<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madeleine McCann: An Intruder, Murat&#8217;s False Alibi And David Payne Is Murat&#8217;s Double</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tinsel</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-59#comment-179080</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinsel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-179080</guid>
		<description>1172
SC45 Says: 
January 8th, 2008 at 4:19 pm
I found it odd that the Express reported this morning that Ms Tanner’s partner was the one that wanted to change his statement so that he too said that he saw the mystery ‘child carrier’.

Notwithstadnig the fact that it adds weight to Ms Tanner’s own ’sighting’ and sounds like a real stitch up, I thouught thr pervailing view on this site was that the changing of the statement by one of the “Tapas 9″was to distance themselves from the goings-on of May 3rd not to add strength to the McC version of events.

So, did the Express get that bit wrong this morning or did posters to this site jump to the wrong conclusions?

It does seem strange to me, if the Express is right, that CM feels the need to maintain that the “Tapas 9″ are as one and nobody is changing their story.

***

It strikes me as a "Hail Mary" play on the part of Team McCann.

Whiffs of desperation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1172<br />
SC45 Says:<br />
January 8th, 2008 at 4:19 pm<br />
I found it odd that the Express reported this morning that Ms Tanner’s partner was the one that wanted to change his statement so that he too said that he saw the mystery ‘child carrier’.</p>
<p>Notwithstadnig the fact that it adds weight to Ms Tanner’s own ’sighting’ and sounds like a real stitch up, I thouught thr pervailing view on this site was that the changing of the statement by one of the “Tapas 9″was to distance themselves from the goings-on of May 3rd not to add strength to the McC version of events.</p>
<p>So, did the Express get that bit wrong this morning or did posters to this site jump to the wrong conclusions?</p>
<p>It does seem strange to me, if the Express is right, that CM feels the need to maintain that the “Tapas 9″ are as one and nobody is changing their story.</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>It strikes me as a &#8220;Hail Mary&#8221; play on the part of Team McCann.</p>
<p>Whiffs of desperation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SC45</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-59#comment-178729</link>
		<dc:creator>SC45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-178729</guid>
		<description>It all went quiet...

try another thread?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all went quiet&#8230;</p>
<p>try another thread?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SC45</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-59#comment-178538</link>
		<dc:creator>SC45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-178538</guid>
		<description>I found it odd that the Express reported this morning that Ms Tanner's partner was the one that wanted to change his statement so that he too said that he saw the mystery 'child carrier'.

Notwithstadnig the fact that it adds weight to Ms Tanner's own 'sighting' and sounds like a real stitch up, I thouught thr pervailing view on this site was that the changing of the statement by one of the "Tapas 9"was to distance themselves from the goings-on of May 3rd not to add strength to the McC version of events.

So, did the Express get that bit wrong this morning or did posters to this site jump to the wrong conclusions?

It does seem strange to me, if the Express is right, that CM feels the need to maintain that the "Tapas 9" are as one and nobody is changing their story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found it odd that the Express reported this morning that Ms Tanner&#8217;s partner was the one that wanted to change his statement so that he too said that he saw the mystery &#8216;child carrier&#8217;.</p>
<p>Notwithstadnig the fact that it adds weight to Ms Tanner&#8217;s own &#8217;sighting&#8217; and sounds like a real stitch up, I thouught thr pervailing view on this site was that the changing of the statement by one of the &#8220;Tapas 9&#8243;was to distance themselves from the goings-on of May 3rd not to add strength to the McC version of events.</p>
<p>So, did the Express get that bit wrong this morning or did posters to this site jump to the wrong conclusions?</p>
<p>It does seem strange to me, if the Express is right, that CM feels the need to maintain that the &#8220;Tapas 9&#8243; are as one and nobody is changing their story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-59#comment-178261</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-178261</guid>
		<description>1079
Cheryl Says: 

January 7th, 2008 at 12:07 am 
MODS AND ADMIN - JUNE JOHNSON

HERE IS THE ONE I REFERRED TO WHERE HE HAD STATED HIS THREAT AND CAPABILITIES AND THEN INTERESTING ONE UNDER THAT I’VE ATTACHED FROM YAMPSTER #718 RE HIS SUSPICIONS HE HAD OF SOMEONE DOING IT LAST WEEK ON HERE

698
Dr. Watson Says: 

January 6th, 2008 at 7:03 pm
Maria,

I once asked you to ignore me, please, I do not deserve your attention.

