrendus murder , stays unpunished ????
November 1st, 2007 at 6:22 pm
Peter H
I know pervs are highly opportunistic, I was really commenting on the time frame and the pattern of checking that the McCanns have given. They say Madeleine was alone for only 15 mins - and there’s no way he could have predicted when those 15 mins were going to be, and no one has seen a man hanging about for hours every night. He could be a waiter or something?
The man who took the girl from the bath was caught, because the risk he took was stupid - the mother knew the girl was missing and phoned the police within minutes. I would expect some more concrete sightings of a man hanging around if it was that difficult for him.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:21 pm
681 thea
I would like to see evidence that KM did actually search on the night of 3 May. I recall reading that she stayed in the apartment and did not join the search, which I thought strange at the time.
If Inspector Gadget and Pitty are correct I believe this is a significant tell-tale sign.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:20 pm
erm… no, i just got in. i been to picturesque hadsund today.it is the home of the blondest fittest laydeeez on the planet. they almost make my wife look normal.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:20 pm
668, karen
Thx Karen but it was not just today it has been mentioned before.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:19 pm
Dora - please forget about some of the more colourful ways people have expressed themselves and look at the intricacies of the case instead.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:19 pm
John, I agree with your points about the abduction by stranger theory. If it is true than the kidnapper is the luckiest criminal of the 21st century and the McCanns are the unluckiest.
Thanks for the Gazeta Digital article too.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:19 pm
682 Peter H
Drat. I will have to wait for my coffee. meanwhile….
Never say “never,” never say “always.” But my understanding of pedophiles is that they will do a lot to avoid detection. Some go in one direction, which is to find jobs with lots of child-contact, first of all because it’s highly stimulating for them, and some pedophiles prefer to be stimulated just by being around children, then going home to some pornography and enjoying themselves that way.
Others look for opportunity, which presents itself in child-oriented places (but so does added scrutiny). So many typical pedphiles become work-at-homes, where they don’t have to have office banter and contact with non-stimulating, bothersome adults. They enter professions where they can work alone, at home. And then, they seize whatever opportunities come their way, like the child selling candy door-to-door for their school, the child seeking a lost puppy….
Then, there is the relative pedophile….who thinks he will never be suspected, and doesn’t need to worry about getting in and out of the child’s bedroom because, well, he’s been invited over for the weekend! Or he’s baby sitting! He knows the child well enough to know what makes the child tick, and manipulates the child into not tattling.
The evil stranger who snatches a child from their bed in the dead of night surely exists, but they are an exceedingly rare breed of pedophile. And most likely, it is someone who knows the family, or lives nearby and knows the routine.
With so much back and forth checking that allegedly went on in Portugal at MW, the chances of a pedophile wanting to snatch a child under the very real chance of being caught seem rather slim.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:19 pm
685 psstfairy
I was stunned by the reaction there today. I’m glad you came forward here to confirm what I witnessed and experienced. Your having been a contributor to the Hitchen’s blog for the last few months makes your comments even more credible. I’ve only been reading (not posting) for the last couple of weeks. Well, at least I’ll save some of the time I devote to reading about Madeleine by skipping his blog from now on.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:17 pm
681. Thea, Kate didn’t search? Oh, well, now the story changes. Friends would search, women too, everyone would……
Pitty says thanks Thea. This now is very very interesting. Pitty says that if they didn’t search, or only just half-heartedly, well they are guilty. No need to look further.
What they did or didn’t say to the kidnappers on the TV looks bad, but believe Pitty, not looking, or only looking a little tells the whole story!
November 1st, 2007 at 6:17 pm
666, Thea (apt number for you)
If people are ignoring my posts then why was I posted a number of times today? The serial killer thing was mentioned many times. If you choose not to believe it then that is up to you. Check back in the archives, there is no reason for me to lie about it.
I always imagine you spending ages trying to come up with your crap jokes - trust me a job in stand up comedy won’t take you very far. You always come across as quite vicious, angry and some what wierd. Stop posting me if you don’t like me. Really it is fine by me.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:17 pm
684 well excuse me matey! What im saying is it is suspicious for them to have taken unpaid leave and if i remember rightly gerry said on his blog at some point that they were not using the fund for their own benefit so that was an outright lie wasn’t it. Lets not forget gerry tells many lies and has done from the start. So dont come the crap about not being suspicious.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:16 pm
683 bulldump
I know! Hey…did you get the modified tiny tears doll?
November 1st, 2007 at 6:16 pm
I am still pondering over the experts saying that an abduction would take minutes, inside job etc.
Well a couple of points which may well have been touched on before so I apologise in advance:-
If it was so well organised why did the abductor remain in the apartment half an hour after the McCanns had left it to go to the tapas bar- surely the abductor would have been aware of when they left.
What kind of random abductor goes in to a dark apartment on the off chance that no adult is there and that the children are there. If the random abductor had seen the parents leave surely the best time for the abduction was within a few minutes of them having left.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:15 pm
674 cool…
Some people thing the number of the beast is 616
These folks may disagree…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icAzyx8EsKU
November 1st, 2007 at 6:15 pm
678
john
Thank You
Now I believe ,the P.J. ,knows she is dead.
