Madeleine McCann: Gail Cooper Says And Amy Fitzpatrick
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
THE SUN: “Potential Maddie witness snub”
“The British woman who may have seen Maddie McCann’s kidnapper has NOT been quizzed by Portuguese cops”
Gail Cooper says she saw a man. An artist’s impression of the man has been released
Gail, of Newark, Notts, says: “They never contacted me. He must be found, even if it is to rule him out”
IRISH INDEPENDENT: “Mum vows to continue search for missing teen Amy”
“Mari Luz Cortes vanished on January 13, as she went to buy sweets from a local kiosk in the Spanish town of Huelva, near the border with Portugal. A massive search for the five-year-old is ongoing.
“The disappearance has been linked to that of Madeleine McCann from the Algarve resort of Praia da Luz, although police said they did not think the two cases were connected.
Ms Fitzpatrick yesterday said that her only daughter is “still just a kid”.
“She is only 15 and she has disappeared without trace.”
Amy Fitpatrick was 15 when she vanished after leaving her friend’s house near Feungirola, in Spain, at 10pm on New Year’s Day. She set out on the 20-minute walk to her own house, but has not been seen since.
Posted: 23rd, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,434) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- Kelley Lynch on Phil Spector’s Hair Performs With Ronettes
- June on The Pirelli 2010 Calendar In Artful Nudity (NSFW)
- June on Susan Boyle: World Divided Over SuBo And Lady Susan
- Tony on Daily Mail And Tax Payers’ Alliance Attacks BBC Over Its Free Trees For A Better Planet
- Cheryl on Susan Boyle: World Divided Over SuBo And Lady Susan
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:13 pm
823
dcb
It was, in my view. I think the ‘abductor’ was someone close to to a certian witness and the sighting simply set on a different day.
But to prove lies one has to make sure that they are remembered and that they are not allowed to be changed gradually - smoke and mirrors are in heavy use.
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:13 pm
“”sledgehammer and coolandcalm both told me to stop going on about it”" Ian ?
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:13 pm
#
821
Garth Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:08 pm
Do woosters have a funny period?
———————————————
Aren’t woosters boys?? Only girls have funny periods
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:12 pm
Coolandcalm
I’d love to read one of your books. Can’t you give me your initials and the first word of one of the titles and I’ll try and track it down on Amazon?
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:12 pm
818
Aardvarko Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:06 pm
Garth,
I don’t think JT’s theory was even formed by the 3rd………..
—————————————————————————
Well she did say on Panorama that she informed the PJ on the night of the 3rd. So either you thought wrong or you’re just a non-believer, hmm?
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:11 pm
Heh! Just accidentally clicked on this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_McCann
Wonder if they are distantly related…?
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:11 pm
811
coolandcalm Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:01 pm
But saying he linked you to porn sites is not on. Really… would you like that said about you?
——————————————————-
Please do not twist my words. I did NOT state that he linked me to porn sites, I asked the question (note the ?) :
“So, Firestar … I need to know … are you the reason I get all this porno mail coming through to my private e-mail address?”
NOWHERE in this do I say that he DID do it!
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:10 pm
805
dcb Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 4:59 pm
793
BabyJane Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 4:53 pm
+++++++++++++++++++
It’s what I have thought - person seen by Tanner at 9.10 or 9.15 does not equal abductor.
****
I think they’ll find Tanner wasn’t anywhere near 5A at the time she stated.
I believe she is blending her memories from previous siting of a wanderer, with about 15% freshly milled lies. She doesn’t want to go to prison. Mostly, she doesn’t want O’Brian to go to prison.
When I studied Tanner’s most recent video, my impression she was telling the truth most of the time, but adding lies to the degree it would throw people off the scent of the truth.
What’s really creepy, she truly seemed to enjoy lying, in my opinion. As if she felt she were quite good at it and it had become fun. I guess that means she is getting lots of compliments from her partner.
Someone who went to PDL said there were 8 security cameras that they could see.
Perhaps that is why we have heard that now O’Brian wants to say he saw the Beatleman, since he was the only one around 5A at the time.
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:10 pm
brandon flowers;yes it would be possible to drive back and it would explain alot re lack of emotions, but i cant see how they could achieve this without help.and with regards to new dna techniques does it not require field testing before using it on high profiled cases,
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:10 pm
820
chenier
Yet Gerry says on his blog that she didnt know that Madeleine was wearing those pyjamas - Im afraid he has added to TB’s list!
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:10 pm
814
Ian Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:05 pm
++++++++++++++
My hope Ian, is that Tanner did see someone at 9.10/9.15, but PJ have found that person who they have proved to be just innocent.
I believe it is a massive case of misdirection on that night.
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:08 pm
808
Sledgehammer
I suggest it is you who hallucinate - read the post more carefully. I said you were trying to stop me (I didnt add, but will now, that I believe this to be because you had no answer and the evidence is solidly sourced.
