Madeleine McCann: The Scenic 17, Dr Denny Says And DNA
MADDY WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY EXPRESS page 21: “New DNA tests could unlock the mystery of lost Madeleine”
More DNA tests at the Forensic Science Service laboratory in Birmingham And this after the DNA tests proved inconclusive…
“Seventeen human cells could provide a major breakthrough in the Madeleine McCann mystery…The DNA samples are being examined by scientists in Britain and Portuguese detectives believe the evidence could unlock an investigation which is now in its eighth month”
The Tapas 7. The Tapas 9. The Scenic 17…
Guilhermino Encarnacao, head of the Policia Judiciaria in the Algarve, says: “We have asked the laboratory to carry out more tests and exhaust every possibility of obtaining conclusive results”
Says Forensic scientist Dr Ronald Denny (not working on the case): “A cell is negligible – you can just about see it under a microscope. It’s a sample someone would leave behind with the touch of a finger. But when placed with certain biochemicals a small amount of DNA grows to a size that can be analysed”
“GP Kate and heart consultant Gerry” are “both 39”
THE SUN page 15: “Only 17 cells of DNA in hol car”
“Cops looking for Madeleine McCann are banking on ‘a smidgen’ of DNA evidence. Scientists have found just 17 cells on samples taken from a hire car rented by Kate and Gerry McCann and their holiday flat”
Says independent forensic expert Dr Ronald Denny: “It is not a hopeless task. If they have 17 cells then they can carry it off very effectively in Birmingham, one of the leading labs in the world”
DAILY MAIL page 5: “Mission Impossible – Forensic evidence too poor to solve mystery of Madeleine, say police”
But Dr Denny is telling two papers otherwise…
A source tells Portuguese newspaper 24 Horas: “It is highly unlikely they will find a DNA connection…If everybody refuses to make statements, which is perfectly possible, we will be left with our hands tied. This is a case which could hang by a thread for years and we may never be able to prove what actually happened to that child”
But what about Dr Denny. Why don’t they ask Dr Denny?
Says Dr Denny: “A person, or their possessions, have to be present for the cells to come off”
DAILY MIRROR page 7: “Maddy: Smidgen of DNA will work?”
Dr Denny is on the case, or not. But the “independent British expert” does have an opinion which is able to share with all of us
DAILY STAR page 9: “MADDIE: IT’S ALL DOWN TO 17 CELLS”
Dr Denny is talking to Star readers…
“Top cop in blast at private eyes” – Former deputy chief constable of Manchester Police John Stalker says of Metodo 3: “I’m not impressed with these people at all. I’d be very surprised if they get anywhere”
This is the same Stalker who delivered “MY VERDICT” to Express reader back in October
“There’s a world of difference in following a paper chase and finding a flesh-and-blood child”
Or a newspaper chase…
DAILY TELEGRAPH page 11: “Madeleine tests are ‘mission impossible’”
Says a source in 24 Horas: “The samples reportedly include microscopic spots of blood from the Ocean Club apartment where Madeleine went missing and ‘bodily fluids’ and hair from the Renault Scenic hired by the McCanns 25 days after their daughter’s disappearance. The samples are so small that, while it will not be impossible to find a DNA link between the car, apartment and Madeleine, it’s highly unlikely The tests being carried out are extremely complex”
But Dr Denny says…
Says Clarence Mitchell: “Kate and Gerry’s friends have consistently said they are happy to be re-interviewed by police if necessary. Indeed, they are keen to help if it clears up any inconsistencies. They, like Gerry and Kate, have nothing to hide”
THE GUARDIAN and THE INDEPENDENT: “No Madeleine news today
Posted: 4th, December 2007 | In: Broadsheets Comments (1,344) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- eggman on Daily Mail Scuppers BBC’s Wrong Shipping Forecast
- agw on Daily Mail Scuppers BBC’s Wrong Shipping Forecast
- Bat E Bird on I’m A Celebrity: Samantha Fox Is Shrinking As ‘Lesbian’ Lover Katie Price Quits
- Bat E Bird on In Photos: Susan Boyle Sings Rockefeller Center Plaza In New York City
- yampster on Daily Mail And Tax Payers’ Alliance Attacks BBC Over Its Free Trees For A Better Planet
December 4th, 2007 at 1:25 pm
Think the curtains were meant to go with the towel, little kid, donkey gold star, daily mirror etc (sorry cant help it)
December 4th, 2007 at 1:25 pm
196
bountyhunter Says:
December 4th, 2007 at 1:02 pm
All in deep mourning. please convey to all Bounty sympathisers.
———————————-
Yes, it’s disconcerting that such a small animal can make such a large space in your heart when it’s gone.
When my own much loved cat departed to chase things in the wild blue yonder I endeavoured to console myself with the reflection that Heaven would probably replace the missing bits which had been sacrificed some years earlier in the hope of reducing the number of times that he got the worst of a fight.
Which involved all the fights he ever got into…
December 4th, 2007 at 1:25 pm
226 maria
gordie mcbroon does not have an image
he does not have a personality either
December 4th, 2007 at 1:24 pm
wHAT? i AGREE
One of the mystery donations to the labour party could have come from the Mc laundry machine (with the help of metodo3)
December 4th, 2007 at 1:23 pm
214
May
Link to Mirror article which mentioned that the curtains were washed:
“CURTAINS in the flat - said to have had blood on them - were washed after Madeleine’s disappearance”
http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/sunday/2007/09/16/exclusive-brit-cops-to-quiz-kate-mccann-98487-19796880/
December 4th, 2007 at 1:22 pm
Matt
Normal if and when there were no suspicions. He spoke to Gillian Gibbons this morning.
