
Madeleine McCann: Kelsey Lynn Kudia For Hire, Paris Hilton And Propaganda
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
THE SUN front page: “’MADDIE’ FOR HIRE”
Tonight Kelsey Lynn Kudia is Madeleine McCann. Kelsey looks likes Madeleine McCann. She’s not in Morocco. She;s nopt Bouchra Benaissa. She not in Malta. But for the right fee she might be. Kelsey is a working Madeleine McCann double
Pages 4 and 5: “The boss of a lookalike agency who hopes to make a fortune out of a little Madeleine McCann double said last night: ‘It’s not sinister – it’s entertainment’. Shona Adams reckons three-year-old Kelsey Lynn Kudla’s similarity to missing Maddie could earn her £9MILLION for starring in a proposed feature film about the vanished tot”
Well, someone would have to play the missing child, unless she is found alive and well…
Says Shona, owner of London’s Juliet Adams Model Agency: “If the film about Madeleine is ever made, then the world is Kelsey’s oyster. If someone like Steven Spielberg made it, she could make £9million easily – of which I’d take 20 per cent. She will become a name in her own right and make it as a child model or actress because she’s got her foot in the door”
Just when you thought it was safe to holiday in Portugal…Dum-dum…
Of course, great acting careers have begun with less. Didn’t Tom Hanks play the baby in a Cry In The Dark?
She continues: “And from there, her earning potential is limitless. It’s not sinister. And if the McCanns are upset, there’s nothing they can do because it’s a democracy. I wouldn’t back away from it because, if a film is being made, then it’s entertainment”
Kate and Gerry McCann are “doctors”.
Says Shona: “I wouldn’t put Kelsey in a position of doing anything bad taste”
SLAP IN FACE FOR McCANNS: Sun columnist Lorraine Kelly says: “It makes you recoil to think a lookalike agency would have a Madeleine on their books alongside someone who looks like Jack Nicholson or Paris Hilton”
Whatever could she mean? Neither Nicolson nor Hilton were available to defend themselves…
DAILY EXPRESS: “The Madeleine lookalike on hire for £600 an hour”
Do you want to get your resort or country in the papers? Hire Kelsey to be a “Madeleine” and attract the world’s media to your locale as she is spotted time and time again
Kelsey is American
“PARENTS trying to ‘distract’ police
A source “close to the official police” investigation says: “Who do the McCanns think they are? The discovery of new witnesses in the last few weeks lead the authorities to believe they are at war with a gigantic propaganda machine. The McCanns have some very powerful people on their side - millionaires, celebrities, even politicians”
Says Robert Murat’s lawyer: “Robert Murat does not have millionaires supporting him, nor campaign funds. “He just wants to see his name cleared in this case as he has nothing to do with Madeleine’s disappearance, despite every day people emerging trying to forcibly incriminate him”
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE – The £600 an hour lookalike”
Page 7: “MADDIE DOUBLE FOR HIRE”
“A sick mother is touting her daughter as a £600-an-hour Madeleine McCann lookalike,” says the paper, amid adverts for “adult fantasies”, “nasty sex” and FILTH”
She is an “unnamed American girl” - see the Sun above
Says Clarence Mitchell: “This is an offensive way to make money out of Madeleine’s disappearance. This is deeply offensive to parents Kate and Gerry”
MADDIE: THE MOVIE: “Yesterday, Channel 4’s head of documentaries Angus Macqueen said he had attended a meeting with the McCanns’ representatives to discuss a movie. He tells us: “Of course we are interested in making a film about this compelling story. We have a history of making quality films about crime matters”
That’s entertainment: “Meanwhile, producers of US psychic TV show Haunting Evidence have been in Praia da Luz planning their own show about Madeleine’s disappearance”
DAILY MAIL: “McCanns are ready to sack detective agency”
Says a source: “We will carry on the search for Madeleine, but not necessarily with Metodo 3. We are stuck with them to the end of the contracted period. The question of whether it is renewed or not has still to be decided. They have faced not having their contract renewed every since Francisco shot his mouth off… It was made clear what they were doing was foolish and unhelpful”
DAILY TELEGRAPH: “US TV psychics join hunt for Madeleine McCann”
“Three clairvoyants from the hit show will travel to Praia da Luz in a bid to find the missing four-year-old”
Come in Madeleine…
Kate and Gerry McCanns have received “1,500” offers from psychics hoping to find Madeleine. Like the Psychic Barber…
Says Clarence Mitchell: “We did receive an offer and chose on this occasion not to respond. We are grateful for any assistance they bring to bear in the hunt for finding Madeleine. We thank them for their concern and any demonstrably checkable fact is passed on to the police or the private detective agency”
Tune and pick up into Madeleine on the telly…
Madeleine McCann: the entertainment, speculation and lookalikes…
Posted: 11th, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,399) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





January 11th, 2008 at 9:59 pm
heres a thought for clarry the photo with kate holding cuddleycat to her nose would make a great add for lenor.considering she washed it so much
January 11th, 2008 at 9:58 pm
959 Fair
Well I just thought there had been two Carmens on here and that Stevo had got confused. Now, had I realised it was a feigned ignorance to attack Stevo, I might have said something quite different.
