Larry Sinclair On Barack Obama (NSFW)
by Anorak | 22nd, January 2008
HOW to say something that no-one will sue you for because to do so would dignify it. David Icke does something that seems similar here:
Posted: 22nd, January 2008 | In: Barack Obama, Politicians, Race For The White House Comments (105) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
June 26th, 2008 at 7:29 am
I really encourage everyone who has any questions whatsoever, to go to this Sinclair’s website (larrysinclair0926 dot wordpress dot com) and spend a few entertaining minutes trying to find any proof with any merit whatsoever.
Now that might sound like it’s about as much fun as a nailgun to the nutsack, so let me just reassure you that it’s VERY entertaining to read what these cult members say, and I can confidently promise you that you won’t be coming after me asking for that hour of your life back.
After you fail to find anything legitimate, as I’m sure you will if you have any understanding of what constitutes reasonable proof, please please please try to ask for more details or a confirmation on some point (any point), or just try to engage Sinclair in any conversation whatsoever.
And then, you will see with completely clarity, that this guy is nothing more than a nutcase running yet another (though somewhat incomprehensible) scam on those without sufficient mental defenses to screen out such nonsense.
June 24th, 2008 at 8:05 pm
Larry Sinclair has thus far failed to produce a single viable piece of evidence. Is it any wonder nobody in the mainstream media wants to risk their career and credibility covering this farce?
I’ve been trying to get Mr. Sinclair to response to questions on his blog (simple ones, like “If you think Obama’s phone records would prove you right, why don’t you provide your phone records, they should work just as well, right?” ), but the blog is so heavily moderated that not one single real question can get through, and apparently even his own worshipers are now having a hard time posting due to overaggressive comment deletion.
I know several people who’ve tried to ask questions of Mr. Sinclair, but that is apparently not allowed on his blog, despite the fact that his blog clearly states “You may comment on any post, regardless of your position. However, please note that any and all abusive, threatening and vulgar comments and emails will result in your user name, email address and IP address being posted regardless and without the posters permission. You have been warned.” .
Small wonder, huh? The guy who wants to force Obama to answer his questions will not answer anyone else’s
I personally would love it if someone in the media just exposed this guy for the fraud he is. I’d watch that episode for certain, and I’m sure the advertisers would be well pleased by the number of viewers
.
May 23rd, 2008 at 2:44 am
Celina, who is the “they” that you refer to who have thoroughly investigated Barack Hussein Obama?
April 21st, 2008 at 12:28 am
I’m surprised that people have jumped to conclusions based on whether or not you want Obama to win. As someone said, Obama has been thoroughly investigated. Heck, when a person apply for any civil service employment that is non-sensitive, they investigate them, so what do you think that they do to a presidential candidate. They would have a responsibility to investigate anything that would make the office of the president look bad. ….. It would just be difficult to believe that Obama would put himself in this kind of position. I’m sure that some of Obama’s enemies have contacted this guy and would do anything for this story to be true. I just think that we should stop and think rationallly before jumping to any kind of conclusions. Obama probably not responded because he thinks that this guy is looney and thinks that it is better to just leave this guy alone.
dr:04:25
April 19th, 2008 at 1:10 am
What limo company did he rent from? And what day did this happen in 1999? How is it that he was able to get a limo when he was unemployed & residing in a halfway home? Can you say SWIFT? Please do some research before this ends up being another “Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim” story.
April 17th, 2008 at 2:18 am
I believe him. He sounds credible. If not, why did whitehouse.com break the rules of their polygraph agreement? What are THEY hiding? Here’s a good article about the state of things to date:
http://savagepolitics.com/?p=274
April 9th, 2008 at 1:24 pm
Now I don’t believe a word of this given Sinclair’s history and condition, but in a way that’s a shame, as I personally think Barack is quite a hottie (especially for a politician), and I’d happily go for a tumble with him.
