
Madeleine McCann: Oprah Winfrey, Barbara Walters And Rape
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY EXPRESS: “MADELEINE: £1M WAR FOR MCCANN INTERVIEW”
“AMERICA’S top chat show hosts are locked in a bidding war for an exclusive interview with the parents of Madeleine McCann. Oprah Winfrey and Barbara Walters have each pledged £1million in an attempt to get them in front of the TV cameras, it emerged yesterday”
Winfrey and Walters - the Pope and Queen Mother of Ameican TV chatter…
Do those shows take advertising? They do. What will the ad-breaks induce viewers to buy? What is the point of the interview? The McCanns cannot discuss the case.
Says the McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell: “We are not in the market for selling Kate and Gerry’s story to the highest bidder. And we are not impressed by big names. We talk to media from all over the world”
But money is important. The fighting fun is running low
DAILY MAIL: “Kate and Gerry McCann in £1million deal to tell all to Oprah Winfrey”
“Kate and Gerry McCann are at the centre of a bidding war between Oprah Winfrey and Barbara Walters.
“Both celebrities are desperate to land an exclusive deal for the couple to talk about their missing daughter. If it goes ahead, it will be the largest publicly-known amount ever paid for a broadcast interview”
Says Clarence Mitchell: “We have been approached by representatives for both Oprah and Barbara,” he added. “They want an exclusive interview with Kate and Gerry. We are discussing it but it doesn’t mean we are definitely doing it. Nothing has been agreed”
Why wouldn’t they do it?
PRESS ASSOCIATION: “US chat shows approach McCanns”
“Kate and Gerry McCann have been approached to appear on the Oprah Winfrey show and for an interview with American network ABC, their spokesman has confirmed.
It was reported that the McCanns were at the centre of a bidding war worth £1 million between Winfrey and ABC star Barbara Walters who both want an exclusive interview with the couple.
THE SUN: “Maddie sketch farmer raped girl”
“The gun-toting pig farmer quizzed in the Maddie McCann hunt was once jailed for raping a British teenager — in Praia da Luz. Joaquim Jose Marques, 31, who bears a resemblance to the sketch of a mystery suspect, served five years. Portuguese cops who grilled him twice at his ramshackle farmhouse nearby are now convinced he is NOT the man in the drawing”
NOT the man. So why is he in the papers?
“But we can reveal Marques and a pal carried out a brutal attack on two British girls, aged 17 and 18, after prowling the beach in July 1995 at the resort where Maddie vanished”
A heinous crime for which he was punished. But what has it to do with Madeleine McCann?
DAILY STAR: “MADDIE WEIRDO RAPED TEEN BRIT”
“The gun-toting Portuguese pig farmer quizzed over Madeleine McCann’s disappearance raped a British teenager yards from where the four-year-old vanished. Joaquim Jose Marques put his 18-year-old victim through a horrific late-night sex ordeal while an accomplice targeted her pal”
Eighteen..
“Now locals fear he is the same man pictured on a ‘wanted’ poster issued by the McCanns as they step up the hunt for their daughter”
Local residents, or local reporters? And is “fear” really “hope”?
DAILY MIRROR: “Madeleine McCann suspect spotted ’spying on little boys’”
“Five women holidaymakers - three British and two German - have seen the “strange and disturbed” man in Altura, close to the Portuguese-Spanish border, in the past two weeks. One of the British witnesses noticed him on the beach on January 21 bending down to talk to the boys, aged about four or five.
“Clearly worried, one of the youngsters started shaking his head mid-conversation. Then a woman ran out of a nearby villa, shouting in alarm. She scooped the children up and hurried them away.”
Adults. children. Run, children, run!
DAILY TELEGRAPH (Aus): “Oprah’s $2m bid for Maddie chat”
“Mr Mitchell said the McCanns would only agree to a deal which would widen the search for their daughter. The couple, both doctors, also want to campaign for a better Europe-wide alert system for missing children, based on an American model”
A campaign
Madeleine McCann: A media event
Posted: 26th, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (730) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





January 26th, 2008 at 10:52 am
#
94
Garth Says:
January 26th, 2008 at 10:48 am
Portugal 2008-01-26 - 00:30:00 Suspected: English tourists guarantee that it was the individual Man of the picture-robot seen in Height and Tavira Epa/Lusa McCann couple is to be requested for American programs At least five tourist, three British and two Germans, say to have seen in Height, concelho of Castrate Marim, Algarve, the man who appears in the picture-robot presented for the McCann. The individual, described as “incrivelmente similar to the drawing”, for one of the British, will have been seen to observe the children of the tourists.
———————————————————-
Huh?
January 26th, 2008 at 10:51 am
94 Garth
?