Jane,

Your comment is sickening. Perverting the course of justice is a criminal offence, people wgo cover up for criminals should be jailed. I call is justice, you state that as Nazism. I know you IP address, I know your other names your post under.
Do not abuse people. You do not want me to splash your real name abd e-mail across anorak. Once more, what you said is sickening.

718
yampster Says: 

January 6th, 2008 at 7:30 pm
696
Dr. Watson 

When I came on here last Friday and suggested that ’someone’ was collecting IP addresses and E-mail adresses for publication it was scoffed at. Now someone has finally admitted it. Thank you for vindicating me and my previous post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1079<br />
Cheryl Says: </p>
<p>January 7th, 2008 at 12:07 am<br />
MODS AND ADMIN - JUNE JOHNSON</p>
<p>HERE IS THE ONE I REFERRED TO WHERE HE HAD STATED HIS THREAT AND CAPABILITIES AND THEN INTERESTING ONE UNDER THAT I’VE ATTACHED FROM YAMPSTER #718 RE HIS SUSPICIONS HE HAD OF SOMEONE DOING IT LAST WEEK ON HERE</p>
<p>698<br />
Dr. Watson Says: </p>
<p>January 6th, 2008 at 7:03 pm<br />
Maria,</p>
<p>I once asked you to ignore me, please, I do not deserve your attention.</p>
<p>Jane,</p>
<p>Your comment is sickening. Perverting the course of justice is a criminal offence, people wgo cover up for criminals should be jailed. I call is justice, you state that as Nazism. I know you IP address, I know your other names your post under.<br />
Do not abuse people. You do not want me to splash your real name abd e-mail across anorak. Once more, what you said is sickening.</p>
<p>718<br />
yampster Says: </p>
<p>January 6th, 2008 at 7:30 pm<br />
696<br />
Dr. Watson </p>
<p>When I came on here last Friday and suggested that ’someone’ was collecting IP addresses and E-mail adresses for publication it was scoffed at. Now someone has finally admitted it. Thank you for vindicating me and my previous post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-59#comment-178246</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-178246</guid>
		<description>Mods and Admin

Who is giving out posters information? we haven’t seen any actually being given out, I asked Cheryl to email me with details two days ago, I’m still waiting to hear from her.
Nobody is censored for holding different views - prove what you are saying.
And freedom of speech is dead here? oh right,thanks for telling us.
What threats?
Your post is blanket accusations and no proof

_____________
IT WAS PUT IN LARGE CAPS ON THE SITE AS I COULDN'T REMEMBER EMAIL ADDRESS TO SEND IT.  GO BACK TO SITE AND ONE CAN'T MISS IT.

Which site? do you mean the forums?  I'll scroll around in the archives then, when I have time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mods and Admin</p>
<p>Who is giving out posters information? we haven’t seen any actually being given out, I asked Cheryl to email me with details two days ago, I’m still waiting to hear from her.<br />
Nobody is censored for holding different views - prove what you are saying.<br />
And freedom of speech is dead here? oh right,thanks for telling us.<br />
What threats?<br />
Your post is blanket accusations and no proof</p>
<p>_____________<br />
IT WAS PUT IN LARGE CAPS ON THE SITE AS I COULDN&#8217;T REMEMBER EMAIL ADDRESS TO SEND IT.  GO BACK TO SITE AND ONE CAN&#8217;T MISS IT.</p>
<p>Which site? do you mean the forums?  I&#8217;ll scroll around in the archives then, when I have time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chenier</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-59#comment-178111</link>
		<dc:creator>chenier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-178111</guid>
		<description>1047
Sledgehammer Says: 

January 7th, 2008 at 11:54 pm 
chenier, yes and the tax man like everyone else will do as the government of the day tell them, what the government wants the government gets, despite rumours of democracy.

-----------------------------------

Tosh.

