Madeleine McCann: Kelsey Lynn Kudia For Hire, Paris Hilton And Propaganda
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
THE SUN front page: “’MADDIE’ FOR HIRE”
Tonight Kelsey Lynn Kudia is Madeleine McCann. Kelsey looks likes Madeleine McCann. She’s not in Morocco. She;s nopt Bouchra Benaissa. She not in Malta. But for the right fee she might be. Kelsey is a working Madeleine McCann double
Pages 4 and 5: “The boss of a lookalike agency who hopes to make a fortune out of a little Madeleine McCann double said last night: ‘It’s not sinister – it’s entertainment’. Shona Adams reckons three-year-old Kelsey Lynn Kudla’s similarity to missing Maddie could earn her £9MILLION for starring in a proposed feature film about the vanished tot”
Well, someone would have to play the missing child, unless she is found alive and well…
Says Shona, owner of London’s Juliet Adams Model Agency: “If the film about Madeleine is ever made, then the world is Kelsey’s oyster. If someone like Steven Spielberg made it, she could make £9million easily – of which I’d take 20 per cent. She will become a name in her own right and make it as a child model or actress because she’s got her foot in the door”
Just when you thought it was safe to holiday in Portugal…Dum-dum…
Of course, great acting careers have begun with less. Didn’t Tom Hanks play the baby in a Cry In The Dark?
She continues: “And from there, her earning potential is limitless. It’s not sinister. And if the McCanns are upset, there’s nothing they can do because it’s a democracy. I wouldn’t back away from it because, if a film is being made, then it’s entertainment”
Kate and Gerry McCann are “doctors”.
Says Shona: “I wouldn’t put Kelsey in a position of doing anything bad taste”
SLAP IN FACE FOR McCANNS: Sun columnist Lorraine Kelly says: “It makes you recoil to think a lookalike agency would have a Madeleine on their books alongside someone who looks like Jack Nicholson or Paris Hilton”
Whatever could she mean? Neither Nicolson nor Hilton were available to defend themselves…
DAILY EXPRESS: “The Madeleine lookalike on hire for £600 an hour”
Do you want to get your resort or country in the papers? Hire Kelsey to be a “Madeleine” and attract the world’s media to your locale as she is spotted time and time again
Kelsey is American
“PARENTS trying to ‘distract’ police
A source “close to the official police” investigation says: “Who do the McCanns think they are? The discovery of new witnesses in the last few weeks lead the authorities to believe they are at war with a gigantic propaganda machine. The McCanns have some very powerful people on their side - millionaires, celebrities, even politicians”
Says Robert Murat’s lawyer: “Robert Murat does not have millionaires supporting him, nor campaign funds. “He just wants to see his name cleared in this case as he has nothing to do with Madeleine’s disappearance, despite every day people emerging trying to forcibly incriminate him”
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE – The £600 an hour lookalike”
Page 7: “MADDIE DOUBLE FOR HIRE”
“A sick mother is touting her daughter as a £600-an-hour Madeleine McCann lookalike,” says the paper, amid adverts for “adult fantasies”, “nasty sex” and FILTH”
She is an “unnamed American girl” - see the Sun above
Says Clarence Mitchell: “This is an offensive way to make money out of Madeleine’s disappearance. This is deeply offensive to parents Kate and Gerry”
MADDIE: THE MOVIE: “Yesterday, Channel 4’s head of documentaries Angus Macqueen said he had attended a meeting with the McCanns’ representatives to discuss a movie. He tells us: “Of course we are interested in making a film about this compelling story. We have a history of making quality films about crime matters”
That’s entertainment: “Meanwhile, producers of US psychic TV show Haunting Evidence have been in Praia da Luz planning their own show about Madeleine’s disappearance”
DAILY MAIL: “McCanns are ready to sack detective agency”
Says a source: “We will carry on the search for Madeleine, but not necessarily with Metodo 3. We are stuck with them to the end of the contracted period. The question of whether it is renewed or not has still to be decided. They have faced not having their contract renewed every since Francisco shot his mouth off… It was made clear what they were doing was foolish and unhelpful”
DAILY TELEGRAPH: “US TV psychics join hunt for Madeleine McCann”
“Three clairvoyants from the hit show will travel to Praia da Luz in a bid to find the missing four-year-old”
Come in Madeleine…
Kate and Gerry McCanns have received “1,500” offers from psychics hoping to find Madeleine. Like the Psychic Barber…
Says Clarence Mitchell: “We did receive an offer and chose on this occasion not to respond. We are grateful for any assistance they bring to bear in the hunt for finding Madeleine. We thank them for their concern and any demonstrably checkable fact is passed on to the police or the private detective agency”
Tune and pick up into Madeleine on the telly…
Madeleine McCann: the entertainment, speculation and lookalikes…
Posted: 11th, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,399) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- James Mcdiffett on Wikileaks Publishes 500,000 9/11 FBI And NYPD Pager Messages, Conspiracy Theorists Read On
- leesmith on Michelle Obama Is A Monkey And Other Offensive Google Images
- magnetite on Church Gives Soul Tattoos To Worshippers
- Evie Walton on Peter Andre ‘Begs’ Katie Price To Come Home
- yampster on The Chilcot Inquiry Into The Iraq War, In Pictures
January 11th, 2008 at 11:52 pm
1135
Ian
Abducted!
