
Madeleine McCann: Not A Film, A Book And The McCanns Making Money
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “Madeleine’s parents planning Hollywood blockbuster movie”
“Kate and Gerry sparked outrage after it was revealed they have held negotiations with leading producers over the movie rights. The couple – who are prime suspects in the case – are also considering book and TV deals in a package worth an estimated £10million”
A book? Like the Daily Express book? That sick..?
Kate McCann: Michelle Pfeiffer
Gerry McCann: James Caan
Madeleine McCann: Macaulay Culkin
And what of this £10million, and the money earned from any film? “The windfall would help finance the search for Madeleine after concerns were raised that a special fund set up by the family was in crisis”
Page 5: The Find Madeleine fund is down to its last £400,000. More money is needed. So why the “outrage”?
Says the McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell: “We need money to search for Madeleine and that is the most important thing. Nothing has been decided yet. A film would be made on a percentage basis, with part of the profits going to the fund. None of the money would go to Kate and Gerry. They are not trying in any way to profit out of her name’’
And how many films ever make a profit? It would be a film, perhaps, like that about 15-year-old Amy Smart, abducted in the US and found eight months later. “Several movies were made about her while she was missing including The Amy Smart Story”
The “WORLD’S GREATEST NEWSPAPER” does not say if the Amy Smart story made any money. But it does trawl the web and see blog comments like:
“Angry” Pamela Blears, from Oldham, posts: “From the day little Madeleine disappeared I have felt sympathy and compassion for the McCanns but this beggers belief. How can they think about making a film out of the tragedy when the poor child hasn’t even been found yet? How low can you get?”
The Daily Express costs “ONLY 40p”
“McCANNS FEAR CHARGES SOON” – “A source close to the family” tells us: “Kate and Gerry insist they are innocent but they fear they will be charged. Naturally Kate and Gerry are concerned that if this line of inquiry continues to its natural conclusion, charges are always a possibility and they know that’s entirely wrong”
He added: “The Portuguese police seem to be blinkered in their approach and it feels like they want to find the McCanns guilty regardless.”
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE: THE £10M MOVIE – Skint parent to sell film rights”
Skint? The Find Madeleine Fund is dwindling, down to its last “£200,000”. But Gerry McCann is going back to work. He is, as the tabloids never tire to telling us, “a heart consultant”. She is a “GP”
Says the Star: “The couple – who are prime suspects – are in negotiations with the world’s biggest talent and entertainment agency IMG”
IMG – International Management Group– has produced the films Touching the Void, Assault on Waco, Seconds from Disaster, I Shouldn’t be Alive and Kevin and Perry Go Large. Naomi Campbell is on the books
Any film would be an “observational documentary following the on-going search for Madeleine,” says IMG
Pages 4 and5: “Thousands blast ‘sick’ plan”
A poll: “WOULD YOU GO AND WATCH MADDIE: THE MOVIE?” Yes? No? Or I’ve already seen tonight With Trevor McDonald, thanks?
“Ester out in crisis” – TV presenter Esther McVey has resigned her post as a director of the Find Madeleine fund
DAILY MAIL front page: “MADDIE’S PARENTS PLAN £2M FILM DEAL”
“Kate and Gerry McCann could make £2million from a film deal over the story of their daughter’s disappearance, it has been claimed”
Not £10m? Such are the perils of showbiz?
Says the paper: “So far the McCanns, both 39, have turned down offers from big-name chat shows and television dramas as they were anxious to avoid being seen as celebrities”
But we watching the parents. So why not make profit, if it will help?
“Disgraced banker Nick Leeson earned a reported £450,000 when he sold the rights to his autobiography, Rogue Trader. Offers to Austrian kidnap victim Natascha Kampusch were said to have topped £1million”
And: “But Gerry McCann was quick to deny the story”
COMMENT: “Maddie the movie: One step too far – Ever since their daughter Madeleine disappeared, Kate and Gerry McCann have ridden a wave of public sympathy. True, there are some (including the Portuguese police) who have aired deeply hurtful suspicions about the couple since that terrible evening in May. But the overwhelming public mood - particularly among parents of young children - has been one of compassion. Today, however, the McCanns risk losing much of that goodwill. Incredibly, it emerges that they are discussing a possible multi-million pound deal to turn Madeleine’s disappearance into a film. To be blunt, isn’t this pushing the boundaries of taste too far?”