This is a constitutional issue, and it really isn't easy to change it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1047<br />
Sledgehammer Says: </p>
<p>January 7th, 2008 at 11:54 pm<br />
chenier, yes and the tax man like everyone else will do as the government of the day tell them, what the government wants the government gets, despite rumours of democracy.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Tosh.</p>
<p>This is a constitutional issue, and it really isn&#8217;t easy to change it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-59#comment-178098</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-178098</guid>
		<description>1154 Freddy

Pamela, 81, is reported to have told cops she heard Maddie crying for her absent parents for hours — and Gerry and Kate promised it would never happen again. 

She has denied the claims. 
**********
Of course it wont happen again.....I wonder why for god sake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1154 Freddy</p>
<p>Pamela, 81, is reported to have told cops she heard Maddie crying for her absent parents for hours — and Gerry and Kate promised it would never happen again. </p>
<p>She has denied the claims.<br />
**********<br />
Of course it wont happen again&#8230;..I wonder why for god sake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: May</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-59#comment-178022</link>
		<dc:creator>May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 10:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-178022</guid>
		<description>1154
Freddy Says: 

January 8th, 2008 at 5:09 am 
**************

Move over, Michael Caplan!  LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1154<br />
Freddy Says: </p>
<p>January 8th, 2008 at 5:09 am<br />
**************</p>
<p>Move over, Michael Caplan!  LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Totje</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-59#comment-178020</link>
		<dc:creator>Totje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 10:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-178020</guid>
		<description>1156
Duncan,

You said : {...} "The Forums work best when there are a variety of opinions/viewpoints up for discussion. A Forum where only one view is expressed is a sterile environment."

I'd say amen to that! 

And now testing my patience..... : 
&lt;a href="http://s238.photobucket.com/albums/ff265/totje2004/?action=view&amp;current=36_1_55.gif" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1156<br />
Duncan,</p>
<p>You said : {&#8230;} &#8220;The Forums work best when there are a variety of opinions/viewpoints up for discussion. A Forum where only one view is expressed is a sterile environment.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say amen to that! </p>
<p>And now testing my patience&#8230;.. :<br />
<a href="http://s238.photobucket.com/albums/ff265/totje2004/?action=view&amp;current=36_1_55.gif" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moriarty</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-58#comment-177993</link>
		<dc:creator>Moriarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-177993</guid>
		<description>1155
DuncanR

The mods and admin here are completely biased towards a clique of posters who rule this site by spin and bullying. Freedom of speech is dead on this site which has become a platform for someone not dissimilar to Gerry McCann. Certain posters use abusive and personal attacks, give out personal details with impunity. Other posters are censored for just holding different views. Satire is dead here and the mob rules. Debate, you say? Only if you repeat the party line. Hardly debate. Contributors are leaving to escape the stranglehold of the thugs here on anorak and their knuckledragger bodyguards. Threats are allowed by mods and admin who not only allow it but actively encourage it. A site once feared by the McCanns is now one megalomaniacs second home. The free thinkers leave on a daily basis.

______________________

Mods and Admin

Who is giving out posters information? we haven't seen any actually being given out, I asked Cheryl to email me with details two days ago, I'm still waiting to hear from her.
Nobody is censored for holding different views - prove what you are saying.
And freedom of speech is dead here? oh right,thanks for telling us.
What threats?
Your post is blanket accusations and no proof</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1155<br />
DuncanR</p>
<p>The mods and admin here are completely biased towards a clique of posters who rule this site by spin and bullying. Freedom of speech is dead on this site which has become a platform for someone not dissimilar to Gerry McCann. Certain posters use abusive and personal attacks, give out personal details with impunity. Other posters are censored for just holding different views. Satire is dead here and the mob rules. Debate, you say? Only if you repeat the party line. Hardly debate. Contributors are leaving to escape the stranglehold of the thugs here on anorak and their knuckledragger bodyguards. Threats are allowed by mods and admin who not only allow it but actively encourage it. A site once feared by the McCanns is now one megalomaniacs second home. The free thinkers leave on a daily basis.</p>
<p>______________________</p>
<p>Mods and Admin</p>
<p>Who is giving out posters information? we haven&#8217;t seen any actually being given out, I asked Cheryl to email me with details two days ago, I&#8217;m still waiting to hear from her.<br />
Nobody is censored for holding different views - prove what you are saying.<br />
And freedom of speech is dead here? oh right,thanks for telling us.<br />
What threats?<br />
Your post is blanket accusations and no proof</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Totje</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-58#comment-177991</link>
		<dc:creator>Totje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-177991</guid>
		<description>1151
Duncan,

Thanks very much for helping me out.

