
Madeleine McCann: 20 Years Of Fury, Kate And Gerry McCann Prime Suspects, Robert Murat Says Nothing
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MIRROR front page: “YOU’RE STILL PRIME SUSPECTS – McCanns’ fury at police chief warning”
“Kate and Gerry McCann were furious last night after learning they are still prime suspects in daughter Madeleine’s disappearance”
It is now the 105th time Kate and Gerry have reacted with fury of been furious in a tabloid setting
“The couple’s hopes of being cleared today were crushed when police chief Paulo Rebelo asked a judge to extend their arguido status because detectives are sticking to their belief that they accidentally killed the four-year-old”
This was predictable. Robert Murat also remains a suspect
Says McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell: “They are frustrated and angry. Frustrated because, yet again, there appears to be no movement in the case when they know they are innocent. They will continue to push for their arguido status to be lifted”
The Correio da Manha newspaper “claimed Kate and Gerry, of Rothley, Leics, could be charged with perjury and wasting police time”
But don’t the police waste enough of that themselves?
“They have been warned by their legal team they may have to go to the European Court of Human Rights to get their arguido status lifted”
Human rights? What of Madeleine’s rights?
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE - McCANNS ARE MAIN SUSPECTS SAY POLICE”
“Kate and Gerry McCann were dealt a crushing blow last night when a police report accused them of killing their daughter Madeleine”
Says a friend: “They are not the prime suspects. As we understand it, the report talks about the police’s continued belief that Madeleine died accidentally in the apartment and that is why Kate and Gerry remain arguidos. It also talks about Robert Murat remaining an arguido and it discusses the possibility of her being abducted. Well, they can’t have it both ways”
No..?
Says Clarence Mitchell: “Throughout 2007 we have declined to comment on speculation in the Portuguese press. We will follow the same policy in 2008. If this report is true, however, and this interim police report exists, then we believe it contains nothing new. It is simply a restatement of the current position of the police. And we note that it not only discusses Kate and Gerry as arguidos, but also continues to name Mr Murat as an arguido. Crucially it also accepts the possibility that abduction took place”
The green shoots of hope…
THE SUN front page: “McCANN AGONY GOES ON – 246 after Maddie vanished, cops name Kate and Gerry as…PRIME SUSPECTS”
“ANGUISHED Kate and Gerry McCann are facing up to living as suspects over their daughter’s disappearance for another TWENTY years, it emerged yesterday”
Maybe…
Kate and Gerry are “both 39-year-old doctors”
Fact!
DAILY MAIL: “Police ’still think McCanns killed Madeleine by accident’ - and they will be suspects for 20 years”
“A secret police dossier has accused Kate and Gerry McCann of accidentally killing their daughter and hiding her body, it was claimed yesterday. The couple faked four-year-old Madeleine’s abduction, according to a leaked report on the eight-month police investigation”
Lawyer Edward Smethurst, who is co-ordinating the McCanns’ defence, says: “Any report about the leaked document we believe is completely without substance. We think it arises out of pure speculation on the part of the Portuguese papers”
Kate and Gerry McCann are “doctors”
THE SCOTSMAN: “Madeleine’s parents could be under suspicion for 20 years, says judge”
“The prospect of the case dragging on for years was reinforced yesterday by the president of the National Union of Portuguese Judges, Antonio Martins, who said: ‘No-one knows what type of crime was committed. If it was homicide, the investigation can only be shelved after 20 years; if it was kidnap, 15 years’”
On we go…
THE OBSERVER: “After a year in which the torment of Madeleine McCann’s family has dominated the British media, the trials of the Lees - and the hope the new image has given them - seem particularly acute”
The story: “Katrice disappeared on her second birthday from a supermarket in Germany, where her father was serving as a soldier. Her mother turned away for a few moments to fetch a pack of crisps for the girl’s party and when she looked back Katrice was gone”
Twenty six years ago…
FOX NEWS: “Missing Madeleine McCann: Irish Witness ‘Clears’ Murat”
Says Martin Smith, who was on holiday in Praia da Luz: “I told police it was definitely not him because the man wasn’t as big as Murat - I think I would have recognised him because I’d met him several times previously. He was wearing beige trousers and a darker top. We all put him in his early 40s and I didn’t think he was Portuguese”
The Speculation Commented Upon
Posted: 4th, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,150) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





January 4th, 2008 at 10:04 am
Brando - do you never sleep?
even when i don’t have time to post i try and pop in to read whats going on - you are an ‘anorak staple’ and deserve a medal!
