
Madeleine McCann: Not A Film, A Book And The McCanns Making Money
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “Madeleine’s parents planning Hollywood blockbuster movie”
“Kate and Gerry sparked outrage after it was revealed they have held negotiations with leading producers over the movie rights. The couple – who are prime suspects in the case – are also considering book and TV deals in a package worth an estimated £10million”
A book? Like the Daily Express book? That sick..?
Kate McCann: Michelle Pfeiffer
Gerry McCann: James Caan
Madeleine McCann: Macaulay Culkin
And what of this £10million, and the money earned from any film? “The windfall would help finance the search for Madeleine after concerns were raised that a special fund set up by the family was in crisis”
Page 5: The Find Madeleine fund is down to its last £400,000. More money is needed. So why the “outrage”?
Says the McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell: “We need money to search for Madeleine and that is the most important thing. Nothing has been decided yet. A film would be made on a percentage basis, with part of the profits going to the fund. None of the money would go to Kate and Gerry. They are not trying in any way to profit out of her name’’
And how many films ever make a profit? It would be a film, perhaps, like that about 15-year-old Amy Smart, abducted in the US and found eight months later. “Several movies were made about her while she was missing including The Amy Smart Story”
The “WORLD’S GREATEST NEWSPAPER” does not say if the Amy Smart story made any money. But it does trawl the web and see blog comments like:
“Angry” Pamela Blears, from Oldham, posts: “From the day little Madeleine disappeared I have felt sympathy and compassion for the McCanns but this beggers belief. How can they think about making a film out of the tragedy when the poor child hasn’t even been found yet? How low can you get?”
The Daily Express costs “ONLY 40p”
“McCANNS FEAR CHARGES SOON” – “A source close to the family” tells us: “Kate and Gerry insist they are innocent but they fear they will be charged. Naturally Kate and Gerry are concerned that if this line of inquiry continues to its natural conclusion, charges are always a possibility and they know that’s entirely wrong”
He added: “The Portuguese police seem to be blinkered in their approach and it feels like they want to find the McCanns guilty regardless.”
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE: THE £10M MOVIE – Skint parent to sell film rights”
Skint? The Find Madeleine Fund is dwindling, down to its last “£200,000”. But Gerry McCann is going back to work. He is, as the tabloids never tire to telling us, “a heart consultant”. She is a “GP”
Says the Star: “The couple – who are prime suspects – are in negotiations with the world’s biggest talent and entertainment agency IMG”
IMG – International Management Group– has produced the films Touching the Void, Assault on Waco, Seconds from Disaster, I Shouldn’t be Alive and Kevin and Perry Go Large. Naomi Campbell is on the books
Any film would be an “observational documentary following the on-going search for Madeleine,” says IMG
Pages 4 and5: “Thousands blast ‘sick’ plan”
A poll: “WOULD YOU GO AND WATCH MADDIE: THE MOVIE?” Yes? No? Or I’ve already seen tonight With Trevor McDonald, thanks?
“Ester out in crisis” – TV presenter Esther McVey has resigned her post as a director of the Find Madeleine fund
DAILY MAIL front page: “MADDIE’S PARENTS PLAN £2M FILM DEAL”
“Kate and Gerry McCann could make £2million from a film deal over the story of their daughter’s disappearance, it has been claimed”
Not £10m? Such are the perils of showbiz?
Says the paper: “So far the McCanns, both 39, have turned down offers from big-name chat shows and television dramas as they were anxious to avoid being seen as celebrities”
But we watching the parents. So why not make profit, if it will help?
“Disgraced banker Nick Leeson earned a reported £450,000 when he sold the rights to his autobiography, Rogue Trader. Offers to Austrian kidnap victim Natascha Kampusch were said to have topped £1million”
And: “But Gerry McCann was quick to deny the story”
COMMENT: “Maddie the movie: One step too far – Ever since their daughter Madeleine disappeared, Kate and Gerry McCann have ridden a wave of public sympathy. True, there are some (including the Portuguese police) who have aired deeply hurtful suspicions about the couple since that terrible evening in May. But the overwhelming public mood - particularly among parents of young children - has been one of compassion. Today, however, the McCanns risk losing much of that goodwill. Incredibly, it emerges that they are discussing a possible multi-million pound deal to turn Madeleine’s disappearance into a film. To be blunt, isn’t this pushing the boundaries of taste too far?”