****
Prove it!
January 11th, 2008 at 11:52 pm
1195 Tony Bennett
“Clarence’s ‘hugely entertaining and great fun’ remark two days ago was just as chilling to the marrow.”
So true. Especially if you consider having to cast for Madeleine. Not so funny then. But that remark of Clarence’s shows just how far divorced they (Team McCann and the parents) are from the terrible kernel of this story. A three year old girl has vanished off the face of the earth. A little girl who suffered terribly no matter what happened.
Where is are their priorities? Where are their morales?
January 11th, 2008 at 11:50 pm
1202
Night Ian and whomever else is off to bed as well (these things tend to happen in groups, I don’t like to speculate but…just kidding)
January 11th, 2008 at 11:50 pm
1199
Sledgehammer Says:
January 11th, 2008 at 11:46 pm
Ian/1138 my dear boy I always do, much as I ignore the rantings of the barmy brigade, lets face it after eight months all of your combined sleuthing has resulted in TB getting well his arse kicked out of court, without a blow being struck. The law will or will not take its course whatever happens, and I think the law wont take its course, the PJ requesting more time because they have no evidence says it all. It is painful to see the barmy brigade tying themselves in knots, making statements of rumour out to be facts, the PJ said Madeleine is deceased according to gum bumping Matt, tosh
…………………..
and your pathetic ranting have acheived ……..could .you remind me again sludgy ????
oh yeah that it you’ve helped to convince most of the pros to come over to the other side.. keep up the good work sludgy 
January 11th, 2008 at 11:50 pm
It’s getting confusing…
Satire, serious. I now declare I stop being serious.
I don’t know who’s who anymore. Who’s defending who’s telling their story, who’s attacking.
I don’t care either anymore.
I will rename myself now for only tonight [and hope I don't fall into the spam filter trap]
AntiTode
January 11th, 2008 at 11:49 pm
1187 chenier says (January 11th, 2008 at 11:42 pm):
“No, no. Limping purposefully. Due to tripping over the furniture in the pitch black apartment…”
REPLY: Come, come. More like *vaulting* purposefully - leaping over a 3-foot high window-sill, clutching Madeleine, and failing to disturb the accumulated years of lichen growth
January 11th, 2008 at 11:49 pm
1199…Sledgehammer
Stop waffling you old soapbox.
I advised that Can’t say No….transcribed the content of the Portuguese TV
programme.
Ask her for the details.
January 11th, 2008 at 11:48 pm
1199 Sledgehammer
Goodnight sledgehammer, goodnight all!
January 11th, 2008 at 11:47 pm
1192 Annie_m
Let me see, would that be more or less inhumane than leaving three little ones….?
January 11th, 2008 at 11:46 pm
1192
Thanks, Annie!
January 11th, 2008 at 11:46 pm
Ian/1138 my dear boy I always do, much as I ignore the rantings of the barmy brigade, lets face it after eight months all of your combined sleuthing has resulted in TB getting well his arse kicked out of court, without a blow being struck. The law will or will not take its course whatever happens, and I think the law wont take its course, the PJ requesting more time because they have no evidence says it all. It is painful to see the barmy brigade tying themselves in knots, making statements of rumour out to be facts, the PJ said Madeleine is deceased according to gum bumping Matt, tosh.
January 11th, 2008 at 11:46 pm
1189 Ciara-Louise
Dont quote me on it!
January 11th, 2008 at 11:46 pm
1120
Châtelaine,
I think I’ll never catch up posts
The meeting in november with the lawyer[s?] and the T9 somewhere at or nearby Rothley.
January 11th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
1177
Ciara-Louise Says:
January 11th, 2008 at 11:38 pm
1158
RedRooster
Ooh RR, you’re so kind. Love to ruffle your feathers….OK if I call over again tonight?
Any news , what have I missed?
……………………………..
your welcome to come and ruffle my feathers anytime, you dont need to ask
…as for news i dont think theres any but havent been back long and have already had a couple of glasses so i may well have missed something..
