
Madeleine McCann: Gail Cooper Says And Amy Fitzpatrick
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
THE SUN: “Potential Maddie witness snub”
“The British woman who may have seen Maddie McCann’s kidnapper has NOT been quizzed by Portuguese cops”
Gail Cooper says she saw a man. An artist’s impression of the man has been released
Gail, of Newark, Notts, says: “They never contacted me. He must be found, even if it is to rule him out”
IRISH INDEPENDENT: “Mum vows to continue search for missing teen Amy”
“Mari Luz Cortes vanished on January 13, as she went to buy sweets from a local kiosk in the Spanish town of Huelva, near the border with Portugal. A massive search for the five-year-old is ongoing.
“The disappearance has been linked to that of Madeleine McCann from the Algarve resort of Praia da Luz, although police said they did not think the two cases were connected.
Ms Fitzpatrick yesterday said that her only daughter is “still just a kid”.
“She is only 15 and she has disappeared without trace.”
Amy Fitpatrick was 15 when she vanished after leaving her friend’s house near Feungirola, in Spain, at 10pm on New Year’s Day. She set out on the 20-minute walk to her own house, but has not been seen since.
Posted: 23rd, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,434) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





January 23rd, 2008 at 2:54 pm
Ive posted a topic on Anorak forums
If anorak goes down meet up here
we can go there without mentioning the m word and decide.plus absent posters could access it later.
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:53 pm
May 550…. what? by disagreeing with Stevo? leave it out.
If you can’t stand the heat then don’t set up a website that invites comments! easy!
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:53 pm
556
slyfox
if anything happens ,i’ll go to Paulo Reis
Then you can tell me where to go
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:53 pm
Ian, you are the acknowledged time line anorak on here, I thought I was giving you a compliment.
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:52 pm
549
brandon flours Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:48 pm
whats wrong with anorak forums?
Nothing at all. I’ve been there they’re fine
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:52 pm
530 gillyflower
“Where we gonna go?
Who we gonna call?”
Ghostbusters?!
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:52 pm
Brandon
Absolutely, definitely if it’s running. If not….?
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:51 pm
549
brandon flours Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:48 pm
whats wrong with anorak forums?
******************************************
Might be a problem discusing the Mccanns because it is a UK server. But can discuss where to go next without mentioning Mcs
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:51 pm
#
549
brandon flours Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:48 pm
whats wrong with anorak forums?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nothing.
But Stevo pointed out that they could be shut down as same site.
So we need another back up in case I guess.
You OK ?
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:51 pm
C’mon guys decide ,it as to be a U.S. server
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:50 pm
The simple answer Stevo is no one knows, and a time line in the public domain is as reliable as the Beano, I say once again it is the PJ or the Magistrate who decide how important any time line is……….and theirs is secret, definitely not for public viewing, that is if they have one at all.
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:50 pm
543 Chloe Spain
Idiots like Firestar make allegations with no basis. I have hundreds of emails and people registered on my site. 1 person out of those hundreds chose to send abusive email and I had to sort it out as he was sending email from his place of work.
Firestar gets all pompous and self-righteous about that. He is the one who sucked people in to his website business unwittingly for a bogus poll.
Pot, kettle, black.
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:49 pm
535
Sledgehammer
I dont understand that post! What are you saying?
Garth calls it ‘my timeline’ but it isnt mine, its times that the T9 have provided - I have made nothing up and make no real assumptions of my own.
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:48 pm
511
coolandcalm Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:33 pm
Firestar… I agree with you on that. I don’t trust any sites that track and I don’t trust Stevo’s.
I was disgusted by Stevo complaining to someone’s place of work because he didn’t like what they had posted.
Absolutely and completely immoral.
***********
Your views are obviously not modified by the knowledge that the offending poster, who was tracked to his place of work, was deliberately being immoral?
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:48 pm
whats wrong with anorak forums?
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:48 pm
Maybe MF just had enough of going round in circles.
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:47 pm
Is Websleuths US? I think it is. There is also Pat Brown’s blog, is that in the US?
Ok several possibilities - which one?
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:47 pm
533 firestar
You’re a lying, spinning, distorting meddle maker. A self-righteous one at that.
I have tussles with Sledgehammer but I’ve stated in here I’d have a beer with him. I played rugby for years and know how to leave differences of opinion on the pitch. He even encountered your crap earlier today.
You - you’re a different animal. I wouldn’t p**s on you if you were on fire. Star.
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:47 pm
520…Sledgehammer
Re…504…Sledgehammer Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:30 pm
It’s called fear of libel lawyers, you know something must be true if you accuse some one, if its not you could be in the shit, AGW took some time to explain it , obviously it fell on deaf ears.
****************************************************
507
Matt. Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:32 pm
504…Sledgehammer
You absolutely sure of that are you Sledgie ??
*************************************************************
Now, answer the question….your stuopid insults don’t affect me.
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:46 pm
Aurelius mod
Has just written that the site is closed due to persistane and serious abuses against other forum posters and the Mccanns.
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:46 pm
540 Firestar
I really don’t know why you think that. I’ve posted on Stevo’s forum a few times and he’s had my e-mail address for ages. I’ve never noticed anything strange.
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:44 pm
536 Chloe Spain
That may well be the case but Germany rocks
lol
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:43 pm
If anyhting gets pulled on Anorak it will probably just be the MCCann one so we could agree to meet up on Man on Mars thread to discuss where to go next - not mentioning the Ms of course. If the whole site gets pulled then we can hop over to websleuths, create an ‘anorak’ thread - is it posible to create threads on WS? Then decide from there what to do.
Alternately we could hijack Paulo Reis blog?
Need to make a decision everyone is comfortable with. Come on!
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:43 pm
well i’m off.
i guess stevo’s shown you all what he’s like, theres no need for me to bother any more.
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:43 pm
can any one log on to gerryblog’s’ it won’t let me on
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:43 pm
531
Sledgehammer
Ian created the timeline in a spreadsheet from the info in the public domain. He didn’t make any of it up. All he did was collate what was already out there.
My question to you was to enquire what you thought about Gerry’s blatantly conflicting times in his alibi. If you don’t want to answer that’s ok too. But why aren’t you simply addressing what’s a simple question?
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:43 pm
Right folks, got three sessions to instruct- and a website to be constructed by midnight….
Hope to see you all same time same tomorrow……………
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:43 pm
529 Will
I think Mods & Admin on here explained that Anorak was previously hosted in the US and that we (the posters) were responsible. Fairly recently, they changed to a UK server and, now, Anorak is responsible.
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:42 pm
Stevo,……… Anorak News » Blog Archive » Madeleine McCann: No More Paedophiles …
Ian. I was thinking more along the lines of just WHO was left in the dark. … yesterday (and Garth actually said my time line was ‘falling apart’, …
http://www.anorak.co.uk
http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/178823.html?cp=1
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:42 pm
So……is it gonna be Websleuths then???