But it is already the subject of a media circus. So why not a DVD – we’ve had the T-shirt, the song, the billboards and the trailers..?
ALISON PEARSON writes in her column: “What CAN Kate and Gerry be thinking? Critics who have never forgiven Gerry and Kate for leaving their kids alone in their holiday apartment will be confirmed in their view that the couple have truly terrible judgment. They will be accused of bad taste; of lacking respect for Madeleine’s memory. Kate will be charged with wanting to swan down the red carpet, even though in this case it is sorrow, not vanity, that has reduced her to a Hollywood Size Zero”
How did it become a story about Kate McCann’s looks?
DAILY MIRROR front page: “Maddy THE Movie”
The McCanns also met with ITV about making a documentary. Maddy A Movie…
THE SUN front page: “Maddie hunt ‘to be film’”
Page 9: “ They pary that movie will help find Maddie”
Gerry McCann is a “cardiac specialist”. The McCanns are “doctors”
“IS THIS THE RIGHT DECISION?”
“YES,” says Lorraine Kelly, GMTV presenter.
“NO,” says the Sun’s Jon ‘Guanty’ Gaunt - “I guess the title of the McCann’s proposed film has to be Home Alone”. Or not…
THE GUARDIAN: “McCanns deny reports of Madeleine film”
Writes Gerry McCann on his blog: “We can categorically deny that we are considering a movie about Madeleine’s disappearance. This is simply untrue. We are approached by a huge number of media outlets regarding a myriad of projects, only a tiny proportion of which we agree to. Each proposal is considered on whether it is likely to have a positive effect, either directly or indirectly, on the search for Madeleine”
ON the Guardian website: “Madeleine’s parents consider film - The parents of Madeleine McCann are considering giving the go-ahead to a film about their missing daughter following an approach by a major entertainment firm”
THE TIMES page 3: “Parents may turn Madeleine McCann story into a Hollywood movie”
“On-screen child horror stories:
A Cry In The Dark
Gone Baby Gone
Honour Thy Father And Mother: the True story of the Menendez Brothers
Menenedez: A Killing in Beverly Hills, 1994
The Amityville Horror series
Everybody’s Baby: The Rescue of Jessica McClure”
Says Clarence Mitchell: The media are making money out of the situation themselves and we feel it is only fair and right that some aspect of that should come to the fund to help find Madeleine”
DAILY TELGRAPH: “McCanns in talks to make a film about AMdldine’s disappearance”
“Do you think a Madeleine film should be made”
Well, we;’ve had the sop opera, and who wants to watch EastEnders: The Movie?
THE SCOTSMAN: “McCanns eye Madeleine film”
BOSTON HERALD: “Missing Madeleine story could become feature film”
The speculation, media hype and sensation so far
Posted: 9th, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,585) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





January 10th, 2008 at 12:32 am
1530
RedRooster
Nope
And i don’t intend
January 10th, 2008 at 12:32 am
Ok pay attention!!
Have to let you all know!! Played 20 Q tonight ( It is a game where you think of something and it asks you 20 questions in order to guess what you ‘re thinking of.) So far tonight it has got most of our thoughts right and some of them were really off the wall! but both myself and my sister thought of Maddie and have been gobsmacked at the reply which was ‘The Devil’we have not played since and also we dont think maddie is the devil but it sounds like something bad has happened to her
January 10th, 2008 at 12:32 am
1528
Totje
Sorry ,we got all wrong
January 10th, 2008 at 12:31 am
1527
can’t say no Says:
January 10th, 2008 at 12:30 am
R R
really ?
………………..
have you heard it??
January 10th, 2008 at 12:31 am
1525
Sledgehammer Says:
January 10th, 2008 at 12:28 am
……………………
first sign of madness they say….talking to yourself
January 10th, 2008 at 12:31 am
1506 can’t say no Says:
Why is always about the mistakes that the P.J. did ,and never blame the brits cops ?
Everybody knows they were there
*****************
Did they speak portuguese or did someone do the translations? Who?
Oh and it is assumed the MC didn’t listen to the police and published Madeleine’s picture, may be the pj didn’t listen to the advice of the british cops?
Oh these macho mans
January 10th, 2008 at 12:30 am
R R
really ?
January 10th, 2008 at 12:29 am
1522
can’t say no Says:
January 10th, 2008 at 12:27 am
R R
still here ?
…………….
just been listening to comical again……he really is a fool
January 10th, 2008 at 12:28 am
Jeez there’s that horrible squawking again……….like a banshee wailing..could well be…….legend says they disguise themselves as fowl things.
