
Madeleine McCann: 20 Years Of Fury, Kate And Gerry McCann Prime Suspects, Robert Murat Says Nothing
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MIRROR front page: “YOU’RE STILL PRIME SUSPECTS – McCanns’ fury at police chief warning”
“Kate and Gerry McCann were furious last night after learning they are still prime suspects in daughter Madeleine’s disappearance”
It is now the 105th time Kate and Gerry have reacted with fury of been furious in a tabloid setting
“The couple’s hopes of being cleared today were crushed when police chief Paulo Rebelo asked a judge to extend their arguido status because detectives are sticking to their belief that they accidentally killed the four-year-old”
This was predictable. Robert Murat also remains a suspect
Says McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell: “They are frustrated and angry. Frustrated because, yet again, there appears to be no movement in the case when they know they are innocent. They will continue to push for their arguido status to be lifted”
The Correio da Manha newspaper “claimed Kate and Gerry, of Rothley, Leics, could be charged with perjury and wasting police time”
But don’t the police waste enough of that themselves?
“They have been warned by their legal team they may have to go to the European Court of Human Rights to get their arguido status lifted”
Human rights? What of Madeleine’s rights?
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE - McCANNS ARE MAIN SUSPECTS SAY POLICE”
“Kate and Gerry McCann were dealt a crushing blow last night when a police report accused them of killing their daughter Madeleine”
Says a friend: “They are not the prime suspects. As we understand it, the report talks about the police’s continued belief that Madeleine died accidentally in the apartment and that is why Kate and Gerry remain arguidos. It also talks about Robert Murat remaining an arguido and it discusses the possibility of her being abducted. Well, they can’t have it both ways”
No..?
Says Clarence Mitchell: “Throughout 2007 we have declined to comment on speculation in the Portuguese press. We will follow the same policy in 2008. If this report is true, however, and this interim police report exists, then we believe it contains nothing new. It is simply a restatement of the current position of the police. And we note that it not only discusses Kate and Gerry as arguidos, but also continues to name Mr Murat as an arguido. Crucially it also accepts the possibility that abduction took place”
The green shoots of hope…
THE SUN front page: “McCANN AGONY GOES ON – 246 after Maddie vanished, cops name Kate and Gerry as…PRIME SUSPECTS”
“ANGUISHED Kate and Gerry McCann are facing up to living as suspects over their daughter’s disappearance for another TWENTY years, it emerged yesterday”
Maybe…
Kate and Gerry are “both 39-year-old doctors”
Fact!
DAILY MAIL: “Police ’still think McCanns killed Madeleine by accident’ - and they will be suspects for 20 years”
“A secret police dossier has accused Kate and Gerry McCann of accidentally killing their daughter and hiding her body, it was claimed yesterday. The couple faked four-year-old Madeleine’s abduction, according to a leaked report on the eight-month police investigation”
Lawyer Edward Smethurst, who is co-ordinating the McCanns’ defence, says: “Any report about the leaked document we believe is completely without substance. We think it arises out of pure speculation on the part of the Portuguese papers”
Kate and Gerry McCann are “doctors”
THE SCOTSMAN: “Madeleine’s parents could be under suspicion for 20 years, says judge”
“The prospect of the case dragging on for years was reinforced yesterday by the president of the National Union of Portuguese Judges, Antonio Martins, who said: ‘No-one knows what type of crime was committed. If it was homicide, the investigation can only be shelved after 20 years; if it was kidnap, 15 years’”
On we go…
THE OBSERVER: “After a year in which the torment of Madeleine McCann’s family has dominated the British media, the trials of the Lees - and the hope the new image has given them - seem particularly acute”
The story: “Katrice disappeared on her second birthday from a supermarket in Germany, where her father was serving as a soldier. Her mother turned away for a few moments to fetch a pack of crisps for the girl’s party and when she looked back Katrice was gone”
Twenty six years ago…
FOX NEWS: “Missing Madeleine McCann: Irish Witness ‘Clears’ Murat”
Says Martin Smith, who was on holiday in Praia da Luz: “I told police it was definitely not him because the man wasn’t as big as Murat - I think I would have recognised him because I’d met him several times previously. He was wearing beige trousers and a darker top. We all put him in his early 40s and I didn’t think he was Portuguese”
The Speculation Commented Upon
Posted: 4th, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,150) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





January 4th, 2008 at 9:22 am
peter O
I’m looking forward to meeting all those “Mum’s” at the school gate on Monday…. You know…. The ones desperate to hand over their little charges so they can run away and have a coffee and read book/magazine in some relative “peace and quiet!
