<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Homosexuals In Anglican Church Fudge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/177598/broadsheets/homosexuals-in-anglican-church-fudge.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/177598/broadsheets/homosexuals-in-anglican-church-fudge.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nemesis</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/177598/broadsheets/homosexuals-in-anglican-church-fudge.html/comment-page-1#comment-120046</link>
		<dc:creator>Nemesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/broadsheets/177598.html#comment-120046</guid>
		<description>A no nonesense bolt up the bum is  required  !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A no nonesense bolt up the bum is  required  !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squeezy</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/177598/broadsheets/homosexuals-in-anglican-church-fudge.html/comment-page-1#comment-119387</link>
		<dc:creator>Squeezy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/broadsheets/177598.html#comment-119387</guid>
		<description>Wiktionary:

"fudge

(euphemism) Colloquially, used in place of fuck"

Oh, so fudging in the C of E is used in place of the other thing you're not supposed to do with people with the same naughty bits.

What does fudging look like?  Bit messy?

I've heard some people like the taste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wiktionary:</p>
<p>&#8220;fudge</p>
<p>(euphemism) Colloquially, used in place of fuck&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, so fudging in the C of E is used in place of the other thing you&#8217;re not supposed to do with people with the same naughty bits.</p>
<p>What does fudging look like?  Bit messy?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard some people like the taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Stickle</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/177598/broadsheets/homosexuals-in-anglican-church-fudge.html/comment-page-1#comment-119303</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Stickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/broadsheets/177598.html#comment-119303</guid>
		<description>I find the word fudge in this title particularly amusing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the word fudge in this title particularly amusing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/177598/broadsheets/homosexuals-in-anglican-church-fudge.html/comment-page-1#comment-118839</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/broadsheets/177598.html#comment-118839</guid>
		<description>I don't know why religion is still taken so seriously. It's only there to make us feel better about death. Why not just enjoy the bible stories, take comfort in the prayers and hymns, be kind, encourage faithfulness, but accept people as they are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why religion is still taken so seriously. It&#8217;s only there to make us feel better about death. Why not just enjoy the bible stories, take comfort in the prayers and hymns, be kind, encourage faithfulness, but accept people as they are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/177598/broadsheets/homosexuals-in-anglican-church-fudge.html/comment-page-1#comment-118792</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/broadsheets/177598.html#comment-118792</guid>
		<description>I can never understand why the Church of England strains at this gnat whilst swallowing the camel of their next Supreme Governor not eligible for marriage in their own Church, being an adulterer in civil marriage with another adulterer, together having destroyed their respective marriages?  How do you administer a coronation oath to such a person?

I'd rather break bread with some gay couples provided they do not lie to and cheat on their spouses, then try to tell them they are crazy for imagining it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can never understand why the Church of England strains at this gnat whilst swallowing the camel of their next Supreme Governor not eligible for marriage in their own Church, being an adulterer in civil marriage with another adulterer, together having destroyed their respective marriages?  How do you administer a coronation oath to such a person?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather break bread with some gay couples provided they do not lie to and cheat on their spouses, then try to tell them they are crazy for imagining it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
