Madeleine McCann: Kate McCann’s A Sex Symbol, Spanish Paedos And Belgian Pervs
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MIRROR: “Maddie: Spain link is probed”
“Private detectives hunting for Madeleine McCann believe she was snatched on the orders of a paedophile ring in Spain, it emerged yesterday”
It’s what Antonio Toscano told us about his “Frenchman”. Now Metodo 3 are journeying to Valencia and Alicante. No, not Morocco
The McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell, says: “A potential paedophile gang connection has been there since May 3. M3 are active in this area”
So nothing definite. Just potential
DAILY STAR: “MADDIE: NEW PERV HUNT”
Metodo 3 “are focusing on child sex rings in Valencia and Alicante, homes to thousands of foreign residents and destinations for millions of tourists every year”
Says Clarence Mitchell: “Any paedophilia connection in the region has been thoroughly examined and they are continuing to look at potential leads in those areas”
“Live 1-2-1 BLACK FILTH,” says the Star’s advert. “FILTH 4 FREE”
DAILY EXPRESS: “Madeleine: Family anger at plans for 26-part TV series”
The TV series and then the film (The Brady Bunch, Dallas, Miami Vice), or the film and then the TV series (Ghost Busters, Planet of the Apes, My Big Fat Greek Life)?
Portuguese policeman turned criminologist Francisco Moita Flores has written the script
“The series, based on the official investigation, will start filming in Portugal shortly. Producers are hoping it will be shown across Europe – raising the prospect of it being broadcast in Britain”
Why bother when we have Crimewatch, Panorama, CSI Praia da Luz…
“Detectives trawl child sex gangs” – In Spain. Although Metodo 3 say the paedos there have links with paedos in Belgium and Morocco
THE SUN: “COSTA LINK TO MADDIE – Hunt switches to Spanish sickos”
Not all Spanish are sickos. Although this is the Sun, so maybe they are…
“Investigators from Metodo 3 are speaking with Spanish police about child sex networks in the area and any known offenders’ links to the Algarve in Portugal, where Maddie, four, disappeared last May. They believe a gang took her to Spain before smuggling her to Morocco or Belgium”. Or Malta?
Says an investigator: “We cannot discount anything”
Says Clarence Mitchell: “It is a primary area of our investigation”
It is the Sun’s - oh dear - “child sex hunt”
BBC: 10 o’clock news: “Call for review of Murat status”
Says Robert Murat’s mother, Jenny: “Let us all get on with our nice, quiet lives that we had before.”
Asked whether her son believes his suspect status will be removed, she replies: “I don’t think Robert thinks about that, obviously he hopes it’s going to be, but we just don’t have a clue”
LOADED: Kate McCann has made it onto the lads’ mag list of “unlikely sex symbols”. Kate McCann in a thong, orange skin and new breasts, anyone?
THE SPOOF: “The News of the World has been criticised for its slowness and ineptitude in solving the case of Madeleine McCann, who has now been missing for 256 days. The newspaper, which has been officially investigating the case since its beginnings, has recently been unable to offer any new evidence, despite front-page headlines”
Madeleine McCann - months of speculation
Posted: 15th, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,352) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- susan jones on Susan Boyle Weeps As The Press Set About Destroying Her
- The Real Stig on The Great Cathay Pacific Blocked Toilet Mystery
- SoDak-GhostDog on Interview With Survior Of James Arthur Ray’s Sedona Sweat Lodge
- Katie Norman on I’m A Celebrity: Joe Bugner’s Career In Pictures
- HOTWATER on Madeleine McCann: The Media Creates A New Maddie Monster And Twists The Facts
January 18th, 2008 at 11:09 am
Forever Searching is a group of Caring dedicated people raising awareness to missing children worldwide. Please visit our website to see a little of what we do http://www.foreversearching.com
We are looking for volunteers to help within our small, friendly, professional group. Can you spare some computer time? As a volunteer, you will need to use the internet to research possible target audiences, as well as emailing posters of missing children worldwide.
You will be allocated a Team Leader who is there to assist you whenever needed. You will be required to email your weekly progress reports to your team leader and discuss where to focus next.
We just need you to be computer literate, reliable and have a passion for children.
Application procedure: Please send an e-mail to register@foreversearching.com.