Love them dearly. No honestly, really I do!
———————————————
Didnt know you lived in Rothely
January 4th, 2008 at 9:21 am
THE SCOTSMAN: “Madeleine’s parents could be under suspicion for 20 years, says judge”
I CAN’T BE ON HERE FOR 20 YEARS !!!
January 4th, 2008 at 9:19 am
Re Clarence Mitchell…
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1284525,00.html
“”"”Madeleine McCann’s parents are “utterly” innocent and
the focus of the police investigation must return to
the hunt to find her, the family spokesman has declared”"”
——————————————————
He has continued to make statements in this vein..”Totally
Innocent”…”Have had nothing to do with their daughter’s
disappearance”….etc etc. All absolute statements of
the parents innocence. No doubt whatsoever..Not..”I believe
in their innocence”, or “I feel they are innocence”.
——————————————————-
If I were part of the PJ Investigating Team, I would haul
Mr Mitchell in for questioning and insist on him revealing
just how he “knows” that the parents are so
“Utterly Innocent”.
I would be also be insisting that he tells me exactly
where he was during the period of April 28th through to
May 3rd especially, and also later.
I would want to know if he was present in the McCann’s
apartment at any time during that period of time.
I would consider him to be very suspect indeed, and would
insist that he convinces me that he himself is not
involved in the child’s disappearance.
If as he says…”Utterly innocent”..then he must be privy
to information which so far may have eluded the PJ, and I
would want to know why he has not volunteered such
important information to us, thereby causing serious
delays in the solving the “mystery” of the “disappearance”.
I would consider him as being, at the very least, a
self professed witness who has deliberately withheld
information essential to the enquiry and has deprived
Police of what could be very important evidence.
As he has made frequent and very definate statements
regarding the parents being “Utterly innocent” then he
must actually know what occurred regarding the
“disappearance”.
I would be demanding that he reveals all he “knows” about
the matter.
I think that such an occurrence would result in a hell
of a lot of the Bombast, Arrogance and Self-importance
and Misinformation which emanates from this pink shirted
PR man.
May not solve the “mystery”, but would certainly cause
him to be much more moderate and realistic in his choice
of, and use of language in the future.
Could even lead to answers not yet known as well.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:18 am
P.S. That was my last post on this Forum. No need for you to ban my access because you want to censor these opinions.
Anti-McCann people on this Forum mean well and I’ve appreciated you, but this Forum has been coopted by pro-McScum posters like Daisy, Cheryl, Peter O, and many many more. There is no opportunity to delve into the truth on this forum. I will stick to the Portuguese ones.
Good bye.
-agw: But it was not your last post was it? You have become tedious and rambling to the point of irrelevance and grossly insulting to other users and moderators.
You will be blocked, marked as a bozo and you may peddle your paedophile theories elsewhere. Other sites may welcome you but I somehow doubt it. You appear to have a total selective outlook if you believe this site to be pro or anti McCann. It is neither, it is pro free speech without others being subject to screaming and hair-pulling such as you exhibit. Go and take your pointless ravings with you.
There is NO censorship…you walked.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:18 am
What do we know about the Webster woman? Why did Clarence Mitchell chuck his top job to look after the McCanns? Was he ordered to do so? On Her Majesty’s Service lol
January 4th, 2008 at 9:15 am
7 SteveT Says: January 4th, 2008 at 8:45 am
I am very dissapointed with the lack of motivation this morning! Peter O seams to be the only one with a genuine excuse.
+++++++++++++
Too kind….. Third cup of coffee! I may have to take up smoking soon though!
(No, I never have….)
January 4th, 2008 at 9:14 am
brandon flours: Sorry no link but he wears it loads and it just seems a bit trendy for a doc to be wearing.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:13 am
25…brandon flours
The great thing about virtual is that there is always the virtual presence
of the landlord in the Headless Woman.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:13 am
26 Swannie Says: January 4th, 2008 at 9:07 am
5 Peter O
“I’m awake… but occupied with “little people”… oh for the start of the school term……”
Edit……. You wanted to be a teacher!
So, pity those of us who aren’t looking forward to the start of the school term quite as much!!
+++++++++++++++
Thank you… Made me smile….