Now off for the night.
January 11th, 2008 at 9:54 pm
901
Matt. Says:
January 11th, 2008 at 8:51 pm
892…Cheryl
don’t be silly Cheryl….all countries are known to be frequented by Paedos.
___________
I beg your pardon, Matt, that is not a silly statement and it is based on research I did on that country the day I heard there was a child missing over there from a resort after having been left alone.
Sorry about that, Matt, do your homework also!
January 11th, 2008 at 9:53 pm
OK CLEVER PEOPLE
PROVE ME WRONG
SOLVE THE CASE BASED ON TV AND TABLOID REPORTS
SEE WHO WILL TAKE YOU SERIOUSLY
January 11th, 2008 at 9:49 pm
943 Carmen
I remember you saying all that but didn’t want to ”expose” you!
How’s Bordeaux?
January 11th, 2008 at 9:47 pm
942 Carmen
I apologise. But you appeared to have no idea what Stevo was talking about. I now see that this was not the case.
January 11th, 2008 at 9:46 pm
949
Nite Gerry
January 11th, 2008 at 9:43 pm
934
Tony Bennett Says:
January 11th, 2008 at 9:15 pm
892 Cheryl say (January 11th, 2008 at 8:46 pm):
FURTHER REPLY: Two points:
1. I stick by exactly what I said; 99% of all claimed ‘abductions’ *from a house* (whether residential home or temporary holiday home) urn out on fuller investigation to be intra-family murders
2. Name me ONE case in previous history - anywhere in the whole wide world - where a child has been snatched from a house (or holiday home if you want to give me an example of that) whilst the parents have been absent.
____________________________________
REPLY TO ABOVE: I shall do my research and get back on such cases.
________________________
Previously you were not able to name ONE case of another young child having gone missing and presumed abducted in circumstances even broadly similar to those of Madeleine McCann. This was after you claimed there were 77,000 missing children in the U.K. and you challenged me as to why I didn’t prosecute some of those parents as well
REPLY TO ABOVE: Keep your facts straight, Tony B., I got that 77,000 missing from statistics in the UK - granted I asked why you did not go after any of those parents; you told me to find you some from over there and you would. I told you very politely that I don’t live over there and would not be able to or rather would not do the research for you.
January 11th, 2008 at 9:41 pm
948
Tinsel
It’s a very nice word
January 11th, 2008 at 9:40 pm
938
Gloria Smudd,
I guess her english isn’t that good?
I’m really smiling now…
One of these days I’ll post a story at the forum “embarrassing moments” about a rooster….
Oh this is for RR: it includes the clothes-hanger
January 11th, 2008 at 9:37 pm
And, in any case, whoever said that the Sainsbury’s loos were a home environment?
January 11th, 2008 at 9:35 pm
936
Chloe Spain,
Thanks. I didn’t know that.
Makes me wonder who was the first to introduce it?
And who’s next?
January 11th, 2008 at 9:35 pm
And I think the mother was in Sainsbury’s in the toilet one!
January 11th, 2008 at 9:34 pm
Watcher : What a dick?
Anyway….
I seem to remember the mother being home in the bath abduction.
January 11th, 2008 at 9:31 pm
TO ALL ON THE FORUM…
IF ANY OF YOU REALLY THINK YOU KNOW THE ANSWERS THEN PRESENT YOUR INFORMATION TO THE PJ.
BUT REMEMBER IN THE REAL WORLD STUFF YOU SEE ON TV AND READ IN THE PAPERS WILL NOT BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY IN COURT.
ENJOY YOUR GAMES
January 11th, 2008 at 9:30 pm
FROM: the Watcher Watcher
Yeah we know about all the paedophiles in the world, but generally they don’t operate in places like Beverly Hills, Monte Carlo, or the Mark Warner complexes.
The police have no credible leads coming from the underworld, even though “The Team” has rendered a few from some extra fat on the fund courtesty of Medato 3. Funds are running a bit low now though, and Clarry is having movie thoughts! He’d better do so because, it’ll be lean times when the lawyers start digging in. Quick, jump Clary!
* * *
definition for the day:
gaol
noun
Brit. variant spelling of jail .
