Walls Have Ears: Princess Diana Bugged, And Charles
“DIANA: ‘SHE WAS BEING BUGGED’,” says the Mails’ front-page headline.
Princess Diana asked former soldier Graham Harding to scan her room in Kensington Palace. He located a “suspected bug behind a wall in her bedroom, adjacent to a room which had been used by Charles”.
If you were going to bug someone wouldn’t you gain access to her chamber, perhaps by passing yourself off as a TV interview, doctor, dress salesman or playboy, and then plant the bug in a telephone or box of tissues?
“How Diana’s bedroom chats were bugged,” says the Express on its cover page, a fact illustrated by a smiling Diana. “Diana’s bedroom was being bugged,” says another headline inside the paper, the initial fact repeated aloud in Town Crier voice.
While the Express repeats, Mr Harding continues to talk. Says he: “As you walk into her bedroom, I believe there was another room off it where this royal highness the Prince of Wales had a room and it was on that wall.”
Indeed, a room each, with a decompression chamber between, a Demilitarized Zone where taffeta and tweed are ever watchful of the other. Such is the way of the royals, who also – and this is fact! – furnish bedrooms with a sofa placed at the foot of each bed.
But we digress. Mr Harding, the stand is yours. He is unable to examine the device. There is “no indication” that the fabric on the wall had been altered. Says he: “It could have been innocent electronic equipment in another room.”
“Diana’s bedroom was being bugged,” says the Express, over and over and over…
Posted: 8th, January 2008 | In: Princess Diana Inquest, Royal Family, Tabloids Comments (4) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
January 8th, 2008 at 9:17 pm
Coolandcalm, this information is all in the public domain.
My whole point is this is not satire, it is cheap, intellectually lazy slop. Much like your grammar.
January 8th, 2008 at 1:32 pm
Did you know her personally then Catherine? assume she must have told you all this; is it straight from the horses mouth so to speak????
Nope? thought not!
Though you’re right about her not going without A man for 13 years….. there were actually loads of em, mostly married to someone else.
AND THIS IS SATIRE! if you want soft and soppy through gauze then there are many books and films out there.
January 8th, 2008 at 10:41 am
I’m sick of cheap shots like yours at Diana’s personal life. She was a 19 year old virgin when this dirty old man got his paws on her, then he refused to have sex with her after 1984 but insisted on banging his old hag and unknown others who are not discussed in newspapers. It is only natural that she would want to then explore the life that other normal women experience before marriage. I suppose you think she was to go without a man for 13 years. Good for her that she did not.
January 8th, 2008 at 10:25 am
So Diana was right after all.