But it is already the subject of a media circus. So why not a DVD – we’ve had the T-shirt, the song, the billboards and the trailers..?
ALISON PEARSON writes in her column: “What CAN Kate and Gerry be thinking? Critics who have never forgiven Gerry and Kate for leaving their kids alone in their holiday apartment will be confirmed in their view that the couple have truly terrible judgment. They will be accused of bad taste; of lacking respect for Madeleine’s memory. Kate will be charged with wanting to swan down the red carpet, even though in this case it is sorrow, not vanity, that has reduced her to a Hollywood Size Zero”
How did it become a story about Kate McCann’s looks?
DAILY MIRROR front page: “Maddy THE Movie”
The McCanns also met with ITV about making a documentary. Maddy A Movie…
THE SUN front page: “Maddie hunt ‘to be film’”
Page 9: “ They pary that movie will help find Maddie”
Gerry McCann is a “cardiac specialist”. The McCanns are “doctors”
“IS THIS THE RIGHT DECISION?”
“YES,” says Lorraine Kelly, GMTV presenter.
“NO,” says the Sun’s Jon ‘Guanty’ Gaunt - “I guess the title of the McCann’s proposed film has to be Home Alone”. Or not…
THE GUARDIAN: “McCanns deny reports of Madeleine film”
Writes Gerry McCann on his blog: “We can categorically deny that we are considering a movie about Madeleine’s disappearance. This is simply untrue. We are approached by a huge number of media outlets regarding a myriad of projects, only a tiny proportion of which we agree to. Each proposal is considered on whether it is likely to have a positive effect, either directly or indirectly, on the search for Madeleine”
ON the Guardian website: “Madeleine’s parents consider film - The parents of Madeleine McCann are considering giving the go-ahead to a film about their missing daughter following an approach by a major entertainment firm”
THE TIMES page 3: “Parents may turn Madeleine McCann story into a Hollywood movie”
“On-screen child horror stories:
A Cry In The Dark
Gone Baby Gone
Honour Thy Father And Mother: the True story of the Menendez Brothers
Menenedez: A Killing in Beverly Hills, 1994
The Amityville Horror series
Everybody’s Baby: The Rescue of Jessica McClure”
Says Clarence Mitchell: The media are making money out of the situation themselves and we feel it is only fair and right that some aspect of that should come to the fund to help find Madeleine”
DAILY TELGRAPH: “McCanns in talks to make a film about AMdldine’s disappearance”
“Do you think a Madeleine film should be made”
Well, we;’ve had the sop opera, and who wants to watch EastEnders: The Movie?
THE SCOTSMAN: “McCanns eye Madeleine film”
BOSTON HERALD: “Missing Madeleine story could become feature film”
The speculation, media hype and sensation so far
Posted: 9th, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,585) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





January 9th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
1249
Sledgehammer Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:55 pm
TB fights back against his dastardly plotters, Guy Fawkes is lined up by the barmy brigade to be conspirator in chief, tune in tomorrow for the continuing meltdown of the barmy brigade and the betrayal of the kingmaker TB. Parental guidance advised.
…………………………………..
where the hell did they find this plonker ??
has anybody got a clue what this fool is on about??
January 9th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
1240
lydia Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:48 pm
there are three involved with this and she lies near water
***
Not trying to be rude here … near water is sort of vague.
Can you look in the pensieve bowl again and get a street sign perhaps?
January 9th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
1253
wtf Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:58 pm
1251 garth
:wank: er
————————-
We dont want to know about your problems. Mindyou they do say alcohol makes you a bit fruity. Taking effect luvvy?
January 9th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
1249 Sledgehammer
Your not funny are you? Humour comes from intelligence which is why TB is funnier than you.
January 9th, 2008 at 9:01 pm
1246
Peter O Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:50 pm
1236 chenier Says: January 9th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
I thought we were obsessive, but the mirror forum is now on page 141 of the ‘forged last photo’ thread.
And they are still discussing the photograph…
++++++++++
Could you summarise please?
