Madeleine McCann: The Witnesses See, A Sketch And Killer Bob
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MAIL: “Madeleine: Four witnesses say they saw suspect pictured in new poster campaign”
“Four key witnesses in the Madeleine McCann investigation could have seen the man shown in a new sketch of a potential suspect, it emerged yesterday”
But there were no witnesses? And “could” and “potential” in one line…
“But four witnesses may have seen the unidentified man - first on the night the three-year-old went missing, then later with named suspect Robert Murat, and finally in Morocco”
“Jane Tanner, who told police she saw a man carrying a child away from the McCanns’ apartment, said she was “80 per cent sure” he was the one depicted in the artist’s impression”
“Isabel Gonzalez, who said she saw Madeleine with a Berber woman in Morocco, said the sketch looked ‘very similar’ to a man she saw immediately after the sighting”
Amanda Mills, 34, from Basildon, Essex, claimed to have spotted a man trying to break into a bedroom window at the Ocean Club in Praia da Luz a week before Madeleine disappeared from the complex.
“Last night she said there are “strong similarities” between the man she saw and the new sketch.
“Nanny Charlotte Pennington’s description of a person she saw with Mr Murat also matches the man shown in the artist’s impression”
DAILY EXPRESS: “New manhunt ‘another diversion by McCanns’”
One Portuguese policeman “stormed”: “The purpose of this exercise by the McCanns is the same as always. It’s another diversionary tactic”
DAILY STAR: “YOU WON’T THROW US OFF THE SCENT”
“Cops blast Maddie sketch as McCann tactic”
DAILY MIRROR: “Madeleine witnesses: This is him”
Witnesses says the sketch cold be a picture of the man they saw. Or it could not be
DEFAMER: Or does the new sketch of the man suspected of snatching young Madeleine McCann look a lot like Killer Bob?
NEW YORK POST: “SKETCHY SUSPECT IN MADDIE MYSTERY”
A picture of the man and he caption: “WANTED – SOUGHT IN KID SWIPE”
Posted: 22nd, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,210) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- leesmith on Michelle Obama Is A Monkey And Other Offensive Google Images
- magnetite on Church Gives Soul Tattoos To Worshippers
- Evie Walton on Peter Andre ‘Begs’ Katie Price To Come Home
- yampster on The Chilcot Inquiry Into The Iraq War, In Pictures
- yampster on Join The Campaign For Straight Gay Marriages
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:44 am
1173 False Flag
Agree with you about the British Press, except for the Daily Express which has been
reporting “sources” from day one. Perhaps more due to the McCann”s PR machine taking
over so early and taking over the daily bulletins. Iv”e said before that all our posting is based on speculation from shall we say sensationalist reporting? There was an article recently by
Matthew Parris in The Spectator about the Press being miffed that the PR had taken over
the reporting, but that the McCanns might regret their publicity seeking approach.
I think the Press has turned and more “Respected ” papers are critical now, no doubt the high profile supporters of the McCanns will drift away as real evidence is produced.
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:33 am
Come on you guys!
CM is doing a sterling job! The guy is la creme de la creme! This man was a top official until we found out MMcC was not in her bed - where she had allegedly been lying whilst her surgeon-daddy gazed upon her in a loving way!
Every time we hear something as juicy as,’The PJ are coming to the UK!’ he whips up a new witness and an even more perve-like abductor and whoosh! All the negative headlines are ousted and we get to see fantasy art piccies of scary men. Paedophiles are the cleverest criminals and they know that little girls don’t like swarthy, dishevelled men. Even the most vile paedo scrubs up to look like a favourite uncle when he’s on the prowl.
I am becoming more and more scared that the media in UK want people to think that this poor child was abducted and did not wake up when she saw this fu*king horrible wretched creature standing by her bed while he administered what? Chloroform? And the PJ found no trace?
Did she sit there looking at his scary face whilst reading her stories untilsome sleeping tablets took effect? - For only a couple of minutes of course - because the film-guy was gabbing to her daddy just outside for definite.
Of course she f*cking didn’t!