January 26th, 2008 at 10:51 am
I am vain of whom he was the same man and it would never pardon me if it will have some thing to see with the Madeleine “, affirmed one of the British. One another tourist guarantees that, in the monday, the man will have attemped to come close itself to two children but he was moved away by the mother of the boys. Already the Germans affirm to have seen it, in diverse occasions, the beach of Height and that it spoke in German. In the neighbor concelho of Tavira had also appeared certifications of the presence of a similar man to the picture-robot. The suspected one is described as a person who “is almost always in house, making much life to the night”. The PJ does not give to great credibility to all these certifications that now appear. “It is natural - it has months, Madeleine also was seen a little for all the side”, said to the cm on source to the process.
January 26th, 2008 at 10:51 am
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/topstories/2008/01/26/i-saw-maddy-creep-spying-on-little-boys-89520-20298666/
January 26th, 2008 at 10:50 am
Chenier, a tad rattled, we know all about Adam Smith up here, it is people who misrepresent his works that are the problem. If you require a Law Lord to tell you wrong from right, I suggest you ask the Danny DeVitto school of law, correspondence degree for a refund along with your fellow student Ian. Anyone who thinks law has anything to with morality in this day and age, is rather quaint. Perhaps if you could confine your extremely limited grasp of play ground law to post 39, perhaps that is also a sandwich to advanced for the pair of you.
January 26th, 2008 at 10:48 am
Portugal 2008-01-26 - 00:30:00 Suspected: English tourists guarantee that it was the individual Man of the picture-robot seen in Height and Tavira Epa/Lusa McCann couple is to be requested for American programs At least five tourist, three British and two Germans, say to have seen in Height, concelho of Castrate Marim, Algarve, the man who appears in the picture-robot presented for the McCann. The individual, described as “incrivelmente similar to the drawing”, for one of the British, will have been seen to observe the children of the tourists.
January 26th, 2008 at 10:48 am
nosey cow
It was a blue aztec towel
Very very absorbent and anti bacterial type for sportsman!!
January 26th, 2008 at 10:47 am
79
noseycow Says:
January 26th, 2008 at 10:38 am
coolandcalm 70 can’ t everyone just…. Please
I find myself actually agreeing with something garthy has said (squirms uncomfortabley )
If any one were reading through today’s posts it has been those who suspect the mcc’s of involvement in maddies dissapearence that seem to be closed to debate.
Which actually i don’t understand - because I think that they/we have the most ‘evidence’ (and i do use that term loosely ) to suport that veiw.
——————————————————-
I’m not closed to debate!
I’ve been trying to drag Sledgie kicking and screaming into having a debate, but he won’t play, I mean he won’t debate. And yet he makes closed statements time after time after time.
My objection is not to debate, but to the absence of it…
January 26th, 2008 at 10:46 am
68 Garth
I also reciprocate respect, in terms of your not holding the PJ in high regard. Also you are much more of a challenge in debate (and therefore rewarding!) than some.
The ’some’ banging on about ‘no evidence’ (which is untrue) and sticking to the slightly narrow agenda of the three possible scenarios that could have led to a tiny tots going missing (namely ‘abduction abduction and abduction’) does draw out the worst in me!
However, there is definately a ‘conspiracy’ (not a ‘conspiracy theory’) wrapped around the McCanns designed primarily to defend them and NOT to find their daughter or the (in my opinion ‘fantastical’) abductor.
The proof of this was Clarences response to the possibility that the pig farmer might be suspect and might be the man in a sketched ’second hand’ impression. He immediately declared that this wasnt the man. He did NOT want the distraction ended so quickly. If they were seriously looking for an abductor they’d have taken a much more considered approach - ‘we will investigate this person’ might have been a better response. Or perhaps even a short delay whilst they consulted with the actual witness!
Every day further perceptual evidence emerges to expose the real agenda, the wider agenda that is at work here.
I have no conspiracy theory, I think its a fact that the McCanns have always and will always be seeking primarily to defend themselves, not to find their child.
The futher conspiracy theories regarding the disposal of her body are a natural consequence built on the foundation of suspicions born from the attempts to distract from the fundamental cause of Madeleines fate - they didnt look after her.
The McCanns could remove at a single stroke many suspicions if they were to fully openly and honestly accept that they should NOT have left her exposed to risks and these risks were manifold, not limited to the most unlikely of all, stranger abduction.
They will not admit it, ever.
January 26th, 2008 at 10:45 am
can anyone shed light on when the ‘towel in the barn’ story broke or when the pj (allegedly) discovered it please?
