<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madeleine McCann: Gerry McCann Talks With Vanity Fair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-68#comment-183953</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-183953</guid>
		<description>This is from the mirror forum (Ironside).  Ironside if you post  here i hope you don't mind.


I do not know if this is true or not....have heard PJ arrived late this afternoon in UK ..at Birmingham Airport....have you heard anything.....would account for this last throw of the dice------

• Posted by: IRONSIDE • Report Comment
..................................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is from the mirror forum (Ironside).  Ironside if you post  here i hope you don&#8217;t mind.</p>
<p>I do not know if this is true or not&#8230;.have heard PJ arrived late this afternoon in UK ..at Birmingham Airport&#8230;.have you heard anything&#8230;..would account for this last throw of the dice&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>• Posted by: IRONSIDE • Report Comment<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agw</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-68#comment-182994</link>
		<dc:creator>agw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182994</guid>
		<description>#

Tony Bennett 

81 LIES (ALLEGEDLY)

Posted across from the Mirror Forums, where it was posted 5 minutes ago:

QUOTE

They lied (allegedly)

UNQUOTE
Jan 10, 8:49 PM 

Administrator: This edited version of the second attempt to place this posting from another Forum is all I’m prepared to accept. It was not posted to this Forum and we are not concerned with or will allow second-hand torts. With your disciplines (which I should point out are close to mine) you should know better. This has been discussed off Forum and the view is this: if this sort of posting is repeated there is a risk of a very serious falling out between us. I know who would have the upper hand here. You have several valuable points to make in most contributions. I should not like you to self-destruct. However, (isn’t there always at least one?) be clear, I will not hesitate to act if anything like this is posted again. The Moderators will take swift and permanent action if need be.-agw

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#</p>
<p>Tony Bennett </p>
<p>81 LIES (ALLEGEDLY)</p>
<p>Posted across from the Mirror Forums, where it was posted 5 minutes ago:</p>
<p>QUOTE</p>
<p>They lied (allegedly)</p>
<p>UNQUOTE<br />
Jan 10, 8:49 PM </p>
<p>Administrator: This edited version of the second attempt to place this posting from another Forum is all I’m prepared to accept. It was not posted to this Forum and we are not concerned with or will allow second-hand torts. With your disciplines (which I should point out are close to mine) you should know better. This has been discussed off Forum and the view is this: if this sort of posting is repeated there is a risk of a very serious falling out between us. I know who would have the upper hand here. You have several valuable points to make in most contributions. I should not like you to self-destruct. However, (isn’t there always at least one?) be clear, I will not hesitate to act if anything like this is posted again. The Moderators will take swift and permanent action if need be.-agw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: May</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-68#comment-182808</link>
		<dc:creator>May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182808</guid>
		<description>994
Totje
—————–

Mods and Admin

It was cumulative with Garth, and it is only yellow and 2tomorrow is another day according to Scarlett, or was that Rhett?
*********
I’m sorry I’ve missed your comment. Rereading some posts and read it now.
I missed the cumulation because I skipped a lot of posts. I’m sure you are/were right.
“Gone with the Wind” takes about 226 minutes, so we can hardly expect someone 
******************
"Tomorrow is another day" was Scarlett's ever optimistic view!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>994<br />
Totje<br />
—————–</p>
<p>Mods and Admin</p>
<p>It was cumulative with Garth, and it is only yellow and 2tomorrow is another day according to Scarlett, or was that Rhett?<br />
*********<br />
I’m sorry I’ve missed your comment. Rereading some posts and read it now.<br />
I missed the cumulation because I skipped a lot of posts. I’m sure you are/were right.<br />
“Gone with the Wind” takes about 226 minutes, so we can hardly expect someone<br />
******************<br />
&#8220;Tomorrow is another day&#8221; was Scarlett&#8217;s ever optimistic view!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: May</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-68#comment-182760</link>
		<dc:creator>May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182760</guid>
		<description>1246
a McCann supporter Says: 

January 11th, 2008 at 12:39 am 
Quote …… Mods and Admin

Please add some balance, what about Murat?