Now I do support his candidacy, but only in spirit, as I am a UK citizen, and I would much rather have Barack as the President of ‘our greatest ally’ than McCain or Hillary. But then again if he won, I suppose he would be too busy for a rendezvous. Sigh.
March 10th, 2008 at 12:57 am
People of America, do not believe this man’s lies. It’s a ploy to destroy Obama’s image simply because he’s getting too close to being the nominee for the Democratic president. If Larry Sinclair’s story was true, it would have come out long before now. Trust me, when Barack started his campaign 18 months ago, he was thoroughly investigated from childhood and if there was such a story as this in his past, the media and Clinton’s campaign people would have discovered it. Larry Sinclair is being paid by an unknown party to fabricate this story as well as publicly announce it via his You Tube video so that it seems true and legitimate. People of America, DON’T BE FOOLED BY THIS PLOY BECAUSE IT’S JUST ANOTHER HORRIFIED “KITCHEN-SINK” SCHEME AGAINST OBAMA, a Black man, who is coming to close to being our next future president.
March 5th, 2008 at 9:19 pm
Larry,
Did that $5,000 check clear? We are having some debt problems, but keep up the good work, and, if you didn’t already cash that badboy, hold off on it until April 23rd.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
Hillary Rodham Clinton
March 5th, 2008 at 3:29 pm
larrysinclair0926 . spaces . live . com/
March 5th, 2008 at 3:28 pm
Larry has posted a photo shopped pic oh himself and Obama. This tells me that Larry is very serious about getting his story out to the American people. I have seen where he has been ridiculed, slammed, and even threatened. I think that if this were a lie, Larry and his story would have gone away and disappeared a long time ago. I think there is something to this story.
February 29th, 2008 at 9:13 pm
Lenaora:
‘THE TRUTH IN MEDIA DOES NOT EXIST.’
Of course, the best known theory that the Media were really one giant conspiracy is, of course, the one found in ‘Mein Kampf’. I’m sure that Hitler would have loathed Obama just as much as you Sinclair Cultists do.
My guess is that since Pat Buchanan or David Duke aren’t running for President, all the Sinclair Cultists can do in 2008 is to oppose Obama with the word of the least credible man in recent history. Larry Sinclair might make even Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard look honest.
February 28th, 2008 at 7:25 pm
I and several others are indeed constantly amazed at the way the main-stream media is keeping this buried. Their idol, fashion plate of the moment, barack, must be protected against all costs. THE TRUTH IN MEDIA DOES NOT EXIST. They are all biased and cowards. They are actually telling the people to vote for barack, and my God, the people are swallowing it hook, line and sinker, just like they did bush – and are now choking on him.
February 27th, 2008 at 7:06 pm
What if Obama does or recently did smoke crack or do cocaine?
Wasn’t that Sinclair’s REAL issue in coming forward?
I think that Sinclair completely believes this to be true or he wouldn’t have been eager for the polygraph. He should have contacted a expert polygrapher indep-endantly and underwent the exam. I have no idea why it should have taken 4 hours for the 4 questions/answers posted on the WH website. The polygraphs and their method of examining just seem to raise more questions. If Sinclair was just a fraud, he should be laughing and mocking everyone now. Yet, he is not.
Bottomline , if someone engages in these activities once, it wasn’t the only time. These people will come forward and either quietly seek to blackmail or gain attention in a big way. I think that is why this Larry Sinclair story is so well posted on various other sites. It is to troll for past drug/sex acquaintenances. Maybe there is no one, and it all has been a fantasy of Sinclair, or maybe the guy he met looked and sounded exactly like Obama, but it just wasn’t him. OTH, If there are other acquaintenances, they really should step forward now and not wait to spoil things later.
From the political standpoint, republicans seem eager to challenge Obama.
This is odd, since Clinton would be an easier candidate to beat this November.
