Comments on: Anonyous Declare War On Tom Cruise’s Scientology

By: xenu

xenu — Sun, 27 Jan 2008 14:53:18 +0000

Anon is doing a very good job of high-lighting the fact that the legal statue of scientology as a religion rather than a cult needs to be reviewed.

By: Anorak

Anorak — Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:43:59 +0000

Is Scientology a religion? And who says when it is or isn’t?

By: chenier

chenier — Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:54:29 +0000

3
May Says:

January 26th, 2008 at 8:47 am
But is it in time to save the Beckhams?

————————————————

And we want to save the Beckhams because….

By: May

May — Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:47:50 +0000

But is it in time to save the Beckhams?

By: chenier

chenier — Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:45:16 +0000

“Anonymous has therefore decided that your organization should be destroyed. For the good of your followers, for the good of mankind–for the laughs–we shall expel you from the Internet and systematically dismantle the Church of Scientology in its present form.”

——————————————

Goody, goody, my kind of war.

Admittedly, if carried out it would lay waste to the Church of Scientology’s balance sheet, but this is greatly preferable to laying waste to people.

Though I might make an exception for Tom Cruise……

By: Drakim

Drakim — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:55:23 +0000

Religious war? Doesn’t that require that two religions are included at the very least? Is any conflict which includes religion a religious war? Was witch burning a religious war too by that logic?

rel:dr:26.01