I’m looking forward to meeting all those “Mum’s” at the school gate on Monday…. You know…. The ones desperate to hand over their little charges so they can run away and have a coffee and read book/magazine in some relative “peace and quiet!
Love them dearly. No honestly, really I do!
January 4th, 2008 at 9:11 am
Does anybody know if Diane Webster has a boyfriend or a companion. It would be spooky if that person had influence in Government or drugs companies. lol
January 4th, 2008 at 9:10 am
coco
have you a link
I thought it was a watch from the shopping channel
January 4th, 2008 at 9:10 am
More humour from Mike Hitchen:
“In a startling new development, a witness has come forward with a photograph of a man she says she saw acting suspiciously on the night of May 3, outside what she claims to be the McCann’s apartment.”
“The MCCanns: ‘undred per cent certain it was ‘im.”
http://ionglobaltrends.blogspot.com/2008/01/mccanns-undred-per-cent-certain-it-was.html
January 4th, 2008 at 9:08 am
This is a very interesting quote if accurate:
Says a friend: “They are not the prime suspects. As we understand it, the report talks about the police’s continued belief that Madeleine died accidentally in the apartment and that is why Kate and Gerry remain arguidos.”
Do I read this to mean that the friend and therefore possibly Team McCann, don’t think they should be arguidos if Madeline died accidentally? Maybe this is the key to it after all. She died accidentally and McCanns and friends consider it none of anybody’s business how they conducted themselves after that!!
January 4th, 2008 at 9:07 am
5 Peter O
“I’m awake… but occupied with “little people”… oh for the start of the school term……”
Have you heard the joke:
Johnny: I don’t want to go back to school. You can’t make me. Anyway, I feel sick and I can’t find my pencil case.
Mother: Get up this instant! I’ve got your pencil case and everything else out ready. No, you are not sick and it’s no good having a tantrum about it; kicking and screaming like that. You’ve got to go back and that’s it. You wanted to be a teacher!
So, pity those of us who aren’t looking forward to the start of the school term quite as much!!
January 4th, 2008 at 9:07 am
matt morning !
do you and stevet do shifts in the bar?
January 4th, 2008 at 9:07 am
Hi Brandon flours! I noticed a long time ago that Gerry wears a bangle of mabe silver or white gold but it looks like a manacle. He wears it on the telly - you will have seen it. Bit trendy lol
January 4th, 2008 at 9:04 am
Good morning all !!!
January 4th, 2008 at 9:04 am
Brandon,
Thanks.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:04 am
It couldn’t have been one of us lot because we are strategic logical thinkers and we would have got our stories straight before we pretended there had been an abduction. This has to be somebody with that ‘first among equals’ attitude similar to what the McCanns exude! Somebody like the Duke of Edinburgh lol
January 4th, 2008 at 9:03 am
Clarence Mitchell:
“Throughout 2007 we have declined to comment on speculation in the Portuguese press. We will follow the same policy in 2008. If this report is true, however, and this interim police report exists, then we believe it contains nothing new. It is simply a restatement of the current position of the police. And we note that it not only discusses Kate and Gerry as arguidos, but also continues to name Mr Murat as an arguido. Crucially it also accepts the possibility that abduction took place”
Talk about contradicting yourself! We are declining to comment on police speculation but, just for the hell of it I will anyway!!
January 4th, 2008 at 9:02 am
stevet
have a good flight x
January 4th, 2008 at 9:02 am
whats a manacle bracelet ?
January 4th, 2008 at 9:01 am
See you all later!
January 4th, 2008 at 8:59 am
14
brandon flours
Or me.
January 4th, 2008 at 8:58 am
Ha! Or an S&M knob if you see the pics of KM on arrse.co.uk lol. I’m intrigued by his regular wearing of his manacle bracelet when he’s squeezing KM into submission during interviews, It’s a wonder her fingers don’t break and yet she barely flinches.
January 4th, 2008 at 8:58 am
wasnt me
January 4th, 2008 at 8:56 am
9 coco
Good questions! Something stinks.
January 4th, 2008 at 8:55 am
stevet
dammit
well im going to toast my other side for a few more minutes then
is it snowing?
January 4th, 2008 at 8:54 am
Brandon,
Dont think so. Looks like some derinate movement this month though.
January 4th, 2008 at 8:54 am
coco
hes not just any knob
hes an M&S knob!!!