DERIVATIVES gaoler noun
jail |jāl| ( Brit. also gaol) noun a place for the confinement of people accused or convicted of a crime : Gerry McCann will spend 15 years in jail | [as adj. ] a jail sentence.
• confinement in a jail : Kate McCann was sentenced to 16 years’ in jail.
verb [ trans. ] (usu. be jailed) put (someone) in jail : O’Brian, their accomplice, was jailed for ten years.
ORIGIN Middle English : based on Latin cavea (see cage ). The word came into English in two forms, jaiole from Old French and gayole from Anglo-Norman French gaole (surviving in the spelling gaol), originally pronounced with a hard g, as in gale.
It’s a nice word, don’t you think?
January 11th, 2008 at 9:27 pm
942…Carmen
Pardon, Carmen ?
Didn’t hear that with the watchers shouting….could you repeat it please ?
January 11th, 2008 at 9:26 pm
Tony
Two cases spring to mind
The Sainsbury toilet bduction and
The kid taken from the bath ?
If I remember correctly ?
January 11th, 2008 at 9:24 pm
941…Chloe Spain
I agree.
But if existing laws were to protect children and were found to be lacking,
I can understand new regulations being created….if however those were
then not inforced…..there isn’t much protection either way.
bad for children. IMO
January 11th, 2008 at 9:24 pm
933 Matt. Says:
I think regulation is a good thing….what I don’t like is the lack of action
at times within those regulations.
**********
Me too, but this lack of action often causes the overregulation, which I don’t like either.
January 11th, 2008 at 9:24 pm
totje ? chernier ? carmen ?
lol
January 11th, 2008 at 9:23 pm
why?
and who ?
January 11th, 2008 at 9:21 pm
933 Matt.
There’s not a lot of point in regulating things that you can’t enforce. Often, the existing law is sufficient but it isn’t enforced.
January 11th, 2008 at 9:20 pm
937…Totje
no fear re the T9 forgetting their lines….they have refresher classes don’t they ?
January 11th, 2008 at 9:20 pm
926
Carmen,
can I offer you a glass of Pinot Gris? Goes fine with the mussles!
January 11th, 2008 at 9:20 pm
Totje
“My Old Man’s a Dutchman” (which was so nearly my Anorak name) so I must tell you - my Dutch mother-in-law could only call our son William and couldn’t understand why we would want to call him Bill!
January 11th, 2008 at 9:18 pm
913 Tony Bennett re
803 Totje says (January 11th, 2008 at 7:37 pm): “…provided both carers were present in the building at the relevant time…”
REPLY: Yes, and IF there is even conclusive evidence that Madeleine died in the apartment, and there is no body, who’s to say - evidentially - who was responsible? - or even HOW she died?
That’s why I think lesser charges e.g. failing to produce a body to the proper authorities, or perverting/interfering with the course of justice, are more likely to be brought than murder/manslaughter.
Unless there is a confession or admission
*******
You could be right about that. They still have to prove that too.
Re-interviewing witnesses might help proving it. But why did/are they waiting so long?
Could have done that months ago. Memories won’t get stronger as time passes. Little things [lies as well as thruth] gets forgotten.
And don’t say they trie[d] to prove they killed her, or tried to find the body.
They could do the interviews and not forget to do the other things meanwhile.
January 11th, 2008 at 9:16 pm
930 Totje
Also in Spain. Same thing.
January 11th, 2008 at 9:15 pm
931…the watcher
Wish you’d stop shouting…use your cap lock key.
January 11th, 2008 at 9:15 pm
892 Cheryl say (January 11th, 2008 at 8:46 pm):
Cheryl said: “Generalizing and thinking about statistics, in 80% of the cases regarding missing children [of that age] a family member or someone with access to the family is involved. That leaves 20% who aren’t involved”.
Tony Bennett replied: “But if you confine that to cases where a child has gone missing from *inside a house*, the 80% figure rises to more like 99%”
Cheryl came back: “Tony B., yes BUT that is from in their own home! These people were on vacation with their youngsters in a foreign country, strangers around, country known to be frequented by paedophiles, and left their children alone in an apartment. This wasn’t as if being at home, Tony B”.
FURTHER REPLY: Two points:
1. I stick by exactly what I said; 99% of all claimed ‘abductions’ *from a house* (whether residential home or temporary holiday home) urn out on fuller investigation to be intra-family murders
2. Name me ONE case in previous history - anywhere in the whole wide world - where a child has been snatched from a house (or holiday home if you want to give me an example of that) whilst the parents have been absent.
Previously you were not able to name ONE case of another young child having gone missing and presumed abducted in circumstances even broadly similar to those of Madeleine McCann. This was after you claimed there were 77,000 missing children in the U.K. and you challenged me as to why I didn’t prosecute some of those parents as well