Nice piccie, was that you running to come to rescue me?
Patience is a virtue, and I'm afraid my friends wouldn't call that first when people ask them about me [my characteristics].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1151<br />
Duncan,</p>
<p>Thanks very much for helping me out.</p>
<p>Nice piccie, was that you running to come to rescue me?<br />
Patience is a virtue, and I&#8217;m afraid my friends wouldn&#8217;t call that first when people ask them about me [my characteristics].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-58#comment-177962</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-177962</guid>
		<description>1158
an observer Says: 

January 8th, 2008 at 8:01 am 
never got an answer from the mccann supporters yesterday, again i ask…

why won’t kate answer the PJ’s questions if she wants to help find maddie?

*******************
....coz they wont find her and she has been advised to just shut up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1158<br />
an observer Says: </p>
<p>January 8th, 2008 at 8:01 am<br />
never got an answer from the mccann supporters yesterday, again i ask…</p>
<p>why won’t kate answer the PJ’s questions if she wants to help find maddie?</p>
<p>*******************<br />
&#8230;.coz they wont find her and she has been advised to just shut up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-58#comment-177960</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-177960</guid>
		<description>Good morning
Before I am off to work: why dont they ALL  just say the freaking truth?????
What a mess.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good morning<br />
Before I am off to work: why dont they ALL  just say the freaking truth?????<br />
What a mess&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suspicious One</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-58#comment-177954</link>
		<dc:creator>Suspicious One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-177954</guid>
		<description>I somehow find a lot of these "pieces of evidence" highly unlikely. For one, I highly doubt Madeleine's parents to be the killers because why all the publivity then? People would clearly try searching to help them and what if they did eventually find that they killed their daughter? Well here's jail for the McCann's who are DOCTORS!

Robert Murat, seems a little suspicious but why is it that there's no concrete evidence to convict him? His Girlfriend Micheala is now a suspect all because someone thought he saw her handing Madeleine over? That's just witnesses, and as far as we all know, most sitings were incorrect! SO why should this one suddenly be correct? It's called "Desperation" Because the police never did do a good job finding correct evidence, now in order to not seem STUPID they are PRETENDING to know who did this crime.

If You ask me, I somehow think the McCann's are being set up. I have a funny feeling that someone from the police or the police could've been involved........ 

And if the blood found in the car is indeed Madeleine's, and investigators are saying that it's impossible, the doesn't that only make sense that some1 put it in the car when the Mccann's hired it?Since it was so EASY to find and FRESH? Why would the Mccann's still be driving the car they used to transport their possibly dead daughter?

I also though think Madeleine is alive, because what good would a dead child be to a person?  Maybe the ransom wasn't demanded becaus the child was put into use? Weres the evidence that Madeleine IS ACTUALLY dead? 

Oh and someone please help me to understand why all the witnesses that say they saw madeleine, not run after and ask something to her? WHO cares about bloody politness when a childs life could be at danger here?!

