
Madeleine McCann: McCann Incorporated, McCann Ink And Going Back To Portugal
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
SUNDAY MIRROR: “Tapas 7 in despair at all the ‘lies’”
They say they are also called the Tapas Nine? And the Sangria Seven
“The Tapas Seven are “in meltdown” over the failure of Portuguese police to make any meaningful progress in the hunt for Madeleine”
“IT’S OUR D-DAY - McCanns return to Portugal - EXCLUSIVE Kate and Gerry set date in April for Algarve showdown They’ll tell cops: show your evidence or clear us for good”. Like that D-Day back on November?
“Despairing Kate and Gerry McCann are planning to return to Portugal for a face-to-face showdown with police who think they killed their daughter Madeleine”
They are going back. Now..?
Well, not exactly: “A close friend said the the couple were likely to go back after their ‘D-Day’ of April 11, when their three-month extension is up, and added: ‘They feel they’ve waited long enough with this cloud of suspicion hanging over them. They know their return would be very high-profile. They believe investigators do not have the evidence against them to bring charges, and their presence in Portugal would embarrass them. They’ve so far held off going back there, but they see it as their trump card”
They will go back once they have been allowed to see the police first on them
Says the paper’s source: “They see April 11 as their D-day. They have decided to give the police reasonable time to clear them, or at least open the case files so they can see the evidence against them”
That’s good of them…
FIONA Philips, of GMTV writes: “Have a heart”. Yes, that Fiona Philips
“Unbelievably, every time I write about the McCanns I get messages saying, ‘I used to like you, until you started supporting the McCanns.’ Nice, eh? So I hope you’re happy now that Kate and Gerry have blamed themselves for Madeleine’s disappearance”
Happy?
“In a list of ‘if onlys’, Gerry said: ‘I wish I’d stayed in the apartment that night.’ Now, I expect more bile on praising them for considering making a documentary on the case. Surely you can’t tell me that there’s a parent out there who wouldn’t do anything possible to find their missing child?”
SUNDAY PEOPLE: “’We pray she’ll be at party for twins’”
“Brave Kate McCann is planning a huge birthday party for her twins - and dreams missing Maddie will be there too. Kate, 39, has vowed to go ahead with the bash for Sean and Amelie even though she is still waiting for cops to quiz her again. Mother-in-law Eileen said: ‘The party’s on and it will be an even bigger one if wee Madeleine is back. All we can do is hope and pray.’ Sean and Amelie turn three on February”
Touching stuff. Gerry McCann is a “heart specialist”
MAIL ON SUNDAY: “Madeleine: No film will be made unless she’s found - alive or dead”
“Kate and Gerry McCann have been told that the proposed documentary about their daughter’s disappearance can go ahead only if she is found – alive or dead.
A source says: “It was awkward to raise but there would need to be an ending – either Madeleine being found alive or a body being discovered. If this wasn’t the case, and there was a major development after filming and editing, it could render the documentary redundant”
Or the parents or some other person or persons are charged, perhaps?
THE OBSERVER: “A good week for … a bad week for …”
“A bad week for …
“Tradition – A Lib Dem MP called Lynne Featherstone has made a bid for the limelight by reporting the monarchy to the Equality Commission because it goes in for primogeniture”
“Marcus Agius The chairman of Barclay’s was the target of £10,000 fraud”
“Good Taste - Or indeed any taste at all. A London based agency which supplies celebrity doubles has employed a small girl to rent out as Madeleine McCann. 20 per cent”
It was a “good weeks for… Washing up”
“THE Maddie story is already a soap opera, so why the moral panic over a movie? - Don’t get me wrong - nobody wants to see Maddie: The Musical. However, needs must if the McCanns want to continue trying to find out what happened to their daughter and they do, despite the devastating expense (their somewhat unproductive detective agency alone costs £50,000 a month) and the increasingly shabby odds.”
Maddie: The Musical, eh..?
THE SUNDAY INDEPENDENT: “Strange case of the detectives trying to trace Madeleine”
“After a week when commercials deals were more apparent than clues, we investigate the investigators”. Why not investigate the case?
“Just when the Madeleine McCann saga couldn’t get any more agonising, along came a raft of developments last week that began to achieve what you would hope would be impossible: turning a little missing girl into an industry – Madeleine Inc. Item: a London agency hawking around various small girls as Madeleine lookalikes. Item: US television bringing a team of psychics to bear on the disappearance as part of what they no doubt hoped would be a money-spinner of a show. Item: her parents, Gerry and Kate McCann, exploring the possibility of selling the book and film rights to the case”
Madeleine became a brand long ago. Brand McCann…
“Madeleine Inc bring benefits to some, but not, so far, to the girl herself or her distraught parents”
Or Madeleine Ink – see the press
THE SUNDAY TIMES: Ron Liddle writes:
“So, get yourself ready for Maddie – The Movie (PG, until you fancy nipping out for something to eat). Kate and Gerry McCann’s press spokesman, Clarence Mitchell, has confirmed that the couple met with representatives from the US entertainment company IMG before Christmas and that while nothing was agreed, the meeting had been ‘positive’. A day later Gerry McCann hastily backtracked and said no, no, they weren’t planning a movie. Who to believe? And which British actors will Hollywood cast as the parents if there is a film? Sacha Baron Cohen and Catherine Tate? Am I bovvered? Look at my face – is it bovvered? And maybe Matt Lucas as the shady-looking Robert Murat? Norman Wisdom as the Portuguese chief of police?”
