
Madeleine McCann: Not A Film, A Book And The McCanns Making Money
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “Madeleine’s parents planning Hollywood blockbuster movie”
“Kate and Gerry sparked outrage after it was revealed they have held negotiations with leading producers over the movie rights. The couple – who are prime suspects in the case – are also considering book and TV deals in a package worth an estimated £10million”
A book? Like the Daily Express book? That sick..?
Kate McCann: Michelle Pfeiffer
Gerry McCann: James Caan
Madeleine McCann: Macaulay Culkin
And what of this £10million, and the money earned from any film? “The windfall would help finance the search for Madeleine after concerns were raised that a special fund set up by the family was in crisis”
Page 5: The Find Madeleine fund is down to its last £400,000. More money is needed. So why the “outrage”?
Says the McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell: “We need money to search for Madeleine and that is the most important thing. Nothing has been decided yet. A film would be made on a percentage basis, with part of the profits going to the fund. None of the money would go to Kate and Gerry. They are not trying in any way to profit out of her name’’
And how many films ever make a profit? It would be a film, perhaps, like that about 15-year-old Amy Smart, abducted in the US and found eight months later. “Several movies were made about her while she was missing including The Amy Smart Story”
The “WORLD’S GREATEST NEWSPAPER” does not say if the Amy Smart story made any money. But it does trawl the web and see blog comments like:
“Angry” Pamela Blears, from Oldham, posts: “From the day little Madeleine disappeared I have felt sympathy and compassion for the McCanns but this beggers belief. How can they think about making a film out of the tragedy when the poor child hasn’t even been found yet? How low can you get?”
The Daily Express costs “ONLY 40p”
“McCANNS FEAR CHARGES SOON” – “A source close to the family” tells us: “Kate and Gerry insist they are innocent but they fear they will be charged. Naturally Kate and Gerry are concerned that if this line of inquiry continues to its natural conclusion, charges are always a possibility and they know that’s entirely wrong”
He added: “The Portuguese police seem to be blinkered in their approach and it feels like they want to find the McCanns guilty regardless.”
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE: THE £10M MOVIE – Skint parent to sell film rights”
Skint? The Find Madeleine Fund is dwindling, down to its last “£200,000”. But Gerry McCann is going back to work. He is, as the tabloids never tire to telling us, “a heart consultant”. She is a “GP”
Says the Star: “The couple – who are prime suspects – are in negotiations with the world’s biggest talent and entertainment agency IMG”
IMG – International Management Group– has produced the films Touching the Void, Assault on Waco, Seconds from Disaster, I Shouldn’t be Alive and Kevin and Perry Go Large. Naomi Campbell is on the books
Any film would be an “observational documentary following the on-going search for Madeleine,” says IMG
Pages 4 and5: “Thousands blast ‘sick’ plan”
A poll: “WOULD YOU GO AND WATCH MADDIE: THE MOVIE?” Yes? No? Or I’ve already seen tonight With Trevor McDonald, thanks?
“Ester out in crisis” – TV presenter Esther McVey has resigned her post as a director of the Find Madeleine fund
DAILY MAIL front page: “MADDIE’S PARENTS PLAN £2M FILM DEAL”
“Kate and Gerry McCann could make £2million from a film deal over the story of their daughter’s disappearance, it has been claimed”
Not £10m? Such are the perils of showbiz?
Says the paper: “So far the McCanns, both 39, have turned down offers from big-name chat shows and television dramas as they were anxious to avoid being seen as celebrities”
But we watching the parents. So why not make profit, if it will help?
“Disgraced banker Nick Leeson earned a reported £450,000 when he sold the rights to his autobiography, Rogue Trader. Offers to Austrian kidnap victim Natascha Kampusch were said to have topped £1million”
And: “But Gerry McCann was quick to deny the story”
COMMENT: “Maddie the movie: One step too far – Ever since their daughter Madeleine disappeared, Kate and Gerry McCann have ridden a wave of public sympathy. True, there are some (including the Portuguese police) who have aired deeply hurtful suspicions about the couple since that terrible evening in May. But the overwhelming public mood - particularly among parents of young children - has been one of compassion. Today, however, the McCanns risk losing much of that goodwill. Incredibly, it emerges that they are discussing a possible multi-million pound deal to turn Madeleine’s disappearance into a film. To be blunt, isn’t this pushing the boundaries of taste too far?”
But it is already the subject of a media circus. So why not a DVD – we’ve had the T-shirt, the song, the billboards and the trailers..?
ALISON PEARSON writes in her column: “What CAN Kate and Gerry be thinking? Critics who have never forgiven Gerry and Kate for leaving their kids alone in their holiday apartment will be confirmed in their view that the couple have truly terrible judgment. They will be accused of bad taste; of lacking respect for Madeleine’s memory. Kate will be charged with wanting to swan down the red carpet, even though in this case it is sorrow, not vanity, that has reduced her to a Hollywood Size Zero”
How did it become a story about Kate McCann’s looks?