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:08 pm
812
RedRooster Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:03 pm
———————————————–
===============
why do you talk such utter bollocks at times garfy i used to think you had a certain level of intelligence
—————————————————
Do woosters have a funny period?
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:08 pm
807
Garth Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:00 pm
793
BabyJane Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 4:53 pm
763, chenier Says:
Maybe the PJ know exactly which (wholly innocent) father carried home his own child on May 3rd around 10pm and was seen by Jane Tanner.
————————————————————
BJ
The PJ discounted Tanners theory on the night of the 3rd. So I think it safe to say they didnt even bother looking into who it was
—————————————-
Tanner didn’t have a theory on May 3rd.
Gerry told journalists on 26th May:
“We feel sure that this sighting of a man with what appeared to be a child in his arms is both significant and relevant to Madeleine’s abduction.”
It took quite a time for Tanner to become convinced that it reallw was a child, and that child really was Madeleine…
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:06 pm
i miss the mf and went to try to find the forum at the 3 arguidos - cant find any link to a forum - anyone know?? thanks
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:06 pm
Garth,
I don’t think JT’s theory was even formed by the 3rd - it was constructed later when she had some “recollections” and amended thereafter. It may well be true that the PJ knew approximately what really happened before JT started digging her (and the McCs’) own grave, so didn’t place much importance on her input.
Gerry’s change of timing is significant - unless he quite quickly corrects what he has recently posted he will not be able to claim it was a typing error - it will already have been pointed out to him.
If not corrected, it can only have been deliberate - he, above everyone else, should be aware of the publicised timings. Is this the start of the Tapas crew (and their carefully choreographed story) cracking up?
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:06 pm
Ian
798
Eh? I’m talking about the Glaswegian with Irish ancestry.
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:06 pm
804 dcb,
doesn’t euqal abductor, exactly. Does probably equal a perfectly innocent holiday-Dad.
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:05 pm
shrubberies are my trade. I am a shrubber. My name is Roger the Shrubber. I arrange, design, and sell shrubberies.
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:05 pm
804
dcb
Do you think I believe there was an abductor? My irritating terrier like obsession is down to my view that Jane Tanner did not see any abductor or anyone that night who she thought was an abductor.
It, in my opinion, is a cover story in case someone saw something - what better story than for the partner of the person who might have been seen carrying a bundle to report having seen just that? Obviously would put their partner in the clear would it not?
Later - when it became clear no one else had seen, the sighting could be modified for better effect and ultimately cancelled out in a relativel harmless way (once an alternate sighting could be found). Like George Harrison man, for example.
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:03 pm
nite Gilly x
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:03 pm
807
Garth Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:00 pm
793
BabyJane Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 4:53 pm
763, chenier Says:
Maybe the PJ know exactly which (wholly innocent) father carried home his own child on May 3rd around 10pm and was seen by Jane Tanner.
————————————————————
BJ
The PJ discounted Tanners theory on the night of the 3rd. So I think it safe to say they didnt even bother looking into who it was
===============
i used to think you had a certain level of intelligence 
why do you talk such utter bollocks at times garfy
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:01 pm
I’m off now.
Ready for the dark wet drive home.
Might be back later. If I can convince himself to go out - I can sneak back onto the computer.
Have loved chatting to you all. Thank you so much for having me.
Night , night.
Love
Gillyflower
xx
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:01 pm
Julie… Firestar and I are of totally opposing views…. I have no reason to support him other than out of fairness.
My books were on his site the same as they are on Amazon and every other book site everywhere. That was way before TB outed me on here and Firestar didn’t even know who I was then.
But saying he linked you to porn sites is not on. Really… would you like that said about you?
It was Stevo himself who boasted about collecting everyones details and threatened to publish them online.
That stuff about Garth’s (maybe) dad was pretty vile…….. And trying to get me to swear on something or other that I wasn’t a McCann? Madness….
Anyway… just trying to be fair.
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:01 pm
801
RedRooster Says:
—————————
Wooster,
My foul mouthed little chicken. Hows the legs?
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:01 pm
Ian, you halucinate and misrepresent as is your norm, I certainly never told you not to go on about anything, it’s only your time you are wasting.
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:00 pm
793
BabyJane Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 4:53 pm
763, chenier Says:
Maybe the PJ know exactly which (wholly innocent) father carried home his own child on May 3rd around 10pm and was seen by Jane Tanner.
————————————————————
BJ
The PJ discounted Tanners theory on the night of the 3rd. So I think it safe to say they didnt even bother looking into who it was
January 23rd, 2008 at 5:00 pm
I know.
Poor retriever. He’s gutted.
January 23rd, 2008 at 4:59 pm
cats are fussy things!
January 23rd, 2008 at 4:59 pm
793
BabyJane Says:
January 23rd, 2008 at 4:53 pm
+++++++++++++++++++
It’s what I have thought - person seen by Tanner at 9.10 or 9.15 does not equal abductor.