
Madeleine McCann: 20 Years Of Fury, Kate And Gerry McCann Prime Suspects, Robert Murat Says Nothing
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MIRROR front page: “YOU’RE STILL PRIME SUSPECTS – McCanns’ fury at police chief warning”
“Kate and Gerry McCann were furious last night after learning they are still prime suspects in daughter Madeleine’s disappearance”
It is now the 105th time Kate and Gerry have reacted with fury of been furious in a tabloid setting
“The couple’s hopes of being cleared today were crushed when police chief Paulo Rebelo asked a judge to extend their arguido status because detectives are sticking to their belief that they accidentally killed the four-year-old”
This was predictable. Robert Murat also remains a suspect
Says McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell: “They are frustrated and angry. Frustrated because, yet again, there appears to be no movement in the case when they know they are innocent. They will continue to push for their arguido status to be lifted”
The Correio da Manha newspaper “claimed Kate and Gerry, of Rothley, Leics, could be charged with perjury and wasting police time”
But don’t the police waste enough of that themselves?
“They have been warned by their legal team they may have to go to the European Court of Human Rights to get their arguido status lifted”
Human rights? What of Madeleine’s rights?
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE - McCANNS ARE MAIN SUSPECTS SAY POLICE”
“Kate and Gerry McCann were dealt a crushing blow last night when a police report accused them of killing their daughter Madeleine”
Says a friend: “They are not the prime suspects. As we understand it, the report talks about the police’s continued belief that Madeleine died accidentally in the apartment and that is why Kate and Gerry remain arguidos. It also talks about Robert Murat remaining an arguido and it discusses the possibility of her being abducted. Well, they can’t have it both ways”
No..?
Says Clarence Mitchell: “Throughout 2007 we have declined to comment on speculation in the Portuguese press. We will follow the same policy in 2008. If this report is true, however, and this interim police report exists, then we believe it contains nothing new. It is simply a restatement of the current position of the police. And we note that it not only discusses Kate and Gerry as arguidos, but also continues to name Mr Murat as an arguido. Crucially it also accepts the possibility that abduction took place”
The green shoots of hope…
THE SUN front page: “McCANN AGONY GOES ON – 246 after Maddie vanished, cops name Kate and Gerry as…PRIME SUSPECTS”
“ANGUISHED Kate and Gerry McCann are facing up to living as suspects over their daughter’s disappearance for another TWENTY years, it emerged yesterday”
Maybe…
Kate and Gerry are “both 39-year-old doctors”
Fact!
DAILY MAIL: “Police ’still think McCanns killed Madeleine by accident’ - and they will be suspects for 20 years”
“A secret police dossier has accused Kate and Gerry McCann of accidentally killing their daughter and hiding her body, it was claimed yesterday. The couple faked four-year-old Madeleine’s abduction, according to a leaked report on the eight-month police investigation”
Lawyer Edward Smethurst, who is co-ordinating the McCanns’ defence, says: “Any report about the leaked document we believe is completely without substance. We think it arises out of pure speculation on the part of the Portuguese papers”
Kate and Gerry McCann are “doctors”
THE SCOTSMAN: “Madeleine’s parents could be under suspicion for 20 years, says judge”
“The prospect of the case dragging on for years was reinforced yesterday by the president of the National Union of Portuguese Judges, Antonio Martins, who said: ‘No-one knows what type of crime was committed. If it was homicide, the investigation can only be shelved after 20 years; if it was kidnap, 15 years’”
On we go…
THE OBSERVER: “After a year in which the torment of Madeleine McCann’s family has dominated the British media, the trials of the Lees - and the hope the new image has given them - seem particularly acute”
The story: “Katrice disappeared on her second birthday from a supermarket in Germany, where her father was serving as a soldier. Her mother turned away for a few moments to fetch a pack of crisps for the girl’s party and when she looked back Katrice was gone”
Twenty six years ago…
FOX NEWS: “Missing Madeleine McCann: Irish Witness ‘Clears’ Murat”
Says Martin Smith, who was on holiday in Praia da Luz: “I told police it was definitely not him because the man wasn’t as big as Murat - I think I would have recognised him because I’d met him several times previously. He was wearing beige trousers and a darker top. We all put him in his early 40s and I didn’t think he was Portuguese”
The Speculation Commented Upon
Posted: 4th, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,150) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





January 5th, 2008 at 1:18 am
I think it adds up pretty much. I also think the T9 have kept stchum because the kid stumbled on a stash of recreationals - IMHO of course. Medical profs taking drugs whilst having kids in their care would not bode well. Other than that I cannot see any other reason for their secrecy.
Wonder if they were stashed in Cuddle Cat and this was the reason for the washing?
January 5th, 2008 at 1:17 am
1008
Thanks for the smile! I am not a triffid or any other plant. I just like to make pertinent observations in plain English. Cheryl needs to find an intellectual forum for novice intellectuals with constipation.
Cheryl has terrible problems with grammar and an inability to make herself interesting! Learn to use the English language in an amusing and articulate way if you are saying f*ck all!. I think she’s trying to sound like an educated person - but comes across like somebody who struggles to get a degree.
Just be yourself Cheryl without rubbishing lesser mortals like me! I will not be unkind to you because you are at distinct disadvantage with your myopia but I can be very cutting when I defend myself and others on here.
God Bless you and keep you from becoming more daft!