Therefore, I suspect some republican has the “goods” on Obama either on drugs, sex, or other wrongful, illegal or suspect activity. If they do, it will be politics as usual, with the coveted October surprise………………
February 27th, 2008 at 3:26 pm
If members of the Cult of Larry Sinclair* want to go on believing in
word of a man whose credibility is lower than the keel of the
Titanic, so be it. Stating that you still believe Sinclair is a neon
sign flashing ‘Gullible Moron’ above your User ID. If Sinclair
were to blog that the Sun will rise tomorrow, General Electric’s
stock would skyrocket.
* some of whom compare Sinclair to Noah
February 27th, 2008 at 6:24 am
No creditable Newspaper will even write about Larry Sinclair’s story because they know he’s a fraud. Most respectable news stories only report stories that have factual evidence… Look at what happened to the NY TIMES even though they had more evidence as of John McCain taking special interest money, and weird letters… but they have no evidence of him having an affair, and that’s when their story went wrong. Larry Sinclair is a joke, and he’s duped you conspiracy theorists nuts, he has a criminal record of fraud. I KNOW 100 PERCENT the judge will dismiss this.
relaw0649
February 24th, 2008 at 7:32 pm
*** just want Mr. Sinclair to recieve the respect and attention any person deserves, especially someone with nothing to gain by making such a shocking accusation ***
Wow, you’re quite the moron.
Nothing to gain? He’s attempted extortion before. Matter of public record. And now he’s failed the lie detector test administered by that web site:
http://www.whitehouse.com/NewsComments.aspx?start=10&NewsID=116#
Of course he got 10 grand just for taking it, even though he failed.
Nothing to gain? My god you are a freaking imbecile.
February 24th, 2008 at 7:13 pm
TST’s copy-paste of the Washington Post article “Sinclair Federal Law Suit To Be Dismissed” is a fake. There is NO such article from Washington Post. Just shows the desperation of Obama’s cronies in trying to sabotage this story.
February 24th, 2008 at 5:22 pm
This same gang up mentality reaped up against Mr. Sinclair reminds me of what initially happened to Noah of Noah’s Ark fame before the rain drops begin. Mr. Sinclair may just be telling the truth here. The truth should matter–regardless of Mr. Sinclair’s mental capacity or not–should we ignore a mentally ill woman should she come forward and share that a crime has been committed against her? Of course, not. We should be more intersted in the truth than trashing Mr. Sinclair. He may just be simply telling the truth here.
February 24th, 2008 at 4:24 pm
The Washington Post Editorial pg1a2;
Thursday, Feb.21 2008
Sinclair Federal Law Suit To Be Dismissed
In late fall of 2007 Lawrence Sinclair approached campaign officials of the Sen.Barack Obama campaign, and told them a very disturbing story. Rob Allen of the Sen. Obama campaign stated. After the meeting had concluded the campaign officials ruled it off, as “just someone trying to make a buck.”
The following week they received a phone call, from a man claiming to represent Mr. Sinclair, and demanding $100,000.00 as restitution for his client.
Lawrence Sinclair has filed a federal suit against Barack Obama and others for harassment since the gay man released his video on YouTube.com, a internet web-site for viewing homemade videos, alleging that, the Senator from Illinois and Mr.Sinclair shared oral sex and cocaine in the back of a Mr. Sinclair’s limo in Gurnee, IL in 1999.
The Post has learned that presiding Judge Donald Wilson is dismissing the case, due to credibility on Mr.Sinclair. Stating that the complainant has an extensive record of mischievous conduct. Further more such allegations warrant sound credible standards, which are not found in matters included in this suit.
Lawrence Sinclair was convicted of “fraud” two times and investigated eight times over 25 years, for trying to secure money for “black male” charges. Two of the defendants were political figures in Illinois and Indiana. Mr.Sinclair also has an extensive record of drug convictions. The Washington Post has learned.”
February 24th, 2008 at 3:06 pm
A desperate attempt to smear Obama, using a person with serious mental health problems as bait. What would Obama have to gain from Larry Sinclair?