Before any more of you dick-head witnesses start going to the press and M3 and talking sh*te and putting your ugly mug-shots on the front pages of the papers - putting me off my breakfast - remember that what you think you are seeing are just your worst fantasy spooky men from when you used to score weed in the 70’s to smoke in your dormitory or local park!
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:24 am
1174
val Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:12 am
1170 Grande Finale
“Now tell me what to do about this”
I would press (ctrl alt and delete) all together to see what windows are open. If you spot the webpage click on it then click (end task)
You might have to start the web browser again though.
Failing this Press (ctrl alt and delete) and then again (ctrl alt and delete) this will restart your computer but will take a while. When the computer restarts open up your web browser again and go to the Anorak.co.uk the best site .
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:23 am
Clouseau 1152 Why indeed ! These are the questions which trouble and pre-occupy me all the time. They are proving just what a sham our democracy and so-called “free press” really is. There was a time when a confident and robust opposition, both in and outside Parliament, could be relied upon. That is no longer so…….
How much longer will such a ‘regime’ tolerate our own last bastion of freedom here in cyber-space ? Nowhere else dare people seriously venture outside the prescribed boundaries of legitimate debate…….
I would love to know the nature of the ‘frighteners’ put on the staff at MW Ocean Club.
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:16 am
#
1168
Tinsel Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 1:34 am
This is from much earlier today
****************************
Thanks I wouldn’t have seen tha, so appreciate your posting it!
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:12 am
1170 Grande Finale
GEE THANKS……….
Actually, I thought it was pretty good too.!!!!!!!!
Now tell me what to do about this, I do mean it when I say I don”t understand the Computer.
About an hour ago, a wbpage appeared on my screen “Online Poker Room” and I don”t know
why or how to get rid of it. Every time I close the page, it comes back again and is still on
the bottom of the screen. Also, every so often, in the bottom right hand corner a black message appears saying “web browser”. It”s all double-dutch to me but hope you can understand what”s happening and advise. Thanks
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:09 am
Hi Val,
Re the British press not reporting this incriminating info……..Why they ain’t allowed to of course………..I reckon there must be quite a lot of stuff never discussed in our press. I came across reference to ‘14 injunctions’ with regard to this the other day….can’t remember where though. Does anyone know? It would be really good to know their precise wording, source etc…….Remember at the very beginning all British editors were briefed /? warned ?
What puzzles me is how has the Mirror got away with having such a radical blog when critical posts get quickly deleted elsewhere ? Maybe they wanted to allow *one* to have a fairly free reign so they could monitor it in various ways ?? I guess the most threatening posts there still get deleted anyway…Is that so ?
January 23rd, 2008 at 1:56 am
Ian 1156 Exactly !
Are there other places where the level of “stupidity” is so ridiculous that we need to look for abother explanation ? Even looking at Clarrie’s entire PR job…….At one level he has kept the distractions flowing nicely [which serves interests beyond the McCs themselves IMO]…..at the level of *their* credibility, however, who could possibly say he has done a decent job …or even a credible one ?
January 23rd, 2008 at 1:55 am
1168 Tinsel
I rely on posters like you to find all this info, I wouldn”t know where to start being a complete
illiterate when it comes to the workings of the Computer.
Interesting, the embalming fluid reference, how come none of the U.K press have made no
reference to this? Also, the “deliberate killing” is obviously based on this “evidence”.
Thanks for the translation, food for thought wouldn”t you say?
January 23rd, 2008 at 1:53 am
1167
val Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 1:26 am
“Then why engage such high profile U.K. Lawyers at a reported cost of £700.00 per hour?
I read somewhere that Richard Branson donated £100,000 specifically for their Legal Fees, some of this must be going to their Portugese Lawyer, so why the rush to appoint U.K. Lawyers since they havn”t actually been charged”
Some might say, why would an *innocent* person rush to employ some of the worlds top lawyers after making a very hasty exit from portugal?
“Incidentally you used the name “toothfairy”in your post to Ian, that was the name I suggested”
Very appropriate too, you must be a very bright type of person with great vision and imagination. Well done!
