Madeleine McCann: Gail Cooper Says And Amy Fitzpatrick
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
THE SUN: “Potential Maddie witness snub”
“The British woman who may have seen Maddie McCann’s kidnapper has NOT been quizzed by Portuguese cops”
Gail Cooper says she saw a man. An artist’s impression of the man has been released
Gail, of Newark, Notts, says: “They never contacted me. He must be found, even if it is to rule him out”
IRISH INDEPENDENT: “Mum vows to continue search for missing teen Amy”
“Mari Luz Cortes vanished on January 13, as she went to buy sweets from a local kiosk in the Spanish town of Huelva, near the border with Portugal. A massive search for the five-year-old is ongoing.
“The disappearance has been linked to that of Madeleine McCann from the Algarve resort of Praia da Luz, although police said they did not think the two cases were connected.
Ms Fitzpatrick yesterday said that her only daughter is “still just a kid”.
“She is only 15 and she has disappeared without trace.”
Amy Fitpatrick was 15 when she vanished after leaving her friend’s house near Feungirola, in Spain, at 10pm on New Year’s Day. She set out on the 20-minute walk to her own house, but has not been seen since.
Posted: 23rd, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,434) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- Anorak on Peter Andre ‘Begs’ Katie Price To Come Home
- June on Peter Andre ‘Begs’ Katie Price To Come Home
- eggman on Madeleine McCann: Kevin Halligen Becomes The ‘Maddie Faudster’
- Trismegistus on Madeleine McCann: Kevin Halligen Becomes The ‘Maddie Faudster’
- Bernie Morgan on Peter Andre ‘Begs’ Katie Price To Come Home
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:39 pm
1067
Totje
You mustn’t take the puppy’s balls away
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:39 pm
1068
firestar Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:36 pm
——————————————-
So, Firestar … I need to know … are you the reason I get all this porno mail coming through to my private e-mail address? The very same PC that I used to vote on YOUR poll?
—————-
no.
i’d ask stevo if i were you.
—————-
and if you say you used your email in my poll you’re either mistaken or lying.
ask anyone who voted in it.
all i took were anorak name and the vote.
stevo has the emails.
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:38 pm
1062
Stevo,
To tell Cheryl
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:38 pm
1060
Garth Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:31 pm
=======
the truth garfy is dicks like you who try to intimidate and threaten others are in fact very insecure themself. One other thing garfy little boy “real tough men” dont do that but week little pathetic bullies do.
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:37 pm
1053 Garth
I agree that the witness statement of Tanner should be take extremely seriously, as the gradual downgrading and subtle distancing by the McCanns underpins.
Perverting the course of justice is an extremely serious act.
I too would not have wasted any resources or distracted the public with her ‘abductor’ creation but it would have alerted me to the suspicion of complicity with the parents who had walked from their apartment in search of hedonist pleasures at the expense, as it turned out, of the life of their eldest, yet very young, daughter.
The PJ are to be congratulated at not having been fooled by the expostulations of the McCanns and their confederates and their attempts to distract from the fundamental neglect they have perpetrated.
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:36 pm
——————————————-
So, Firestar … I need to know … are you the reason I get all this porno mail coming through to my private e-mail address? The very same PC that I used to vote on YOUR poll?
—————-
no.
i’d ask stevo if i were you.
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:36 pm
1056 yampster,
I know how puppy wants to hold on to the ball.
And I know how to get it even so
Nice to see you’re around.
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:35 pm
Mods and Admin
A few months ago a poster spent 4 hours trashing me in here because she revealed that she’d emailed me but had the audacity to blame me for that - which you were quick to put right.
Today, coolandcalm, Firestar, and Chenier are pretty much doing the same thing with no basis of fact. Can you please set the record straight because it’s tedious having to write more posts on this issue than posts on info regarding the McCann case - which is what I believe the site to be for
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:35 pm
1058
Stevo Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:30 pm
1052chenier Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:24 pm
And you are the only person frequenting this blog who threatens to reveal private information when someone pisses you off…
________________
Keep on lying Chenier. You’re good at it. It’s never happened and you can’t find proof of it.