———————————————————————————————————————————–

I really don’t know about Murat, he has a lot more feasible evidence against him than the McCanns, but I will keep an open mind. Sometimes I think he is innocent, and feel sorry for him, but sometimes I think he is as guilty as hell. So who knows, perhaps we never shall!!

***************

A lot more feasible evidence against Robert Murat than the McCanns????!!!

You're keeping an open mind??!!!

It's OK to say Murat is guilty as hell, but cast no aspersions on those who acted so irresponsibly over the protection of young children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1246<br />
a McCann supporter Says: </p>
<p>January 11th, 2008 at 12:39 am<br />
Quote …… Mods and Admin</p>
<p>Please add some balance, what about Murat?</p>
<p>———————————————————————————————————————————–</p>
<p>I really don’t know about Murat, he has a lot more feasible evidence against him than the McCanns, but I will keep an open mind. Sometimes I think he is innocent, and feel sorry for him, but sometimes I think he is as guilty as hell. So who knows, perhaps we never shall!!</p>
<p>***************</p>
<p>A lot more feasible evidence against Robert Murat than the McCanns????!!!</p>
<p>You&#8217;re keeping an open mind??!!!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s OK to say Murat is guilty as hell, but cast no aspersions on those who acted so irresponsibly over the protection of young children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Totje</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-67#comment-182755</link>
		<dc:creator>Totje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182755</guid>
		<description>994
Totje
—————–

Mods and Admin

It was cumulative with Garth, and it is only yellow and tomorrow is another day according to Scarlett, or was that Rhett?
*********
I'm sorry I've missed your comment. Rereading some posts and read it now.
I missed the cumulation because I skipped a lot of posts. I'm sure you are/were right.
"Gone with the Wind"  takes about 226 minutes, so we can hardly expect someone recalls who said what ;)

___________

Mods and Admin

probably best if the warnings etc are left to M and A.But the Scarlett /Rhett happened at the very end...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>994<br />
Totje<br />
—————–</p>
<p>Mods and Admin</p>
<p>It was cumulative with Garth, and it is only yellow and tomorrow is another day according to Scarlett, or was that Rhett?<br />
*********<br />
I&#8217;m sorry I&#8217;ve missed your comment. Rereading some posts and read it now.<br />
I missed the cumulation because I skipped a lot of posts. I&#8217;m sure you are/were right.<br />
&#8220;Gone with the Wind&#8221;  takes about 226 minutes, so we can hardly expect someone recalls who said what <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>___________</p>
<p>Mods and Admin</p>
<p>probably best if the warnings etc are left to M and A.But the Scarlett /Rhett happened at the very end&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catkidd</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-67#comment-182706</link>
		<dc:creator>catkidd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182706</guid>
		<description>to declan foley from the west of ireland probably one of the very low populated areas were people are throughly protected from the outside world do you fancy helping,maybe by buying a pair of maddie pyjamas for your little daughter.oh sorrys sounds more like you dont have one.IF IT WAS your child and you truely believed your child in the hands of a sick scum the truth of the childs where abouts could posibily be found cheaper;IE with a cattlle prod and a lenght of rope.and maybe more effective than any metdo 3,and anything less would be a futher failure to ones child.....YOU NIAVE LITTLE MAN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to declan foley from the west of ireland probably one of the very low populated areas were people are throughly protected from the outside world do you fancy helping,maybe by buying a pair of maddie pyjamas for your little daughter.oh sorrys sounds more like you dont have one.IF IT WAS your child and you truely believed your child in the hands of a sick scum the truth of the childs where abouts could posibily be found cheaper;IE with a cattlle prod and a lenght of rope.and maybe more effective than any metdo 3,and anything less would be a futher failure to ones child&#8230;..YOU NIAVE LITTLE MAN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-67#comment-182702</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182702</guid>
		<description>1343
Ian Says: 