==============================
Well, I could give you the editted high lights of page 141…
January 9th, 2008 at 9:00 pm
TB. stop being such a silly-billy and do STOP DIGGING!!!!
January 9th, 2008 at 9:00 pm
#
1251
Garth Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:57 pm
1235
Julie Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
#
———————————————
Your so dizzy! And by the way, my names Garth not Garthy. Okay Joosy?
**********************************
Didn’t think I’d get any form of direct answer from you on that one GARY! You’re a waste of time, are you prepared to debate on my questions or not? Haven’t they written those guidelines yet?
January 9th, 2008 at 9:00 pm
1251
Garth Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:57 pm
…………………………
are you ok garthy, the offer is still there my feathered friend - come over to the other side, there only so many times i’m gonna ask you Garthy boy
January 9th, 2008 at 8:59 pm
1237 RedRooster
1230 Poppy
621 chenier
The ‘Evening Standard’ article leaves out the amounts spent on the Control Risks Group, appointed by the McCanns back in *May*, whose fees were said to amount to ‘thousands of pounds per day’.
No-one really knows why they were employed and what they have beeen doing.
The children who gave their pocket money and the pensioners who gave some or all of their weekly pension money - and thousands of others - have been, in effect, putting money into Control Risks Group and Metodo 3.
It would be nice if those who gave so generously and willingly were told what the money had been spent on.
But the uncaring rats, some of them now leaving the sinking ship, have no concern about them whatsoever.
They’ve got the money in.
And they want more, more, more
January 9th, 2008 at 8:59 pm
oops sorry, slip of the keyboard
January 9th, 2008 at 8:58 pm
1251 garth
:wank: er
January 9th, 2008 at 8:58 pm
839
catkidd Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 5:23 pm
690matt;K+G were f….d .from the start as anyone who knows anything about human nature could tell you their behaviour was not reasonable,taking circumstances in to account.WHEN DOES RATIONAL BEHAVIOUR BECOME SO RATIONAL THAT IT IS IRRATIONAL.phsciopaths is what they are .Phycos are insane but Phscios just dont give a f… But it also goes along way.the difference between insane and leagally insane
+++++Hi is that the same as sociopaths?
January 9th, 2008 at 8:57 pm
1235
Julie Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
#
———————————————
Your so dizzy! And by the way, my names Garth not Garthy. Okay Joosy?
January 9th, 2008 at 8:55 pm
1245
RedRooster Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:50 pm
1235
Julie Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
……………..
i think his feathers have been well and truly ruffled
********************************
Don’t think DIRECT ANSWERS are in the Team McCann booklet!
January 9th, 2008 at 8:55 pm
TB fights back against his dastardly plotters, Guy Fawkes is lined up by the barmy brigade to be conspirator in chief, tune in tomorrow for the continuing meltdown of the barmy brigade and the betrayal of the kingmaker TB. Parental guidance advised.
January 9th, 2008 at 8:51 pm
1243 man on a hill
true, but they are still in denial arent they? The first step is to admit they are pro mccs and it will set them on their way
January 9th, 2008 at 8:50 pm
1230
Poppy Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:44 pm
621
chenier Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 3:12 pm
In other words, it looks as if there is a large hole in the fund …
++++++++++++++++++++
Or a large fund down a hole.
==========================
I would give a great deal to be a fly on the wall at the Board meeting.
I’d give even more to be a member of the Fraud Squad at the meeting…
January 9th, 2008 at 8:50 pm
1236 chenier Says: January 9th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
I thought we were obsessive, but the mirror forum is now on page 141 of the ‘forged last photo’ thread.
And they are still discussing the photograph…
++++++++++
Could you summarise please?
January 9th, 2008 at 8:50 pm
1235
Julie Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
……………..
i think his feathers have been well and truly ruffled
January 9th, 2008 at 8:49 pm
1142 coolandcalm (or by the sound of it, more like ‘coolandmorethanabitflustered’) says:
“Liar liar bums on fire! Nothing like my actual mail! Check it back then apologise please Mr B. Not doing so well today in the truth department are you??!! Tut tut”
REPLY: All this, just because I described your attitude to Clarence as ‘worshipful’. Which you described as ‘untruthful’.