You’re just Ms Pompous sat on your holier than thou chair. If someone strays off topic you’re quick to moan about them and tell them about the good people at Anorak putting a site together so we should “stick to the subject in hand”. Well you ought to try it sometime…you hypocritical shit.
——————————————————-
Good to see Stevo demonstrating the awesome range of his intellectual capacity…
I suspect, however, that the bit about ’stick to the subject at hand’ is Stevo’s version of my assertion that I for one would be sticking with Anorak…
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:34 pm
1060
Garth Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:31 pm
=====
you keep telling yourself that mr tough garfy… what you problem??
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:33 pm
still bickering I see………….. bizarre behaviour
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:32 pm
1050 Totje Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:22 pm
I think I know what she was referring to, however I’m not going to speak for her.
_______________________
So why did you stick your two-penneth in at all then if it wasn’t your argument?
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:31 pm
1053 garth - could you please explain why the police would put a efit together of a man who was seen in pdl - 2 WEEKS before maddie dissapeared? They were however showing round the rather helpful description of egg man that Ms Tanner had provided them with.
Ms Tanner is on record - panorama - as saying that she didn’t see his face.
It was only LAST WEEK that ms Tanner said that she thought Ms Coopers efit ‘could be’ the same man.
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:31 pm
1051
RedRooster Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:24 pm
1037
Garth Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:10 pm
1031
RedRooster Says:
==============
look garfy i have for quite some time now put up with your nasty vicious foul mouthed tongue. Not only that but also your vicious threat etc etc, so i think if i wind you up a little here and there i think thats really quite fair dont you??? As far as adding anything i have on numerous occassion offered fair debate with yourself, but oh no you cant do that can you?? So i’ll tell you what matey you start practicing what you preach or shut the fuck garfy. And dont talk to me about gobby, you friggin donkey, you,ve got the biggest gob i’ve ever heard Incidently im happy to have a larf with you but dont try telling what to do you great twat
————————————
Like you say chicken dip, the truth hurts. Evident by you’re foul mouthed ranting. Truth is, in reality, I’d chew you up and spit you out. Now go and do one!
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:30 pm
1025
Peter O Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:03 pm
1003 Garth Says: January 23rd, 2008 at 7:44 pm
l Totje Well your point is bang on imo.
.
The sighting by Cooper is another example of the PJ’s either arrogance or lack or incompetance or both. They have dismissed her sighting as of no importance. Yet how do they know? Edit…
++++++++++++++++
With respect, your statement could be construed as both arrogant and incompetent. Do you actually know anything about how/what the UK local police and the PJ did in respect of Gail Cooper’s alleged sighting? In the unlikely event that you do, perhaps you would be so good as to share your insights rather than making unsubstantiated claims.
****************************************
It would be nice if Garth could also explain where the one million posters of The Artist Formerly Known As George Harrison are. After all, if the McCanns are taking Mrs Cooper’s evidence seriously those posters should be out there…
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:30 pm
1052chenier Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:24 pm
And you are the only person frequenting this blog who threatens to reveal private information when someone pisses you off…
________________
Keep on lying Chenier. You’re good at it. It’s never happened and you can’t find proof of it.
You’re just Ms Pompous sat on your holier than thou chair. If someone strays off topic you’re quick to moan about them and tell them about the good people at Anorak putting a site together so we should “stick to the subject in hand”. Well you ought to try it sometime…you hypocritical shit.
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:30 pm
1053
Garth Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:25 pm
1025
==========
ffs when are you going to get it garfy “this person” does NOT exist
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:27 pm
1050
Totje
Evening Totje. Word in ‘another place’ is that the forces of evil were gathering tonight as the border colloie was worrying the sheep again. Might have to wait until the footie finishes though. You know how the forces of evil like their football
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:27 pm
All the Mirror forums are down now
Either someones pulling a DNS attack or the Mirrors pulled it to stop random Maddy posts.
If its the latter, could well be a Schillings letter. Just look at Wikileaks to see what they tried to pull on Northern Rock - an injunction on the story and an injunction on telling anyone they’d taken out an injunction as well
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:27 pm
In the 6 days after May 3:
Chief Inspector Oligeario Sousa offered some concrete information, disclosing that 500 apartments had been searched, as well as ten miles of fields and rivers. He said 100 foreign nationals had been interviewed.