January 11th, 2008 at 9:39 am 
Todays

************
I am getting confused...anyhow,time to go to work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1343<br />
Ian Says: </p>
<p>January 11th, 2008 at 9:39 am<br />
Todays</p>
<p>************<br />
I am getting confused&#8230;anyhow,time to go to work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-67#comment-182699</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182699</guid>
		<description>Todays</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todays</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-67#comment-182698</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182698</guid>
		<description>Which new thread?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which new thread?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-67#comment-182695</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182695</guid>
		<description>Ian

I don't know, I accidentally ended up in this thread thinking I was going back to the new one!  

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, I accidentally ended up in this thread thinking I was going back to the new one!  </p>
<p> <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-67#comment-182694</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182694</guid>
		<description>1338 Karen

Thats right, thats what people who say that actually mean.

Anyway, why are we in this thread? There is a new one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1338 Karen</p>
<p>Thats right, thats what people who say that actually mean.</p>
<p>Anyway, why are we in this thread? There is a new one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-67#comment-182692</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182692</guid>
		<description>1335 InnocentChild

Fear not, joe public is not so stupid - many of us know the reality.

The racist Jackson escaped any criticism. Why calling some one 'Indian' is an insult, I do not know. Why not knowing a name and using another name known to be from the same culture is considered racist I do not know either.

It seems that to be black is to have a teflon veneer to accusations of racism, but to be white is to have no rights as far as racism is concerned. If I dont like someone - am I not allowed to say I dont like them, if theIr skin happens to be a different colour to mine ?

Isnt that racist in itself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1335 InnocentChild</p>
<p>Fear not, joe public is not so stupid - many of us know the reality.</p>
<p>The racist Jackson escaped any criticism. Why calling some one &#8216;Indian&#8217; is an insult, I do not know. Why not knowing a name and using another name known to be from the same culture is considered racist I do not know either.</p>
<p>It seems that to be black is to have a teflon veneer to accusations of racism, but to be white is to have no rights as far as racism is concerned. If I dont like someone - am I not allowed to say I dont like them, if theIr skin happens to be a different colour to mine ?</p>
<p>Isnt that racist in itself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-67#comment-182691</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182691</guid>
		<description>Ryan

That's not what you mean though... You mean the McCanns are innocent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you mean though&#8230; You mean the McCanns are innocent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-67#comment-182688</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182688</guid>
		<description>1332
Ryan Says: 

January 11th, 2008 at 7:36 am 
Innocent until proven guilty. Stop your ugly gossip. That’s my opinion.'

End quote.

Not allowed to discuss it huh?

I wish that legal terminology would not be used by unqualfied persons. In the real world, everyone knows its quite the other way around. Although in a legal framework the prosecution generally (not always) have to do the proving, in the real world we all know its the accused who must prove their innocence. 

Its also well known that many who are found not guilty by a court of law are in fact well known not to be. But the view taken is its better to release some guilty than to lock away or otherwise punish an innocent.

Mods and Admin

Oh I dunno Ian, are you struck by Murats' guilt in this? perhaps thats who Ryan meant, do hate ambiguous postings, don't you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1332<br />
Ryan Says: </p>
<p>January 11th, 2008 at 7:36 am<br />
Innocent until proven guilty. Stop your ugly gossip. That’s my opinion.&#8217;</p>
<p>End quote.</p>
<p>Not allowed to discuss it huh?</p>
<p>I wish that legal terminology would not be used by unqualfied persons. In the real world, everyone knows its quite the other way around. Although in a legal framework the prosecution generally (not always) have to do the proving, in the real world we all know its the accused who must prove their innocence. </p>
<p>Its also well known that many who are found not guilty by a court of law are in fact well known not to be. But the view taken is its better to release some guilty than to lock away or otherwise punish an innocent.</p>
<p>Mods and Admin</p>
<p>Oh I dunno Ian, are you struck by Murats&#8217; guilt in this? perhaps thats who Ryan meant, do hate ambiguous postings, don&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-67#comment-182684</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182684</guid>
		<description>1332
Ryan Says: 

January 11th, 2008 at 7:36 am 
Innocent until proven guilty. Stop your ugly gossip. That’s my opinion.