January 4th, 2008 at 10:03 am
Dr K McCann….Born 5th March 1968
Dr G P McCann..Born 5th June 1968
January 4th, 2008 at 10:02 am
brandon - ugh
January 4th, 2008 at 10:01 am
http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq3BQ1u9
January 4th, 2008 at 10:01 am
Shouldd we throw a suprise party Brandon?
Perhaps we could set up a business delivering ‘four-year-old-blonde-girl-o-grammes’ ?
January 4th, 2008 at 9:59 am
morning noseycow!
Kates 40th soon lol
January 4th, 2008 at 9:58 am
Morning all- may i apologies in advance for my typing - middle child ‘broke’ my keyboard, so I’ve pinched theirs!!
Any one of anyexperience of pc’s used by children will tell you of sticking keys… please remind me to disinfect my hands before eating anything! lol
RE the Drs’ McC: How long do we think they will be billed as 49 years old? Anyone got an invite to their 40th?
More importantly how long will they be billed as ‘Doctors’ ??
January 4th, 2008 at 9:57 am
lone pigeon
Is it going to snow today?
January 4th, 2008 at 9:52 am
58…coco
Dr K McCann is a GP…
Dr G P McCann is a Hospital Consultant…..
January 4th, 2008 at 9:49 am
The cops walked into the apartment and said hello, hello, hello as they noticed Madeleine’s bed had not been slept in for a while and it was all neat and tidy. They noticed that nobody had come or gone through the window because the paint and moss had not been disturbed and automatically assumed that Madeleine had wandered off or she they had ‘done her in’. They alerted the coast and the ports and did a thorough job at the time given how obvious it all was. They also realised that they would be looking for a body that bery night because they knew she did not go missing on the 3rd of May. Check the clothes they were wearing on the first day of the holiday and then check the ‘last day’s’ clothing. Same as! They were just to busy to attend to the details. Typical f*cking doctors lol
January 4th, 2008 at 9:48 am
56…Patch
Don’t hold your breath yet, Patch.
We are not sure if that info is reliable.
Was posted onthe Mirror Forum yesterdayby at least two differently
named posters.
One of which, Vision, had registered as a Forum poster that very same day.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:47 am
56
Patch Says:
January 4th, 2008 at 9:44 am
SNIP
… if they were asked to return by someone at MW, it would point to the McCanns being enraged, …
SNIP
………………………………………..
No it would not… the McConns only get furious!
January 4th, 2008 at 9:47 am
Checking to see if posts go through
January 4th, 2008 at 9:45 am
55…Mr B
Well….he must have been there if he “knows” that the parents are
totally innocent….otherwise he is, at the very least, being misinformative,
or else lying through his teeth.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:44 am
I am a little excited at the clouseau post, borrowed from another forum, yesterday. This ties in with something Tony B was talking about last year when he said there might be CCTV footage of Gerry somewhere he shouldn’t be i.e. being somewhere else at the time he was supposed to be playing tennis. Instead he was somewhere other than PDL. It also places the Tapas lot at Chaplins the night of the 2nd, which has always been a strong rumour and mentions the crying heard by Mrs Fenn in early reports. I really hope this is a truthful post as it really seems to offer some hope. If, indeed, they were as far away as Chplins, neglect is even more pronounced and, if they were asked to return by someone at MW, it would point to the McCanns being enraged, I would think, as they are not people who would welcome any criticism of their behaviour. Could Madeleine have been the one to take the brunt of her parents annoyance at being shamed regarding their lack of efficient child care? Many of us here think that Madeleine met her fate before the evening of the 3rd and this would make sense, given this scenario. 8 months and no real last sighting and no truth emerging. How can this be?
January 4th, 2008 at 9:41 am
36
coco Says:
January 4th, 2008 at 9:18 am
36
coco Says:
January 4th, 2008 at 9:18 am
………………………………………
Regarding the Webster woman and the whole shenanigan - and sorry this has been mentioned before…
I am not aware of any group photographs from PdL - its the sort of thing that often gets taken at joyous (aka drunken) get togethers.