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:25 pm
1025
Peter O Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:03 pm
1003 Garth Says: January 23rd, 2008 at 7:44 pm
l Totje Well your point is bang on imo.
.
The sighting by Cooper is another example of the PJ’s either arrogance or lack or incompetance or both. They have dismissed her sighting as of no importance. Yet how do they know? Edit…
++++++++++++++++
With respect, your statement could be construed as both arrogant and incompetent. Do you actually know anything about how/what the UK local police and the PJ did in respect of Gail Cooper’s alleged sighting? In the unlikely event that you do, perhaps you would be so good as to share your insights rather than making unsubstantiated claims.
=================
One thing we definately know is that the PJ did NOT put an artists impression of the person sighted by Gail Cooper. Now logic tells me that unless this person is identified then how on earth can this person be traced? And until this person is traced and allowed to give a full statement of his movements then how can this person be negated? And if you believe that the PJ knew exactly who this person was based on a description by GC then you are as daft as them imo.
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:24 pm
1045
Stevo Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:17 pm
1038 chenier Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:12 pm
I don’t think so.
And you are carefully not mentioning the fact that the Mods and Admin told you earlier on that your behaviour to Garth was completely unacceptable.
_________________________________________
No they didn’t. They asked what it contributed to the debate or words to that effect. I told them and got no reply.
I’m not carefully not mentioning anything. Don’t suck me into your stupid games Chenier.
——————————————————-
‘or words to that effect’?
You can’t even be bothered to read what the Mods and Admin actually said.
And you are the only person frequenting this blog who threatens to reveal private information when someone pisses you off…
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:24 pm
1037
Garth Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:10 pm
1031
RedRooster Says:
================
like its sometimes said garfy - the truth hurts
————————————
What, truth like bullshit? Some fucking answer that? Listen woosey, I dont mind having a larf with you now and then but you’ve really got to add something to this forum other than your own desire for attention. Do you reckon you can do that, you know, without getting all gobby?
==============
look garfy i have for quite some time now put up with your nasty vicious foul mouthed tongue. Not only that but also your vicious threat etc etc, so i think if i wind you up a little here and there i think thats really quite fair dont you??? As far as adding anything i have on numerous occassion offered fair debate with yourself, but oh no you cant do that can you?? So i’ll tell you what matey you start practicing what you preach or shut the fuck garfy. And dont talk to me about gobby, you friggin donkey, you,ve got the biggest gob i’ve ever heard
Incidently im happy to have a larf with you but dont try telling what to do you great twat 
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:22 pm
1034
Stevo,
CoolandCalm isn’t present now. So I suggest the two of you discuss it when both of you are on line?
I think I know what she was referring to, however I’m not going to speak for her.
And it’s too long ago to remember it exactly and the context. So it’s no use for me to go into a he said, she said, no he said etc. discussion.
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:21 pm
1046
chenier
Some very nasty viruses about. Always mutating……..!!!!
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:21 pm
garth 1010
how have i not been nosey enough - a quote from YOUR link
quote ‘ But they have, apparently, shown a sketch like this to residents in Praia da Luz. unquote
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:20 pm
1035 Cheryl
Show me. Do you have a link to a UK libel case or the UK libel law?
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:19 pm
1042
Patch Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:15 pm
1038
chenier
Feeling better?
———————————
Thanks Patch; much better.
Am suffering the natural frustration of being incapable of finding any trace of Clarrie’s promised one million posters, but I am gritting my teeth and soldiering on.
I hopefully suggested to Garth earlier on that he could get out there and start putting those posters up, but he’s stalwartly ignoring me…
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:17 pm
1038 chenier Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:12 pm
I don’t think so.
And you are carefully not mentioning the fact that the Mods and Admin told you earlier on that your behaviour to Garth was completely unacceptable.
_________________________________________
No they didn’t. They asked what it contributed to the debate or words to that effect. I told them and got no reply.
I’m not carefully not mentioning anything. Don’t suck me into your stupid games Chenier.
January 23rd, 2008 at 8:16 pm
1028 Cheryl,
Yes!