And that just make me sooo sick
November 1st, 2007 at 6:14 pm
New article:
Sick Nurse Jailed for 28 Hoax Calls claiming she knew where Madeleine was
(published Nov. 1)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=491077&in_page_id=1770
(found this in the ‘Send in the Clowns’ article on transfattyacid’s blog)
November 1st, 2007 at 6:14 pm
i am quite sure that gerry has been living off of donated money for the last 6 months and since he will not have his mind on his proper job he will continue doing so.
the only difference being, that prior to his return to work the choice to give money was the donators, now there is a man at work without his heart or mind on the job being given nhs money. there is no chioce for people to pay him now
November 1st, 2007 at 6:13 pm
Sick nurse jailed for 28 hoax calls claiming she knew where Madeleine was
published Nov. 1
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=491077&in_page_id=1770
(found this in the ‘Send in the Clowns’ article on transfattyacid’s blog: http://trannyfattyacid.blogspot.com/ )
November 1st, 2007 at 6:11 pm
Hi Jolie
I was the one who posted the original anonymous response on Mike Hitchen’s blog today. I’ve been a regular contributor to his blog for a few months but I didn’t want to offend him with my post. I thought it was a very mild criticism, but he responded by calling me a chook and all sorts of things.
I also agree with your sentiments that he’s getting too big for his boots and is misleading people and his ‘disciples’ with his ‘knowledge’ of the McCanns. He’s a fake, I realise that now. It doesn’t matter how politely you criticise him you get a right old earful back again. He’s not nice.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:11 pm
brianthesnail Says:
“672 whos fault is that then. They chose to have unpaid leave. and its there bloody fault maddies gone. its about time that lazy bastard got off his arse and went back to work dont you think?”
That was not the question. I just pointed out that youmg families often go to their financial limits when buying their family home. That’s not suspicious.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:10 pm
stevo, i have read so much about the minor ditties in the german publication, but what about ours?
where’s our recognition for our dastardly deeds. where’s our recognition for our contempt of the sterile ones?
November 1st, 2007 at 6:10 pm
515 Karen
You make a reference in the post to the possible abductor being ‘one brave perv’. Paedophiles are prepared to take chances. They are desperate and they are clever. Comparable to a drug user and his next hit. Nothing will get in the way of their next fix.
It wasn’t long ago that that necky sexual predator took a chance through the back door of a family home in Newcastle, helping himself to the little girl in the bath while her mother was sat in the lounge. What was the likelihood of getting caught in that instance?
The dirty little sex offender crept quietly in to the rear of the house, probably tip-toeing up the stairs to grab the child and escape the same way.
Don’t fool yourself that Paedophiles won’t grab an opportunity like that, especially if they have been sizing up your kid in the days before, watching the family routine.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:09 pm
625 coolandcalms says: (snipped)…..and yes they were out with the search… I know that firsthand from someone who there at the time staying nearby.
All the locals, residents, holidaymakers…. all were out scouring the complex, apartments, the beach etc. Though it did irritate the local police who took it as criticism.
The local searching by all and sundry (including the McCanns and their group) went on for days.
It was filmed for all the news channels…….
Uh first of all that would still be hearsay. YOU did not witness the event. So your inane misinformation is just that: inane misinformation like much of your tripe.
Hearsay: Evidence based on what the witness has heard someone else say, rather than what the witness has personally experienced or observed.
Second of all the police did not pereceive the assistance of locals and visitors (Aren’t “locals” and “residents” the same? Why the need to be redundant?) as “irritating”. Now you are either lying outright or have once again erred on believing hearsay.
Last, from information I was given firsthand - not only were the police grateful of locals and visitors assisting in the search for Madeleine but from my firsthand account only Gerry and one other male from the McCann group went out on searches - no one else did and this includes Kate. Kate did not search nor did the rest of the group except for another male which my contact believes was O’Brien. None of the others took part in the searches.
I used to give you the benefit of the doubt but now I know exactly what kind of “honest” person you are.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:09 pm
675
I think they took unpaid leave to look virtuous - but it was a pointless gesture, and it backfired in the end - all gestures do, that’s why they should ditch the P.R., and do and say what they feel and believe, even if they look bad sometimes, at least they’d look natural.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:09 pm
672 Ferdinand
I must say that I don’t know any young professional who’d dip their hand into the till of money set aside to “find” their lost child or pay the ransom! They might try the mommy and daddy bank, they might talk to their lender, they might, uhm…take a second job? Or work, oh, three days a week instead of two? I mean, if you only work two days a week somewhere, how do you even know where your parking space is?
The McCanns’ methods of solving their financial problems seem strange to me, and to others.
In the light most favorable to the McCanns, they appear to be very immature people. That they are both in the “caring” professions with such immaturity is, well, frightening.
In the light most unfavorable to the McCanns, such immaturity and insolvency provide a motive for murder.
Going to get more coffee now, so my family knows I am still alive.
November 1st, 2007 at 6:07 pm
This may have already been pointed out today but if not it may be interesting for everyone to read the views of a Moroccan organisation which works in combatting child abuse as well as Mark W-T the renowned British “expert”.
http://gazetadigitalmadeleinecase.blogspot.com/2007/11/moroccan-police-madeleine-in-morocco.html
November 1st, 2007 at 6:07 pm
gerry said: “We have always said that at six months we didn’t want to look back and say ‘I wish we had done that and wish we had done this’.
“But now we feel we have done everything we can do to establish the search for Madeleine on an ongoing basis and we feel we have the proper infrastructure now in place to find her.”
the lying cunt, he has maintained throughout that they would never cease to look for maddie, well in my opinion they have never really started because they already knew it was futile to look for her in any other place than they had put her.
he could at least have admitted defeat if he were to be innocent!!!