Well, just to remind you, here are your actual words:
QUOTE FROM COOLANDCALM: “I agree about Clarence doing his job perfectly. He is doing exactly what he is paid to do.I would love him as my PR same as I would equally love to have any well-trained spin-doctor! I might not like Campbell & co but they’re good at what they does. PR is short for PoweR IMO. ENDQUOTE FROM COOLANDCALM
So let’s unpick that. You said Clarence: “is doing his job **perfectly**”.
You said Clarence: “…is doing **exactly** what he is paid to do”.
You said: “I would **love** him as my PR”.
My dictionary defines ‘worshipful’ as
‘reverential’,
‘adoring’,
‘devoted’,
‘entitled to honour or respect’,
‘imbued with a spirit of veneration’,
‘worthy’,
‘having merit’,
‘is due recognition, honour and respect’.
O.K., so you quibble with the use of my word: “worships Clarence”.
Will you accept “admires Clarence intensely”?
January 9th, 2008 at 8:49 pm
1226 wtf Says:
“how about pro mccs annonymous? could help them, stand up on this forum and say “i am a pro mccann” , we could help them surely?”
What the hell do you think we’ve been doing all this time?
January 9th, 2008 at 8:49 pm
1240 lydia
are you ok?
January 9th, 2008 at 8:49 pm
#
1234
Garth Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:46 pm
Come on Julie……….balls in your court. Where’s the riposte?
*******************************8
Directly after yours, GARY dearest!
January 9th, 2008 at 8:48 pm
there are three involved with this and she lies near water
January 9th, 2008 at 8:48 pm
Ded Rooster, has certainly gone clucking mad and is spitting feathers, after a seriously intense plucking today.
January 9th, 2008 at 8:48 pm
1233 tinsel
i dont think i could stand another year of the holy pair being on the loose, they are like a dripping tap
January 9th, 2008 at 8:48 pm
1230
Poppy Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:44 pm
621
chenier Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 3:12 pm
Interestingly, the Evening Standard shows that the McCanns have apparently got through £700k.
£300k on M3
£80k on advertising- though allegedly more
£50k on Justine and a communications agency in Britain
Unspecified amounts on travel
Unspecified amounts on the McCanns living expenses
In other words, it looks as if there is a large hole in the fund …
++++++++++++++++++++
Or a large fund down a hole.
……………………………
lets hope the mcscrougers follow the money then ????
January 9th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
I thought we were obsessive, but the mirror forum is now on page 141 of the ‘forged last photo’ thread.
And they are still discussing the photograph…
January 9th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
#
1220
Garth Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
1205
Julie Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
——————————————
You’re not very bright are you Joosy. You posed the questions and bleedin answered them yourself, look here just incase you forget you jumped up little fool
1. When they discovered their child had been “abducted” - did they immediately phone the police for help? NO!
2. Did they react like parents whose child had been abducted? NO!
3. Where they able to give an accurate account of when the child had actually last been seen? NO!
4. Did they co-operate with the Police? NO!
5. Did they actively search for their “abducted” child? NO!
6. Did they IMMEDIATELY release CURRENT photos of their missing child? NO!
7. Are there discrepancies surrounding the supposed “abduction”? YES!
8. Did they cling onto their remaining children so as to protect them from the same fate? NO!
9. Did they take the advice of professionals to not release certain information regarding the “abducted” child? NO!
I could go on and on, but the basics of this case speak for themselves! Sad but true!
So because your so bleedin ‘arrogant and cocksure’ of yourself I asked the question. I didnt make the claim you fool!
***************************************
Erm … No. 1 Garthy …. I was not rude to you, no need to lose your cool with me!
No. 2 … You made the “insinuation” that as I was not there, etc … etc …. (remember it)??
No. 3 …. I posed a similar question to you???? (remember it)???
No. 4 …. You obviously cannot answer it directly
No. 5 … I make the assumption that you ARE a member of Team McCann, and now resort to insults to try and avoid answering a direct question?!
No. 6 … My name is NOT Joosy, but Julie (if you read correctly!)
No. 7 … Please feel free to dispute and debate any of my questions and answers above (without resorting to insults!)
January 9th, 2008 at 8:46 pm
Come on Julie……….balls in your court. Where’s the riposte?