January 10th, 2008 at 12:28 am
1512 Sledgehammer Says: January 10th, 2008 at 12:23 am
Peter O, I am not using a report that appeared in the press to prove anything, I am stating it appeared in the press, whither you believe it or not is your decision, as far as press reports go I would say it was one of the few that could be probable.
++++++++++++++
OK… I’ll carry on believing the media stories that suits my prejudices in this case. Just wanted to be clear about the rules.
January 10th, 2008 at 12:28 am
Totje even
January 10th, 2008 at 12:27 am
R R
still here ?
January 10th, 2008 at 12:27 am
1516
Totje Says:
January 10th, 2008 at 12:25 am
Nite nite Garth.
btw you forgot to mention handing back the car with the alledged bodily fluid, now called blood….
——————-
Its late Tojet. There’s plenty more of course. Goodnite
January 10th, 2008 at 12:27 am
1517
Peter O Says:
January 10th, 2008 at 12:26 am
………………..
not i sorry
January 10th, 2008 at 12:26 am
Please ANORAK
delete this post ,in a few minuts
For those who are here ,i’m a mum ,strugling daily, with my son’s life.
I feel in my bones what is like , living in this limbo
Both the mccs ,show they are in denial
Take this as you want
January 10th, 2008 at 12:26 am
1508
Moriarty
Yes, and I’m off to bed now, stayed on here longer than I should , I always like to get the last word. Goodnight all. C-Lou
January 10th, 2008 at 12:26 am
1507 What? Says: January 10th, 2008 at 12:21 am
I have been reading for a few weeks but not posting (lurking!) but i have had a very surreal experience ! I ask again has anybody got 20 Q
++++++++++++++++
Well, if no one answers you (it may be a bit quiet here at this time), then I guess the answer is no?
January 10th, 2008 at 12:25 am
Nite nite Garth.
btw you forgot to mention handing back the car with the alledged bodily fluid, now called blood….
January 10th, 2008 at 12:24 am
1494
Sledgehammer Says:
January 10th, 2008 at 12:12 am
There appears to be a rather grating strangled sensation about, it’s a rooster getting the old neck stretched thats the choking sound, there it goes again……….squaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwkkkkkkkkk, irratating but of no real account !
……………………………
OMG help i think im being threatened help arrrrgghhh firestar help arrgghhhhh
now piss off sludgehimer or you will find yourself in your face
January 10th, 2008 at 12:24 am
1496
Peter O Says:
January 10th, 2008 at 12:14 am
———————————————–
When I say the Pj are corrupt, of course, I’m generalising. I do, infact, mean someone within the force and like you say, someone who has influence. Its not as wild as it seems. However, the point Im trying to make is that if you are sat on a certain side of the fence, then corruption would appear to be nothing more than wild speculation. However, I could quite easily account for alot stories damning the McCanns to fit this theory. Its easy isant it? If you understand what Im getting at?
January 10th, 2008 at 12:23 am
1507
What?
I ask again has anybody got 20 Q
—
Number 1 -Are you animal, vegetable or mineral?
January 10th, 2008 at 12:23 am
Peter O, I am not using a report that appeared in the press to prove anything, I am stating it appeared in the press, whither you believe it or not is your decision, as far as press reports go I would say it was one of the few that could be probable.
January 10th, 2008 at 12:23 am
1507
What?
Dunno
January 10th, 2008 at 12:22 am
1505
Thank you im in
January 10th, 2008 at 12:22 am
1500 What? Says: January 10th, 2008 at 12:17 am
is there any reason why my post wont go through
++++++++++++++
Well…. The above post made it?
Usual thing that stops a post from going through is more than one URL in a post? Sometimes a single very long URL might cause a problem I believe?
January 10th, 2008 at 12:21 am
1504
Ciara-Louise
My bits are all intact and working.!!
—-
So you’re a working girl, eh?
January 10th, 2008 at 12:21 am
I have been reading for a few weeks but not posting (lurking!) but i have had a very surreal experience ! I ask again has anybody got 20 Q
January 10th, 2008 at 12:20 am
Why is always about the mistakes that the P.J. did ,and never blame the brits cops ?
Everybody knows they were there
January 10th, 2008 at 12:19 am
1500
What?
Someone may have nailed up your letterbox
January 10th, 2008 at 12:18 am
1498
Moriarty
My bits are all intact and working.!!