January 26th, 2008 at 10:45 am
82
lindy
Yep
And , as a Portuguese ,i wish ,that the P.J. ,just throw all the case ,in to the Brits. Police , and move on ,with other problems
January 26th, 2008 at 10:45 am
85 can’t say no
Yeah, trusting liars seems rather foolhardy.
January 26th, 2008 at 10:44 am
The Mc Canns have very good reasons for lying.
The hundreds of other people do not.
Dogs definitely do not lie!
January 26th, 2008 at 10:43 am
lindy, so glad you pointed that out so nicely to Garth. No point in throwing money after something that’s not going to bear fruit is there?
January 26th, 2008 at 10:42 am
80
Garth
No ,for sure i don’t
But i trust the Brits. Police and the P.P.
You trust others ,
aw1414
January 26th, 2008 at 10:41 am
68 Garth
I agree with you that we have to keep all options open.
But you can’t say the PJ has been “still unable to bring charges” without adding that the arguidos do what they can to delay them, since they don’t answer the questions, hire a lawyer specialised in extradition, and get the help of a self-appointed sheriff to criticise the PJ and do a parallel inquiry. You have to acknowledge the PJ doesn’t get full cooperation from them.
January 26th, 2008 at 10:41 am
39 Sledgehammer Says: January 26th, 2008 at 9:30 am
Day 268 and where is the investigation, no charges, no arrests and no evidence. Edit….
++++++++++++
Morning Sledgehammer.
Evidence will arrive if and when charges are ever brought. Charges will be brought if and when it suits Portuguese authorities. You meanwhile have no evidence to support your incessantly repeated claptrap.
Irrespective of what you may think about the “evidence”, the McCann’s, and/or their friends and possibly by now some of the their family, know rather more about the events leading up to and following Madeleine’s disappearance than has currently come to light, in my opinion.
January 26th, 2008 at 10:40 am
Garth,I don’t agree with you.The head of the portugal’s legal system would have after 8 month’s ,not ageed to give the pj a further 3 month’s. If they had no evidence.After all they are spending a lot of euro’s on this case,euro’s that could be well spent on other thing’s. IMO
January 26th, 2008 at 10:40 am
Garth
So did the judge who extended the time and made them PRIME suspects
January 26th, 2008 at 10:38 am
75
can’t say no Says:
January 26th, 2008 at 10:33 am
————————————————
Really? And do you know what happened to Madeleine?
January 26th, 2008 at 10:38 am
coolandcalm 70
can’ t everyone just…. Please
I find myself actually agreeing with something garthy has said (squirms uncomfortabley
)
If any one were reading through today’s posts it has been those who suspect the mcc’s of involvement in maddies dissapearence that seem to be closed to debate.
Which actually i don’t understand - because I think that they/we have the most ‘evidence’ (and i do use that term loosely ) to suport that veiw.
January 26th, 2008 at 10:37 am
74
brandon flours Says:
January 26th, 2008 at 10:32 am
Garth
They are able!!
————————————–
Correction there brandon…………. you ‘think’ they are able!
January 26th, 2008 at 10:36 am
76 chenier
lol. See, that’s funny.
January 26th, 2008 at 10:34 am
72
Garth Says:
January 26th, 2008 at 10:30 am
39
Sledgehammer Says:
January 26th, 2008 at 9:30 am
——————————————
And that is it in a nutshell!
———————————————–
Well, that would depend on the nut…
January 26th, 2008 at 10:33 am
68
Garth
and to that end I think it right that we question all aspects of this case and inparticular the PJ, who, after all this time, are still unable to bring charges against them.
___________________________________
Oh dear
That’s why ,a certain politic ,has asked a few favours to Portugal ???
January 26th, 2008 at 10:32 am
Garth
They are able!!
They just dont want to!
They want them to wriggle and squirm, talk bollocks and hang themselves!
The delay might just mean they never murdered her.
The twins are probably being monitored and never left alone with crazy Kate.
allegedly, IMO
(Not that she minds, she now has a permanent babysitter to replace Madeleine!!!!)
January 26th, 2008 at 10:31 am
Mornin All
January 26th, 2008 at 10:30 am
39
Sledgehammer Says:
January 26th, 2008 at 9:30 am
——————————————
And that is it in a nutshell!
January 26th, 2008 at 10:30 am
#
69
Garth Says:
January 26th, 2008 at 10:29 am
65
Julie Says:
January 26th, 2008 at 10:17 am
———————————————-
Intelligence has nothing to do with it. Common sense does!
———————————————
Errr …. are you referring to the McCann’s in that sentence? Yes a rather appropriate quote then
January 26th, 2008 at 10:30 am
Hey Ho. Can’t please everyone….!!
Am fascinated though that the ‘ad hominen attacks’ phrase is never used towards an anti-McCann? Strange that! (see Julie 65!)