It's all a bit weird, and I think someone possibly involved in the investigation is the kidnapper....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I somehow find a lot of these &#8220;pieces of evidence&#8221; highly unlikely. For one, I highly doubt Madeleine&#8217;s parents to be the killers because why all the publivity then? People would clearly try searching to help them and what if they did eventually find that they killed their daughter? Well here&#8217;s jail for the McCann&#8217;s who are DOCTORS!</p>
<p>Robert Murat, seems a little suspicious but why is it that there&#8217;s no concrete evidence to convict him? His Girlfriend Micheala is now a suspect all because someone thought he saw her handing Madeleine over? That&#8217;s just witnesses, and as far as we all know, most sitings were incorrect! SO why should this one suddenly be correct? It&#8217;s called &#8220;Desperation&#8221; Because the police never did do a good job finding correct evidence, now in order to not seem STUPID they are PRETENDING to know who did this crime.</p>
<p>If You ask me, I somehow think the McCann&#8217;s are being set up. I have a funny feeling that someone from the police or the police could&#8217;ve been involved&#8230;&#8230;.. </p>
<p>And if the blood found in the car is indeed Madeleine&#8217;s, and investigators are saying that it&#8217;s impossible, the doesn&#8217;t that only make sense that some1 put it in the car when the Mccann&#8217;s hired it?Since it was so EASY to find and FRESH? Why would the Mccann&#8217;s still be driving the car they used to transport their possibly dead daughter?</p>
<p>I also though think Madeleine is alive, because what good would a dead child be to a person?  Maybe the ransom wasn&#8217;t demanded becaus the child was put into use? Weres the evidence that Madeleine IS ACTUALLY dead? </p>
<p>Oh and someone please help me to understand why all the witnesses that say they saw madeleine, not run after and ask something to her? WHO cares about bloody politness when a childs life could be at danger here?!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all a bit weird, and I think someone possibly involved in the investigation is the kidnapper&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freddy</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-58#comment-177950</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-177950</guid>
		<description>1158
an observer Says: 
why won’t kate answer the PJ’s questions if she wants to help find maddie?
------------------------
Who says she won't answer their questions? Kate has said she will answer them. Goodness, she has even practically offered to swim over to Portugal if need be. It is not her fault that the Portuguese do not want to see her on the front pages in a swimsuit. She has been heavily criticized for her flat chest and monotone emotion-less voice and for her remarkably dry tears. But it is the incompetent PJ that told her not to bother coming back to Portugal. They said, "just wait, Kate" and she has been waiting for them ever since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1158<br />
an observer Says:<br />
why won’t kate answer the PJ’s questions if she wants to help find maddie?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Who says she won&#8217;t answer their questions? Kate has said she will answer them. Goodness, she has even practically offered to swim over to Portugal if need be. It is not her fault that the Portuguese do not want to see her on the front pages in a swimsuit. She has been heavily criticized for her flat chest and monotone emotion-less voice and for her remarkably dry tears. But it is the incompetent PJ that told her not to bother coming back to Portugal. They said, &#8220;just wait, Kate&#8221; and she has been waiting for them ever since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: an observer</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-58#comment-177912</link>
		<dc:creator>an observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-177912</guid>
		<description>never got an answer from the mccann supporters yesterday, again i ask...

why won’t kate answer the PJ’s questions if she wants to help find maddie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>never got an answer from the mccann supporters yesterday, again i ask&#8230;</p>
<p>why won’t kate answer the PJ’s questions if she wants to help find maddie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-58#comment-177911</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-177911</guid>
		<description>1151 Tinsel says (January 8th, 2008 at 4:37 am:  "It’s starting to get a bit obvious from Clarence’s statements that he knows a legal battle is ahead. It’s all about semantics now. 
“Madeleine was never in the car,” he says. Instead of, “Her blood came off some towels — but not from her directly from her.” To me this points to Clarence knowing what happened, but trying to protect the McKillers anyway!

REPLY:  Agreed; additionally, his comment about Madeleine being dead was another huge pointer in that direction. They can no longer hold the line about 'wanting to re-focus on Madeleine'. They have indeed 'lost the plot' in this tragi-drama being played out on a public stage</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1151 Tinsel says (January 8th, 2008 at 4:37 am:  &#8220;It’s starting to get a bit obvious from Clarence’s statements that he knows a legal battle is ahead. It’s all about semantics now.<br />
“Madeleine was never in the car,” he says. Instead of, “Her blood came off some towels — but not from her directly from her.” To me this points to Clarence knowing what happened, but trying to protect the McKillers anyway!</p>
<p>REPLY:  Agreed; additionally, his comment about Madeleine being dead was another huge pointer in that direction. They can no longer hold the line about &#8216;wanting to re-focus on Madeleine&#8217;. They have indeed &#8216;lost the plot&#8217; in this tragi-drama being played out on a public stage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sledgehammer</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-58#comment-177908</link>
		<dc:creator>Sledgehammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 06:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-177908</guid>
		<description>Why do people believe a single word they read in the newspapers, gone fishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people believe a single word they read in the newspapers, gone fishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DuncanR</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-58#comment-177906</link>
		<dc:creator>DuncanR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-177906</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;General Comment - People abandoning ship&lt;/strong&gt;