Thank you
M Black (please quote when registering)
http://www.foreversearching.com
January 17th, 2008 at 3:02 am
PeterO:
Be no longer curious! Just as stuff is pulled from the public domain on a regular basis re: the Clan - be well assured that any murmerings from the ‘local people’ are not allowed to even enter the public consciousness. No TV or newspaper mogul would dare to upset the ‘powers that be’ en ce moment.Fact. (As Anorak would say!) Joking aside - We are just mushrooms! Fed on sh*t and kept in the dark.
January 16th, 2008 at 10:38 pm
Jo 1353
Can anyone, in their wildest dreams, imagine the McScums dishing out any of their hard conned money on anyone other than themselves.
They would find this suggestion “LUDICROUS” .
I take your point and know exactly what you mean.
January 16th, 2008 at 9:05 pm
So the McCanns have WARNED the Policia Judiciari to put up or shut up. THE McCANNS have warned them.!!!!!!!!
Oh dear, it seems the P.J hav’nt taken any notice. HOW DARE the P.J ignore a WARNING from somebody who is just ONE down from GOD. Tut Tut.
So call in the desciples Branson, Kennedy, Rowling, Mitchell, Brown, Green, The Sun, The Mirror, The Express, ITV, BBC, Hoity Toity Magazine, to take instructions from their almighty to put pressure on the P.J. What a boot quaking thought. Mind you the P.J can ask for forgiveness in the form of “BOllOCKS”. A word which also describes the McCanns pleas of innocence.
But is’nt it great that the P.J are firm in their really really “CREDIBLE” theory and will continue to maintain it while all around are going into realms of fantasy on a daily basis.
Something else I was thinking about with a supposed abduction. According to what K & G say it seems the alleged abductor must have been the most house proud abductor in the world.
He supposedly removes the cuddle cat and places it neatly on a shelf. He slides the girl out of the bed and leaves the bed clothes perfectly intact. Not even a crease! Yeah Sure: and I suppose he run the iron over the pyjamas, did a bit of dusting and got frustrated when he could’nt find a vacuum cleaner. A spot of washing up, and probably wiped his feet on the door mat too before finally cleaning the windows and nipping off.
Some of the most unsuspecting people do some of the most extraordinary things. That is FACT.
January 16th, 2008 at 1:06 pm
1361 veritablequandary Says: January 16th, 2008 at 12:48 pm
Late on the last thread, 1331 coco at 3:25 am responded to 1329 Tinsel:
Tinsel: Sadly it is not a sad suspicion at all. She was a handful and everybody knew this from her family and their friends to neighbours and villagers.
(This is what 1329 Tinsel said at 3:18 am):
There is still a sort of sad suspicion that Madeleine was perceived as a burden by her parents, and may have been a bit slow in developing in additional to having complicated physical problems the clues to which appeared in her eyes.
—-
I asked for sources and got skewered. But I have always been curious that we do not hear more from neighbors and such. I don’t see television, so perhaps that’s where such stories might be relayed. We do hear from friends and relatives, but nothing from locals.
+++++++++++++
I thought your question was reasonable, sadly coco felt otherwise. If we cannot, for whatever reason, provide attributable sources for information we post here then it really is difficult for others to assess the likely truth/value of what we post. Is it the truth, gossip or just mere supposition?
It has been remarked many times in here, and I’m sure other forums, that it is however somewhat strange, maybe even suspicious, that there have been so few “kiss and tell” stories about the McCann’s, their family and friends. It is almost like these people did not exist prior to May 3rd?
January 16th, 2008 at 12:48 pm
Late on the last thread, 1331 coco at 3:25 am responded to 1329 Tinsel:
Tinsel: Sadly it is not a sad suspicion at all. She was a handful and everybody knew this from her family and their friends to neighbours and villagers.
(This is what 1329 Tinsel said at 3:18 am):
There is still a sort of sad suspicion that Madeleine was perceived as a burden by her parents, and may have been a bit slow in developing in additional to having complicated physical problems the clues to which appeared in her eyes.
—-
I asked for sources and got skewered. But I have always been curious that we do not hear more from neighbors and such. I don’t see television, so perhaps that’s where such stories might be relayed. We do hear from friends and relatives, but nothing from locals.
January 16th, 2008 at 12:21 pm
1358
Totje
I don’t think the alleged cut was mentioned in any other articles. I didn’t remember this one. Interesting.
Did she cry in the video? Can’t say I noticed this either.
January 16th, 2008 at 12:13 pm
1340 DuncanR,
You’re welcome. I thought you would like this tool to make things easier for you
January 16th, 2008 at 12:09 pm
1324 veritablequandary Says:
Totje and Ferdeinand
“Something strange in this story. I wonder if someone else also sees it????”