Madeleine McCann: Fiction, faction and a single unbearable fact
Posted: 13th, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,025) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





January 14th, 2008 at 1:09 am
974
Totje Says:
January 14th, 2008 at 1:07 am
Nite nite RR be nice to Garth
========
goes without saying
nite nite sweet dreams xxx
January 14th, 2008 at 1:08 am
thanks, wanderer
January 14th, 2008 at 1:07 am
965 RedRooster Says: January 14th, 2008 at 1:00 am
im off again guys gotta be up to take the little chicks to school..nite all - lets hope theres some news this coming week
+++++++++++++
I’m not far behind you, metaphorically speaking, and for similar reasons.
If you are still here… my spam filter has just picked up some e-mail obviously intended for you:
Rooster-challanged men can now improve their lives!
Any idea what that’s all about?
Good night!
January 14th, 2008 at 1:07 am
Nite nite RR be nice to Garth
January 14th, 2008 at 1:06 am
962
Right, you don’t mean Tony’s list? We’re not allowed to repost that here, as even copying it and posting it could still be libel.
As for a statement: “Says Englishman Clarence Mitchell: “A few days ago Kate was criticised for not showing enough emotion and then when she does cry she is criticised too. Everything that Kate and Gerry said on that interview was totally genuine. They have nothing to hide. The people who are making these allegations should be very sure about what they are saying. Our lawyers are watching the media coverage very carefully in both Portugal and Britain and action will be taken against anything we feel has gone too far”
Another paper had a source that claimed they were keeping a list.
http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177198.html
January 14th, 2008 at 1:05 am
968 Peter O Says:
Thanks Peter O!
January 14th, 2008 at 1:05 am
961
Miss Match,
I was/am too polite to say it aloud, but the answer is YES
We [=Lulu, Rationalist and I] had a whole night a conversation about a festive airblown Christmas Jaws, with a hat
January 14th, 2008 at 1:03 am
Can’t say no - May I formally welcome you to the Shutter Club.
On a separate note, I have got terrible indigestion and think I may have poisoned myself with my cooking and, much less importantly, my dinner guests. I’m hoping Mr M just sleeps through his digestive disturbances.
January 14th, 2008 at 1:03 am
967
Totje
January 14th, 2008 at 1:03 am
941 veritablequandary Says: January 14th, 2008 at 12:49 am
I don’t recall see this warning to Tony. But I am not around all of the time.
How about others of you? Sometimes these “intervention” are out of sequence of real time.
Edit…
+++++++++++++++++
This was posted VERY late the day after the thread it’s actually posted on, I think something like 1:29 PM the day AFTER. It was also the last but one post.
By this time of day we were all chattering away on the following days thread, hence Tony never saw it. I expect that by the time agw was able to get to this and address the issue(s) he raised it was just much later the following day.
Follow the link in post 874 and you’ll see what I mean. Think it’s just an innocent misunderstanding.
January 14th, 2008 at 1:02 am
959
can’t say no : yep
January 14th, 2008 at 1:02 am
963
Châtelaine
If i have time i’ll go down to PDL ,and put 1 face on the eggman
January 14th, 2008 at 1:00 am
im off again guys gotta be up to take the little chicks to school..nite all - lets hope theres some news this coming week
January 14th, 2008 at 1:00 am
953
veritablequandary,
I saw it because I was looking for an answer how to post images over here [and it doesn't work still].
IF I’m correct 81 points they thought were lies by the T9 [very long post] from the Mirror Forum was copied. It could be considered as libel. Many assumptions also. Things based on hearsay imo. He posted a link to the MF on this thread. Have a look yourself.
January 14th, 2008 at 1:00 am
955
Miss Match Says:
January 14th, 2008 at 12:56 am
Chatelaine. Yòù’ré wèlcòmè!!!
******
Ms. Match
I’m still not over your “octopus” theory….
My old Maman neither
lol
It shouldn’t be too difficult to find a peadophile octopus with an egg-shaped head inPdL
No…???
January 14th, 2008 at 12:59 am
957 Wanderer Says:
(actually, I can only think of one)
—
and that would be?
or post the whole list and let me guess, if the list still remains
January 14th, 2008 at 12:58 am
Totje - I remember the name, Lulu, but cannot recall any of her posts. I didn’t post for months and months but read Anorak regularly. Was she as insane as me?
January 14th, 2008 at 12:57 am
958
Miss Match
No way
January 14th, 2008 at 12:57 am
956
Totje
Brit server
January 14th, 2008 at 12:57 am
Can’t say no - and what were your scientific findings?
January 14th, 2008 at 12:56 am
953
I think he is just looking out for the site and people here, by warning them of libel and what not. This case is huge and the comments from a “source” of the McCanns have made little comments about going after the papers and things. (actually, I can only think of one)
January 14th, 2008 at 12:56 am
949
can’t say no
No quotes, just links to things that might be considered as libel, I think. To protect Anorak.
January 14th, 2008 at 12:56 am
Chatelaine. Yòù’ré wèlcòmè!!!
January 14th, 2008 at 12:55 am
952
Miss Match
yep
January 14th, 2008 at 12:55 am
946 Totje Says:
I’ve seen it.
—-
what is agw upset about?
by all means paraphrase!
January 14th, 2008 at 12:54 am
Hello can’t say no!
Are you in Portugal? If so, did you also do the ‘Miss Match shutter experiment’?
January 14th, 2008 at 12:54 am
942
RedRooster : I won’t
944
Miss Match : Did you ever read a post of Lulu? You could be her sister
Nite nite Châtelaine.
January 14th, 2008 at 12:54 am
941
Veritablequandary, I remember it, but only because I try to skim through the posts a bit before I post (sometimes I don’t have the patience for it).
January 14th, 2008 at 12:54 am
946
Totje
Me no
Have no idea ,what we can post now
January 14th, 2008 at 12:52 am
Till tomorrow
I’m going to let the “galls” alone