The amount of posts to Anorak on a daily basis is very much higher than that on some other Forums.  Part of that higher level of traffic may be attributable to the nature of the posting experience on Anorak.  Many Forums are heavily Moderated.  &lt;strong&gt;ALL&lt;/strong&gt; comments submitted are held for review before being ‘released’ and printed on the site.  This approach prevents repetitive posts, those which are not relevant to the discussion, ‘infantile’/abusive comments, as well as potentially  libellous posts being published.  The downside is traffic on these sites appears ‘sluggish’ since there is a delay between a post being submitted and it’s appearance on the site.

I suspect one of the attractions of Anorak is the ‘instant messaging’ style of the Forums.  Admin/Mods interfere as little as possible and comments submitted are immediately visible to all on the site and can be responded to in ‘real time’  This allows ‘conversations’ to take place.  The downside to the Anorak approach is that some contributors use that freedom to be overly-vehement in dismissing opposing viewpoints.  Anorak is neither ‘pro’ or ‘anti’ McCann.  We offer an opportunity for all viewpoints to be discussed and debated.  The key word here is ‘debate’.  If  contributors to Anorak decide to leave and join other Forums because they feel they are not given the courtesy of having their views taken seriously and the strength/weaknesses of their position examined and tested by logical argument, but are instead treated in – what seems to them – an hostile fashion merely for expressing their opinions then that is a loss to Anorak.  The Forums work best when there are a variety of opinions/viewpoints up for discussion.  &lt;strong&gt;A Forum where only one view is expressed is a sterile environment.&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Administrator: Plus the Anorak viewpoint is: They come; they go; they come back again...&lt;/em&gt; -agw&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>General Comment - People abandoning ship</strong></p>
<p>The amount of posts to Anorak on a daily basis is very much higher than that on some other Forums.  Part of that higher level of traffic may be attributable to the nature of the posting experience on Anorak.  Many Forums are heavily Moderated.  <strong>ALL</strong> comments submitted are held for review before being ‘released’ and printed on the site.  This approach prevents repetitive posts, those which are not relevant to the discussion, ‘infantile’/abusive comments, as well as potentially  libellous posts being published.  The downside is traffic on these sites appears ‘sluggish’ since there is a delay between a post being submitted and it’s appearance on the site.</p>
<p>I suspect one of the attractions of Anorak is the ‘instant messaging’ style of the Forums.  Admin/Mods interfere as little as possible and comments submitted are immediately visible to all on the site and can be responded to in ‘real time’  This allows ‘conversations’ to take place.  The downside to the Anorak approach is that some contributors use that freedom to be overly-vehement in dismissing opposing viewpoints.  Anorak is neither ‘pro’ or ‘anti’ McCann.  We offer an opportunity for all viewpoints to be discussed and debated.  The key word here is ‘debate’.  If  contributors to Anorak decide to leave and join other Forums because they feel they are not given the courtesy of having their views taken seriously and the strength/weaknesses of their position examined and tested by logical argument, but are instead treated in – what seems to them – an hostile fashion merely for expressing their opinions then that is a loss to Anorak.  The Forums work best when there are a variety of opinions/viewpoints up for discussion.  <strong>A Forum where only one view is expressed is a sterile environment.</strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Administrator: Plus the Anorak viewpoint is: They come; they go; they come back again&#8230;</em> -agw</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: an observer</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179099/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-an-intruder-murats-false-alibi-and-david-payne-is-murats-double.html/comment-page-58#comment-177904</link>
		<dc:creator>an observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179099.html#comment-177904</guid>
		<description>1150
DuncanR Says:
---------------------
that's a brilliant smiley ( i am not sure if it's called a smiley or not but it is great whatever it is called)  :-)
thanks for taking on board suggestion about better search capabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1150<br />
DuncanR Says:<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
that&#8217;s a brilliant smiley ( i am not sure if it&#8217;s called a smiley or not but it is great whatever it is called)  <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
thanks for taking on board suggestion about better search capabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