PMs do things like that. Good for image etc.
GB lost a child himself and was presumably genuinely sorry for them and hoping for a good outcome, insofar as he bothered to give any thought to the matter. Would imagine he has more pressing issues though!
December 4th, 2007 at 1:22 pm
The MCCANN’S and Tapas 7 get together over weekend making sure next statement’s match.Strange that not on tv for 7 month church service,or statment ,tv interview,new photo or Comical giving statement on tv. Not like them to miss a photo opportunity.all imo,
December 4th, 2007 at 1:21 pm
Mary 190
“We should all be concentrating on finding wee Madeleine instead of sniping at her lovely, caring and innocent parents. Miricles have been known to happen at this time of year.”
AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!! WHO IS THAT VOMITING INTRUDER?????????????????
December 4th, 2007 at 1:21 pm
Matt
G Brown and Co are embroiled in the case because Kate and Gerry used to donate cash under a false name and he dont want it coming out.
December 4th, 2007 at 1:20 pm
215 Lulu
How insightful you are! I’m thinking that you’re in the South West somewhere, I hope your lads have got a surfboard, it is the law you know, I’ve reported several parents to the relevant authorities for deprivation re not getting their kids a board
December 4th, 2007 at 1:20 pm
207 maria
their holy fragrances are just a couple of doctors
pretty thick too from their meaningless spoutings and complete lack of understanding of basic grammar (see gerrymeandering blogs)
they are friends of gordie mcbroon’s brother
when mcbroon had his 45 minute phone call (as chancellor) he thought nuw laburr were untouchable
things have change to the effect that he is too scared to hold a general election
how the mighty have fallen
and a couple of crap “doctors” too
excellent fun
December 4th, 2007 at 1:19 pm
Hideki
At present the conclusion is that they are following a star down a country road in the Virgin Islands
December 4th, 2007 at 1:18 pm
I wonder why G Brown and Co got so embroiled in this case ?
December 4th, 2007 at 1:17 pm
Where have the McCanniballs gone?
Even “Cuddle” Kate and Gerry do not know. They are “lost souls”…
December 4th, 2007 at 1:17 pm
Steve
Jane
December 4th, 2007 at 1:15 pm
209
rockhopper
mouth full of tiffin, huh?
December 4th, 2007 at 1:15 pm
38 Noseycow
Did you miss washing the curtains? Never understood how this was known as I haven’t seen the link. Sorry if this has been mentioned, have only just tuned in.
December 4th, 2007 at 1:15 pm
203
what ?
Which one is Judas?
December 4th, 2007 at 1:15 pm
188 hannasus
i’d like the film to be based on the pj
i’d love to be a fly on the wall at pj hq now…
December 4th, 2007 at 1:14 pm
SteveT
LOL x 2
December 4th, 2007 at 1:13 pm
205 Lulu
Ugh no way, Debm.
December 4th, 2007 at 1:13 pm
Joseph, Please stop posting!
December 4th, 2007 at 1:12 pm
Anyone else having probs refreshing page? Mine is trying to download a picture? Think is the web page not my PC
December 4th, 2007 at 1:12 pm
204
what ?
Which one will be Judas?
December 4th, 2007 at 1:11 pm
addedsugar
The info about a diplomat having allegedly advised caution on Govt support should actually SCOTCH all the rubbish about a Govt cover-up. As soon as a diplomat found that the PJ had any suspicions about the McCanns, if indeed, such a diplomat existed at all and, if s/he did, actually had contact with the PJ, the normal thing would be to advise the Govt to be cautious about its support for the McCanns, I would have thought.
The story may be total rubbish; it wasn’t even in all the papers who never scruple to lie if it suits their purposes. But if it is true, it should reassure everyone that a proper investigation is being held and will continue until there are definite results. Probably at the beginning, the support was of a similar order as that given to Gillian Gibbons. Once it was known (if it was) that the police had suspicions, the nature of the “official” support would clearly have to change. The UK Govt would have to be seen to support the investigation of another EU country, even though it was bungled and slow in the early days, and would presumably wish to listen to PJ suspicions anyway.
Conspiracy theory was always daft, in my view. The British establishment wishing to cover up this particular cime and protect G and K? I think not! Why? What power do these people have? None. A couple of doctors. They are not politicians, cabinet members, in the know on foreign policy etc. etc. What Govt secrets could they have? GM knows about hearts and KM is a GP. Why would anyone powerful wish to protect them if they’ve committed a crime?
If there is evidence that they are guilty, they will be charged. No cover-up. If there is no evidence, they should not be charged. No cover-up, just no evidence. The PJ won’t let it go. We don’t know the state of the evidence but it doesn’t seem to be conclusive at the moment.
December 4th, 2007 at 1:09 pm
rockhopper
201
Well, first 2 were on there, but the others hadn’t occurred to me.
But no and no.
You from Newquay boy?
December 4th, 2007 at 1:08 pm
WILL
So happy to have kids back well and healthy for more than a month after Princes demise.
Mrs B will bounce back eventually, I have had a bit of whisky bad form only 3. pm here.
December 4th, 2007 at 1:07 pm
Were the Tapas nine having a last supper
December 4th, 2007 at 1:06 pm
Lulu
Love it!
December 4th, 2007 at 1:06 pm
Lulu,
No prodding, poking, sub-letting, wet wetsuits……