February 24th, 2008 at 7:46 am
I like how the obama camps says, “oh this isn’t true” but yet they back it not comming out. And obama, being the great snatcher of others accomplishments, should be more than happy to agree that, “The truth will set us free”. So the arguement that it should be brought up is fallacious. If the statements are not true then they will be found to be so.
The simple fact that no one will touch this even though it is apparent that it is very popular is amazing. I have never seen the new so blatantly protecting a canidate. There is a cover up or at the very least denial that the truth might be something everyone couldn’t handle right now.
Rest assured though, there is legislation in Congress to deal with media. Right now they are drafting legislation to investigate the media’s bias in this election. Don’t believe me, go on the US Senates website and do a general search for Hillary Clinton or Obama, one of the newest drafts up is this legislation. I hope that the Obama camp is prepared to be implicated in a fraud and manipulation case set forth by the government, cause if they find out he is using his political influence to sway media coverage to be elected to be the United States President, that is a treasonable offense. It is basically a coup.
February 24th, 2008 at 6:43 am
Sounds like one of Billary’s or the GOPs desperate moves. Who would allow this trashy appearing person to give favors. Please. Desperation and money causes this to happen. Whoever the nominee is, there will be attempts to destroy their character. Is anybody talking about Billary’s sexuality?
dr:24.02:06.42
February 23rd, 2008 at 11:28 pm
Larry Sinclair lives at 600 W Superior St. #604 Duluth MN 55802. That is what Larry filed in Court which is public record for anyone to see. This is available via a google search, we are not revealing anything not publicly available. According to H.U.D. records which are also public, that address is a building with 154 units called Gateway Tower and is a complex for the elderly and disabled; a government subsidized home for the mentally ill and disabled.
Larry Sinclair may have been in a mental hospital during the time he says he was in Illinois. He was suffering from sever psychosis due to schizophrenia.(Maybe drug induced? He’s a self admitted heavy user or was) This is being confirmed by reporters of the Globe Magazine and others. (It may already be confirmed and why the lies have not made it to mainstream media.
YouTuber Absinthelover reports the above and this: In the Globe Magazine that just came out. It has an article and an interview with Sinclair. It says he has had multiple convictions for fraud in the past. He also has a brain tumor.
From YouTuber MasterJoberry, the article: “On Delusional Misidentification” From the link: Focusing on the neurological bases, these delusions can result from…brain tumor. Delusional misidentification syndrome…used to describe certain delusions of times, places, objects, persons, including the ‘self’, and even body parts.”
Larry claims he was off his meds for a week so as to take the polygraph but if they have not accounted for the role that Larry’s brain tumor might have on his beliefs (and also his clearly demonstrated erratic behavior) then they may be measuring nothing more than delusions caused by the brain tumor. We have reason to believe that his condition is fairly advanced given he said he had little more than a year to live (Globe Magazine).
CNN, MSNBC & FOX all know about this, and others. They have researched this story and will not air it because it is libelous, inaccurate, and fraud based on the ranting of a very sick man with a self-admitted mental disorder and self-admitted criminal history where he says, “…I actually revealed some things about myself that could put me away for quite a bit of time…”
In Larry’s radio Interview he revealed that he has a past that could have him put behind bars. It’s about 2/5 near 1/2 way into the interview, JUST before a break.
“…I actually revealed some things about myself that could put me away for quite a bit of time…”
YouTuber kujayhawklaw says, “I got really worked up about this. I insulted his methods to the point I got him to call me personally at home. He was friendly, but requested that I start sites against him because controversy helps him sell his message. Nice guy, but a fraud.”
YouTuber asdffd says, “I just asked this guy on his video if he had ever been convicted of fraud. Soon after he made a post saying he would be busy for a few days and not be able to post for awhile. When I tried to make a follow up comment my comment wasn’t posted- I think he blocked me from posting. I think the truth is going to come out about Larry Sinclair and it ain’t gonna be pretty. The first video he made- it looks like it was made in a hotel room. I wonder if someone put him up to it.”