January 5th, 2008 at 1:17 am
1013 I recall!
January 5th, 2008 at 1:12 am
poppy
do you think theres any truth in it?
January 5th, 2008 at 1:12 am
YAMPSTER you naugty daredevil, glad you’re back. Happy new year to you!
815 Judith C / yampster:
NEVER EVER use the word “psychiatrist” when “she’s” around.
Btw still catching up posts and happy new year to you too Judith C.
[yes little she-devil IS back
]
January 5th, 2008 at 1:11 am
Yesterdays. Take it you’ve checked it out.
January 5th, 2008 at 1:10 am
983 chenier
Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. I was not referring to one of Hideki’s particular posts and I would have thought that was obvious. I was referring to the general theme of all of Hideki’s posts which I assume led to the ban. How do you know that there wasn’t a nugget of truth in them? If I didn’t catch the exact post which caused the uproar, so what? I don’t sit reading this forum all day and night. I just happened to see that he/she was banned and was musing why, do you have a problem with that?
January 5th, 2008 at 1:09 am
poppy is it a new one?
or yesterdays?
January 5th, 2008 at 1:09 am
1012
brandon flours Says:
January 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
garthy
oops sorry! I like pete docherty and nearly spelt his band!!
i am so sorry!
————————————————–
So you should be…….into Pete docherty?………what ever next?
January 5th, 2008 at 1:09 am
Totje
are you on about bleeding cavader tampons!!?
January 5th, 2008 at 1:09 am
Hi all, just logged on so haven’t time to check all the posts. Have you all looked at Coldwaters post on the Mirror forum?
January 5th, 2008 at 1:07 am
1011
Can’t say No Says:
January 5th, 2008 at 1:05 am
1010
Garth
shut up
Lol
———–
Hang on csn. I havent even started!
January 5th, 2008 at 1:07 am
833
Julie,
I don’t know what’s going on. Just returned from work and a nice evening/dinner with friends.
It seems my theory I stated a couple of days ago about women living in the same house or working at the same place [I'm sure Ian recalls it
] and having their periods at the same time and my question if that also works the same at Anorak really needs a good investigation.
January 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
garthy
oops sorry! I like pete docherty and nearly spelt his band!!
i am so sorry!
January 5th, 2008 at 1:05 am
1010
Garth
shut up
Lol
January 5th, 2008 at 1:04 am
1005
coco Says:
January 5th, 2008 at 1:01 am
——————————————
Are you coco the bleedin clown or what?
January 5th, 2008 at 1:03 am
ve vil not be siilenceddd!!
January 5th, 2008 at 1:03 am
1005

coco
Please stop
I have to go
Lol
January 5th, 2008 at 1:02 am
997
brandon flours Says:
January 5th, 2008 at 12:57 am
—————————————————
January 5th, 2008 at 1:02 am
off topic
but I am sad about the bbc presenter who lost his fiance!
accidents happen all the time
calling the emergency services and answering questions helps so much
January 5th, 2008 at 1:01 am
Cheryl:
Hi! I am not very bright at all and rather unintelligent. I only learned to read and write recently.
However, a blind man on a galloping horse with both ears sliced off and his knob-end hanging off howling in pain would pick up more f*cking clues in a millisecond than you have picked up in the past 8 months.
You lower the tone of Anorak and so I am going out to a swingers party to get pissed now. I am leaving my 3 yr old to look after the 18mths old babies but I will leave the patio doors slightly open in case there is a fire.
Don’t go ringing the police because it’s obviously not against the law anymore coz K and G did it last year. To quote G - What are the chances of a stranger-abduction? F*ucking none! They will all be there when I get back but one could have suffocated another or one could have choked to death on some fluff Hey ho!
January 5th, 2008 at 1:01 am
1002 Garth
Pardon me?
January 5th, 2008 at 1:00 am
1001
brandon flours
I know
Today they invited me to post somewherelse
I was touching some politics
January 5th, 2008 at 12:59 am
996
Ian Says:
January 5th, 2008 at 12:57 am
———————————————-
Good try eyon but you still cant rid the ‘dipstick’ thingy mate. IUGWIM
January 5th, 2008 at 12:59 am
cant say no
I didnt mean you
more the moderators one!
January 5th, 2008 at 12:58 am
801 Tony B
Oh, come, Sir !
“… 2 June 1953, the same morning that Sir Edmund Hillary became the first person to climb Mount Everest, along with the Sherpa, Tenzing.”
1 The announcement was made in the press on the day of the Coronation. The event had happened some time earlier
2 Neither man ever told who was the ‘first’. I believe I am right in saying that to their last days they insisted it was a joint affair - and rightly so.
3 In any event the discovery of Mallory’s (or Irvine’s) body on the ice fall some years ago lead to a fascinating forensic argument, the conclusion of which is that they (M&I) had ‘probably’ been first on the summit.
But in the absence of direct first hand evidence the case would have to be left for people to argue about for generations … Oh, bugger. Rather like this one in fact.
Good night.
January 5th, 2008 at 12:58 am
995 Garth
Dunno, Im bored with this McCann stuff.
January 5th, 2008 at 12:57 am
time to enjoy my night
Till tomorrow
January 5th, 2008 at 12:57 am
Garthy
hows it hanging?
finished a whole babysham!!
better move on too a bacardi breezer!!
where you been?
January 5th, 2008 at 12:57 am
Garthy!
Before you say it, I’ll do it for you…
992 Ian
‘Its what dipsticks do’! Now am I back in the Pro-McCann team?