January 23rd, 2008 at 1:40 am
Sleepy…
Totje,
Actually, you do have a “proper” grammar, and never make mistakes that only people who first speak, then spell make. Catkidd knows too much of the “insider’s” English (the way people like to say things) foe his awful grammar.
And you cannot possibly be a multiposter, because your username means “the same one” in some language.
January 23rd, 2008 at 1:34 am
This is from much earlier today, updated on MF. Not much new to regulars here, but of interest nonetheless:
http://www.kidnapping.be/maddie/maddie.html
The Belgian website Enfants Kidnappes is reporting that the PJ have a number of rather damning pieces of evidence:
“C’est ainsi que nous étions au courant que la PJ portugaise savait quand et comment Madeleine à été sortie de l’appartement de vacances à Praia Da Luz. La PJ sait également où la petite Madeleine est restée durant les premiers jours! ”
We are aware that the PJ know when Madeleine went out of the holiday flat in PDL. The PJ also know where Madeleine was kept (stayed) in the first days.
“Souvenez vous, nous vous avions aussi parlé de ce cellier où une serviette sur laquelle des vestiges de sang appartenant à Madeleine a été trouvé. C’est également là, que la PJ a retrouvé divers produits “fait maison” qui pourraient être utilisés dans la conservation d’un corps. Toutefois la police n’a pas confirmé qu’ils avaient bien été utilisés à cela.”
Remember that we have also spoken of the cellar (or barn?) where they found the towel with Madeleine’s blood. They also found there various DIY products that could be used for embalming a body. Though the police have not confirmed that they were used for that.
“D’autres éléments troublants vous seront bientôt divulgués, dès que nous aurons reçu le feu vert. Ainsi, la thèse de l’homicide involontaire pourrait bien glisser vers la thèse de l’homicide tout court. ”
Other disturbing elements will be disclosed soon when we have got the green light. Maybe the charge will not be involuntary homicide but deliberate killing.
January 23rd, 2008 at 1:26 am
1165 Grande Finale
Then why engage such high profile U.K. Lawyers at a reported cost of £700.00 per hour?
I read somewhere that Richard Branson donated £100,000 specifically for their Legal Fees, some of this must be going to their Portugese Lawyer, so why the rush to appoint U.K. Lawyers since they havn”t actually been charged.
Incidentally you used the name “toothfairy”in your post to Ian, that was the name I suggested
to Abraham Zapbruder who was running a contest to find the most suitable name. His choice
was Beatleman and since I did”nt go to the Site after I didn”t know the result but assumed his
choice was given the vote because a few posters have used it today.
January 23rd, 2008 at 1:18 am
The Real Stig
I guess you are you. I don’t think an Unreal Stig would remember my boyfriend was gigging in Ireland. I only mentioned it once.
January 23rd, 2008 at 1:09 am
#
1163
val Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 1:02 am
“Should the McCanns be charged and returned to Portugal to face Trial, could their U.K.
Lawyers defend them in Portugal?”
The Mccann’s already have lawyers in portugal………….
January 23rd, 2008 at 1:07 am
1161
Ian Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:46 am
“Now why would they want to keep the discredited M3 going?”
*********************************
If somebody has to discover where the tooth fairy dumped the body prior to April 12th too IMO.
January 23rd, 2008 at 1:02 am
1161 Ian
To milk the Fund dry.
I think it will prove pointless re-interviewing the Tapas 9 because nobody can remember
what they said exactly eight months ago.. The most interesting Statements will be those
of the Restaurant and Bar Staff which would be more reliable, and that is what the Police
will use, not their timelines.
Should the McCanns be charged and returned to Portugal to face Trial, could their U.K.
Lawyers defend them in Portugal?
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:50 am
1158 Ian
Now you mention it, it could well have been Heath in PDL in May. He was probably so
spaced out and dishevelled that he would appear “creepy” to anyone.
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:46 am
‘Last night the McCanns” spokesman Clarence Mitchell said the McCanns” sleuth agency”s “50,000-a-week contract is up next month but could be extended if the mystery man was still at large.’