YouTuber PoliticalJunk says, “LARRY SINCLAIRE BLOCKED MY SCREEN NAME TO COMMENT ON HIS VIDEO: YOU can check out this website to know the Federal LAWSUIT: It shows his Address with is a HUD FACILITY for ELDERLY and DISABLE PEOPLE (Mentally disable people too!) – In a radio interview he even said he had mental problems as a child.”
Larry has accepted $100,000 to take a lie detector test via a tabloid website. He claims his intentions are selfless to expose Obama… Given that he is a mentally ill person, and a polygraph only detects deceptive answers, if he believes his delusion, he may in fact pass. He might also pass if he believes he can fly when no one is looking or if he believes he in the reincarnation of Jesus Christ.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This post and all those quoted here have not voiced a presidential preference, and hold NO AFLIATION with ANY Candidate, nor work for any political party.
All herein deplore the attacks of Larry Sinclair and have created these comments to bring some clarity to the nature of Sinclair’s statements. We have undertaken this rebuttal to counteract a grave injustice of lies that could affect the history of our nation and to expose these lies for what they are; the rantings of a self admitted criminal with a history of mental disease, severe drug use and in the final stages of terminal brain cancer.
Larry is a man in need of help, not hatred even though his lies have caused much distress.
February 23rd, 2008 at 2:40 am
Miss America,
You make some valid points. Never really thought about the consequences of Obama’s actions much, just want Mr. Sinclair to recieve the respect and attention any person deserves, especially someone with nothing to gain by making such a shocking accusation. Again, it may just be that Mr. Sinclair is simply telling the truth here.
February 23rd, 2008 at 2:28 am
barry and jennifer,
are you two slow or what? comparing some story from a guy with a camera and access to youtube to nyt story about john mccain , complete with credible witnesses is absurd. and barry , why hasn’t john mccain responded to the guy who claims john shot him in the head. that youtube video exists as well. stupid people, get a life.
February 23rd, 2008 at 1:55 am
BARRY, sadly I agree. It makes you wonder in the days of accusatory “gotcha” politics, why he has not responded. If you don’t get out ahead of this stuff, it has a tendency to have a life of its own. It’s interenesting that Larry Sinclair repeatedly says, ALL I wanted was an acknowledgement by Obama that the coke habit was still active within the decade. Maybe Larry was strictly a dealer, nothing more or less. It’s possible Larry tossed in the superfluous sex because he got ticked when Obama wouldn’t respond and wanted to make sure he was heard. Hopefully, if any of this is true, it turns out to be the crack cocaine part. That way Barry’s political career may be lost., but not his beautiful wife and young daughters. (I say maybe, because in the case of Marion Barry, the drugs make no difference to his constituents.)
I hope for his situation, Barry has not been on the “down-low’ and exposed his wife and daughters to AIDS and the embarassment of all that.
I also hope that this entire story is done prior to him becoming an actual nominee, because it is disgraceful and demoralizing for the country, as well as the party. In other words, if republicans have the proof, they should dump it now (rather than the old October surprise routine) and then fight it out with Hillary legitimately (if there is such a thing! )
February 23rd, 2008 at 1:28 am
What’s interesting here is Obama’s reluctance to acknowledge Mr. Sinclair one way or another–for someone who talks as much as Obama does about change and hope, it’s just curious that Obama is playing by the same set of rules of disengagement the establishment he says he wants to “change” does rather than reaching out to Mr. Sinclair and offering him professional help as his change agenda would imply. Maybe this matter isn’t about Mr. Sinclair needing professional help or not, it may simply be that Mr. Sinclair IS telling the truth.
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:23 pm
We need a >Larry&Barry< truth detector squad.
1. If Larry is LIEing, why is Barry not DENYing?
2 If Larry is being truthful, and he prefers a Hill/Bill win, he’ll blow Barry up next week with all his evidence, and the party will flock back to Hillary.