—
What I find strange is: [...] The cut herself quite badly, part.
Yep that caught my eye too!
Well, also the next part is gruesome: “She was dead excited about going away with the rest of the kids.”
I thought this was a common expression? I’m not familiar with “all” the slang.
You’re a good observer, and I’m sorry I left you all in suspence by leaving the building so to speak.
January 16th, 2008 at 9:23 am
1352
jo
Did they offer any support to Ylenia Lenhard’s mother, who did start a fund but only after her daughter’s body was recovered? Perhaps they did but it was rejected or not publicised.
January 16th, 2008 at 7:30 am
New thread.
January 16th, 2008 at 7:24 am
Anorak strives for ‘balance’. It seems we are succeeding in that aim ……
Richard/Hideki accuses us of supporting the McCanns while the pro-McCanns on the ‘Not in Malta or Morroco’ thread are leaving because they perceive us to be anti-McCann in stance.
We must be doing something right then!
January 16th, 2008 at 7:15 am
I was wondering if the Mccanns are going to offer some cash to Mariluz”s parents to help with her search….
January 16th, 2008 at 7:06 am
1350 agw Says: January 16th, 2008 at 7:03 am
Richard/Hideki/Freddy etc., etc. has left the building…again.
The latest scintillating, inspired thinking, can remain in view for all.
++++++++++
And with each iteration of the character the time between hello and self implosion seems to decrease!
Administrator: We aim to please
January 16th, 2008 at 7:04 am
1311 Ferdinand Says: January 16th, 2008 at 1:47 am
1287 Peter O Says:
“Is there anything suspicious about them wanting to leave that video out there? Most people pick on Gerry swearing, which let’s face it is hardly unusual, sadly. In fact, when this video first appeared a lot of the debate was about how grumpy Gerry was.”
So a harmless video leads to a lot of pointless debate. If there were any deeper sense in releasing things that distract, it could be that the distraction is itself the sense?
+++++++++++++
You might have an opinion about what is pointless debate, but you surely can’t know for certain which of the many topics that gets discussed in here are in fact pointless? I grant that probably a lot of them are, but we just don’t know which are at the moment?
January 16th, 2008 at 7:03 am
Richard/Hideki/Freddy etc., etc. has left the building…again.
The latest scintillating, inspired thinking, can remain in view for all.
January 16th, 2008 at 7:00 am
Morning Brandon
Are you back amongst the living?
January 16th, 2008 at 6:54 am
richard
I said steve fossett
and you never responded
January 16th, 2008 at 6:47 am
1345
Richard Says:
——————-
ferdinand tried and proferred a possible explanation. you did not respond when ferdinand shared his hypothesis with us. he assumed that you concurred (by your prolonged non reponse) then you shot him down.
are you able and willing to provide data on 5c which will advance this debate? if so please do so and contribute now or bow out now and stop teasing.
January 16th, 2008 at 6:18 am
1342 coco — “The connotation was, ‘Prove it coz I haven’t seen it anywhere, therefore coco’s making it up coz it’s not been in the papers or Anorak’.”
That sounds familiar. Coco, are you really Richard? ha ha
January 16th, 2008 at 6:14 am
1343 an observer — “if you feel the occupants of 5c are relevant and you believe you know who they were why won’t you state why you think this is relevant and opine who you believe they were?”
Because no one offered the slightest answer to the list of possibilities I provided (either adding possibilities, or eliminating possiblities, or suggesting who would be more likely or less likely for what reason, etc). On top of that I was relentlessly attacked by several posters, accused of being aggressive, of being other posters, etc in an obvious attempt to provoke me and create distraction. Further, the Administrator then threatened to ban me for an extremely tame remark I made to one of the people attacking me, a poster who frequently attacks others by lying about what they have posted.
Also because no one seemed able to comprehend why it is so important (I did mention why it was relevant, which should be obvious anyway), and indeed why it is central to the “abduction/intruder” scenarios.
And finally, because … I don’t really care if you know who was staying in apartment 5c. Even if I told you, that would simply be the beginning of the topic, not the end. But it’s not something that can be discussed here, where posters are banned for doing nothing other than making the moderators nervous. And you will eventually find out. There’s no hurry.
That’s why.
January 16th, 2008 at 6:00 am
574 agw– “Care to comment? A reasoned, obscenity-free, reply would do very nicely thank you.”
I have never shown the slightest inclination to use obscenity. So this remark of yours is uncalled for.
