More shame.

983 chenier

Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. I was not referring to one of Hideki’s particular posts and I would have thought that was obvious. I was referring to the general theme of all of Hideki’s posts which I assume led to the ban. How do you know that there wasn’t a nugget of truth in them? If I didn’t catch the exact post which caused the uproar, so what? I don’t sit reading this forum all day and night. I just happened to see that he/she was banned and was musing why, do you have a problem with that?
———————————————————————–

The odd thing is that people announce that they don’t bother to read other posts with the air of expecting others to imediately recognise that they are busy and important people with busy and important things to do.

They don’t seem to realise that it simply confirms the impression that they are conceited twats sounding off for the pleasure of hearing their cyber voices echoing in the void.

If you are going to accuse the Mods and Admin of dark deeds, best get the facts straight.

Admittedly, the facts indicate that there was no dark deed, which rather khybers the claim, so I will rephrase.

If you are going to accuse the Mods and Admins of dark deeds, do so amusingly. Sarcasm will do…

Thank you!

morning all

To make them crack.

Oh, dear. I’m stilling feeling mortified from my googling horror.

Maybe the PJs don’t want the items and it’s all speculation.

Maybe the PJs are just bugging them to make crack.

Maybe they want to see if they’ll panic and clean the items, or will lose them or will refuse to hand them over - in which case that’s a hint that they’re guilty.

+++++++++++++++++++++++

Will put your suggestion up to the Tech Guy

One of many things that have puzzled me regarding their investigation is, why are the PJ forewarning the McCanns about what they want to cease and when?

Where is the element of surprise? What if these items mysteriously disappear and can never be re-examined?

I don’t understand their process in this regard. Any clues anybody?

Wish I hadn’t. Seems I put my occupation as playwright. Must have been pretending to be someone else. Or drunk. :opps:

Thanks!!!!

Many thanks,

I was looking for something in backpages. Instead of saying ….”I think so and do said..” its nicer to check who actually said what….. and credit that poster correctly

Top Right of the Page, sandwiched in between ‘Recent Post’ and ‘Twitterings’ is a Google Search Box. Enter posters name in here, click search button and the page will reload with details of previous posts by that person positioned above the ‘Twitterings’ section. Space limits means only a few posts will be shown but there are ‘button’s providing option to view ‘more’ postings.

I suspect, however, that this is not quite what you are looking for. Admin/Mods have a facility to look back at all posts from a particular person, but am not sure if there is any way for ordinary punters to do this - other than by using the ‘find’ option on your browser to jump to posts from a particular user.

Perhaps someone else can help here?

Anyone know a ’shortcut’ way to filter out comments other than those you want to read from a particular person?

Below is a list of some Smilies currently supported in Opinions. In the examples that follow I have included an * before and after the emoticon text to enable you to ’see’ what must be typed. When you want to use any of these smiles in your posts, however, DO NOT type the *. Instead, type the emoticon text preceded IMMEDIATELY and after by a colon, i.e., no space between the colons and the text.

:*smile*:

:*grin*:

:*sad*:

:*shock*:

:*???*:

:*cool*:

:*mad*:

:*razz*:

:*neutral*

:*wink*:

:*lol*:

:*oops*:

:*cry*:

:*evil*:

:*twisted*:

:*roll*:

:*!*:

:*?*:

:*idea*:

:*arrow*:

:*mrgreen*:

I know its early for you and Sorry off topic

but how do you track back on comments from one particular poster

do you click on their name and press F4 or summat??

Thanks