Well well, I didnt notice that little snippet in the Express article posted by Grande Finale
Now why would they want to keep the discredited M3 going?
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:43 am
1151 Grand finale
Looks like things are hotting up. Read my post 1111, just hope there is no delay now, I don”t think we can take much more!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks for info, literally Hot Off the Press….
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:41 am
1158 Just kidding.
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:41 am
1157
val
Was Heath Ledger in PDL in May?
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:38 am
1139 Brandon Flours
Do you mean Heath Ledger? Just read Grand Finale”s post. Read the Daily Express article
and there is an item, which I did”nt read saying Heath Leger had died from a possible drug
over dose.
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:36 am
Stevo
Can’t find my original source right now, but here is the Daily Mirror article talking about the lurker in the bedroom (sounds like HP Lovecraft doesnt it!)….
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/topstories/2007/09/22/mccanns-how-madeleine-was-taken-89520-19829472/
He entered the apartment at 9.05pm and saw Madeleine asleep in her bed with twins Sean and Amelie, two, in cots on either side of her.
But, mysteriously, the door to the bedroom door was open.
Although Gerry thought nothing of it at the time, he has told friends he is now sure he previously shut it.
Our source said: “When he went in he saw Madeleine was asleep but the bedroom door was slightly ajar.
“He thought ‘That’s odd’ because he’d left it firmly closed. But the children were asleep. So he just closed the door again and came out at about 9.10pm.
So he entered about 9:05. From another source..(Spanish interview video where Kate ‘broke down’….’Gerry looked down at Madeleine and thought ‘…how beautiful she is and how lucky I am to be the father of three children…’
Bearing in mind he was purported to have used the toilet and looked around, the 9:10 leaving time is reasonable (or maybe not enough time!)….anyway, by the time he got down to Jes, it would be well after 9:10. Anyway, Tanner now seeing the abductor at 9:10 means that the abductor had a handful of seconds to grab her and get all the way to the top of the road for Tanner to see him.
I put it to you that this is now not just highly unlikely, but actually impossible. Unless the times slip yet again.
It seems very odd indeed for Gerry to choose the same time - 9:10 - for Tanner’s sighting, added to the confirmation from her that George Harrison Man is in fact Cartoon man (when she couldnt possibly know that, she said she didnt see his face).
It beggers belief for it to be a mistake, moving her sighting to 9:10, when all along it has been a consistant 9:15 (even if it was stated to be ‘about 9:15′). Why then say ‘about 9:10′ and reduce the window of opportunity?
It all looks to me like a deliberate effort confuse timings and get her off the hook from having to ever testify (inadmissable evidence as unreliable).
Why would they do that? Well, as I said before many times, the 9:15 statement (against advice of the McCanns lawyers, in my opinion -remember the fuss?) nailed the window of opportunity to 5 minutes. Discredit Tanner and, excuse the pun, you open the window again!
They dont need her now they have created a new ‘nasty paedo type’ in the form of ‘George Harrison Man’ - they still have the iconic abductor they need to fool joe public!
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:30 am
Where is Gadget?
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:27 am
1152 Clouseau
See my post 1149 to Fair and you. don”t know if it”s true, but makes interesting reading.
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:22 am
Clouseau
The floor now belongs to Chateleine….
Nite!
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:20 am
1124
why the media blackout/
national security
Royal connection
ask yourself why the oppostion parties are not rippping this goverment apart..they are silent why
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:18 am
Latest NEWS!!
“Last night, sources in the Policia Judiciaria revealed reports of a dishevelled man lurking around Praia da Luz were investigated months ago and found to be groundless.”
“One stormed: “The purpose of this latest exercise by the McCanns is the same as always. It”s another diversionary tactic.”
“This is maybe the most critical moment in the investigation. They know there is evidence that the girl died and we are on the eve of interrogating witnesses who may undo all the theories.”
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/32295/Madeleine-Manhunt-is-McCann-diversion-
January 23rd, 2008 at 12:16 am
Nite nite Fair.
I’m off too.