DAILY MIRROR front page: “Maddy THE Movie”
The McCanns also met with ITV about making a documentary. Maddy A Movie…
THE SUN front page: “Maddie hunt ‘to be film’”
Page 9: “ They pary that movie will help find Maddie”
Gerry McCann is a “cardiac specialist”. The McCanns are “doctors”
“IS THIS THE RIGHT DECISION?”
“YES,” says Lorraine Kelly, GMTV presenter.
“NO,” says the Sun’s Jon ‘Guanty’ Gaunt - “I guess the title of the McCann’s proposed film has to be Home Alone”. Or not…
THE GUARDIAN: “McCanns deny reports of Madeleine film”
Writes Gerry McCann on his blog: “We can categorically deny that we are considering a movie about Madeleine’s disappearance. This is simply untrue. We are approached by a huge number of media outlets regarding a myriad of projects, only a tiny proportion of which we agree to. Each proposal is considered on whether it is likely to have a positive effect, either directly or indirectly, on the search for Madeleine”
ON the Guardian website: “Madeleine’s parents consider film - The parents of Madeleine McCann are considering giving the go-ahead to a film about their missing daughter following an approach by a major entertainment firm”
THE TIMES page 3: “Parents may turn Madeleine McCann story into a Hollywood movie”
“On-screen child horror stories:
A Cry In The Dark
Gone Baby Gone
Honour Thy Father And Mother: the True story of the Menendez Brothers
Menenedez: A Killing in Beverly Hills, 1994
The Amityville Horror series
Everybody’s Baby: The Rescue of Jessica McClure”
Says Clarence Mitchell: The media are making money out of the situation themselves and we feel it is only fair and right that some aspect of that should come to the fund to help find Madeleine”
DAILY TELGRAPH: “McCanns in talks to make a film about AMdldine’s disappearance”
“Do you think a Madeleine film should be made”
Well, we;’ve had the sop opera, and who wants to watch EastEnders: The Movie?
THE SCOTSMAN: “McCanns eye Madeleine film”
BOSTON HERALD: “Missing Madeleine story could become feature film”
The speculation, media hype and sensation so far
Posted: 9th, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,585) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





January 9th, 2008 at 8:46 pm
1201
wtf Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:31 pm
1196 garth
you said it! they sure are cashing in on her name
***
But they need all that cash if they’re going to produce the truth: {i} Our Madeleine, A woebegone tale of a perfectly lovely and responsible family victimized in a tragic moment by [whoosh click] a dark slave trader from the mysterious East. {/i}
January 9th, 2008 at 8:45 pm
1228
Sledgehammer Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:44 pm
Yes a very bad day all round for the brigade, as can be seen from their innane fantasty rants. TB their commander will probably abdicate , at the ingratitude of the barmy brigaders
……………..
they havent sacked you have they sludgehimer????
January 9th, 2008 at 8:45 pm
1228 sledgehammer
i could use you to smash my crockery!
January 9th, 2008 at 8:44 pm
621
chenier Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 3:12 pm
Interestingly, the Evening Standard shows that the McCanns have apparently got through £700k.
£300k on M3
£80k on advertising- though allegedly more
£50k on Justine and a communications agency in Britain
Unspecified amounts on travel
Unspecified amounts on the McCanns living expenses
In other words, it looks as if there is a large hole in the fund …
++++++++++++++++++++
Or a large fund down a hole.
January 9th, 2008 at 8:44 pm
Garthy….
give it up garth while you’re still floating
January 9th, 2008 at 8:44 pm
1034 Logic and nearly everyone else
Garth is sticking to the script to the letter. I really don’t know if he’s GMc but I am sure he is the Real Stig.
January 9th, 2008 at 8:44 pm
Yes a very bad day all round for the brigade, as can be seen from their innane fantasty rants. TB their commander will probably abdicate , at the ingratitude of the barmy brigaders.
January 9th, 2008 at 8:43 pm
how about pro mccs annonymous? could help them, stand up on this forum and say “i am a pro mccann” , we could help them surely?
January 9th, 2008 at 8:42 pm
1220
Garth Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
1205
Julie Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
——————————————
You’re not very bright are you Joosy. You posed the questions and bleedin answered them yourself, look here just incase you forget you jumped up little fool
1. When they discovered their child had been “abducted” - did they immediately phone the police for help? NO!
2. Did they react like parents whose child had been abducted? NO!
3. Where they able to give an accurate account of when the child had actually last been seen? NO!
4. Did they co-operate with the Police? NO!
5. Did they actively search for their “abducted” child? NO!
6. Did they IMMEDIATELY release CURRENT photos of their missing child? NO!
7. Are there discrepancies surrounding the supposed “abduction”? YES!
8. Did they cling onto their remaining children so as to protect them from the same fate? NO!
9. Did they take the advice of professionals to not release certain information regarding the “abducted” child? NO!
I could go on and on, but the basics of this case speak for themselves! Sad but true!
So because your so bleedin ‘arrogant and cocksure’ of yourself I asked the question. I didnt make the claim you fool!
………………….
do you dispute any of the above garthy????
January 9th, 2008 at 8:42 pm
1134 Garth
They buried her did they? Actually we didn’t know that for sure. Thanks for the info. Another clue for those who are looking for her.