January 11th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
1172 Ian says (January 11th, 2008 at 11:36 pm): “Tony Bennett - You are kidding [re Clarence Mitchell o nRadio 5 Live tonight]! Really?”
REPLY: Ian, these media people are very influential and very sure of themselves.
But occasionally they come badly unstuck.
Remember that spin merchantess who e-mailed her Labour masters just after thousands had been blown up and killed on 9/11 and said: “This is now a very good day to bury bad news”?
Clarence’s ‘hugely entertaining and great fun’ remark two days ago was just as chilling to the marrow.
Tonight’s gaffe has, if possible, lowered his reputation still further
January 11th, 2008 at 11:44 pm
1168 Matt
So true. Just popping down to the Tapas Bar to a top up.
January 11th, 2008 at 11:44 pm
1186 we could have done better! Muyst try when not having drunk too much brandy!
1187 chenier
Made me chuckle!
January 11th, 2008 at 11:44 pm
“McCann spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: “We are disappointed, but not surprised given that the police are still investigating.
“We had expected this request, however our lawyers will be examining it and once again we would urge the police to come over and interview who they want to.
“This delay is inhumane, we remain in legal limbo and our lawyers remain in the dark as do Kate and Gerry.
“We expect no special treatment from the Portuguese authorities and we respect Portuguese law, but the amount of time it is taking is inhumane, they must get through this stage of the inquiry, it is quite unfair and extremely disappointing.
“The quicker we get this resolved, the quicker we can get back to finding Madeleine.”
Portuguese police have sent formal letters of appeal to Britain, asking for the McCanns and their friends to be re-interviewed by British police, with Portuguese officers present.
Their request for an extension of the secrecy of justice is considered certain to be granted, as it could be disastrous to the police case if the McCanns were to learn the evidence against them before they are re-interviewed.”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=507808&in_page_id=1770
January 11th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
648 chenier,
you are really annoying. I was quoting Angela Cannings case :
“. Nowadays, we read and hear much about a new concept, “found innocent”: that is not a verdict known to the law. ”
You were quoting the Tripti Patel case, and accused me in misrepresentation.
Calm down. You are too jumpy still about your childbearing decisions, I think, so you try to “bite”.
I repeat : “found innocent IS NOT A VERDICT KNOWN TO THE LAW”. That’s what I wanted to say. ONLY.
Thank goodness I am not your work collegue, your comments often are quite bitchy, I guess you used to work in an office.
January 11th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
1185
Better clear your head first, a nice run at the first of the morning should sort you out. Cock-a-doodle-do!
January 11th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
1183
Ian
Really
January 11th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
1185 Weve got you banged to rights you bastard…put down that trademark and put your hands in the till…I mean the air.
January 11th, 2008 at 11:42 pm
1176
Tony Bennett Says:
January 11th, 2008 at 11:38 pm
1143 Batman
But we have even more about the abductor.
He is 5′ 7″.
He once wore a dark top and beige trousers.
And he is capable of ‘walkingpurposfully’
—————————————–
No, no.
Limping purposefully.
Due to tripping over the furniture in the pitch black apartment…
January 11th, 2008 at 11:42 pm
1178…Ian
An entertaining attempt.
The comments made me laugh.
January 11th, 2008 at 11:41 pm
1173
Wanderer Says:
January 11th, 2008 at 11:37 pm
1170
Blast you, firestar…that did bring about a cruel remark in my head. (No doubt you can work it out, eggs, hatching, this whole thing..)
Are we done switching roles now then
………………………
did someone mention eggs…… where are they you thief, dont force me to form a ltd company etc multi million pound fund fool half the bloody country into giving me their life saving etc..give them back you cruel heartless bastards
i only left them for half an hour or so and was regularly checking on them 
January 11th, 2008 at 11:41 pm
1176 Tony Bennett
and he was not, I repeat NOT, carrying a child-size blue tennis bag.
January 11th, 2008 at 11:41 pm
1177 Ciara-Louise
Apparently there are these doctors and one of them has misplaced a child….
January 11th, 2008 at 11:40 pm
1178
Better hope she doesn’t think you’re mixing up names there.
January 11th, 2008 at 11:40 pm
1163
Totje Says:
January 11th, 2008 at 11:33 pm
” [...] which itself is serious enough] because there is the [slim I admit - and all imo alledged etc.- ] chance they are innocent in harming/killing their daughter.”
——
Totje, we don’t have much more to really go on than what they say themselves [documented]: which is that they are not involved in/had nothing to do with the DISAPPEARANCE of their daughter.
And that is - IMO - different from any other event which may have happened
January 11th, 2008 at 11:39 pm
which reminds me my tea is going cold.