3. If Larry prefers McCain win, he should wait until Barry has his “head” count of delegates, then slowly take Barry out in the general election by releasing bits and pieces of information. It would throw any campaign into chaos.
I think all 3 of these candidates suck, it’s just a matter of who will do the least amount of damage over the next four years.
Either way, this story is not going to die. It is nationally on the cover of The Globe and has been translated into multiple languages on web/blog sites in Europe, S. Africa, China and the Middle East.
If it’s not true, Barry should be indignant, angry and slapping Larry with a libel defamation of character suit to protect the ‘Yes, We Can!” dream of 1st Afro-American Prez.
If it’s true, or even partially true {drugs} or {sex}, I guess Larry will be making a new YouTube video “Yes, I Can” ruin your career, Barry.
If it’s true, Larry needs to continue his “Yes, We Can” des
February 22nd, 2008 at 10:42 pm
Oddly enough– there is a lawsuit on this– if the guy is lying he’ll be arrested for perjury then as he details some things in the suit. Sinclair sued Obama and his campaign manager for CIVIL RIGHTS Violations. The dates do indeed line up with graduation cermonies where he claimed- Obama was a state legislator then – and for those interested he has agreed to take a lie detector test with an independent analyst to re-check the results. As to not remembering the specific name of the bar– I guess I wouldn’t remember the specific name of a place if I was from out of town and doing drugs but I’d remember the face again I’m sure if I saw him 6 years later running for president and claiming he’s an unspoiled politician who hasn’t touched drugs in 20 years.
He attempted to contact Obama in 2007, asking him only to admit his drug usage later than first admitted; he was ignored and then alledgedly started receiving threats. If it was all bogus and a case of mistaken identity or memory- Obama should have handled it back then. Since he didn’t the guy exercised his rights and filed a lawsuit.
When contacted about the lawsuit the obama group ‘could not be reached for comment’ according to news reports on it. According to the news reporters Axelrod launched a private investigation(meaning he’d see what the guy had before reacting) but who’s paying for that– the obama supporters…
But no counter-suit for slander or libel?? seems maybe part of it is true??
and btw– the only reason why the major media outlets aren’t reporting on this is that they would have just as much egg on their face if they did for touting him as our savior.
Obama did dealings with Rezko- WELL after the investigations started… and continues to have memories come back on what he was involved in (just 2 days ago he admitted more about remembering events he couldn’t when questioned last year). How is Obama going to claim being experienced and knowledgeable on how to run our country, and then claim he was naive and should have known better than to take the guy’s money while being investigated? If anyone believes that they are the naive ones.
He invited his pastor to his events and then uninvited him as it might not be good for the jewish vote… Hypocritical at best.
He voted against bringing back our troops in 2006 but then spouts off how hillary voted for inspections and he didn’t. I guess he should mention too that he wasn’t allowed to vote on those inspections as he’s only been a JUNIOR senator 3 years this month. Again, wishy-washy and misleading.
He also said he’d use public funding for the election along w/mc cain and has back-tracked on that too. Wishy-washy opportunist who will say anything without thought.
Why are people so willing to believe what Obama says at this point– and no one noticing there are so many posts and discussions on this and still no denial from Obama????? No comment at all about being sued??? and yet some ‘anonymous’ person claims this girl was seen alot with mccain and that’s front page news? i think WE, THE PEOPLE are owed a lot more credit for logic and reason, and a lot more information on the politicians we’re being force fed for November.
February 22nd, 2008 at 8:57 pm
where there’s smoke there’s fire,,,,,err i mean where’s there’s smoke there’s crack cocaine,,,,,,,,
if nothing else obama should deny it,,,,,,,and the news outlets should report on it,,,,,,,why the pass on everything the obamas that would normally be fodder for the press,,,,,,,,,
i don’t get it,,,,,,,,if obama gets nomination, i vote mccain