January 9th, 2008 at 8:41 pm
1217
Julie Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:38 pm
1214
RedRooster Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:36 pm
the meeting must have finished… the reinforcements are back, keep your heads down guys
****************************
I’m not keeping my head down, I want a simple answer from Garthy …. YES or NO?????
Either way, his bonus is history!
…………………………..
you may be waiting a while…..hes having to answer the powers that be, and hes got a lot to explain
January 9th, 2008 at 8:41 pm
I’m ignorant, are we - the tax payers of this country - paying for any sort of police security around the Rothley mansion ?If so - Why ?
January 9th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
1219 me
oops
need to top me glass up me thinks Smile: thank god for the grape!
January 9th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
1205
Julie Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
——————————————
You’re not very bright are you Joosy. You posed the questions and bleedin answered them yourself, look here just incase you forget you jumped up little fool
1. When they discovered their child had been “abducted” - did they immediately phone the police for help? NO!
2. Did they react like parents whose child had been abducted? NO!
3. Where they able to give an accurate account of when the child had actually last been seen? NO!
4. Did they co-operate with the Police? NO!
5. Did they actively search for their “abducted” child? NO!
6. Did they IMMEDIATELY release CURRENT photos of their missing child? NO!
7. Are there discrepancies surrounding the supposed “abduction”? YES!
8. Did they cling onto their remaining children so as to protect them from the same fate? NO!
9. Did they take the advice of professionals to not release certain information regarding the “abducted” child? NO!
I could go on and on, but the basics of this case speak for themselves! Sad but true!
So because your so bleedin ‘arrogant and cocksure’ of yourself I asked the question. I didnt make the claim you fool!
January 9th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
i personally think that garthy is having a crisis of faith, therefore venting his anger at us, the reasonable ones, imo of course:wink:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:39 pm
Tottenham 1 - Arsenal 0
January 9th, 2008 at 8:38 pm
1214
RedRooster Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:36 pm
the meeting must have finished… the reinforcements are back, keep your heads down guys
****************************
I’m not keeping my head down, I want a simple answer from Garthy …. YES or NO?????
Either way, his bonus is history!
January 9th, 2008 at 8:38 pm
1214
RedRooster
The meeting didn’t go well then?
January 9th, 2008 at 8:37 pm
Garthy
enough ??????
open your eyes
January 9th, 2008 at 8:36 pm
1209
Sledgehammer Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:33 pm
Goodness gracious me, we are witnessing the get ‘em at any cost brigade disintegrating before our eyes, turning against their commander TB, infighting amongst themselves, what a shower. Justice for Madelein !!!!!!
…………………………………….
the meeting must have finished… the reinforcements are back, keep your heads down guys
January 9th, 2008 at 8:36 pm
Hi. I have puke/vomit smileys i’d like to share….
or you can use paypal 
Who’s going to open the bidding
(no score at emirates yet)
January 9th, 2008 at 8:35 pm
1184
man on a hill Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:24 pm
1090 Garth
“…the PJ in my opinion are scum!”
I didn’t see that post.
But I’m not going to rise to it.
An neither should anyone else!
January 9th, 2008 at 8:34 pm
Till later
My family already asked me about my mental health
January 9th, 2008 at 8:34 pm
1197
wtf Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:30 pm
1195 redrooster
he is getting to me tonight! pmt im afraid. someone once said pmt can be cured by going into an attic and throwing and smashing crockery, would give my eye teeth to be in a room with garth now!
………………..
January 9th, 2008 at 8:33 pm
Goodness gracious me, we are witnessing the get ‘em at any cost brigade disintegrating before our eyes, turning against their commander TB, infighting amongst themselves, what a shower. Justice for Madelein !!!!!!
January 9th, 2008 at 8:33 pm
1192
Tony Bennett
No court ….
January 9th, 2008 at 8:33 pm
1189
Garth Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:26 pm
1182
chenier Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:23 pm
———————————————
Open your eyes. Was it me or lovely Julie who made them claims?
————————————–
Eyes are open; I thought you were suggesting that if one wasn’t an eyewitness one couldn’t know what happened.
A view which has garnered singularly little support from the Courts down the centuries.
And you still haven’t answered about the FBI…
January 9th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
1198
Ian Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:30 pm
1090 Garth
——————————————–
Stand up and say it again.
January 9th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
1171
Garth Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:19 pm
1145
Julie Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:05 pm
——————————————
Were you there? No………nuff said me thinks

************************************
My question to you Garthy - WERE YOU THERE?
***************************************
Erm …. erm ….. Garthy I asked you a question! I wasn’t there at the time, so you dispute my posting as being null and void. I asked WERE YOU THERE … if you answer NO, then I gather I can dispute all your comments as being null and void. If you answer YES, then you have one heck of a lot of explaining to do! I’m waiting for your answer!
January 9th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
1196
Garth Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:30 pm
1185
wtf Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:25 pm
——————————————-
Ah right! You’ve cracked it! Not only did they murder their daughter, they’re cashing in on her name? Get real ffs.
……………………………….
i think you’re closer to the truth than you realise
any news by the way garth?? is the meeting still going on??