574 agw — “In my case, my bite is much worse than my bark particularly as I become to suspect you are not what you would like to appear to be…”
Sorry, I have no idea what you are talking about. If it is related to your warning about obcenity, you are perhaps mistaking me for someone else. But none of my posts contained objectionable language.
463agw — Richard said: “Take a long walk, Chenier. Get lost. ha ha”
“Not the wording I expect from a gentleman, Richard… You are within a gnat’s hair breadth of a swift plunge into oblivion.”
I think I was right to interpret this as a threat to ban me from this Forum for nothing more than responding to someone who had repeatedly attacked me and accused me of being another poster, by telling them to get away from their computer, get outside, take a walk, get some fresh air, and “get lost”. I hardly think my response merited your threat:
“You are within a gnat’s hair breadth of a swift plunge into oblivion.”
That’s why I assumed that you were rather interested in ensuring that no one speculates too deeply about who was in apartment 5c, and then other related questions, such as why it was not mentioned explictly in the media that the witness-sisters were referring to this apartment, why the apartment appeared to be empty and unused when in fact it was not, what was going on in apartment 5c, etc.
Thanks to your “oblivion” threat , which IMO is also an uncalled for, immoderate remark, (not “gentlemanly” at all) I have lost interest in discussing these or any other matter on this Forum. That was your objective, IMO.
Personally, I’m not at all interested in the tremendous amounts of frivolous chat and bickering that you seem to promote here. But whatever floats your boat. You’re the boss. Do as you see fit. Probably it is unrealistic to expect anything better from a British media outlet. The contraints you are under are no different than those other British media print under. You may be the boss here, but you must answer to Clarence Mitchell too….. ( ha ha)
January 16th, 2008 at 5:44 am
1341
Richard Says:
——————–
if you feel the occupants of 5c are relevant and you believe you know who they were why won’t you state why you think this is relevant and opine who you believe they were?
January 16th, 2008 at 5:41 am
DuncanR: I am civil. And a civilian to boot. I just don’t want somebody jumping on me asking from where I get my information in sour tones. The connotation was, ‘Prove it coz I haven’t seen it anywhere, therefore coco’s making it up coz it’s not been in the papers or Anorak’.
Read my previous posts over the past couple of weeks. I am an articulate, eloquent oick and bloody proud of it. Sorry for leaving the e out of fecking! If it was this that offended.
January 16th, 2008 at 5:25 am
Comment re; the bodyguard idea. That was Ferdinand’s idea, not mine. I merely responded in a slightly sarcastic manner, meaning, “yeah sure, the T9 hired bodyguards…”.
So… no no no no, I do not think there were bodyguards staying in apartment 5c. As for Ferdinand, I cannot speak for him. Maybe he was joking, or maybe that was his best guess.
January 16th, 2008 at 4:31 am
1264 - Totje
++++++++++++++++++
Thanks!
January 16th, 2008 at 4:27 am
1337 - Coco
Can we have some civility please?
January 16th, 2008 at 4:24 am
1331
coco Says:
January 16th, 2008 at 3:25 am
Tinsel: Sadly it is not a sad suspicion at all. She was a handful and everybody knew this from her family and their friends to neighbours and villagers.
***
She would have been fine if she’d gotten care by her parents, IMO. A little attention and reassurance goes a long way when children act up. Being left 5-6 nights in a row, and stored in the creche, had to be hard for a toddler on vacation.
January 16th, 2008 at 4:20 am
MMcC’s parents in most interviews; grandparents and their neighbours and friends and hospital staff I cannot divulge my sources - you buffoon - or else I would not be able to collect any other information, If you wish to read my other comments, you will see that I do not and never have involved myself in any silliness on here - except for alluding to the clone earlier! lol
You would be better off finding out more information before you jump on people like me because you sound like an arse-hole gently far*ing under the bed-clothes.
Liberate thyself and open your mind up. We are dealing with media-manipulating magicians here. You are obviously caught up in the illusions
January 16th, 2008 at 4:09 am
Keesha:
Is this ‘the’ blue bag that GMcC can’t recall ever having? The one that CM was filmed and photographed carting about everywhere? Nobody has got a clue what happened to that bag. Peculiar!
However - if you can lose a 3 year old child, you could easily misplace a handbag.
I am thinking in earnest that this is going to be of majorly importance! I know there was not a railway station nearby but …….! lol
January 16th, 2008 at 3:48 am
My questions below are not prompted by aspirations to be moderator, but from astonishment that those locals keep their mouths shut.
And furthermore, what would be their motives?
Fear?
Circling of wagons?
What else?