*************
I think we ALL want THEM to  say the TRUTH for Madeleine"s sake.They would get real support.
If I was in their situation,arguido or not,I would just speak up even if I know that I face jail for speaking.I would do it.
Thats my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1332<br />
Ryan Says: </p>
<p>January 11th, 2008 at 7:36 am<br />
Innocent until proven guilty. Stop your ugly gossip. That’s my opinion.</p>
<p>*************<br />
I think we ALL want THEM to  say the TRUTH for Madeleine&#8221;s sake.They would get real support.<br />
If I was in their situation,arguido or not,I would just speak up even if I know that I face jail for speaking.I would do it.<br />
Thats my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InnocentChild</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-67#comment-182657</link>
		<dc:creator>InnocentChild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182657</guid>
		<description>47
Trismegistus Says: 
January 10th, 2008 at 9:38 am
Empty celebrity… Jade Goody and the McCanns… a perfect match.
Differences: Jade was manipulated by the media ad PR scums while it is blatantly the opposite with the M’s.    
 Jade uses her acquired celeb status effectively and for good purposes, lacking somewhat in the M’s.
Jade comes from a low educational background unlike the M’s who should know better.
Jade is a good mother and doesn’t neglect her children.
Jade jogged for charity in the 2006 London Marathon while the M’s jog for narcicissistic publicity.
Jade isn’t a suspect in a criminal investigation for her own missing child.
Jade is neither a liar nor a bigot.  
Where is the perfect match comparison?

JMHO - Jade seems to be reviled for reasons to do with jealousy re her success and background, so equating the M’s with Jade points to jealousy of the M’s.
Be informed; read this article
http://www.selfometer.org/articles/articles_racist_bullying.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>47<br />
Trismegistus Says:<br />
January 10th, 2008 at 9:38 am<br />
Empty celebrity… Jade Goody and the McCanns… a perfect match.<br />
Differences: Jade was manipulated by the media ad PR scums while it is blatantly the opposite with the M’s.<br />
 Jade uses her acquired celeb status effectively and for good purposes, lacking somewhat in the M’s.<br />
Jade comes from a low educational background unlike the M’s who should know better.<br />
Jade is a good mother and doesn’t neglect her children.<br />
Jade jogged for charity in the 2006 London Marathon while the M’s jog for narcicissistic publicity.<br />
Jade isn’t a suspect in a criminal investigation for her own missing child.<br />
Jade is neither a liar nor a bigot.<br />
Where is the perfect match comparison?</p>
<p>JMHO - Jade seems to be reviled for reasons to do with jealousy re her success and background, so equating the M’s with Jade points to jealousy of the M’s.<br />
Be informed; read this article<br />
<a href="http://www.selfometer.org/articles/articles_racist_bullying.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.selfometer.org/articles/articles_racist_bullying.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-67#comment-182650</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182650</guid>
		<description>Good morning
Metodo 3 on the dole!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good morning<br />
Metodo 3 on the dole!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hannasus</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-67#comment-182641</link>
		<dc:creator>hannasus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182641</guid>
		<description>Morning all.
New thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morning all.<br />
New thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-67#comment-182637</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182637</guid>
		<description>Innocent until proven guilty. Stop your ugly gossip. That's my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Innocent until proven guilty. Stop your ugly gossip. That&#8217;s my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BabyJane</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179232/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-gerry-mccann-talks-with-vanity-fair.html/comment-page-67#comment-182636</link>
		<dc:creator>BabyJane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html#comment-182636</guid>
		<description>:whisper: Good morning, can anybody tell me in which cases Scotland Yard gets involved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:whisper: Good morning, can anybody tell me in which cases Scotland Yard gets involved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