I just cannot reconcile that no-one would have taken the tabloid’s silver dollar and sold any number of photographs. I am sure such a picture would demand a bigger wad than the delightful ones of Ms Brooks in today’s Scum.
So, perhaps there is some sor of D Notice (is that the right term?). Sorry if I have missed something but is it known that Clarry was in PdL prior to 3 May. If so that could be the link.
The augido status seems to me to produce a situation akin to sub-judice - so why are all the comments from the Mcconns supporters subject to the rules (have I misinterpreted the rules?).
Sorry about the ramblings.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:39 am
52…Peter O
Very much so…..would be a marvellous sight to see….the PJ
outdoing the PR man in matters of PR.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:37 am
51…coco
I am sure that if you addressed those very questions to the
Leicestershire Social Services you would very soon get a
very clear example of what an “embarrassed silence” actually
sounds like.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:35 am
42 brandon flours Says: January 4th, 2008 at 9:24 am
Matt
He always says abduction or disapearance
never neglect or murder
++++++++++++
Yes, good spot Brandon flours… Seemingly always very careful with word selection? Almost like there maybe be some “truth” in them not being involved in her “disappearance”, because it wasn’t actually “them” that moved her body, though that doesn’t rule out others being involved on their behalf, in my opinion.
Matt – re Clarence… If he is Tapas 10, or knows who this persons is, or the person(s) who ultimately wants this case kept from ever going to trial(s) etc… Wouldn’t that be an “Ace card” for the PJ to hold up their sleeve until an opportune moment in the case? E.g. Say about the time they brought charges against someone(s), they then call in others for questioning/make them arguido/a’s?
January 4th, 2008 at 9:34 am
brandon flours lol
Am I a simpleton thinking that this arrogant pair of first-among-equals should only be seeing the children under supervision? I feel like a mad person.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:33 am
46…coco
Mysteries atop mysteries.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:31 am
45…brandon flours
You can rest assured that Anorak is Mr Rebelo’s favourite bedtime reading
as he happily munches on his sardine sandwich and swills down another beer.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:29 am
coco
you will garth salivating with that sort of talk
January 4th, 2008 at 9:27 am
40 brandon flours Says: January 4th, 2008 at 9:22 am
peter O
I’m looking forward to meeting all those “Mum’s” at the school gate on Monday…. You know…. The ones desperate to hand over their little charges so they can run away and have a coffee and read book/magazine in some relative “peace and quiet!
Love them dearly. No honestly, really I do!
———————————————
Didnt know you lived in Rothely
+++++++++++++
Well, not in, but near… Well, nearer than say Sydney…
January 4th, 2008 at 9:27 am
Why are the McCanns children not in care if big burly intelligent policemen are suspicious that they are implicated in the death of their other child. Who would be responsible if anything happened to one of them now? Just theorising lol. Atop Portuguse cop was saying that they should have got 3 years for admitting they were 200 feet away just having a booze and a meal. Will somebody please explain why the kids are not in care. I feel as if I am the simpleton.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:27 am
I am sure anorak is saved to the pjs favourites list
January 4th, 2008 at 9:26 am
37 Hideki Says: January 4th, 2008 at 9:18 am
P.S. That was my last post on this Forum. No need for you to ban my access because you want to censor these opinions.
Edit…. but this Forum has been coopted by pro-McScum posters like Daisy, Cheryl, Peter O, and many many more. Edit….
Good bye.
++++++++++++++
Sorry that you feel you have to leave. You are however still incorrect in your assertions about my views of the McCann’s and their friends.
________________
Mods and Admin
Just a generally jaundiced and self deceiving view of anyone and everything, I’ve unapproved the post as its irrational and ranting and contradicting everything the poster said anyway. The fights are best kept within that one head , and not plastered all over the site
January 4th, 2008 at 9:25 am
42…brandon flours
Indeed….Thank you for your evidence, Ms Flours.
The virtual PJ are grateful.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:24 am
Matt
He always says abduction or disapearance
never neglect or murder
January 4th, 2008 at 9:24 am
39…Swannie
All together….”OH, YES YOU CAN” !!!!!